Unpacking rumor that Trump is sending out $5K stimulus checks
According to a rumor that spread online in late May and early June 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump would be sending out $5,000 "stimulus" checks to Americans after his administration uncovered billions of dollars in "wasted money."
The viral rumor likely stems from an investment firm CEO's proposal to send some taxpayers so-called "DOGE Dividend" checks. The original proposal for $5,000 checks was based on the assumption that DOGE would achieve $2 trillion in total savings, which is highly unlikely.
Trump has previously floated the idea of a "DOGE Dividend," but there was no proof at the time of this writing that he would send $5,000 checks to Americans. Snopes reached out to the White House for clarity but has not received a response.
In late May and early June 2025, a rumor on TikTok (archived) claimed that U.S. President Donald Trump was reportedly sending out $5,000 "stimulus" checks to Americans after his administration uncovered $50 billion in "wasted money."
"Trump is going to be sending out five grand to everybody and this is because they uncovered $50 billion … of just wasted money," the TikTok video's narrator said.
@todaynews919 #fyp #foryou #new #news ♬ original sound - todaynews919
The video's narrator later said the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency initiative allegedly proposed sending money it had "recovered" to the American people. The initiative, spearheaded by tech billionaire Elon Musk before his departure, works to slash government spending through layoffs and cuts to various federal programs.
Though Trump has previously floated the idea of a "DOGE Dividend," there was no proof at the time of this writing that he would send $5,000 checks to Americans. Snopes reached out to the White House to ask if the president has any plans to send such checks and is awaiting a response. Since we were not able to definitively prove or disprove this rumor, we have not put a rating on this claim.
The viral rumor likely stems from a proposal to send some taxpayers "DOGE Dividend" checks. Trump previously said he would consider such a plan, but his administration has not confirmed that it's sending any checks.
The idea for DOGE Dividend checks was originally proposed by James Fishback, the founder and CEO of the investment firm Azoria Partners, in an X post (archived) shared on Feb. 18, 2025:
Fishback's post also included a more in-depth proposal based on the assumption that DOGE would achieve $2 trillion in total savings. He suggested that the federal government take 20% of DOGE's presumed savings, or about $400 billion, and return it to approximately 79 million taxpaying households in the form of $5,000 tax refund checks called the DOGE Dividend.
Under Fishback's plan, the government would send checks only to "households that will be net payers of federal income tax," meaning those that pay more money in taxes than they get back in tax credits or refunds. That means American households that do not owe federal income tax would not qualify for the proposed payments.
In 2025, an estimated 40% of U.S. households will pay no federal individual income tax, according to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Most of these households have lower incomes, with about 70% earning less than $75,000 and about 45% earning less than $40,000, the Tax Policy Center estimates.
On the same day that Fishback shared his proposal for the $5,000 checks, Musk replied (archived), "Will check with the president."
Trump quickly acknowledged the idea as he delivered remarks during a Saudi investors conference in Miami on Feb. 19, 2025.
"There's even under consideration a new concept where we give 20% of the DOGE savings to American citizens and 20% goes to paying down debt, because the numbers are incredible, Elon," Trump said at the conference.
A reporter also asked Trump about the plan as he flew back to Washington, D.C., aboard Air Force One that day. He said:
I love it. A 20% dividend, so to speak, for the money that we're saving by going after the waste and fraud and abuse and all the other things that are happening, I think it's a great idea.
The dividend checks would also give taxpayers "an incentive … to go out and report things to use when we can save money," Trump added.
Several weeks later, Fishback spoke further about his proposal during a March 2025 podcast appearance. He said if DOGE didn't hit the $2 trillion in projected savings, the amount of money in the dividend checks should be adjusted.
"This plan is not predestined to the $5,000 number. If the savings come in above or below that, the check will be reflected accordingly," Fishback said. "So again, if the savings are $1 trillion — which I think is awfully low — the check goes from $5,000 to $2,500."
At a town hall in Wisconsin on March 30, 2025, Musk fielded questions about the proposal, ultimately putting the responsibility of approving tax refund checks on Congress and Trump.
