Grocery store coming to downtown Rockford, receives $165K state grant
ROCKFORD, Ill. (WTVO) — A new grocery store, coming to downtown Rockford, has secured funding from the State of Illinois.
will be located adjacent to Downtown Discount Drugs at the corner of West State and North Church Streets, under the ownership of Raj Patel and his son Ashay.
The combination grocery-pharmacy is expected to sell fresh produce, craft beer, and wine, and feature a UPS Store.
Above the store, 35 loft-style apartments are being renovated into the Nu-State Apartments.
A portion of the funding for the grocery store comes from a $165,491 grant from Illinois' New Stores in Food Deserts program.
'A grocery store has long been considered a missing link in the rejuvenation of downtown Rockford,' Sen. Steve Stadelman (D-Rockford) said. 'That need only increases as office space continues to be converted into residential use. State investment to help downtown Rockford redefine itself helps the entire region because economic growth doesn't occur in communities with stagnant or declining cores.'
To be eligible for the grant funding, stores must meet the following criteria:
Must be located in a food desert,
Must earn less than 30% of revenue from alcohol and tobacco sales,
Must accept SNAP and WIC, and
Must contribute to diversity of fresh foods available in community.
According to the Governor's Office, the $165,491 for the City Center Market will go toward updated refrigeration and coolers.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Foundations likely to see increased requests from New Mexico nonprofits after federal cuts
Twenty-six trucks were set to deliver groceries to The Food Depot between April and December. Two weeks before the first truck was scheduled to arrive, however, staff at the Santa Fe food bank learned the goods — a mix of expensive and tough-to-source groceries like yogurt, milk, chicken and produce from a U.S. Department of Agriculture program — weren't coming after all, executive director Jill Dixon said. The Emergency Food Assistance Program was hit in March with $500 million in cuts, the latest in a string of federal food-related policy changes. 'Food banking requires planning, so it meant that there was just a gap,' Dixon said. 'For The Food Depot, that gap translated to approximately $200,000.' Such a loss is a common story for New Mexico nonprofits these days. A new report jointly commissioned by the Thornburg Foundation, Anchorum Health Foundation and Santa Fe Community Foundation surveyed more than 200 nonprofits across the state and found 'federal funding cuts may disproportionately affect New Mexico.' About 37% of the state's nonprofits receive some kind of federal support, the sixth highest level in the nation, with one in five getting the majority of their funding from federal grants. Some $1.1 billion has been awarded to those surveyed with only about half paid out so far. The other half of that money can be clawed back — and in some cases already has been terminated by the federal government. Philanthropic funders are likely to see a surge in requests from nonprofits competing for private dollars to offset their losses, the study found, estimating foundations would have to increase their giving by 282% to replace terminated grants. 060525_MS_Food Depot_002.JPG Eloy Almoner receives groceries from The Food Depot last week. Executive director Jill Dixon said previous federal aid cuts were "small potatoes" compared to proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program in President Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill," which wants to strip $267 billion in SNAP funding by 2034. Foundations would spend down their savings in short order to fill those gaps, said Allan Oliver, president of the Thornburg Foundation. 'The need is really, really significant,' he said, noting 'not all nonprofits wish to be public about the situation with their federal funding.' Nonprofits — which provide about 8% of the jobs in New Mexico's private-sector workforce, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics — 'are making extremely hard decisions right now,' Oliver said. 'These are agreements that the federal government made with these nonprofits — and the nonprofits are holding up their end of the deal,' he added. 'It's really up to the federal government to hold up their end of the deal.' 'Extremely hard decisions' Programs in the state focused on food security have seen a significant toll. The National Center for Frontier Communities, a 30-year-old nonprofit based in Silver City, hasn't been able to draw down about two-thirds of a four-year, nearly $400,000 Community Food Project grant from the Department of Agriculture since January, CEO Ben Rasmussen said. The grant funded a project supporting the local food landscape in the small, remote towns Frontier Communities serves. Among its initiatives are the development of an agricultural training center and assistance in increasing local producers' sales to a self-sustainable level. Rasmussen takes pride in serving communities that are often 'quite literally the last stop on the road,' he said. The center's home base in Silver City means the southwestern corner of New Mexico often serves as a 'testing ground' for new initiatives that could have a nationwide impact on remote communities — many of them Indigenous and agricultural, with low-income populations. 'We are still in compliance with the grant, and we are still moving forward,' Rasmussen said of the federal funding. But, he added, 'What's at risk is this momentum. ... It really forces you to think about what's important to you and your organization.' 060525_MS_Food Depot_001.JPG Volunteers load groceries into a waiting car during a food distribution effort at The Food Depot last week. Executive director Jill Dixon says federal cuts to food stamps will create an untenable demand at The Food Depot and other food banks. 