North Korea opens massive beach resort to boost tourism
North Korea has opened a massive "world-class cultural resort" on its eastern coast, state media said on Wednesday.
The Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) shared images of tourists enjoying the beach in swimwear as the tourist zone opened to domestic visitors on Tuesday.
"The guests' hearts were filled with overwhelming emotion as they felt the astonishing new heights of our-style tourism culture blossoming under the era of the Workers' Party," KCNA said.
The agency said tourists were "astonished by the grandeur and splendor of the tourist city, which can accommodate nearly 20,000 people.
South Korean media referred to the Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area as "North Korea's Waikiki."
What is the significance of the project?
Analysts say North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is very keen on developing the tourism industry, especially the coastal areas. The Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area is believed to be one of his pet projects.
Kim said construction of the site would go down as "one of the greatest successes this year" and that Pyongyang will build more large-scale tourist zones.
Images of Kim with his daughter Ju Ae and wife Ri Sol Ju watching a man flying off a water slide in the resort were shared days ahead of the opening.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
Russian tourists are also expected to visit the zone from July 7 for an 8-day trip which includes a visit to Pyongyang, as per a statement from Russia's Primorsky region.
South Korea's Unification Ministry said the site is expected to expand over time. But given limited transportation to the destination via Pyongyang, the resort is "likely to remain small in scale," with around 170 visitors per day.
Experts say Pyongyang has received some aid from Russia to develop this site, in exchange for help with Moscow's war in Ukraine.
What kind of tourism does North Korea get?
For North Korea, tourism is potentially a good source of acquiring foreign currency.
After remaining closed since the COVID-19 pandemic, North Korea finally opened its borders to visitors. But even before that, the number of foreign tourists was very limited.
Chinese tourists made up about 90 percent of visitors with only about 5,000 western tourists being allowed. But Chinese tourists seem to have stayed away as questions remain about ties between Beijing and Pyongyang.
After the pandemic, Russian tourists were only allowed last year and Western tourists briefly returned in February 2025.
US tourists used to make up about 20 percent of foreign tourists. But Washington banned travel to North Korea after the imprisonment and death of student Otto Warmbier.
South Koreans travelled to Mount Kumgang at the border until 2008, when a tourist was shot dead by a North Korean soldier.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Chinese stocks edge up to seven-month high
Chinese stocks were supported amid choppy trades as investors awaited the monthly US nonfarm payroll data. China's Shanghai Composite index added 0.18% to 3,461.15 as the Trump administration lifted recent export license requirements for chip design software sales in China. The overall mood still remains positive for the Chinese equities and the benchmark index has hit seven-month high now, marking a gain of around 3% over last one month.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
No Chinese engineers in Indian iPhone unit: What all China is doing to stop manufacturing switch
China is strategically curbing exports and talent flow to disrupt India's manufacturing rise, using rare earths, fertilisers and supply chain controls as tools of economic pressure read more As India pushes forward in its bid to become a leading global manufacturing hub, China appears to be deploying a variety of strategic measures to resist the shift in global supply chains, particularly from its own factories to those of its southern neighbour. While the global trend dubbed 'China Plus One' encourages diversification away from Chinese manufacturing, recent developments indicate that Beijing is intent on using every lever at its disposal—be it materials, manpower or regulation—to slow India's rise. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Strategic withdrawal of talent Perhaps the most visible recent example of Chinese obstructionism is the reported forced withdrawal of more than 300 Chinese engineers from Foxconn's iPhone manufacturing unit in India. These engineers, previously deployed to help Indian teams ramp up production of Apple's upcoming iPhone 17, were allegedly recalled due to Beijing's direct pressure, according to a report by News18 citing top intelligence sources. The move, seen as a disruption aimed at undercutting Apple's Indian supply chain expansion serves to send a broader message to multinational companies that relocating manufacturing to India may invite covert Chinese retaliation. Though Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo later downplayed the strategic impact of this pullout, emphasising that Taiwanese teams had built most of the critical capacity, it remains symbolically significant. It shows China's willingness to exert non-market pressure even at the expense of its own nationals working abroad to preserve its manufacturing dominance, a report in The Economic Times said. Export restrictions: A new arsenal of economic pressure China's control over key raw materials, particularly rare earth elements, has long given it substantial leverage over global industries. This control is now being weaponised to disrupt India's manufacturing ambitions. In April 2025, China introduced stricter export licensing requirements for seven rare earth elements, delaying shipments critical to India's electric vehicle (EV), electronics and defence sectors. Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri raised this issue directly with Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Sun Weidong in Jun,e reflecting the seriousness of the disruption. Despite this diplomatic engagement, dozens of Indian shipments remained stalled at Chinese ports. This is not an isolated friction. The broader geopolitical undercurrents reveal a strategic intent behind these export denials. Reports indicate that while countries like Japan and South Korea have begun receiving export licenses, India has been selectively denied or subjected to prolonged scrutiny. Some suspect that Beijing's reluctance stems not only from geopolitical tension but also from India's growing alignment with the United States and its tightening restrictions on Chinese firms post-2020. Magnets and markets: The rare earth crisis The situation with rare earth magnets highlights the extent of India's vulnerability. China controls more than 85 per cent of global rare earth processing and over 80 per cent of India's rare earth magnet imports. These magnets are indispensable in EVs, electronics, wind turbines and defence systems. With shipments stalled since April, Indian automakers warned that EV production