US preparing to evacuate embassy in Iraq over security risks, sources say
BAGHDAD/WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The United States is preparing to evacuate its Iraqi embassy due to heightened security risks in the region, three U.S. and two Iraqi sources said on Wednesday while a U.S. official said military dependents could also leave Bahrain.
The sources did not specify which security risks had prompted the decision to evacuate and the State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened to strike Iran if stuttering talks over its nuclear programme fail and on Wednesday he said he was growing less confident that Tehran would agree to stop enriching uranium, a key American demand.
Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said Iran would hit U.S. bases if the nuclear talks failed, leading to war.
"The State Department is set to have an ordered departure for (the) U.S. embassy in Baghdad. The intent is to do it through commercial means, but the U.S. military is standing by if help is requested," a U.S. official said.
An Iraqi foreign ministry official said a "partial evacuation" of U.S. embassy staff had been confirmed due to what the official termed "potential security concerns related to possible regional tensions".
U.S. military dependents in Bahrain can temporarily depart due to the heightened regional tensions, a U.S. official told Reuters.
Another U.S. official said that there was no change in operations at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, the largest U.S. military base in the Middle East and that no evacuation order had been issued for employees or families linked to the U.S. embassy in Qatar, which was operating as usual.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
8 minutes ago
- New York Post
Ignore the blowhard activists— keep horse carriages in Central Park
It's amazing how much manure is produced by the elite interests trying to bully horse carriages out of Central Park. The latest is Central Park Conservancy President Betsy Smith coming out in favor of a City Council bill to ban the carriages citywide. 'With visitation to the park growing to record levels,' she claims, the ban is 'a matter of public health and safety for park visitors.' Advertisement In other words: Add the Conservancy to the long list of local nonprofits playing politics. In fact, it's been making life harder for the horses and their trade for years now: The CPC's recent street-markings update failed 'to designate a mixed-use lane for carriages to use as there had been,' notes Pete Donohue, president of Transport Workers Union of America, the union that reps the carriage drivers. Animal-welfare extremists and other ideologues have been trying to put the horses and their 200 carriage drivers and stable hands out of work for years. Advertisement But those blue-collar, largely immigrant or first-generation American workers don't matter to the well-paid leaders of the park nonprofit, nor to the City Council members backing the ban. As for safety in the park: Puh-leaze. Smith cites two recent incidents where horses got free from their drivers and ran loose through the park, resulting in a handful of injuries. That's nothing compared to the 522 bike-involved collisions, with one fatality, reported in the park from 2018 to 2022. Advertisement Not to mention the menace of heavier, faster, more dangerous e-bikes and e-scooters — plus the scandal-plagued pedicabs: Why isn't Smith demanding they get barred from the park? Carriage-haters seem to imagine the horses would otherwise roam free in fields somewhere, but now suffer horribly doing work . . . they've been bred for generations to do. Nor is there any evidence of true, systemic mistreatment in the carriage industry — only one-off stories distorted to stir up fury. Advertisement Last week, for example a mare named Lady died while on the way back to her stable in Hell's Kitchen, kicking off another round of outrage — when she actually died of a small tumor in her adrenal gland, not any abuse. There's no cause to completely ban a favorite tourist activity, which is undoubtedly a draw for those record visitors Smith brags about. The City Council shouldn't heed the high-horse panic-mongers seeking to kill a tradition that dates back nearly two centuries. Let the horses keep clomping through Central Park.
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
NIH director offers reason for cutting vaccine contracts
Bhattacharya said in a recent episode of the podcast 'War Room' and then again in an opinion piece in The Washington Post, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) chose to cancel millions of dollars in mRNA contracts because the American public does not trust the technology. His reasoning differs from the explanation HHS Secretary Kennedy gave for canceling $500 million worth of mRNA contracts last week. Kennedy justified the move by claiming the technology does not meet 'current scientific standards.' Bhattacharya called mRNA a promising technology that could lead to better treatments for diseases like cancer. But he expressed concern over just how much antigen mRNA vaccines produce and leave in the body, even though other types of vaccines share the same issue and are considered safe and effective. Bhattacharya blamed public distrust in mRNA on vaccine mandates and other public health safety measures issued under the Biden administration, arguing that his administration did not properly address concerns about the vaccine's safety and efficacy. 'As a vaccine intended for broad public use, especially during a public health emergency, the platform has failed a crucial test: earning public trust,' he wrote. 'No matter how elegant the science, a platform that lacks credibility among the people it seeks to protect cannot fulfill its public health mission.' outspoken critic of lockdown measures and vaccine mandates.
Politico
39 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump tells European leaders US could provide security guarantees for Ukraine
Trump's openness to such guarantees — a key demand for both Ukraine and Europe — help explain the cautious optimism European officials have expressed after the conversation and ahead of Friday's meeting. Trump did not specify what he meant by security guarantees and only discussed the broader concept, the person briefed on the call said. Trump recognizes that an American security guarantee must be part of a final settlement and sees the U.S. as playing a role in that, the British official said. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Trump's openness to an American role in a security guarantee. Whatever the security guarantees may be, Trump has made clear that the U.S. will not continue to provide weapons or troops directly to Ukraine, though he will sell weapons to Europe to be used by Kyiv. It also is likely to be limited — and is sure to disappoint Ukraine's backers who want more robust assurances from the U.S. to deter Russia from invading Ukraine again once the fighting is over. While European and Ukrainian officials feel that Trump has taken their advice into account and is seeking a ceasefire, they are wary of what will happen when Trump and Putin are alone together.
