Pharmacy Benefit Manager reform bill to be debated
DES MOINES, Iowa — As the end of the 2025 legislative session is near, the PBM reform bill is still waiting for its fate.
Pharmacists across the state have championed a bill that would reform the practices of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), or the middlemen between pharmacies and insurance companies. PBMs determine the total drug costs for insurers, shape patients' access to medications, and determine how much pharmacies are paid.
In 2024, 31 pharmacies in 22 counties closed in the state of Iowa, according to the Iowa Pharmacy Association (IPA), and an estimated 955,000 Iowans have been affected by these closures.
These closures are largely the result of PBM practices, including not being reimbursed at fair rates. PBMs often pay pharmacies less money than it costs for the pharmacy to purchase drugs and distribute prescriptions. This was the case for pharmacies in Oskaloosa, Minden, Colfax, and Eagle Grove.
Rob Sand announces run for Iowa governor
The legislation proposed this session would require PBMs to reimburse pharmacies for their cost and enable patients to choose the pharmacy they want to receive care from.
The bill is on the Monday debate schedule for the Iowa House of Representatives.
An amendment to the bill was proposed by State Representative Bill Gustoff of District 40 on Monday morning.
State Representative and pharmacist Brett Barker of District 51 opposes the amendment and said it's detrimental to pharmacies in Iowa.
'It guts the bill. It strikes the core provisions. It actually is a reimbursement increase on your smallest pharmacies, so it's something that absolutely does not help small pharmacies. It would be a step backwards from current law and I'm absolutely advocating against it,' he said.
Over 100 pharmacists were at the State House Monday morning, speaking with lawmakers as they entered. Many were optimistic until they heard news about the amendment.
Heidi Van Buren was one of them. She said PBM reform is necessary to keep her pharmacy open.
'I feel like I'm carrying a rock going into a sword fight,' she said. 'If I sign the current contract that [a PBM] has sent to us, my pharmacy will be closed within months.'
Representative Gustoff did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the amendment.
Both the original bill and the amended bill will be debated on Monday. Whichever is passed will head to Governor Kim Reynolds' desk.
Congressman Randy Feenstra files paperwork hinting he may run for governor
Pharmacy Benefit Manager reform bill to be debated
Fire causes 'significant' damage to Raccoon River Valley Bike Trail bridge in Adel
Rob Sand announces run for Iowa governor
Before they name a 2028 nominee, Democrats will have to decide which state will weigh in first
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
8 minutes ago
- Fox News
NY lawmaker lambastes failed commemoration of Oct 7 attack, as Dem leadership accused of 'antisemitism'
The New York assemblyman behind an effort to formally commemorate the Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack in Israel lambasted leadership for tanking what was supposed to be a "poignant" bill remembering the tragedy. Assemblyman Lester Chang, R-Brooklyn – one of the few GOP members from New York City in the 103-47 Democratic-majority chamber – said he had been working on a resolution for New York state to officially remember the terror attack since hostage negotiations began a year ago. "I'm a Navy veteran of 24 years and I did a tour in Afghanistan. So I understand what war is all about," said Chang. "I've seen atrocities out there." Once American figures like then-candidate Donald Trump began helping hostage negotiations, Chang said he directed his staff to craft a message – which he said took more than a month of back-and-forth to make sure it was "balanced" and did not have a partisan streak. "We submitted it in January, as a resolution, and it was rejected… because [leadership] said it was 'controversial,'" Chang said. "We were astounded but not surprised. So we converted it to a bill," he said, adding that, in the end, a bill would be better because a resolution only commemorates an event for that year, while a bill would codify the remembrance for eternity. With a handful of Democratic co-sponsors, Chang and colleagues believed they had the right balance to attempt to put it up for a vote, but as the New York Post reported, it was reportedly ultimately blocked by House Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, and other top Democrats. Chang said the bill, destined for the smaller governmental operations committee, was redirected to the larger Ways and Means committee, and that four members were "switched out." The top Republican on that panel, Assemblyman Ed Ra, told the New York Post that remembering Oct. 7 and/or combating antisemitism should never be "political." Republican Assemblyman Ari Brown, who, like Ra, represents Long Island, accused Albany Democrats of "veiled antisemitism," telling the Post the legislature is "rotten" with it. The assembly also tanked a resolution from Brown that complimented Chang's bill. Compounding that was, as Chang described, no GOP bills have been successfully put through the process at all this session. "Having me as a Republican [sponsor] – that would [procedurally] choke them – not because of me, the person, but as a member of that party." Chang said he would just as soon "give this bill to a Democrat" to sponsor if it meant commemorating the Oct. 7 attack. He added that, as a person of Chinese ancestry who represents largely Asian and Italian Bensonhurst, he has no religious horse in the race. "That should make it more poignant as a non-Jewish person pushing this bill in a mostly Christian and Buddhist district," he said. At least seven Democrats did come out in support of the Oct. 7 remembrance legislation, all of whom hail from New York City. Senate Minority Leader Rob Ortt, R-Niagara Falls, echoed Chang's concerns in comments to Fox News Digital. "Many New Yorkers had loved ones injured or worse in the terror attacks in Israel on Oct. 7," Ortt said. "The least we can do is commemorate this tragic day." "Instead of taking commonsense action, Albany Democrats would rather play politics, and have time and again refused to defend our Jewish brothers and sisters." Fox News Digital reached out to Heastie for comment and response to the allegations but did not hear back.