"It's somewhat up to the Congress and maybe the president … as to whether specific checks are cut," Musk said in response.
A search of Congress.gov did not return any results for legislation proposing "DOGE Dividend" tax refund checks. Snopes also could not find any record of Trump sharing additional details about a plan for such checks since February 2025, and we are still awaiting a response from the White House.
It's still unclear how much money DOGE might ultimately save. Musk said in October 2024 that he expected to cut "at least $2 trillion" but he later lowered that estimate to $1 trillion. However, both of those estimates were "wildly unrealistic," PolitiFact reported in June 2025.
As of June 6, 2025, DOGE's online "wall of receipts" touted an estimated $180 billion in cuts, but analyses by PolitiFact (here and here) and The New York Times found that the online ledger was riddled with errors.
X. https://x.com/j_fishback/status/1891933120313663493. Accessed 6 June 2025.
"Who Will Pay No Federal Individual Income Tax in 2025?" Tax Policy Center, 4 June 2025, taxpolicycenter.org/fiscal-facts/who-will-pay-no-federal-individual-income-tax-2025. Accessed 6 June 2025.
X. https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1891967592048611532. Accessed 6 June 2025.
Palm Beach Post. "Full Donald Trump Speech at Miami FII Investment Summit Hosted by Saudi Public Investment Fund." YouTube, 19 Feb. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKT1UOg7Pr4. Accessed 6 June 2025.
Ap.org, 2025, newsroom.ap.org/editorial-photos-videos/detail?itemid=23f583499b664b38859e9d5fffcdd9ba. Accessed 6 June 2025.
David Lin. "Will You Get a $5,000 Check? "Doge Dividend" Explained | James Fishback." YouTube, 12 Mar. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQbuf6NvZFA. Accessed 6 June 2025.
FOX 9 Minneapolis-St. Paul. "LIVE | Elon Musk Holds Town Hall in Wisconsin." YouTube, 30 Mar. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhIIS_9ZtDE. Accessed 6 June 2025.
"Legislative Search Results." Congress.gov, 2025, www.congress.gov/search?q=%7B%22congress%22%3A%5B%22119%22%5D%2C%22source%22%3A%22all%22%2C%22search%22%3A%22DOGE+Dividends%22%7D. Accessed 6 June 2025.
WFAA. "Elon Musk Full Speech at Trump Rally in Madison Square Garden (Oct. 27, 2024)." YouTube, 27 Oct. 2024, www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWSXmMiWTJ0. Accessed 15 Nov. 2024.
X. x.com/elonmusk/status/1885176751036252621. Accessed 6 June 2025.
Clarke, Amelia. "Yes, Musk Said He'd Ask Trump about $5K Checks for US Taxpayers Funded by DOGE Savings." Snopes, 21 Feb. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/musk-taxpayer-5000-refund/.
Czopek, Madison, and Amy Sherman. "Trump and Musk Public Bickering Raises More DOGE Uncertainty." @Politifact, 5 June 2025, www.politifact.com/article/2025/jun/05/elon-musk-donald-trump-doge-cuts/. Accessed 6 June 2025.
DOGE. "DOGE: Department of Government Efficiency." DOGE: Department of Government Efficiency, 2025, doge.gov/savings. Accessed 6 June 2025.
McCullough, Caleb. "Where Do DOGE's Reported Savings Come From?" @Politifact, 21 Feb. 2025, www.politifact.com/article/2025/feb/21/doge-touts-billions-in-canceled-government-contrac/.
