'Devastated' Sounds Air to axe two routes, sell some aircraft
The carrier confirmed it would axe its Blenheim to Christchurch and Christchurch to Wānaka services from September 28, reverting to what it calls a "back to the future" model squarely focused on Cook Strait crossings.
The airline will expand its Cessna Caravan fleet for shorter sectors while seeking buyers for five larger Pilatus aircraft, in order to help "rebuild the viability of the business".
Sounds Air managing director Andrew Crawford said the airline's hand had been forced.
"We are truly devastated that we have been forced into this position after five years of fighting for a solution," he said in a statement.
ADVERTISEMENT
"It will mean the loss of a number our dedicated and skilled staff, but we are also hugely disappointed for our incredibly loyal customer base who rely on us to get around New Zealand - not only for tourism and leisure purposes but also for regional access to critical healthcare, higher education, and to do business that contributes to regional economies."
The Government is hoping to boost tourism with more money for international marketing. (Source: Breakfast)
Sounds Air and other carriers, including Air Chathams, wanted the Government to step in and called for a concessionary loan scheme, 1News reported last month. The firm had already withdrawn Wellington to Taupō and Wellington to Westport routes in December.
Crawford said the company had been fighting rising costs that threatened regional aviation, and that it faced a "deadlock" between government and private capital markets.
"We are not alone in this, Air New Zealand and other regional carriers in New Zealand, and worldwide, have been hit by the same cost increases, and the irony is that our passenger demand has never been stronger," he said in a statement.
"Government appears to believe that private capital markets will step in to sort this out, while on the other hand, private capital markets believe that government should step in to level the playing field like they do in other parts of the world, in order to maintain essential regional air services."
Sounds Air will continue operating its core Cook Strait routes including Wellington to Blenheim, Wellington to Nelson, Wellington to Picton, Blenheim to Paraparaumu and Nelson to Paraparaumu.
ADVERTISEMENT
Associate Transport Minister James Meager has been approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Pointless foreshore debate a distraction from economic crisis
At the same time, our second biggest export market has just imposed 15% tariffs on our products – higher than on our direct competitors – and its rival for global hegemony is extending its influence and projecting its military power into our region and even our realm. Yet despite all this – or perhaps because of it – some within the coalition Government and fringe groups aligned to them think it's a good idea to have another argument about race. Maybe that's not surprising. With the working and middle classes crying out for an explanation for why things are so bad and the country's prospects so bleak, some within the old political and business establishments dare not admit it is because of poor policy and commercial decisions they themselves contributed to over recent decades. As in other nations facing seemingly irretrievable decline, it's much better to point to a minority and blame them. 'It's not your fault, or mine, that you're doing it tough,' this old elite tells those who are struggling. 'We're all just victims of the 'grievance economy' where Māori keep taking what is rightfully yours.' The worst thing is that it works, at least with perhaps 20% of voters. That rump, which polls suggest consists mainly of white baby-boomer men, is particularly important electorally to NZ First and Act, who fight over them. You may think that the biggest issues in this year's local government elections are out-of-control rates and councils' cumbersome and incompetent application of the Resource Management Act. But, according to Hobson's Pledge, 'the most important fight of 2025' is around Māori wards. 