logo
Does outer space end – or go on forever?

Does outer space end – or go on forever?

Yahoo27-04-2025

Curious Kids is a series for children of all ages. If you have a question you'd like an expert to answer, send it to curiouskidsus@theconversation.com.
What is beyond outer space? – Siah, age 11, Fremont, California
Right above you is the sky – or as scientists would call it, the atmosphere. It extends about 20 miles (32 kilometers) above the Earth. Floating around the atmosphere is a mixture of molecules – tiny bits of air so small you take in billions of them every time you breathe.
Above the atmosphere is space. It's called that because it has far fewer molecules, with lots of empty space between them.
Have you ever wondered what it would be like to travel to outer space – and then keep going? What would you find? Scientists like me are able to explain a lot of what you'd see. But there are some things we don't know yet, like whether space just goes on forever.
At the beginning of your trip through space, you might recognize some of the sights. The Earth is part of a group of planets that all orbit the Sun – with some orbiting asteroids and comets mixed in, too.
You might know that the Sun is actually just an average star, and looks bigger and brighter than the other stars only because it is closer. To get to the next nearest star, you would have to travel through trillions of miles of space. If you could ride on the fastest space probe NASA has ever made, it would still take you thousands of years to get there.
If stars are like houses, then galaxies are like cities full of houses. Scientists estimate there are 100 billion stars in Earth's galaxy. If you could zoom out, way beyond Earth's galaxy, those 100 billion stars would blend together – the way lights of city buildings do when viewed from an airplane.
Recently astronomers have learned that many or even most stars have their own orbiting planets. Some are even like Earth, so it's possible they might be home to other beings also wondering what's out there.
You would have to travel through millions of trillions more miles of space just to reach another galaxy. Most of that space is almost completely empty, with only some stray molecules and tiny mysterious invisible particles scientists call 'dark matter.'
Using big telescopes, astronomers see millions of galaxies out there – and they just keep going, in every direction.
If you could watch for long enough, over millions of years, it would look like new space is gradually being added between all the galaxies. You can visualize this by imagining tiny dots on a deflated balloon and then thinking about blowing it up. The dots would keep moving farther apart, just like the galaxies are.
If you could keep going out, as far as you wanted, would you just keep passing by galaxies forever? Are there an infinite number of galaxies in every direction? Or does the whole thing eventually end? And if it does end, what does it end with?
These are questions scientists don't have definite answers to yet. Many think it's likely you would just keep passing galaxies in every direction, forever. In that case, the universe would be infinite, with no end.
Some scientists think it's possible the universe might eventually wrap back around on itself – so if you could just keep going out, you would someday come back around to where you started, from the other direction.
One way to think about this is to picture a globe, and imagine that you are a creature that can move only on the surface. If you start walking any direction, east for example, and just keep going, eventually you would come back to where you began. If this were the case for the universe, it would mean it is not infinitely big – although it would still be bigger than you can imagine.
In either case, you could never get to the end of the universe or space. Scientists now consider it unlikely the universe has an end – a region where the galaxies stop or where there would be a barrier of some kind marking the end of space.
But nobody knows for sure. How to answer this question will need to be figured out by a future scientist.
Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you'd like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com. Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live.
And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you're wondering, too. We won't be able to answer every question, but we will do our best.
This article has been updated to correct the distances to the nearest star and galaxy.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Jack Singal, University of Richmond
Read more:
The art of Aphantasia: how 'mind blind' artists create without being able to visualise
Why your zodiac sign is probably wrong
Why do people look into space with telescopes but not binoculars?
Jack Singal does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NASA Langley workforce slashed by 40% in Trump budget plan
NASA Langley workforce slashed by 40% in Trump budget plan

