Controversial OPM email server operates 'entirely' on government computers, agency says
Controversial OPM email server operates 'entirely' on government computers, agency says
Show Caption
Hide Caption
DOGE accesses government payment system, reports New York Times
Elon Musk was reportedly given access to the Treasury's payment system, which contains the personal information of millions of Americans.
The controversial email system used by Elon Musk and his associates to simultaneously contact all federal employees for the first time operates "entirely on government computers" and contrary to news reports does not use a non-government server, officials with the Office of Personnel Management said in a court filing Wednesday.
An attorney representing unnamed OPM employees asked a judge on Jan. 27 to issue a temporary restraining order halting the system as it represented a grave security risk to roughly 2 million executive branch and judicial branch employees, along with an unknown number of contractors.
The email system was developed and installed without the required Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA), Kelly McClanahan, the executive director of the National Security Counselors publicinterest law firm, argued in a complaint.
The PIA was not necessary since the system only deals with federal employee data, government lawyers said in a February 5 court filing, which included a PIA dated February 5 that said the system, dubbed the "Government-Wide Email System (GWES)," collects federal employee names, their government email addresses, and "short, voluntary email responses.
The filing comes amid growing concern that Musk and his associates are flouting security protocols when handling personal information and data as they work to cut staff acrossthe U.S. government.
The Democratic members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, along with Sen. Angus King, an independent from Maine, on Wednesday demanded answers from White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles about how the White House has vetted staff working on Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) efforts, including the OPM email system, and how security considerations have factored in.
"No information has been provided to Congress or the public as to who has been formally hired under DOGE, under what authority or regulations DOGE is operating, or how DOGE isvetting and monitoring its staff and representatives before providing them with seemingly unfettered access to classified materials and Americans' personal information," the senatorssaid in a letter.
The PIA listed Senior Advisor to the Director Riccardo Biasini as the system's contact point and was signed by Greg Hogan, the agency's chief information officer. Biasini is a former engineer at Tesla and most recently a director at The Boring Company, Musk's tunnel-building operation in Las Vegas.
It's not clear whether the "government computers" are new or existing OPM infrastructure. An OPM spokesperson declined to comment.
McClanahan argued the system contains "vast quantities" of personally identifiable information "which are more susceptible to cyberattacks than the pre-existing OPM systems.'
The suit cited an anonymous Reddit post saying someone "walked into our building and plugged in an email server to our network" to send the emails. An anonymous OPM staffer told the Musk Watch newsletter on Feb. 3 that the server was "a piece of commercial hardware they believed was not obtained through the proper federal procurement process."
McClanahan did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.Contributing: Karen Freifeld, Reuters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New York Becomes First State to Require Employers Disclose When Layoffs Are Due to AI
If you lose your job as part of mass layoffs at your company because your boss believes an artificial intelligence model can do your work instead, they will have to start filing more paperwork disclosing the decision. That is according to a new law in New York state that requires employers to disclose if mass layoffs — which is defined as 50 or more workers — were due to AI. The change to New York's Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) system went into effect in March, but has received little coverage since then; Bloomberg was the first major outlet to report on the change on Thursday. Now, employers have to fill out a form at least 90 days before a mass layoff round, according to New York law, and check a box if the cuts are due to 'technological innovation or automation.' If that box is checked, the employers then go to another screen on the WARN website where they have to specify whether AI or another technology is the reason for the cuts. New York is the first state with such a law. Other states have looked to put safeguards in place against AI replacing workers, including in California, which had a law go into effect at the start of 2025 which protects actors from having their likeness used by AI models without informed consent; California also passed a similar law last year that requires the estates of dead actors and performers to give clearance for AI models to use their likeness. The new law in New York comes as AI's rapid rise has led to questions over which jobs are safe in a number of fields. This has been an issue in the media world as of late, where a number of outlets, like Axel Springer and News Corp. have signed content licensing deals with OpenAI, the parent company of ChatGPT. Editorial staff at some outlets have said they are concerned about newsrooms growing too cozy with AI models; the Vox Media Union, for example, called for protections to be put in place for writers at outlets like New York Magazine and The Verge so that their jobs would not be taken by AI bots. That concern is a common one in the U.S. A Pew Research Center survey earlier this year found 52% of Americans were 'worried' about AI in the workplace, compared to 36% who said they were 'hopeful' about it. The post New York Becomes First State to Require Employers Disclose When Layoffs Are Due to AI appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Undo President: Trump Gets Country Off Wrong Track