might halt by July due to depleted inventories. A delegation of 20 executives from India's automobile industry even visited Beijing to resolve the issue, backed by India's commerce ministry. The government has responded by preparing a Rs 3,500–5,000 crore Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme to support domestic magnet manufacturing. According to The Economic Times, companies like Sona Comstar have already announced plans to start local production, reflecting the urgency of building resilience in critical components. Agriculture as a battleground While industrial sectors feel the pinch, Indian agriculture is also under pressure due to China's complete halt of speciality fertiliser exports. China has been progressively tightening fertiliser exports to India for the past five years, but the latest freeze is the most severe. India imports nearly 80 per cent of its speciality fertilisers, such as water-soluble, micronutrient, and nano fertilisers from China. These products are critical for fruit and vegetable farming and are increasingly replacing traditional fertilisers. Rajib Chakraborty, president of the Soluble Fertiliser Industry Association, told Financial Express that the complete halt is due to Beijing's opaque non-inspection policies that effectively block shipments without officially banning them. This has jeopardised India's crop cycles and food production. Despite increasing demand, domestic production remains infeasible due to low volumes and technological gaps, although companies are now exploring investments in local manufacturing. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Weaponising supply chains Beyond raw materials and labour, China is also exploiting regulatory choke points to interfere in supply chains. Chinese authorities now demand highly sensitive business information, including production workflows, customer lists, images of factories and product blueprints as part of the export approval process for rare earths and magnets. This, as reported by the Financial Times, has raised alarm among Western and Indian firms about data security and potential commercial espionage. Executives like Frank Eckard of Magnosphere and Andrea Pratesi of Italy's B&C Speakers describe how companies must now submit extensive proprietary data to Chinese authorities to receive export permissions. The Chinese commerce ministry's guidelines for dual-use exports go beyond standard protocols, even asking for visual evidence of the end-user's application, creating major concerns about intellectual property theft and business confidentiality. Such data demands highlight how China's export policies are increasingly tied to its strategic intent to monitor and potentially undermine foreign competitors. A broader economic strategy against India Viewed in totality, these measures reflect a broader economic strategy to thwart India's rise as a manufacturing rival. China has wielded its control over supply chains to impose a series of strategic bottlenecks from export restrictions and fertiliser freezes to labour withdrawals and regulatory roadblocks. As The Economic Times noted, these are not arbitrary actions but part of a low-intensity economic campaign, designed to erode confidence in India as a stable alternative to Chinese manufacturing. China's motivations are twofold. First, India's assertive post-Galwan policies, including bans on Chinese apps, restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) and exclusion of Huawei and ZTE from 5G trials have significantly reduced Beijing's economic leverage. These retaliatory measures may be Beijing's way of reasserting control. Second, and more fundamentally, China seeks to preempt the global narrative shift from 'Make in China' to 'Make in India'. India's response Yet China's aggressive stance may be backfiring. While these disruptions have revealed India's current vulnerabilities, they are also catalysing long-overdue reforms and investments in supply chain independence. The Indian government has launched multiple PLI schemes across 14 sectors, from semiconductors and electronics to EVs and pharmaceuticals, to reduce reliance on China. These initiatives have already made India the second-largest mobile phone manufacturer in the world. India is also pursuing diplomatic avenues to secure alternative suppliers. Deals with countries like Australia, Vietnam, Kazakhstan and several African nations are underway to diversify sources of rare earths and speciality fertilisers. At the same time, India is negotiating trade agreements with Western powers, such as the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom to unlock new markets and investment channels. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Efforts are also being made to enhance the domestic talent pool. India is investing heavily in skilling programmes for engineering and technical manpower to substitute for the kind of talent China had previously supplied. The void left by Chinese engineers in operations like Foxconn's may in fact accelerate India's push for indigenous expertise. Pressure as a catalyst for change While China's tactics may temporarily slow India's manufacturing momentum, they also serve to highlight the shifting contours of global economic power. The move to recall engineers, restrict material exports and demand sensitive business data all reveal a deeper insecurity within Beijing about its fading monopoly over global manufacturing. They reflect an awareness that the world's supply chains are beginning to reorient and that India is becoming central to that realignment. India's manufacturing ecosystem remains young, but it is evolving rapidly, shaped by domestic ambition, global trust and strategic necessity. China's attempt to derail this trajectory may well become the very pressure that forces India to become more resilient, more diversified and ultimately, more independent. If India can handle this critical phase with foresight and resolve, it will not just withstand China's pressure, it may emerge from it significantly stronger.
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trade unions stage protest at Vijayamohini Mills
A joint committee of various trade unions of the Vijayamohini Mills, a unit of National Textile Corporation (NTC) in Thiruvananthapuram, staged a protest at the mill on Wednesday by blocking the entry of the company management. The workers staged the protest raising various demands including the reopening of the mill which has remained closed for five years since the COVID-19 outbreak and the payment of pending salaries and other benefits. The protest ended with the management promising to take up the issues with the NTC. Mill workers affiliated to the Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU), Indian National Trade Union Congress (INTUC) and Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS) took part in the protest. M.T. Antony, secretary of the Trivandrum Textile Workers' Union, affiliated to the CITU, said that the workers will take over the mill's lands to carry out farming if their demands are not met within the stipulated time.