'We are not built to be first line for food-insecure families,' she said. 'The writing on the wall' Ladona Clayton's organization hasn't yet experienced any direct federal funding cuts, but she fears revenue might dry up — and with it, Eastern New Mexico communities. Clayton is executive director of the Ogallala Land & Water Conservancy, a nonprofit working to ensure water security for Clovis, the Cannon Air Force Base and parts of Curry County by compensating landowners for retiring their irrigation wells and putting conservation easements into place to keep water underground. The stakes couldn't be higher, Clayton said: 'If we don't save, preserve, store as much groundwater as we possibly can, we don't survive.' But it takes federal dollars to make that work happen. 'We can see the writing on the wall,' she said, referring to the potential for federal funding cuts. The Ogallala Land & Water Conservancy is primarily funded by the U.S. Department of Defense's Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration Program — thanks to the Air Force base — and the Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service, Clayton said. She's been warned to expect steep competition for the next round of Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration Program dollars. About a year ago, the conservancy contracted with a consulting firm to search for other federal grant options. In the months since, Clayton said, 'Every one of those doors closed on us.' She's also applied for and received approval for seven conservation easements through the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Three have already been funded; money for two more is set to come through. But two remain unfunded. 'That is where we find ourselves, but we're working aggressively to do what we can. If the funding's not out there ... I think my greatest concern is everyone's now turning to foundations,' Clayton said. 'If we're all moving in that direction ... competition's just going to amp up,' she added. Fight for private funding Competition has amped up. Nonprofits are feeling that, said Leah Ricci, interim executive director of the Santa Fe-based Quivira Coalition, an organization focused on implementing holistic farming methods known as regenerative agriculture. The sustainable practice aims to improve land and ecosystems through biodiversity. The Department of Agriculture in April canceled the group's Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities program — an initiative Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins criticized as an effort to 'advance the green new scam.' At the time, the Quivira Coalition was about a year into a five-year, $3.9 million grant, Ricci said. The organization had planned to use the money to help livestock producers transform waste products, like woody debris or carcasses, into soil amendments, such as compost or biochar. With the Climate-Smart Commodities funding now gone, Ricci said the Quivira Coalition has pared down its program. It continues to train the 13 producers already recruited. Nevertheless, the coalition still relies heavily on federal funding, with 65% of its 2025 budget coming from five big federal grants, four of which remain in place. 'We are fortunate, even with 65% of our income coming from federal grants, to have fairly diverse income from foundation grants and from donors,' Ricci said. 'We're being really careful and thoughtful about how we use those general operating support dollars so that we have the opportunity to pivot if needed,' she said. Going forward, though, foundation grants may become harder to get. Every grant program the Quivira Coalition has applied for this year has seen an overwhelming number of applications, Ricci said. The local foundations' new report includes a lengthy list of recommendations for private funders as they prepare for the surge in requests, noting philanthropy 'can and should step in' to support nonprofits. 'They want to be as helpful as possible,' Ricci said of philanthropic funders. 'They also have a limited amount of money, and they're having to make tough decisions about who to award their grant funds to.' 060525_MS_Food Depot_004.JPG A line of cars wait for food from The Food Depot last week. The Congressional Budget office estimates more than 4 million Americans would lose SNAP benefits entirely as a result of proposed cuts. Cuts so far: 'Small potatoes' From Dixon's perspective at The Food Depot, there's more to worry about. She described the losses of federal assistance the food bank has already weathered as 'small potatoes' in comparison to proposed congressional cuts to critical food aid known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly called food stamps. 'The proposed cuts to SNAP [are] really what we're focused on now,' Dixon said. President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' of spending priorities is expected to strip $267 billion in SNAP funding by 2034, according to analysis by the Congressional Budget Office. The bill has already passed the U.S. House and is now being considered in the Senate; Trump wants the bill on his desk by July 4. The Congressional Budget office estimates more than 4 million Americans would lose SNAP benefits entirely as a result of the cuts, while monthly benefits would be reduced by about $15 by 2034 for all remaining participants. Food stamps are meant to be the 'first and best line of defense' against hunger, Dixon said, while food banks work to fill the gap when SNAP benefits run out. For every meal a food bank provides, SNAP provides nine, according to the nationwide hunger relief organization Feeding America. Slashing SNAP will likely result in untenable demand for The Food Depot and other food banks, Dixon said. 'We are not built to be first line for food-insecure families,' she said, 'and the proposed cut in the bill as it stands today is the largest and deepest cut to the SNAP program in its history.'