Fahrenthold, David A, and Jeremy Singer-Vine. "DOGE Is Far Short of Its Goal, and Still Overstating Its Progress." Nytimes.com, The New York Times, 13 Apr. 2025, www.nytimes.com/2025/04/13/us/politics/doge-contracts-savings.html. Accessed 6 June 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
30 minutes ago
- Business Insider
'Sell America' is in full force for elite investor Jeffrey Gundlach, who warns of a US debt 'reckoning'
Investor Jeff Gundlach expressed caution over the US debt load in recent remarks. He said the "untenable" debt burden in America is heading for a "reckoning." The so-called "King of Bonds" said his firm is starting to introduce foreign currencies to its funds. Elite investor Jeffrey Gundlach is doubling down on the '" Sell America" trade. The DoubleLine Capital CEO, previously coined as the "King of Bonds," raised concerns about dollar-denominated assets when speaking at the Bloomberg Global Credit Forum on Wednesday. At the core of his comments is growing concern over America's swelling debt load, which is expected to get even bigger if President Donald Trump's " Big Beautiful Bill" eventually passes. "There's an awareness now that the long-term Treasury bond is not a legitimate flight-to-quality asset," Gundlach said, warning that a "reckoning is coming." He's referring to recent volatility in long-dated government bonds, like 30-year Treasurys, which haven't been trading like the sure-thing safe bet they're supposed to be. And Gundlach's firm has been putting its money where its mouth is. The DoubleLine CEO said his firm has been allocating more fund holdings to foreign currencies, and recommended that investors broadly start to think about boosting non-dollar-denominated holdings. Gundlach also sees the tide turning in the global stock market. "Things always take longer than people think, but it's happening in real-time, and the next one will be selective emerging market equities as opposed to the US," Gundlach said. 2 signs of stress Reuters Gundlach highlighted multiple unusual patterns that have been flashing in US markets this year. He sees these as signs that markets are likely concerned about the US debt, and that faith in US assets is starting to fade, he added. The US dollar and stocks. When the S&P 500 falls, the value of the dollar typically moves higher relative to other currencies, Gundlach said. But in April, when the S&P 500 tanked 20% amid the turmoil from Donald Trump's tariffs, the US dollar also weakened in value. The US Dollar Index, which weighs the greenback against a basket of foreign currencies, traded around 97.8 on Thursday, down 9% from levels at the start of the year. US Treasurys. When the Fed cuts interest rates, the 10-year US Treasury yield, which is tied to long-term interest rate expectations in the economy, typically falls. But the 10-year yield has climbed around 74 basis points from its low in September, around the time the Fed issued its first rate cut. "So I think what we have is recognition is that the interest expense for the United States is untenable if we continue running a $2.1 trillion budget deficit and we continue to have sticky interest rates," Gundlach said of the market shifts. Foreign investors have steadily added exposure to the US market over the last 17 years, Gundlach said, noting that the foreign net investment position in the US currently hovered around $25 trillion. "It's not inconceivable that some of the $25 trillion that came in just a couple — not even two decades — could go out," Gundlach said. "You should be thinking about increasing your allocations to non-dollar investments. And it's already working." Where to go if you're "selling America" Gundlach said there were several areas where investors could find safety away from US assets. Gold. Gundlach said he's continued to hold gold when it reached the level around $3,000 an ounce, and that he also holds stakes in gold miners. Previously, he's said that he believes gold could rally to as high as $4,000 an ounce as concerns swirl over tariffs, geopolitical conflict, and rising debt levels in the US. "I think gold is a real asset class. It's no longer for lunatic survivalists and wild speculators," he said. India. Gundlach also said investors should look into Indian assets, suggesting that India could see a similar run-up in economic growth that China has seen over the past three decades. India is riddled with many of the same economic issue China faced 35 years ago, Gundlach said, though be believed many of those issues can be fixed. "I don't know how long it will take, but that's one you buy," he said. Gundlach has consistently sounded the alarm on rising deficits in the US for years, and encouraged investors to pile into safe-havens. But forecasters on Wall Street have cast doubt on the "Sell America" trade, which is hinges on the idea that US will stop outperforming other assets in the world. JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley are among those who have said that they believe US assets will continue to dominate global markets.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Trump-Musk Feud Revealed Two Massive National Security Concerns