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

NASA Langley workforce slashed by 40% in Trump budget plan

NASA Langley Research Center will lose funding for several projects and cut its workforce by 672 civil servants under the Trump administration's proposal to slash about $163 billion in federal spending next fiscal year. The White House budget proposal is a starting point, and ultimately Congress must approve it. But the technical supplement to the proposed budget released on Friday includes new details about how the administration would seek to reduce federal spending levels. NASA's budget would be slashed by roughly a quarter — from $24.8 billion down to $18.8 billion — and would lay off nearly a third of its workforce — more than 5,500 people across its 10 staffed centers. The technical supplement said centers will use cross-mission retraining opportunities and offer buyouts to meet the staffing requests. For NASA Langley, that includes a staffing cut from 1,730 people to 1,058. NASA Langley spokesperson Brittny McGraw said Langley doesn't have any additional context for how the cuts would work. 'At this point, there are no decisions that have been made going forward about what things could look like,' McGraw said. Another major shift proposed for Langley would be in its Aerosciences Evaluation and Test Capabilities. NASA currently operates 12 wind tunnels and propulsion test facilities, seven of which reside at Langley. The proposed budget would replace an 84-year-old vertical spin tunnel with a new flight dynamics research facility at Langley. However, there's a catch. The proposed budget slashes Aerosciences funding by more than $40 million and will put up to five unspecified wind tunnels in 'stand by' mode with minimal maintenance. Aerosciences isn't the only program being hit with cuts to meet the budget request. NASA's science programs across the board are set to be gutted to meet the new goals. Science funding is seeing its funding cut from $7.3 billion to $3.9 billion. That includes: Earth Science research funding cut by $240 million. Earth systematic missions, which study the planet's biology, having its budget more than halved. The Sentinel-6 project, which studies sea levels, cut from roughly $51 million to $8 million. The GRACE-Continuity project, which tracks glaciers and water movement, cut from more than $132 million to roughly $42 million Aperture Radar, which provides detailed imaging of Earth, chopped to roughly a third of its budget. That's bad news for a research center with a significant science directorate, according to U.S. Rep. Bobby Scott. Scott, the Democratic Congress member who represents the Hampton area where Langley sits, said Langley is an integral part of NASA's scientific research to understand the planet, and cutting its funding will have real consequences. The White House seeks sharp spending cuts in Trump's 2026 budget plan Say cheese: Cameras built at NASA Langley are landing on moon's surface Sunday NASA and Jefferson Lab fuel inventions and the regional economy, leaders say Youngkin says current Jefferson Lab management contract will be extended during rebid process 'Much of this work is being done in Hampton Roads at NASA Langley,' Scott said in a statement. 'The cuts to NASA's funding and staff proposed by the Trump Administration will put the United States behind in our pursuit to advance science and protect our communities from threats like climate change and sea level rise.' Sen. Tim Kaine, Virginia Democrat, added in a statement the loss of jobs will have a particularly devastating impact on the Hampton Roads community. 'These proposed cuts, if the House and Senate pass them, would destroy NASA as we know it, and have a devastating impact on the region's community and economy,' Kaine said. Those proposed cuts are a 'full-out assault on science,' according to Sen. Mark Warner, who said Wednesday that NASA Langley has been an integral part of building a culture of scientific innovation in Hampton Roads and the country. Now, Warner said that culture is in jeopardy. 'That trickles through the economy, especially when we're talking about this many folks laid off at NASA Langley, that has been our premier aerospace research facility in the country,' the Virginia Democrat said. 'Many of those future scientists, you can make a lot more money working at a tech company, but they come and work for NASA because of the mission. Well, that mission is being undermined. That's going to hurt Hampton Roads' ability to be a research community.' Devlin Epding, 757-510-4037,

Europe prepares to land rover on the Moon for first time
Europe prepares to land rover on the Moon for first time

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Europe prepares to land rover on the Moon for first time

