Southern Water receives further £1.2bn equity injection to bolster finances
The plans come as part of a deal that will also see the debt owed to Southern Water's holding company lenders slashed by more than half.
Southern Water, which supplies 4.7 million people across the south and south-east of England, has amassed nearly £9 billion of debt – making it one of the most heavily indebted water firms in the UK behind Thames Water.
It has seen its credit rating downgraded amid fears that it may break the conditions of its lending agreements.
But the firm's lenders have agreed to write down debt under the latest support package, reducing it debt mounting from £865 million to £415 million.
Lawrence Gosden, chief executive of Southern Water, said: 'Every penny of this equity raise will go directly towards delivering the largest growth investment programme in the sector relative to its size, for the benefit of our customers and the environment.
'This follows £1.65 billion of equity already invested by Macquarie, since 2021.
'Taken together with the reduction in debt, and no forecast dividends for the 2025-30 regulatory period, the new investment will directly support Southern Water's financial resilience and improving performance.'
Macquarie had already committed in February to £900 million of new equity into Southern Water, up from the £650 million it had previously pledged.
Southern Water is among six water firms urging regulators to allow them to charge customers even more than previously granted.
The group had already been allowed a 53% increase to average bills over the next five years by Ofwat, but is appealing to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to have this reviewed.
Macquarie said the amount of equity investment under the second tranche, which is due by December, is partially dependent on the CMA's decision on the appeal, but will be a minimum of £245 million.
Southern Water has also come under recent fire over its environmental track record and its top bosses have been banned from receiving bonuses for the past financial year – alongside senior executives at five other water suppliers.
They have all been banned under new rules which prevent bonuses from being paid if a water company does not meet environmental or consumer standards, does not meet financial resilience requirements, or is convicted of a criminal offence.
Southern and the other five companies were found to have committed the most serious so-called Category 1 pollution breaches.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
12 hours ago
- Reuters
Moody's raises Southern Water's outlook after Macquarie's $1.63 billion boost
July 3 (Reuters) - Ratings agency Moody's on Thursday raised Southern Water's outlook to stable from a review for downgrade, after the British water utility secured an equity lifeline from Australia's Macquarie and a credit refinancing to avert a debt crisis. Moody's also confirmed Southern Water's rating at 'Ba1'. The firm's bonds were up on Thursday, adding to the sharp jump they saw after a consortium led by Macquarie Asset Management agreed to inject up to 1.2 billion pounds ($1.64 billion) in Southern Water on Tuesday. While the utility faces performance penalties from Britain's water regulator and potential cost overruns, the equity injection provides Southern Water with enough buffer to maintain its credit quality, Moody's said in a report. ($1 = 0.7331 pounds)
BBC News
14 hours ago
- BBC News
Tankers brought in to help 'keep taps flowing' in Surrey
Tankers have been brought in to "help keep taps flowing" for customers in a part of Surrey, a water company has said. Thames Water said hot weather and high demand were presenting "challenges" in maintaining water supplies in south Guildford. It urged people in the area to conserve water wherever possible, such as by taking shorter showers or turning off the tap while brushing their teeth. "Our teams continue to work around the clock in the heat to deliver high-quality drinking water to our customers' taps," Thames Water said in a statement. "Fortunately, our water resources remain in a reasonably healthy state," it added. The South East has experienced scorching temperatures this week, with Tuesday confirmed by the BBC Weather Centre as the hottest day of the year so far. The supply issues come as the beleaguered water company, which hiked bills for customers earlier this year, faces continued heavy criticism over its performance. In May, Thames Water was fined £122.7m for breaching rules over sewage spills and shareholder payouts - the biggest penalty ever issued by water industry regulator with £20bn in debt, it serves about a quarter of the UK's population, mostly across London and parts of southern England.