'Across the country,' it says in an apocalyptic fund-raising email, 'local councils have become the frontline in a slow, stealthy assault on democracy. Behind closed doors, race-based policies are being pushed through. Co-governance is being installed without consent. And representation is being carved up based not on merit or votes, but on ancestry.' Hobson's Pledge says it will 'go big with this campaign', including 'billboards, signage, social media, and engaging with new voices'. The campaign's integrity is already under question, after it was revealed that Hobson's Pledge used, without her permission, a photograph of an elderly Māori woman in a billboard implying she opposes Māori wards. Rotorua kuia Ellen Tamati is devastated after discovering her image is being used by a political lobby group that's pushing to abolish Māori wards. Photo / Aukaha News In fact, she supports them. She never agreed for anyone to use her image commercially, and the agency which sold it anyway was clear it could not be used in advertising. Hobson's Pledge has since asked the billboard company to remove the advertisement and said it would contact the woman to ensure she was okay and let her know her image was publicly available as a stock image. Hobson's Pledge has form with this sort of thing, setting up a 'We Belong Aotearoa' campaign before the last election, falsely suggesting a grassroots movement by immigrants concerned about co-governance. Next time, Hobson's Pledge ought to use one of its own supporters – of which it claims to have many – in its advertisements. It might also give greater attention to telling the truth, after its advertising about the foreshore and seabed in the New Zealand Herald was found by the Advertising Standards Board to be materially misleading. Hobson's Pledge will continue to do its thing, and its antics are probably best seen as another small price to pay for the benefits of free speech. More worrying is internal coalition politics pushing Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith to proceed with new foreshore and seabed legislation. This is certain to arouse all the passions of the Clark Government's 2003 and 2004 fiasco that the Key Government resolved so successfully in its first term by passing then-Attorney General Christopher Finlayson's Marine and Coastal Area Act 2011. The Luxon Government – or at least a powerful faction within it – seems to want a repeat of Act's failed Treaty Principles Bill, with all the associated division and distraction from the real economic crises. There might have been a case for the bill Goldsmith is fronting had the Supreme Court upheld a recent novel interpretation of Finlayson's legislation by the Court of Appeal. But the Supreme Court overruled the Court of Appeal, making the proposed bill seem redundant. We must now choose whether Finlayson or Goldsmith is likely to be the better jurist. Finlayson says the Supreme Court left things as Parliament intended back in 2011 and that Goldsmith's bill would compromise existing Māori rights. Goldsmith says the Supreme Court made it too easy for Māori to have their rights recognised by the courts and that the bill is needed to return things to the status quo the Key Government established. Since the whole foreshore and seabed controversy emerged in 2003, it has been based on what Finlayson calls a 'lie': concerns about public access to beaches. Hobson's Pledge now goes so far as to claim there's a risk of 'kissing our entire coastline goodbye'. Yet beach access was never an issue, even when the Court of Appeal made its original 2003 ruling that kicked off the controversy. It certainly isn't an issue under the 2011 law or the Supreme Court's decisions. The rights that an iwi can have recognised over bits of the foreshore and seabed are highly limited, and nothing like ordinary property rights. Underlying all this is another lie: that there is something activist, radical or woke about the courts acknowledging Māori customary law. Yet in Africa, India, Southeast Asia, North America and New Zealand, the British Empire and its common law always acknowledged that customary law continued after colonisation, unless it was specifically repealed. The truly radical or activist judges have been those who historically tried to deny this. It can be annoying when other people's legal rights are upheld, like farmers being able to stop hikers from walking across their property. But that is no reason to deny such rights. To the contrary, it is an essential democratic principle that the specific legal rights of individuals and other minorities are upheld, whatever the majority may think. It's wrong to keep changing the law on the foreshore and seabed or anything else when it looks like the courts may uphold some specific legal rights that someone else might find annoying. If they can do it to an iwi, they can do it to you. And, with all New Zealand's economic and social crises, ask yourself whose interests are served by trying to turn your attention to race.
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Cost of living, economy challenge National ahead of Election 2026
Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. Photo / Mark Mitchell. Cost of living and the economy remain top of the agenda for the National Party Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is already touting his leadership as one that is a 'clear choice' for New Zealanders, while reiterating that the Government 'inherited a mess and is sorting it out'.
