Charges Laid Over Deaths In New Zealand Hostel Fire
The charges were laid after a two-year investigation into whether the condition of the 52-year-old, four-storey Loafers Lodge and its fire safety systems 'contributed to the fatal outcome.' Detective Sergeant Timothy Leitch said the people charged were 'involved with the management and operation of the building, and police allege they were responsible for aspects of the building's fire safety system.'
Two men aged 75 and 58, and a 70-year-old woman, appeared in the Wellington District Court facing five charges of manslaughter, one for each victim. They are alleged to have failed to take reasonable precautions and care to avoid danger to life. They face an alternative set of manslaughter charges alleging failure to comply with duty under the Health and Safety at Work Act. The fourth person charged, a 72-year-old man, also entered no plea when he appeared in court on June 9.
The charges are the first of their kind in New Zealand, it being the first time that police have charged anyone involved in maintaining a building with manslaughter. The courts suppressed the names of all four and remanded them on bail until their appearance in the High Court on June 19.
Shortly after the 2023 fire, a 50-year-old man who lived at the boarding house was accused of deliberately lighting it. He pleaded not guilty and is scheduled to face trial in August, charged with five counts of murder and two of arson. His lawyer has indicated a defence of insanity will be lodged.
The five residents who died in the blaze which gutted the building were: Michael Wahrlich, 67, a street performer known around town as Mike the Juggler, Melvin Parun, 68, Kenneth Barnard, 67, Peter O'Sullivan, 64, and Liam Hockings, 50.
More than 90 people, many of them long-term residents, were staying at the boarding house when the fire broke out on the third floor at 12:25 a.m. on May 16. About 50 survivors were forced to take refuge at an evacuation centre in Newtown Park. Many lost everything in the fire.
The 92-room lodge was a death trap. It had no sprinkler system, which firefighters said would have saved lives, and only one functional exit. Fire alarms were reportedly faulty, with some residents saying they only went off in part of the building, and others saying there were so many false alarms that people had learned to ignore them. The fire spread rapidly, making it impossible for many to reach the stairwell to escape.
Resident Simon Hanify told the World Socialist Web Site that the front door had been 'sealed shut for about a month; someone kicked it in.' A notice said: 'Door broken, use side entrance.' Some people who could not reach the stairwell to the side entrance were forced to jump onto the roof of an adjacent building. Others were rescued from the rooftop by a fire truck ladder. Some residents were, he said, 'mentally ill or medicated, or infirm, or old, and they wouldn't have stood a chance.'
Others spoke of the rooms infested with bed bugs and the lifts frequently not working. Hanify was charged $280 a week for the room, including power, while some were charged as much as $320. 'Do the maths for 92 rooms—and they can't even put a sprinkler system in or replace the roof,' Hanify said.
Loafers Lodge is a microcosm of the social crisis affecting ever wider layers of the New Zealand working class. It was home to low-paid shift workers, including meat processing workers, hospital staff, as well as unemployed and elderly people unable to find affordable housing elsewhere.
Many were among the city's poorest and lived there for lack of any better options. Murray Edridge, from the Wellington City Mission charity, told the Guardian: 'A significant proportion of residents of the lodge are under our care. This is an absolute disaster. These are people who are inherently vulnerable anyway.'
Survivor Alan Potter told the Post following the charges: 'That's the news I wanted to hear.' The 78-year-old has long called for an inquiry into the deadly fire, beyond just charging a man with lighting it. 'I believe it's an institutional failure,' he said.
Liam Hockings' family released a statement saying: 'This tragedy has highlighted serious concerns about the safety and conditions of some accommodation, particularly for vulnerable people in our communities who are often housed in buildings like this…
'Everyone deserves a safe place to live—regardless of their circumstances—and we urge all those who own, operate, or manage buildings to take their responsibilities seriously. Lives literally depend on it.'
The family was still coming to terms with Liam's death. 'He would have turned 53 just a few days ago,' they said.
While the building's managers are now facing legal consequences, the entire ruling elite, including the previous Labour-led government, bears responsibility for creating both the legal framework and social conditions that allowed it.