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
How SNAP Benefits Are Impacted by Trump's Tax Bill: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. House Republicans have advanced a sweeping tax and spending bill backed by President Donald Trump that makes significant changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps. The bill—the One Big Beautiful Act—passed the House by a narrow 215–214 vote and is now headed to the Senate, where revisions are expected. If enacted, the measures would mark a major shift in eligibility and administrative rules for the country's largest anti-hunger program. Why It Matters More than 40 million low-income Americans rely on SNAP to help pay for groceries each month. The changes proposed in the Trump-supported bill reflect broader Republican goals to tighten eligibility, reduce federal spending and increase work requirements for federal food assistance. While the legislation also aims to cut taxes and simplify rules for retirees and workers, critics warn the SNAP provisions could leave vulnerable recipients—especially childless adults and those without full-time work—at risk of losing access to essential food support. What to Know The bill includes the following SNAP-related provisions: Increased state financial responsibility : States would be required to contribute more funds to support SNAP, shifting part of the cost burden from the federal government to state budgets. : States would be required to contribute more funds to support SNAP, shifting part of the cost burden from the federal government to state budgets. Expanded work requirements : The bill would require more SNAP recipients to work in order to maintain eligibility. Specifically, it increases the age cap at which work requirements end from 54 to 64 years old. Able-bodied adults without dependents would be subject to these rules unless they meet other exemptions. Only parents with children under age 7 would be exempt from the work requirements, a significant change from the current exemption for parents with children under 18. : The bill would require more SNAP recipients to work in order to maintain eligibility. Specifically, it increases the age cap at which work requirements end from 54 to 64 years old. Able-bodied adults without dependents would be subject to these rules unless they meet other exemptions. Only parents with children under age 7 would be exempt from the work requirements, a significant change from the current exemption for parents with children under 18. Reduced state exemptions : The legislation limits states' ability to exempt individuals from federal SNAP work requirements. : The legislation limits states' ability to exempt individuals from federal SNAP work requirements. No changes to benefit amounts or maximum eligibility thresholds were specified in the bill, but administrative changes could affect how and when recipients qualify. These SNAP reforms are intended to partially offset revenue losses from the bill's expanded tax deductions, including higher standard deductions for older Americans and the elimination of taxes on overtime and tips. Stock image/file photo: Man shopping for groceries in a store. Stock image/file photo: Man shopping for groceries in a store. GETTY Policy and poverty experts have said the bill could be devastating for SNAP recipients. The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning think tank, said the passage of the bill would constitute "by far the largest cut to SNAP in history"—with some 7 million recipients possibly seeing reduction or total loss of their benefits. The Congressional Budget Office has said that while it will reduce federal spending on SNAP to $76.6 billion in 2034, down from a baseline projection of $115.8 billion, recipients would see an average reduction of SNAP benefits of $15 dollars per month by 2034 for every single SNAP participant What People Are Saying President Trump has not commented directly on the SNAP provisions, but he framed the broader legislation as a necessary reset. "It's time for our friends in the United States Senate to get to work, and send this Bill to my desk AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!" he wrote on Truth Social. Democrats have been outspoken in their criticism. Those on the House Agriculture Committee said the bill is "irresponsible" and poses an "immense threat" to "food assistance for vulnerable seniors, children, working families, veterans, and Americans with disabilities." Jennifer Greenfield, associate professor at University of Denver who specializes in the intersection of health and wealth disparities, told Newsweek: "The proposed federal "savings" are not savings at all—it's a shift of the costs to our already cash-strapped states and families. The net result will be to increase hunger and financial instability among households with children, older adults, people with disabilities, and veterans—while also sending tens of thousands of people into unemployment." What's Next The Senate is expected to negotiate revisions to several parts of the legislation, including the SNAP work requirement provisions, before any final vote. If changes are made, the bill will return to the House for another vote.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicare & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now
President Donald Trump's 'one big beautiful bill' has passed in the House and is now awaiting Senate approval. If passed, Trump's signature bill would extend the tax cuts granted by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and add additional tax cuts. While this might be welcome news to many, the bill also includes changes to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that could threaten seniors' access to these programs. Find Out: Read Next: 'The 'one big beautiful bill' passed by the House of Representatives, if it were passed into law today, would cut Medicaid and SNAP by a combined $1 trillion,' said Chris Orestis, president of Retirement Genius. 'In addition, because of the increase to federal debt of as much as $5 trillion, the bill would trigger an automatic reduction in Medicare funding of $500 billion,' he continued. 'This would represent the largest cut to social services and health insurance for the poor, disabled, children and the elderly in U.S. history.' Here's a look at the changes retirees can make now to secure care and avoid benefit disruptions if the bill were to pass. Before changes go into effect, check with your healthcare providers to ensure there won't be any interruption to your care if there are cuts to Medicaid. 'Check with your healthcare provider to see if they might cut back on services or cease accepting Medicaid-funded patients, and contact any nursing home where you or a loved one may reside to find out if they will be reducing the number of patients they can support — or even [if they are] possibly planning to close,' Orestis said. Knowing this ahead of time will allow you to find alternative care providers before it's too late. Learn More: If you are reliant on SNAP, start searching for alternatives that may be able to provide food assistance in the event your benefits are reduced or cut. 'Make sure you know where there are local support services through community or faith-based organizations to replace lost access through SNAP,' Orestis said. Many retirees plan to 'spend down' their savings so that they qualify for Medicaid to pay for their long-term care. However, this may no longer be a viable option. 'If you are considering going onto Medicaid for long-term care and are preparing to engage the 'spend down' process to impoverish yourself and get below the poverty level to qualify, you may want to reconsider that strategy, and instead look to leverage private pay resources to pay for your care,' Orestis said. 'If you are on Medicaid, you will primarily be reliant on nursing homes for your care, and their ability to withstand these cuts will be very challenging and up in the air,' he continued. 'If you are private pay, you are in control and can decide where and when you will receive care, such as at home or an assisted living community not funded by Medicaid.' Strategies to stay private pay for long-term care would include long-term care insurance, annuities, a life insurance settlement, a reverse mortgage or VA benefits. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement This article originally appeared on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicare & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now
