
George Gibney due in Florida court to formally consent to extradition
The Irish Government has sought his return to face 78 counts of indecent assault and one count of attempted rape against four girls aged between eight and 14 at the time of the alleged offences.
George Gibney, with an address in Altamont Springs Orlando, submitted an affidavit of waiver of extradition to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
In it he agrees to give up his right to challenge the extradition request, and agrees to being held in custody until his removal to Ireland by Irish authorities.
Mr Gibney states in the signed affidavit: "I am the individual against whom charges are pending in Ireland and for whom process is outstanding there".
He was arrested on 1 July on foot of an extradition request from Ireland that was submitted by a Diplomatic Note to the US Department of State last October.
In February, the State Department's legal advisor's office said the documents complied with the terms of a 1983 Extradition Treaty between the EU and the US, and with a 2003 EU-US Extradition Agreement, and sent it to the Department of Justice for processing.
An arrest warrant was issued in the Central District of Florida on 23 June at the request of the US Attorney's office.
After his arrest, the US Attorney's office submitted a memorandum to Judge Daniel Irick, who is dealing with the Gibney case, which argued strongly against granting bail to Mr Gibney.
It also set out the extradition law of the United States, arguing that the court's function is to ensure that the paperwork is correct, not to hear arguments about the charges being brought.
Mr Gibney met with his court appointed public defenders, who went through the government memorandum with him.
The following day, he notified the court of his intention to not contest his extradition.
In the formal affidavit withdrawing his challenge to continued custody and his extradition to Ireland, Mr Gibney states that he has been fully informed of his rights by his attorney, who also explained the terms of the extradition treaty between the US and Ireland, the nature of the complaint filed and the treaty obligation of the US Government to the Government of Ireland.
He states "I understand that I am entitled to a hearing at which certain facts would need establishing, including: A) that currently there is an extradition treaty in force between the United States and Ireland. B) That the Treaty covers the offense for which my extradition was requested. C) That I am the person whose extradition is sought by Ireland: and D) that probable cause exists to believe that I committed the offense for which extradition was requested."
Mr Gibney's affidavit continues: "I fully understand that in the absence of a waiver of my rights, I cannot be compelled to return to Ireland unless and until a court in the United States issues a ruling certifying my extraditability and the Secretary of State of the United States issues a warrant of surrender."
Mr Gibney says he understands that he has a right to a hearing to challenge the extradition, but has decided to waive that right and not challenge it.
He states that he agrees "to be transported in custody, as soon as possible, to Ireland, and to remain in custody of the United States Marshal pending the arrival of duly authorised representatives from Ireland".
Mr Gibney further states that no officials, representatives or officers of the United States or the Government of Ireland nor anyone else has made any promise, inducement or threat, nor exercised any form of intimidation against him, and he agrees to not contest his extradition knowingly, voluntarily and entirely of his own free will.
Judge Daniel Irick is expected to order Mr Gibney's continued detention by US Marshals until his transport to Ireland is arranged, which is understood to be at least five more days away.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
178,000 products withdrawn, recalled or prevented from reaching market in 2024
Over 178,000 unsafe products were recalled, withdrawn or prevented from reaching the Irish market last year by the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission. The actions were taken following consumer complaints, referrals from European networks, proactive investigations and work with Revenue Customs. The recalls included almost 10,000 babies sleepsuits and over 2,400 toy construction trucks. The CCPC's annual report for 2024 also showed that it carried out more than 200 consumer protection inspections last year. As a result of the enforcement and legal actions, it issued 47 fixed penalty notices and 23 compliance notices. The report said successful prosecutions were brought against five retailers, including Tesco Ireland. The CCPC said the retailer pleaded guilty to two sample counts of failing to comply with the law in how they displayed the price of products offered on promotion to clubcard holders. The consumer watchdog also undertook five successful prosecutions for breaches of consumer protection law, including action against misleading pricing practices. And it opened an investigation into Ticketmaster Ireland and its handling of the sale of Oasis tickets last August, following almost 100 complaints over dynamic pricing. The commission also carried out dawn raids on two premises as part of an ongoing cartel-related investigation in the home alarm industry. It also assisted the Italian Competition Authority, the Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, in an unannounced search of Ryanair's headquarters in Dublin as part of an ongoing Italian competition law investigation. The CCPC said its "successful intervention to prevent a potential monopoly in car parking at Dublin Airport" was among its highlights in 2024. The consumer watchdog said it blocked the daa's attempted purchase of the former Quickpark site due to findings that it would lead to "higher prices, less choice and lower service quality for consumers." As a result, it said it facilitated the entry of a new competitor to the car park market at Dublin Airport. There was a 21% increase in merger notifications, with 71% of determinations last year made within 13.3 days under a simplified process. 2024 marked a significant milestone for the CCPC, which celebrated its 10th anniversary, marking what it described as "a decade of work promoting competition and enhancing consumer welfare." The Chairperson of the CCPC, Brian McHugh, said the annual report highlights the "vital role the CCPC plays across all sectors of the economy, from enforcing consumer law on retail pricing, to advocating proactively for reforming the legal sector to better serve the interests of Irish businesses and consumers." "Open, fair markets are the backbone of our economy's success, ensuring that whether consumers are making small everyday purchases or major financial decisions, their interests are protected," he added. "Following a year of notable achievements and a decade of progress, our focus remains on delivering transparent outcomes, empowering consumers with knowledge of their rights, and being a leading voice for competition and consumer welfare across Ireland." The Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment, Peter Burke, said the CCPC "continues to deliver for Irish consumers and businesses by ensuring our markets remain competitive, transparent, and safe." "Their work in 2024, from blocking anti-competitive mergers to removing dangerous products and empowering consumers through education, demonstrates the importance of strong, independent enforcement." Minister Burke said he will continue his close collaboration with the CCPC to ensure it has "sufficient powers and resources to effectively advocate for and enforce competition and consumer protection legislation." The commission said it responded to over 44,000 helpline contacts and received 1.8 million visits to its website throughout last year.


Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Capel St stabbing: How misinformation spread across social media
At about 6.30pm on Tuesday evening, a probationary garda on a high-visibility patrol on Capel St, Dublin, was attacked without provocation by a knife-wielding assailant. Within minutes, misinformation regarding the attacker, who is an Irish citizen, had begun to spread on various social media platforms — a recurring trend in recent times in the fallout from such incidents, with false narratives emerging before facts can be definitively established by official outlets. 6.55pm: An X account, with just 13 followers, posts: 'Garda stabbed by foreigner on Capel Street 10 minutes ago." This post is made in response to an unrelated post from prominent far-right agitator Mick O'Keeffe. The post has been viewed 1,100 times. It is followed eight minutes later by a post from an account with 15 followers, stating: 'Capel Street 20 minutes ago, copper randomly stabbed by foreigner'. That post has been viewed more than 80,000 times. 7.43pm: Prominent anti-immigration X account Real News Éire posts a video allegedly depicting the assault, stating: "A foreigner has stabbed a Gardai [sic] on Capel Street'. The video has been viewed more than 237,000 times. 8.32pm: Gardaí release a statement, quoting assistant commissioner for the Dublin region Paul Cleary, noting the attack and the fact the attacker had been arrested at the scene. No details of his nationality or ethnicity is given, a break from the protocol employed with regard to a shooting at a Carlow shopping centre in early June, when gardaí moved within hours to confirm that the shooter in question Evan Fitzgerald — who took his own life during the incident — was both white and Irish. Revealing such information early is a calculated gambit to quell the spread of misinformation before it can take hold. 8.37pm: Former mixed martial artist Conor McGregor posts on X that an attack has been carried out on a garda 'by one of the Irish Government's new to the parish imports through its human trafficking racket'. The post has been viewed more than 352,000 times. Wednesday morning: It emerges that Tuesday evening's attacker is an Irish citizen of Pakistani heritage. Mr Cleary speaks on RTÉ Radio of 'very inaccurate misinformation and disinformation that went out online after this incident very quickly'. 'We have some people with their own agenda trying to use incidents like this to inflame situations for their own ends," he says. All of the original posts describing the attacker as a non-Irish national remain online. A post from McGregor on Wednesday afternoon pivoted somewhat in describing the suspected attacker as 'a second-generation migrant of full Pakistani heritage', while stating that 'the stabber and his entire family MUST BE DEPORTED' — a statement viewed more than 218,000 times.

The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
Debunked: How misinformation spread within minutes of a garda being stabbed on Capel Street
FOLLOWING A KNIFE attack on a garda patrolling inner city Dublin yesterday, false claims that the suspect was a migrant quickly spread on the internet. The garda was attacked yesterday evening during a routine, high-visibility patrol on Capel Street. He was wounded on his upper arm, and his stab vest sustained some impact damage, before the suspect was subdued and detained. The injured garda has since been discharged from hospital after being treated for his injuries. However, false rumours about the suspect soon spread online. 'We have some people with their own agenda try and inflame situations like this for their own ends,' Paul Cleary, Assistant Commissioner for the Dublin Metropolitan Region, said on Morning Ireland today. Many posts with inaccurate claims about the incident, that have accumulated hundreds of thousands of views, can still be seen on social media. One post to Facebook calling the suspect a 'non-national' has accumulated more than 92,600 views since being posted just before 8pm yesterday. Another post that appeared half an hour later, which says that the stabbing was carried out by a 'migrant who went Tonto [crazy]', has been seen 22,800 times, according to statistics from Meta, Facebook's parent company. Advertisement Multiple other posts on Facebook blamed the stabbing on a 'foreigner' without providing any evidence. Posts on the social media platform X alleging that the suspect was a non-Irish person have been viewed more than 100,000 times, according to metrics on that site. One of the earliest posts blaming the stabbing simply read: 'Garda stabbed by foreigner on Capel street 10 minutes ago' responding at 6.55pm to a well-known far-right activist who had been complaining about Ireland being a '3rd world country' because of immigration. Similar narratives quickly spread on X, including claims that Ireland was being overridden by foreign criminals. 'This street has gone to the dogs,' reads a 7.02pm post about the Capel Street stabbing that has been viewed more than 13,100 times. 'Every single day we have foreign nationals, drinking, shitting and pissing on the street in Broad daylight.' Similar arguments that exaggerate how dangerous Dublin is are common in anti-immigrant groups, which often portray non-Irish people are inherently criminal. However, claims that the suspect was a migrant or a non-national contradicts all mainstream reporting on the case, as well as statements made by the Gardaí. The suspect is an Irish citizen who was born in the country, according to numerous outlets, including RTÉ . The suspect is expected to be charged this evening. Baseless accusations that foreigners are responsible regularly appear online almost as soon as crimes occur. Some of these accusations have been associated with real-life violence, including the case of an Indian man who was brutally attacked by a mob in Tallaght last week after being falsely accused of inappropriate behaviour around children. Want to be your own fact-checker? Visit our brand-new FactCheck Knowledge Bank for guides and toolkits The Journal's FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network's Code of Principles. You can read it here . For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader's Guide here . You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks here . Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions. We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support. Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone. Learn More Support The Journal