Following the fire, Labour's then Housing Minister Megan Wood declared that Loafers Lodge had passed an inspection by the Wellington City Council and 'met the requirements of the Building Act.' While some countries require sprinklers in buildings of four storeys and above, in New Zealand they are required only for buildings more than 10 storeys high.
The fire was a product of the assault on the living standards of the working class, particularly the basic right to decent housing. Loafers Lodge was one of hundreds of boarding houses that are essentially dumping grounds for thousands of people who cannot afford soaring private rents and are unable to access limited public housing.
In the five years preceding the fire, including during the Ardern-led Labour government from 2017, Wellington's median rent went up by 33 percent, pushing more people into precarious housing. The waiting list for state housing more than quadrupled from 5,353 in June 2017 to 24,080 in March 2023. More than 100,000 people were estimated to be homeless or in severely substandard housing—about 2 percent of the population.
The situation continues to worsen under the current far-right National Party-NZ First-ACT coalition government, which took office in 2023. Figures released in March showed that the number of people sleeping rough had risen 53 percent in Auckland and 40 percent in Wellington.
Housing First Auckland manager Rami Alrudani told Radio NZ last month that his organisation was seeing 'more and more homelessness every day.' Last year, the government imposed stricter rules making it more difficult for people to access emergency housing.
Among the government's many anti-working-class policies, there has been a massive tax cut for landlords, including many MPs who are property investors, estimated to have cost $NZ2.9 billion. The government falsely claimed this would lead to more affordable rents. According to Infometrics, average rent has risen by 2.7 percent in the past year, in line with inflation, to $575 per week and $592 in metropolitan areas.
The government is meanwhile moving to water down health and safety regulations. The regulator WorkSafe will be 'reformed' to reduce the 'burden' on businesses and 'rebalance' its focus away from enforcement and towards 'advice.' More than a hundred jobs have been cut at the agency.
This sets the stage for similar tragedies to the Wellington fire, not only in slum boarding houses but more broadly.
By John Braddock, Socialist Equality Group
12 June 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Man claimed he was 'under mind control' during fatal stabbing in Taranaki
By Tara Shaskey, Open Justice reporter of He pleaded guilty to manslaughter. Photo: 123RF A man claimed he was hypnotised and under "mind control" for several years before killing another man in a frenzied stabbing. The South Taranaki victim was stabbed 31 times by the defendant, who can not be named, in August last year. On Friday, he appeared via audio-visual link from prison in the High Court at New Plymouth, where he pleaded guilty to manslaughter. He initially faced a murder charge and was subject to proceedings under the Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act, due to concerns regarding his state of mind at the time of the offending. The defendant's interim name suppression order remains in place ahead of his sentencing and limits what can be reported about the fatal incident. According to the summary of facts, the defendant called 111 twice on August 23 in an agitated state. He requested police assistance and claimed to have been hypnotised. "He said he had been under mind control [...], had just woken up and could not remember his life," the summary stated. A person at the South Taranaki property spoke with the call taker and advised the defendant hadn't had much sleep and was having memory issues. They were encouraged to call mental health services for the defendant. Later that day, another call was made to emergency services and police visited the property. There had been concerns of a family harm incident but that had resolved by the time police arrived. The defendant spoke with police and admitted to using methamphetamine and said he had been hallucinating. Police encouraged that medical advice be sought for the defendant and provided information on methamphetamine, including rehabilitation pamphlets. The following morning, police were called to the property again following further 111 calls with concerns of a family harm incident. The defendant reported having "woken up from a daydream" and being under "MK Ultra mind control". When officers arrived, they found the critically injured victim on the floor of one of the bedrooms. He was given CPR by the officers, and then ambulance staff once they arrived, but was declared dead soon after. The defendant was arrested at the scene. He was compliant and seen to have blood on his clothes, hands and face. He also had a cut on his hand and a graze to his chin. When spoken to by police, he repeated his claims of having been under mind control. He said he stabbed the victim in the head and "I should have taken the c***s head off". A post-mortem examination later found the victim suffered approximately 31 stab wounds, including to his head, chest, arms, leg, abdomen and back. It concluded that one of the stab wounds to the abdomen injured the victim's aorta and caused a large amount of bleeding, resulting in his death. Following the defendant's guilty plea last week, Justice Dale La Hood remanded him back into custody. He will be sentenced on 6 October. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