Fox News
12 minutes ago
- Fox News
Non-citizen LA rioters could be deported under new House bill
FIRST ON FOX: Some House Republicans are now considering whether non-citizens who are found to have participated in violent anti-law enforcement riots have a right to stay in the United States. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, is leading a bill that would make non-U.S. citizens convicted of "actual or attempted assault, battery, or use of force" against any law enforcement officer eligible for deportation. Any immigrants deported under the legislation, if enacted, would be permanently barred from the United States. "The thing about breaking the law is, there's effectively a waiving of your constitutional rights that's sort of inherent in our system, right? When you go to prison, you're losing your liberty," Crenshaw told Fox News Digital in an interview Tuesday. "So this is a very normal thing, and in the case of say, people who are here legally, but then committing acts of violence – in this case, we're being really specific, during a national emergency, committing assaults against police officers, and destruction of property – that should have an effect and be on the list of things that allows for revocation of your status." Early bill text obtained by Fox News Digital shows the bill would apply to legal permanent residents, people here illegally, and beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy. It would go into effect when presidents, governors or local leaders make emergency or major disaster declarations. It comes amid continued tensions in Los Angeles, where protests against Immigrations and Customs Enforcement operations turned violent across the city this weekend. Rioters were seen burning American flags and cars stood on the street in flames, while police used pepper spray and rubber bullets on crowds outside federal buildings. President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard despite the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and ordered 700 U.S. Marines to Los Angeles as well. Those Marines will be training in Seal Beach for a few more days before deployment, a U.S. defense official told Fox News. Democrats have accused the Trump administration of escalating violence in Los Angeles, while Republicans argue that federal action is necessary based on the state's handling of the situation. Crenshaw said his legislation would help the administration restore order during such times. "What it would do is, it would give the administration the option to say, yeah we've rounded all these people up, half of them are U.S. citizens, okay, you're going to jail for rioting. Maybe another quarter are illegals, well that's easy you can deport them," he said. "But what about the other quarter? You know, that might be…a number of legal aliens here rioting against America for enforcing our immigration laws. In our minds, you've violated that sort of social contract with the United States at that point." Crenshaw said he spoke with the White House and that officials there were "excited" about the bill. The White House said it would not get in front of the president on legislative matters when reached for comment by Fox News Digital. Currently, legal U.S. residents, including green card holders, can have their status revoked by an immigration judge if they are found guilty of certain crimes or are found to have fraudulently misrepresented themselves in their application for residence. Crimes that would make legal U.S. visa holders and green card holders eligible for deportation currently include murder, drug trafficking and rape.
Politico
22 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump's research budget plan hits the ringer
WASHINGTON WATCH NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya offered a lukewarm defense of the 40 percent cut the Trump administration has proposed for his agency during testimony before a Senate Appropriations panel Tuesday. Asked to defend the administration's fiscal 2026 budget plan, which also calls for a major agency reorganization, Bhattacharya repeatedly demurred, saying 'the budget is a collaboration between Congress and the administration.' Bhattcharya also distanced himself from President Donald Trump's fight with universities and Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, which led a cost-cutting campaign before Bhattacharya's March confirmation. Bhattacharya called that period — when the NIH proposed to cap the rates it pays university grantees to cover their administrative costs, laid off hundreds of probationary workers, and began an assault on universities Trump accuses of anti-semitism — 'a very bumpy time.' His testimony annoyed Democrats. In one representative exchange, Illinois' Dick Durbin asked Bhattacharya to take responsibility for Trump's move to freeze funding for Northwestern University, based in a Chicago suburb, leading to a tense back-and-forth. 'The buck stops in your office,' Durbin said. 'I know it does,' Bhattacharya responded. Why it matters: Bhattacharya is under fire from Democrats and many of his own employees for the cuts the administration has already made, which include about 2,500 jobs, and slowed grant funding that's reduced awards given out by $1.6 billion compared to last year. He's sought to reassure them that now that he's in charge further agency moves will be more carefully considered and that funding will again flow, though some of the grantees will be different. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. Doctors and their spouses go to the emergency room 20 percent less often than others, a Harvard study found. Why? Doctors can write their own prescriptions. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Danny Nguyen at dnguyen@ Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: Dannyn516.70, CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. WORLDVIEW GOP lawmakers are pushing back on President Donald Trump's proposed cuts to the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, our Meredith Lee Hill reports. It's one of the first signals that the Republicans who control Congress aren't happy with everything Trump's Department of Government Efficiency did and aren't likely to rubber stamp Trump's fiscal 2026 budget proposal. State of play: The disagreement over PEPFAR stems from Trump's request that Congress rescind $400 million in money it has already asked the administration to spend on global health programs. That includes some funding for the HIV and AIDS relief program. Then-President George W. Bush created PEPFAR in 2003 and it's since been credited with saving 25 million lives, mostly in Africa. In order to shore up support for the rescission package, White House officials have conveyed to GOP leaders that they will not only maintain life-saving treatments under PEPFAR but will also — in response to concerns from more than a dozen House Republicans — preserve some prevention programs as well, according to three people granted anonymity to discuss the private assurances. Speaker Mike Johnson's whip team conveyed the altered plans in conversations and text messages with lawmakers, our Meredith Lee Hill reports. Even so: White House budget director Russ Vought told appropriators last week that the Trump administration wants to take 'an analytical look' at 'the prevention itself' and instead fund 'life-saving treatment' for people with AIDS. But Vought said the White House is still planning to scale down PEPFAR and other programs. 'It is something that our budget will be very trim on,' Vought said of funding AIDS prevention work, 'because we believe that many of these nonprofits are not geared towards the viewpoints of the administration. And we're $37 trillion in debt. So at some point, the continent of Africa needs to absorb more of the burden of providing this health care.'