Americans are usually an optimistic people - except when it comes to our countrys future. Right-track/wrong-track surveys have long found yawning gaps favoring the dark view. The RealClearPolitics poll average, stretching back to 2009, reports no point with a positive majority but several where the spread was 40 or even 50 points to the negative. When Donald Trump was sworn in last January, the wrong-track view held sway by 30 points. Followers of the news - which presents the presidents first months in office as a kleptocratic frenzy marked by destructive economic policies and naked assaults on the Constitution - would expect these numbers to have subsequently cracked the oceans bottom. But, lo and behold, the wrong-track/right-track gap has shrunk to nine points. Its still in negative territory, but that is the tightest gap since April 2021 (minus 6.5), when the COVID vaccine offered hope that we might return to normal. We did, in a way, as the gap quickly shot back up, peaking at minus 57 in July 2022. The recent positive poll numbers are just a snapshot in time. They might change tomorrow. They do not reflect an algorithms assessment of thousands of firm data points but the fluid psychological state - the vibe, to take the Democrats once favorite phrase - of the people. Still, the near-historic rise in optimism recorded by established polls is significant. It can also be a little confounding given Trumps ridiculously harsh press coverage and the fact that material conditions have not dramatically improved during the last five months. Indeed, a key story of Trumps second term is the difficulty he and the GOP Congress are having passing his agenda. Whats driving the vibe shift? Americas drive for innovation and the progressive domination of the intelligentsia have led us to judge presidencies by their forward-looking plans to get America on the right track. We remember what our leaders built. Trumps secret sauce so far has been his focus on the other side of the equation - dismantling past actions that sent us down the wrong track. Trump may not be a classic conservative, but, like Ronald Reagan, much of his success at home has been rooted in subtraction rather than addition. Trump is a reactionary in the best sense of the word. He has been more "undo" than "can do." The Biden administration gave his wrecking ball plenty of targets. His efforts to reverse the Biden administrations embrace of open borders and its insistence that males be allowed to compete against women seek a return to the way things used to be. His deployment of troops to quell the LA riots is not a strong mans push to silence dissent but a commitment - lost in both the BLM riots of 2020 and the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol - to the principle that we should not express our political discontent through violence. The same spirit informs his efforts to reform higher education. He is not trying to destroy Harvard, Columbia, and other elite schools. He is seeking to restore their pivotal role as safe spaces for the free exchange of ideas. His efforts to limit the number of foreign students - 25% of whom come from our main adversary, China - aim to reassert the basic point that even our private institutions should, on the whole, serve our countrys interests. Yes, many Americans have concerns about how Trump is pursuing these aims. The devil is always in the details. But the shrunken right-track/wrong-track gap suggests the broad sense across the country that he is moving the country in the right direction by moving us off the wrong track. Anecdotal evidence suggests that even some of his opponents are quietly pleased by some of his more controversial actions. I recently asked a very liberal friend who "fears and despises" Trump whether she supports his opposition to birthright citizenship. "I support the Constitution," she replied. After telling her I wanted to wait for the Supreme Court to definitively answer that question, I asked her: "If we were writing the Constitution from scratch today, should we enshrine the idea that anybody born on our soil is automatically a citizen?" "Of course not," she said, without missing a beat. Taking a step back, it seems fair to say she is not unhappy that he is asking the question. Likewise, she does not support his efforts to cut the federal government, but she is happy that hes refocused attention on the deficit and debt. The right-track/wrong-track numbers show that Americans have recognized that things were amiss in our nations capital. The vibe has shifted because of Trumps willingness to challenge many assumptions of governance and sacred cows. Will it last? Who knows. Getting us off the wrong track is a key first step; moving us on to the right track may be harder still. J. Peder Zane is an editor for RealClearInvestigations and a columnist for RealClearPolitics. Follow him on X @jpederzane.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘No Kings' protests planned in multiple South Dakota cities
Nicole Preble holds a sign during a protest against the Trump administration on April 23, 2025, in Rapid City. (Seth Tupper/South Dakota Searchlight) Nationwide protests against the Trump administration are planned this Saturday, including in at least eight South Dakota cities. 'No Kings' is the theme of the protests, which will coincide with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, Flag Day and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary military parade in Washington, D.C. The D.C. events will cost an estimated $25 million to $45 million, according to Army spokesperson Heather Hagan, though the price tag for the parade alone was not specified. Protest organizers are calling attention to what they describe as the Trump administration's authoritarian overreach. 'They've defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services,' the No Kings website reads. 'The corruption has gone too far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings.' The No Kings website lists the following protests planned in South Dakota: Spearfish: 11 a.m. Mountain time at North Main Street and West Jackson Street. Rapid City: noon Mountain at 300 Sixth Street. Pierre: 12:30 p.m. Central at 500 E. Capitol Ave. Watertown: 11 a.m. Central at 211 E. Kemp Ave. Brookings: 1 p.m. at Sixth Street and 17th Avenue. Sioux Falls: 11 a.m. Central at 300 N. Minnesota Ave. Yankton: 10:30 a.m. Central at 2000 Douglas Ave. Chamberlain: 10 a.m. Central at 100 King Street and Main Street. 'No Kings' is part of the 50501 Movement, founded to protest the Trump administration. Partners include the American Civil Liberties Union, 350 Action, Climate Defenders, Greenpeace, Human Rights Campaign, Vote Save America and many other advocacy groups. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