1News
8 hours ago
- 1News
Qantas fined $98 million for illegally sacking staff
Australia's largest airline has been ordered to pay a landmark penalty of AU$90 million (NZ$98.8 million) for what has been dubbed the largest case of illegal sackings in the country's history. Qantas outsourced more than 1800 baggage handlers, cleaners and ground staff in 2020, in a move the Federal Court ruled was designed to curb union bargaining power in wage negotiations. The embattled airline's appeal to the High Court was unsuccessful, paving the way for the penalty to be awarded on Monday. The Transport Workers Union sought the maximum penalty of AU$121 million (NZ$132.9 million), while Qantas urged Justice Michael Lee to impose a "mid-range" penalty between AU$40 million (NZ$43.9 million) and AU$80 million (NZ$87.8 million). The Federal Court judge cited the "sheer scale of the contraventions, being the largest of their type" as a reason to impose a penalty that would deter other businesses from similar conduct. ADVERTISEMENT He ordered Qantas to pay AU$90 million (NZ$98.9 million) in penalties, AU$50 million (NZ$54.9 million) of which is to be paid directly to the union that brought the proceedings and highlighted the illegal conduct. "To deprive someone of work illegally is to deprive someone of an aspect of their human dignity, and this is not assuaged simply by expressions of regret," Justice Lee said. He was scathing about the embattled airline's conduct after the outsourcing, pointing to efforts to place a "less than candid" picture of the outsourcing decision before the court. He noted Qantas had apologised publicly but then had attempted to deny any compensation payments to the affected workers. Qantas will have to pay the hefty bill on top of a AU$120 million (NZ$131.7 million) compensation payment it has made to the affected ground staff for their economic loss, pain and suffering following the outsourcing. However, Justice Lee said he didn't have enough evidence to be convinced those payments would be made. The court was told the scandal-plagued airline began to finally accept responsibility for its actions in 2023, Justice Lee noted, which coincided with the departure of former CEO Alan Joyce. The courtroom was packed with union members and representatives, who hugged and exchanged smiles after Justice Lee handed down his decision. It comes after Qantas also sold tickets to cancelled flights for several years, triggering more legal turmoil and a AU$100 million (NZ$109.8 million) fine after it was sued by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
NZ Herald
3 days ago
- NZ Herald
Auckland teacher who abused, photographed girls, had prior indecent act convictions
But the Thursday afternoon sentencing at Manukau District Court wasn't the first time Fisher had been before the courts for committing indecencies. A court document obtained by the Herald reveals that in 2002 he was convicted of three counts of committing an indecent act. Despite these convictions, it appears he was able to pass background checks and gain employment at various schools and teaching providers. It is unclear if his convictions were subject to the Clean Slate scheme. EduExperts, the Crimson-'powered', after-school tutoring brand that Fisher worked under, said it was shocked by the revelations and undertaking an urgent investigation. In a statement provided by a public relations representative, the company said Fisher was a contracted teacher at an independently-owned franchisee with a licence to operate under the EduExperts brand. 'Our understanding is that the contracted teacher had been working at [the independent franchisee] since 2019 and his contract was terminated once police commenced an investigation into his conduct. Timothy Fisher pleaded guilty to 14 charges and was sent to prison after sentencing this week in Manukau District Court. Photo / Sylvie Whinray 'As a nationwide and trusted education provider, EduExperts is disappointed by this case and expresses its sympathy to those impacted by the contracted teacher's conduct. The safety and wellbeing of students is our top priority.' The statement said Fisher held a current practising certificate and the independent franchisee had received a positive reference letter from a school where he formerly worked. Franchisees were required to follow strict recruitment processes, including only hiring registered teachers with current practising certificates from the Teaching Council. Any teacher applying for or renewing their practising certificate was required to undergo a police vet, the statement said. 'EduExperts is conducting its own investigation into this case and working with [the franchisee] to review this in detail. Any further questions relating to the case should be directed to police.' 