The spectacular falling out last week between U.S. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the billionaire who became one of his closest aides, put the spotlight on two dangerous developments affecting U.S. national security. The breakup provided Schadenfreude to the two men's critics and delivered entertainment value to social media audiences across the world. But it also revealed crucial vulnerabilities deriving from the ways in which important elements of U.S. military and intelligence operations, among others, have been personalized in both men's hands. While this is particularly alarming for the U.S., its repercussions extend beyond U.S. borders, to U.S. allies and others. When the world's most powerful man and the world's wealthiest entrepreneur started lobbing verbal missiles at each other from the social media platforms they each own, the crossfire included threats with serious geopolitical consequences. It may have looked like a high-profile schoolyard scuffle, but the two people involved are so powerful that the clash was far more consequential. It all started when Musk blasted Trump's massive budget bill currently making its way through Congress. If approved, the legislation would add trillions of dollars to the national debt. That was anathema to Musk, whose ostensible role in the Trump administration was to strengthen the government's finances. He initially vowed to slash $2 trillion in spending, later lowering his sights to $1 trillion. Ultimately the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, cut less than $200 million, and by some estimates it produced more costs than savings. Still, Musk lambasted the budget bill, and when Trump criticized him for that, it unleashed the furies, with Musk going as far as suggesting Trump should be impeached. To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter. Among the many threats the erstwhile allies traded was a warning Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that '[t]he easiest way to save money … is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' to which Musk responded on his X platform that his SpaceX company 'will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' The U.S. depends on the Dragon to send astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station, making it no small threat. Focusing on just these two posts, we can see the danger. First, there's the deeply alarming fact that Trump openly threatened to use the power of the presidency to exact personal revenge. We've seen this many times already since he returned to the presidency less than five months ago, but it's an undemocratic, corrupt practice that may be routine in dictatorships but should be unacceptable in solid democracies. Over the weekend, Trump once again threatened to use the power of his office against Musk, warning of 'very serious consequences' if Musk opted to fund Democratic candidates in next year's midterm congressional elections. In other words, he would use his office for political retribution, another affront against democracy. In addition to canceling contracts, as he suggested on Thursday when the war of words started, Trump could also unleash regulators on Musk's firms. As president, Trump's duty is to make decisions in the national interest. If the contracts made sense before the falling out, they should still make sense after it. But the contracts were actually deeply troubling before, and the dispute and threats highlight just how dangerously dependent the U.S., as well as other countries, have become on companies controlled by a single individual, and a volatile one with a troubling ideology at that. Musk retracted his threats to decommission Dragon, but the mere mention of the possibility alarmed NASA and shocked the space travel community. As mentioned, without Dragon, the U.S. has no way to send its astronauts and supplies to the ISS for now, as an alternative built by Boeing proved unreliable. But the threat to shut down Dragon is minimal compared to other off switches on Musk's console. The Pentagon and the entire U.S. security apparatus have become perilously dependent on Musk's companies. In addition to its contracts for the ISS, SpaceX carries out the overwhelming majority of all satellite launches around the globe, including those of military and intelligence satellites. Then there's the SpaceX subsidiary Starlink and its military version Starshield, both of which have become indispensable communications platforms, and not only for the United States. In 2022, when Russia launched its all-out invasion of Ukraine, Musk provided Starlink equipment to Kyiv, allowing Ukrainian troops to access the internet and communicate with each other and their commanders. A large part of the cost of that arrangement is borne by the Pentagon. The dangers of relying on Musk's company for such a fundamental function in the midst of an active war was already becoming evident when Musk started echoing Russian talking points. Then, a recently published biography of Musk claimed that when the Ukrainians asked for Starlink support in 2022 as part of an operation in Russian-occupied Crimea, Musk refused, saying that attacking the illegally annexed territory was 'going too far.' The revelation raised red flags at the Pentagon, where officials started speaking about the risk represented by Musk's ability to simply deny access to his products in the midst of a conflict. And yet, despite urgent calls by military officials for competitors to provide alternatives, few viable options have emerged. The Boeing space vehicle for taking astronauts to the ISS was a disappointment, and Eutelsat, a Franco-British competitor of Starlink, has launched only 600 satellites compared to Musk's 7,000, which represents the majority of the satellites orbiting Earth. What's more, Eutelsat's user equipment is more cumbersome. This