1News
9 hours ago
- 1News
What we know about new road user charges and end of petrol tax
The Government made it official this week that the petrol tax is on the way out, to be replaced by electronic road user charges, or RUCs, for everyone. Drivers of all light vehicles – petrol, hybrid, diesel and electric – will now pay for road use based on distance travelled and vehicle weight, instead of an extra charge at the pump. Right now, Road User Charges (RUC) only apply to vehicles not powered wholly by petrol, and all vehicles weighing more than 3.5 tonnes. An awful lot of the specifics around the new system remain uncertain, as the government considers how to implement the plan. But here's what we know so far. The petrol tax will go, but what's replacing it? ADVERTISEMENT All of Aotearoa's 3.5 million light vehicle owners will need to pay RUC fees to help pay for road upkeep and maintenance. But exactly how the fees will be set and collected are still a work in progress. In making the announcement, Transportation Minister Chris Bishop said it was "the biggest change to how we fund our roading network in 50 years". It comes as more and more drivers use hybrids, electric vehicles or other technology. Bishop said the number of fuel-efficient petrol hybrid vehicles has jumped from 12,000 in 2015 to 350,000 today. "As our vehicle fleet changes, so too must the way we fund our roads. It isn't fair to have Kiwis who drive less and who can't afford a fuel-efficient car paying more than people who can afford one and drive more often. "This is a change that simply has to happen. The government has recognised reality and is getting on with the transition." Replacing fuel excise taxes with electronic road user charging was part of National and ACT's coalition agreement. The government's been signalling this move for some time and last year scrapped an Auckland regional fuel tax of 11.5 cents per litre. AA principal policy adviser Terry Collins said while the association thinks the changes are good in principle, "we need to see the detail". ADVERTISEMENT How much will all this cost drivers? AA principal policy advisor Terry Collins discussed the "pros and cons" of replacing petrol tax with electronic road user charges. (Source: Breakfast) That's one of the big question marks right now. Under the system, all vehicles would be paying for road use based on distance and their vehicle's weight, Bishop said, but no detail on the weight limits was given. The current RUC for light vehicles – under 3500kg – are $76 per 1000km. The average Toyota Corolla weighs between 1200-1500kg. Charges can widely vary for larger vehicles under the current RUC, according to NTZA's website. There's also an administration fee of $12-$13 per transaction. ADVERTISEMENT No costs or parameters for the new system have been announced, but just as an example under the current RUC setup, a small electric vehicle would pay more than $760 including fees for 10,000km worth of credits. Will this bring petrol prices down? Again, answer unclear. Bishop said currently, petrol drivers pay a tax of about 70 cents per litre. However, the AA says that the full cost of fuel excise, duties and taxes such as GST altogether was over $1.20 per litre as of mid-2024. There's no real way of knowing yet if the changes would automatically drop 70 cents or more from fuel prices. When will it take effect? ADVERTISEMENT Chris Bishop said paying for RUC would be similar to paying an electricity bill at the end of each month. (Source: Breakfast) Legislative work toward the changes will begin next year, with the government eyeing 2027 for the new system to take place. "At this stage, no date has been set for the full transition of the light vehicle fleet," Bishop said. "That's a deliberate choice, as we're focused on getting the system right rather than rushing its rollout." The legislative plans include: Removing the requirement to carry or display RUC licences, allowing for digital records instead; enabling the use of a broader range of electronic RUC devices, including those already built into many modern vehicles; supporting flexible payment models such as post-pay and monthly billing; separating NZTA's roles as both RUC regulator and retailer to foster fairer competition; and allowing bundling of other road charges like tolls and time of used based pricing into a single, easy payment. "The changes will support a more user-friendly, technology-enabled RUC system, with multiple retail options available for motorists," Bishop said in announcing the changes. "Eventually, paying for RUC should be like paying a power bill online, or a Netflix subscription. Simple and easy." ADVERTISEMENT Bishop told ThreeNews that users could possibly pay road RUCs through an app, and log in and pay what they owed at the end of each month. The next step for the plan is changes to the Road User Charges Act 2012, and a bill will be introduced to Parliament and referred to a Select Committee for public input. "I expect to pass legislation in 2026, followed by an updated Code of Practice for RUC providers," Bishop said. "We will also engage with the market in 2026 to assess technological solutions and delivery timelines. In parallel, NZTA and Police will upgrade their systems to support enforcement in a digital environment." How do RUCs work now for those who pay them? Bishop called the current setup for light vehicles a "clunky" system. You keep