The first European Moon rover is due to land on the lunar surface on Thursday. Named Tenacious, the rover is less than 2ft long and can carry a payload of just over one pound. Built by the European arm of Japanese lunar exploration company Ispace, it will be controlled by ground staff in Luxembourg, who will be able to drive it at up to four inches per second in near real time, using a video camera mounted on its front panel. Once on the Moon, it will deliver an art project called Moonhouse, a 3in-high model of a typical red Swedish cottage, developed by Mikael Genberg, a Swedish artist. The team hopes to place the house in a location where it can be photographed with the Earth in the background. The rover is also carrying a shovel to collect lunar regolith – moon dust – which will be sold to Nasa for $5,000 (£3,685) under an agreement that will make history as the first off-planet sale of resources. It is the second attempt to land on the Moon by Ispace, after the company's first craft crash-landed on the lunar surface in 2020. An investigation later found that a software glitch had led the spacecraft to believe it was on the surface when it was still several miles from landing. Takeshi Hakamada, the founder of Ispace, said: 'Just over two years ago, Ispace became the first private company in the world to attempt a lunar landing. 'While the mission achieved significant results, we lost communication with the lander just before touchdown. 'Since that time, we have drawn on the experience, using it as motivation to move forward with resolve. We are now at the dawn of our next attempt to make history.' The rover is being carried in a lander spacecraft called Resilience which launched in January on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket and entered lunar orbit on May 6. It is due to land on the Mare Frigoris region of the northern hemisphere of the near side of the Moon at 19:17 BST. The team is hoping that the area will be flat enough to allow the rover to trundle around, although its sturdy wheels should help it navigate unexpectedly rough terrain. Sophia Casanova, a senior lunar scientist at Ispace, said: 'The mission will be going to a really exciting region on the Moon. We are hoping to encounter a range of really interesting geologic features, and in particular with our Tenacious rover we will be exploring the lunar regolith, which is the soil-like material that covers the lunar surface. 'Understanding the characteristics of this material will help us not only understand the geology of the Moon but also help us understand the design of our future rovers.' She added: 'The Tenacious rover may encounter an array of features that may pose a hazard. Things like steep slopes, highly fluffy or compacted material, or small craters and boulders. However, these features represent really important characteristics for us to evaluate and our rover was designed with these operational conditions in mind.' The lander is also carrying several payloads including a water electrolyser for splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen atoms, as well as experiments looking at food production and space radiation. Kathryn Hadler, the director of the European Space Resources Innovation Centre, said: 'There are many resources of interest on the Moon, we can use the oxygen and metals present on the dust that coats the surface of the Moon, and we are also interested in the water ice that is present in the permanently shadowed reasons. 'This is important because we can use these resources to support human life, we can use it for rocket propellant, and this will allow us to support a future of sustainable space exploration. 'We need to develop the technologies to allow us to use these resources in space. It will allow us to understand how the regolith behaves when it is scooped and handled. And this is critical to develop technology for future space missions.' Ispace has previously said that its goal is to kick off the lunar economy, and it has several more missions planned, including working on two more landers. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

How NASA plans to mine the Moon
How NASA plans to mine the Moon

Miami Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

How NASA plans to mine the Moon

By Dean Murray The United States has shown off how it plans to mine the Moon. Incredible scenes show NASA testing a vehicle designed to extract vital resources that could help humans live in the lunar environment or even on Mars. Engineers at Kennedy Space Center in Florida are experimenting with the RASSOR (Regolith Advanced Surface Systems Operations Robot) on a simulated lunar surface. RASSOR's counter-rotating drums dig up simulated moon dust to extract regolith, the loose, fragmental material found on the Moon's surface. The opposing motion of the drums helps RASSOR grip the surface in low-gravity environments like the Moon or Mars. On Tuesday (June 3), NASA said: "With this unique capability, RASSOR can traverse the rough surface to dig, load, haul, and dump regolith that could later be broken down into hydrogen, oxygen, or water-resources critical for sustaining human presence." The space agency is using the foundation of RASSOR's development to inform IPEx (In-Situ Resource Utilisation Pilot Excavator), a newer vehicle being prepared for a potential technology demonstration mission on the Moon. IPEx is still in the advanced development and testing phase and will improve on RASSOR with refinements in scale, modularity, and mission capability to support future lunar resource extraction missions. The post How NASA plans to mine the Moon appeared first on Talker. Copyright Talker News. All Rights Reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store