Scottish Sun
17 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Sheep farmer's ex-wife LOSES battle over £80MILLION ‘gift' he gave her for kids… after she divorced him & kept cash
The ruling has been upheld by the Supreme Court BAAH HUMBUG Sheep farmer's ex-wife LOSES battle over £80MILLION 'gift' he gave her for kids… after she divorced him & kept cash Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A SHEEP farmer's ex-wife has lost a five-year legal battle to keep half of a £80million sum he gave her as part of a tax avoidance scheme. Clive Standish, 72, transferred the multi-million pound gift to his former partner Anna in 2017, with the intention of eventually placing the money in an offshore trust for their children. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 Clive Standish will keep the majority of an £80million gift he gave his wife Credit: Central News 5 It was initially decided by the High Court that Anna should receive half of the funds Credit: Champion News Clive, a former chief financial officer at UBS, made the decision to move the funds over to his Australian wife to exploit her non-dom status and avoid a crippling 40% inheritance-tax rate. The former banker believed he would face a bill of about £32 million if he died with the money in his name. But the pair's 15 year marriage later hit the rocks and divorce proceedings began in 2020 with the assets still in her name. It was initially decided by the High Court in 2023 that Anna, 57, should receive half of the funds in the settlement. Read more News CHEEKY BURGERS Uber Eats kitchen cooking burgers set up in asylum hotel is SHUT DOWN But last year, the Court of Appeal ruled that her share should be reduced from half to £25million. The amount was judged to fairly represent her contribution to raising the children and looking after their home. And despite Anna's recent attempts to overturn the decision, the ruling was upheld by the Supreme Court yesterday. Five judges argued that the sum was not a marital asset because it had not been shared by the couple and Mr Standish had intended it for their children. The ruling said: 'Tax planning schemes to save tax, involving transfers of assets from one spouse to another, are commonplace. 'The problem for the wife is that there is nothing to show that, over time, the parties were treating the 2017 assets as shared between them. 'Rather, the transfer was in pursuance of a scheme to negate inheritance tax and it was for the benefit exclusively of the children. 'The parties' intention was that the £80 million should not be retained by the wife.' Fresh twist in Eamonn Holmes & Ruth Langsford's divorce as celeb pair battle over £3.6m home His wife never established two offshore trusts as he had expected, so Clive was judged to be the sole owner of those assets when divorce proceedings began. Lord Faulks, representing Anna, tried to argue that the money had become shared property after the initial transfer, adding that she had contributed by accepting the gift. Mr Standish moved to Australia in 1976 and married Anna in December 2005, before the pair moved to the UK five years later. The couple lived together at Moundsmere Manor, an 18-bedroom mansion near Preston Candover, Hampshire. Clive's laywer, Tim Bishop KC, explained that in June 2004 his client was worth £57.3 million, while Anna had 'no significant pre-marital wealth'. The marital assets at the time of the split amounted to £132million, almost all of which had come from Clive's initial fortune. Mr Bishop added: "The husband made the transfers in March 2017, but the wife failed to transfer the assets into trust by the time the marriage ran into problems in 2019 and then broke down finally in 2020". Delivering the Supreme Court ruling, Lord Burrows and Lord Stephens agreed with the Court of Appeal's verdict. 5 The pair lived together at Moundsmere Manor in Hampshire Credit: Champion News Service 5 Clive moved the funds over to his Australian wife to avoid inheritance-tax Credit: Champion News Service Ltd They said: "There was no matrimonialisation of the 2017 assets because the transfer was to save tax and it was for the benefit of the children not the wife. "The 2017 assets were not, therefore, being treated by the husband and wife for any period of time as an asset that was shared between them. "Transfers of capital assets with the intention of saving tax do not, without some further compelling evidence, establish that the parties are treating the capital asset as shared between them. "The 2017 assets comprise the husband's pre-marital assets and earnings that the husband made in the years 2004-2007, to which the wife contributed by being the home-maker and child carer during those years. "In relation to a scheme designed to save tax, under which one spouse transfers an asset to the other spouse, the parties' dealings with the asset do not normally show that the asset is being treated as shared between them. "Rather, the intention is simply to save tax."