track of your odometer readings, pay for RUC in 1000km chunks and put a sticker on your windscreen that shows how many km they are good for. Once your odometer passes the number you've paid for in RUC, you need to pay for more. "We're not going to shift millions of drivers from a simple system at the pump to queues at retailers," Bishop said. "So, instead of expanding a clunky government system, we will reform the rules to allow the market to deliver innovative, user-friendly services for drivers." ADVERTISEMENT The AA's Martin Glynn told RNZ's Morning Report that it's not the easiest system for users. "The biggest problem with it, people need to keep an eye on their odometers and see if they've used up their RUC and need to buy more. That's probably the biggest problem with it." However, the Government said it wants to shift away from the "outdated" system and replace it with greater use of electronic RUC, or eRUCs. What are eRUCs, anyway? Basically, instead of having to keep track of your odometer readings and paying as you go for km credits, it's a device that does that work automatically. There are a variety in place now for current requirements. There are several approved eRUC providers for the heavy vehicle fleet of vehicles over 3.5 tonnes. "EROAD's system automatically records the distance each vehicle travels on-road and accurately records all off-road travel with its intuitive GPS-tracking capability," the website of one of the providers, EROAD, states. ADVERTISEMENT Infrastructure New Zealand chief executive Nick Leggett applauded the change and said it could work well with other transport charges. "User-charging is a fair, proven way to fund infrastructure. ERUC will make it easier to apply that principle consistently across all vehicles, whether petrol, diesel, electric or hybrid, and as our transport system evolves. "We also see the use of flexible payment methods and the integration of eRUC with other transport charges such as tolling and congestion pricing as sensible moves." However, there's still a lot of questions around the costs of implementing eRUCs for everyone. Would all cars be fitted with new devices or would some kind of self-monitoring system be in place for those with older vehicles? And what does that eRUC technology mean for privacy? There's also been a fair bit of talk doing the rounds on social media about the idea of electronic records on vehicle travel and worries about the government tracking people. In a statement to RNZ, Bishop said there were privacy protections in place and it would remain a concern in developing the new systems. ADVERTISEMENT "The Road User Charges Act 2012 has existing provisions that protect privacy by limiting what RUC electronic information the RUC collector can access. "Location data can only be accessed to verify where the driver is owed a refund for off-road use. "Officials will be engaging with the market and stakeholders (including the Office of the Privacy Commissioner) on the features of potential solutions, such as cost, privacy and ease of use." The AA's Collins said it would be important to see the detail of "who has that information and what's done with it". "Everybody in the trucking industry wants to have that technology fitted. I don't think that's the case in the light fleet." Collins noted that our phones – which almost everyone has with them in their cars – are also packed with tracking technology. Other countries have managed similar systems, he said, but "it's what the data will ultimately be used for in the future that's the biggest concern". ADVERTISEMENT Private firms will be in charge of collecting the new fees In their announcement, the Government also said that private firms will take over the collection and administration of charges from NZTA, "to foster fairer competition". Tax Justice Aotearoa said they were concerned about that change and taking the responsibility away from the Government. "We are deeply concerned by this initiative as using the power of the state to require citizens to pay charges decided by the state is a core function of government," chairman of Tax Justice Aotearoa Glenn Barclay said in a statement. "It should not be for the profit of anyone and it means that the details of thousands of road users will be held and managed by private organisations with no accountability back to the public." "Putting RUC in the hands of private companies, who will need to make a profit on the transactions, is a recipe for higher fees for drivers," the Public Service Association union's national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said. Will all this actually save people money? ADVERTISEMENT It's unclear. Petrol could in theory be cheaper, but will be somewhat offset by RUCs all vehicle owners must pay. "This is a once-in-a-generation change," Bishop said. "It's the right thing to do, it's the fair thing to do, and it will future proof how we fund our roads for decades to come." Collins said the distance-based changes could benefit certain drivers, such as those who own multiple vehicles that aren't actually travelling much, or boat users. "Nothing's going to be cheaper, we know that," he said. "It's like saying do you think that your cars are going to be cheaper in three years' time?" "Realistically, we want to be building a modern safe roading network and that's not cheap. All of us as road users need to contribute to that." By Nik Dirga of