'You see the face but not the heart' The independent franchise owner, who the Herald cannot name for legal reasons, said she was devastated to learn of Fisher's offending and her heart went out to the victims. She said she bought the franchise in 2019. The previous owners told her Fisher held a current teaching licence, provided the school reference letter and 'said they did all the checks'. She was stunned to learn yesterday that Fisher had previous convictions and that some of the offending had happened at the company's premises. 'We feel shock and sorrow. We trust our teachers ... and try our best to keep an eye on everybody.' She said her company had security cameras and had passed all the footage to police. It had co-operated fully since learning Fisher was under investigation last year and immediately dismissed him as a teacher when alerted. She said Fisher was a 'very good' teacher. Learning he was a child sex offender was difficult to comprehend. 'You see the face but not the heart.' Sexual predator 'knows he does have a problem' At the Thursday hearing, Judge Sacha Nepe sentenced Fisher to four years and five months' imprisonment on 14 charges, which included committing indecent acts on children and making objectionable material. She gave him a 25% discount for his guilty plea, 10% for childhood issues raised in his psychiatric report and 5% for the counselling he had undertaken. Judge Sacha Nepe (right) being sworn in as a new judge by Gisborne Judge Hemi Taumanu in May this year. His lawyer, Tim Blackwell, said Fisher 'knows he does have a problem'. Blackwell sought a discount for remorse and told the court some of his client's comments to report writers had been taken out of context. Prosecutor Kristy Li said Fisher told a report writer he did not feel remorseful because he felt the victims were not 'traumatised' by his offending. Judge Nepe sided with Li: 'I am not prepared, Mr Fisher, to give a discount for remorse. I have looked at the material before me… In my view there was an almost justification for the behaviour.' She uplifted his sentence by two months for his prior offending. A place on the sex offender register was automatic. Details of abuse laid out in court A summary of facts says Fisher taught English at two of the franchisee's branches. The youngest victim was 9 and the oldest 14. Almost all of the indecent offending listed on the document occurred at one campus, with the physical offending occurring in February 2024. Fisher indecently abused the young girls in various ways, including touching their buttocks, lower backs, chest, thigh and groin area over clothing. Timothy Fisher was sentenced to four years and five months' imprisonment after pleading guilty to 14 charges. Photo / Sylvie Whinray He tried to photograph one child's groin area and legs from under her desk while she did schoolwork in an undisclosed location. Eight of the nine victims were offended against physically. Judge Nepe said some of the videos Fisher created were made at an unnamed high school he had worked at. On one occasion, Fisher filmed himself masturbating in an undisclosed location next to two female students who were blindfolded and not aware of his actions. Other footage he captured showed unknown prepubescent girls swimming in a public pool while he pleasured himself from inside a sauna. Another video depicted him recording himself masturbating in a classroom at the high school while nearby students were unaware. In a different clip, he filmed himself masturbating with a child on his lap. He also was found in possession of objectionable material, including of adults abusing children. When spoken to by police, he denied indecently assaulting the students but stated he had 'crossed a line' with the girls and 'got too comfortable'. For his most recent offending, Fisher was charged with seven representative counts of committing an indecent act on a child. Each carries a maximum of 10 years' imprisonment. A representative charge means the offending occurred more than once. Police also laid four attempted intimate visual recording charges and one representative indecent act on a young person charge. In addition, Fisher faced a representative charge for possessing objectionable publications and another representative charge for making an objectionable publication. The maximum term for these charges is 10 and 14 years' imprisonment respectively. Detective Senior Sergeant Martin Bienvenu, Counties Manukau CIB, acknowledged the courage of the young people who came forward to report the offending. Asked if Fisher had been subject to the Clean Slate scheme, Bienvenu said he couldn't comment and referred queries to the Ministry of Justice. A Justice Ministry spokeswoman said convictions were automatically concealed under the scheme if the person was eligible. However, the scheme did not extend to people applying for certain jobs or roles. She said the Children's Act required safety checks for people working with children and the Clean Slate Act did not apply to those safety checks. Katie Harris is an Auckland-based journalist who covers issues such as sexual assault, workplace misconduct, media, crime and justice. She joined the Herald in 2020. Lane Nichols is Auckland desk editor for the New Zealand Herald with more than 20 years' experience in the industry. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