March, while he was still working closely with Trump, Musk posted that 'Ukraine will inevitably lose' the war and noted ominously that Kyiv's 'entire front line would collapse' if he turned Starlink off. That's a not-so-veiled warning about Musk's power to cause havoc not only for Ukraine but for all of Starlink's users, of which the U.S. government is the biggest. The U.S. has a reported $22 billion in federal contracts with SpaceX. Musk already controls the launching of spy satellites as well as much of the communications systems the U.S. uses and would use should it go to war. If Trump launches construction of his promised missile shield, the Golden Dome, Musk would be a major player. This risky dependence on Musk is not the reason Trump has threatened to abuse his presidency against his former friend. That is all about revenge. But the U.S. should do everything in its power to ensure it can carry out its policies and objectives without being at the mercy of any single individual or company, even if that was not something Trump was concerned about before he had a reason to punish Musk. The acrimonious breakup, while entertaining, has also delivered two important warnings. It showed that Trump's use of his office for personal vendettas has become a regular, openly deployed practice in this presidency. And it has provided an urgent reminder that the U.S. and other countries have become dangerously dependent on the unpredictable and untrustworthy Musk. Frida Ghitis is WPR's senior columnist and a contributor to CNN and The Washington Post. Her WPR column appears every Thursday. You can follow her on Twitter and Threads at @fridaghitis. The post The Trump-Musk Feud Revealed Two Massive National Security Concerns appeared first on World Politics Review.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Starmer accused of using private school VAT raid to ‘house illegal migrants'
Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of using private school VAT cash to 'house illegal migrants' after he suggested the policy would fund Labour's house-building Prime Minister wrote on X, formerly Twitter, yesterday that the decision to levy 20pc VAT on private school fees had allowed the Government to make the 'largest investment in a generation' to affordable housing. Laura Trott, the shadow education secretary, accused Sir Keir of taxing children's education to build homes which would be 'given away' to migrants. Labour has long-maintained that its controversial VAT raid, which has already seen dozens of schools close as a result, would be used to improve state schools. But this week it was forced to abandon its manifesto promise to hire 6,500 new state school teachers. Yesterday, the Prime Minister tweeted how the 'tough choice' on VAT had paid off. Ms Trott described the post as 'madness.' She told The Telegraph: 'Labour needs to come clean with the public. Not only have they broken their promise to hire 6,500 more teachers but now they are taxing British children's education to build homes that will be given away to illegal migrants. 'The sums don't add up. It's children, parents and teachers in the state sector who'll pay the price for Labour's ideological agenda.' The Treasury hopes to raise £1.5bn from its VAT raid this year, rising to £1.7bn by 2029-30. In December, Chancellor Rachel Reeves told reporters 'every single penny' of the £1.5bn it hoped to raise from the private school VAT raid would be ring-fenced for state education. In an interview with ITV, Ms Reeves was asked: 'Will all of that money be ring-fenced for state schools?' She replied: 'Yes, every single penny of that money will go into our state schools to ensure that every child gets the best start in life.' Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said her party had opposed the VAT raid because it was 'terrible policy'. She said: 'It has forced schools to shut, sending thousands of pupils into state schools that are now struggling for space, teachers and money you didn't account for. 'You said every single penny would go into state schools, but now it's housing?' Questions have also been raised over whether the Government's forecasts are accurate. It was revealed last week that four times as many pupils left private schools last year than was predicted. In the spending review, Labour said it would spend £4bn by 2029-30 on its Affordable Homes Programme. It also vowed to stop housing asylum seekers in hotels by 2029, raising suggestions these people would instead be moved into social housing. Rachel Reeves said she was providing a 'cash uplift' of more than £4.5bn for schools between now and 2029. However a large proportion of this is as a result of the decision to extend free school meals to 500,000 more children. When this figure is removed, the core budget for schools will rise by 0.4pc over the next three years. Julie Robinson, chief executive of the Independent Schools Council, said: 'Throughout the debate on VAT, schools were promised that the money raised – if any – would go to state education. We have seen the rhetoric on this watered down to 'public services' and now the revelation that it will now pay for housing. 'We are in the worst-case scenario, one that we have warned about since the introduction of this policy: real damage has been done to independent education without any benefit to state schools, who are also facing further cuts. It is children who will lose out as a result.' The Treasury was approached for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
