‘We reject your bill:' First Nations heads urge Quebec to scrap forestry reform bill
QUÉBEC - Representatives of the Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador have told a provincial legislature committee that they reject the government's proposed forestry reform.
AFNQL Chief Francis Verreault-Paul said today that Bill 97 does not respect First Nations' ancestral rights.
The proposed legislation would divide the province's public forest land into three zones: conservation zones, multi-purpose zones and forest development zones where the forestry industry is prioritized.
Natural Resources Minister Maïté Blanchette Vézina wrote in a recent memo that the government hopes at least 30 per cent of public forests in each region will become development zones by 2028.
The AFNQL says that premise is unacceptable and would amount to privatizing one-third of First Nations territories for industrial interests.
The leaders are urging the government to scrap the bill in its present form and restart the process with First Nations as co-authors.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 3, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
No decision yet from Idaho Supreme Court leaves abortion ballot initiative group in the lurch
Anne Henderson Haws, an attorney representing the abortion ballot initiative group Idahoans United for Women and Families, presents opening arguments to the Idaho Supreme Court on Friday, April 25, 2025. (Kyle Pfannenstiel/Idaho Capital Sun) It's been more than 30 days since a hearing in a conflict over the language of a proposed 2026 reproductive rights ballot initiative, but with no decision yet from the Idaho Supreme Court, the group leading the push to restore abortion access in Idaho says the delay is hurting their organizing efforts. Idahoans United for Women and Families launched its citizen-led initiative effort in April 2024 and submitted proposed ballot titles in August. A new state law also requires a fiscal impact statement to be attached to initiatives, and the group alleged Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador, a Republican who has been outspoken about his anti-abortion views, and the Division of Financial Management inserted language that was prejudicial. They pointed in particular to a statement that said costs associated with the prisoner population and the Medicaid budget could occur. Idaho Supreme Court hears arguments in abortion ballot initiative lawsuit As part of the initiative process, the Attorney General's Office is responsible for drafting short and long ballot titles that summarize what the legislation would do if passed. State law says the language must describe the proposal accurately and use common language without phrasing that is likely to prejudice voters. The complaint filed by Idahoans United with the Idaho Supreme Court in late January called the statement biased and says it includes contradictory language, 'wrongly implies' that Medicaid and corrections spending would increase, and 'prejudicially includes an irrelevant reference to the state's $850 million Medicaid budget.' Labrador's office did not respond to requests for comment. In court filings, Labrador did not address the fiscal impact statement component of the complaint, and only spoke to the 'fetus viability' language that Idahoans United said was objectionable because it is not medical terminology. Labrador said it is common parlance and there is no difference between that language and 'fetal viability.' In a separate court filing, officials with the Idaho Division of Financial Management did not speak to the rationale for the fiscal impact statement, but restated the language and denied that it was prejudicial to the initiative. The Idaho Supreme Court heard arguments April 25, and there have been no updates since then, despite a motion to expedite. The last court battle over ballot titles was in 2023, when Reclaim Idaho said Labrador's office also prejudiced its initiative language about changing the state primary election system. In that case, oral arguments were held on a Monday and a decision came out that Thursday, with a unanimous vote in favor of Reclaim Idaho. Ultimately, voters overwhelmingly defeated the initiative in the November 2024 election. Idaho has a citizen ballot initiative process, but only its Legislature can propose constitutional amendments, unlike many other states. So instead of a constitutional amendment, the voters are asked to approve a citizen-crafted piece of legislation to be adopted. The measure requires a simple majority of voters to pass. Idahoans United submitted a policy that would establish a fundamental right to contraception and fertility treatments under state law, including in vitro fertilization, the right to make decisions about pregnancy and childbirth, legalize abortion before fetal viability, and preserve the right to abortion after viability in medical emergencies. Fetal viability would be determined by a physician and what treatment is available, but the commonly accepted gestational age of viability in the medical community is 23 to 24 weeks. The group's spokesperson and lead organizer, Melanie Folwell, told States Newsroom that the delay has forced them to cancel a planned kickoff rally on June 14 at the Idaho Capitol. The rally is now scheduled for June 28, in hopes there will be a decision by then. The initiative needs more than 70,000 valid signatures from districts across the state, and organizers had hoped to gather 10,000 of those in June alone. But the initiative language must be finalized and approved before any signatures can be collected, and the signature goal must be reached by April 30, 2026, to qualify for the ballot. 'We won't get another June. We won't get another crack at this in the coming months, and there are some real impacts to having to pursue a lawsuit,' Folwell told States Newsroom. The frustration is not directed at the court, Folwell said, but rather at state offices that crafted the language. 'I can't speculate as to their intent, but in providing us with unclear titles and fiscal impact statement, we have certainly been slowed down,' she said. 'It didn't need to be this way.' There will also be financial effects, she said, because adding pressure to the timeline will increase the costs associated with mobilizing volunteers and canvassers to gather signatures by the deadline. Nate Poppino, spokesperson for the Idaho Supreme Court, told States Newsroom in an email that the court does not comment on judicial deliberations, and opinions are issued at the court's discretion. 'Sometimes the issues the court must consider resolve quickly, and sometimes they require longer discussion,' Poppino said. Each opinion starts with one authoring justice, he said, and a draft is circulated among the other justices who can edit and weigh in before anything is finalized. That includes details like wording and the legal issues involved. 'If it's a situation that involves a dissent, that also is examined by the full court,' he said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'I'm game': Alberta Premier Smith invites Prime Minister Carney to Oilers game
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says she has invited Prime Minister Mark Carney to watch an Edmonton Oilers Stanley Cup final game. Speaking to The Canadian Press in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, Smith said she's waiting to see if Carney will join her for Game 5, which could take place next weekend ahead of the G7 conference in Kananaskis, Alta. Carney, who grew up in Edmonton, made his allegiance to the home team clear when he stopped at Rogers Place to skate with the Oilers in March. That was his first visit to the city after being sworn in as Liberal leader, replacing Justin Trudeau. "I am pleased to see that we at least have a prime minister who knows what team to root for," Smith said. "I'm game. We'll see if we can go together." The Prime Minister's Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday. In response to a request for further details, Smith's press secretary Sam Blackett offered a brief statement. "Let's see if the series goes to five games first," he said. It would be the first game Smith has publicly acknowledged planning to attend during this year's Oilers NHL playoff run. Last year, the premier and some of her cabinet members faced criticism for accepting free luxury box tickets to playoff games. At the time, Smith defended their attendance, saying Albertans expect their elected representatives to support the team. WATCH| Canada cheers for Edmonton as the Oilers take Game 1 over Panthers: While Smith said the tickets she accepted were courtesy of a provincial Crown corporation, a few ministers were given tickets by a private businessman whose contracts with the Alberta government are now part of multiple broader investigations into government health-care contracts. The premier has said that she and her ministers' moves were above board, and broke no ethics rules. Subsequent allegations of bloated sweetheart deals from the former head of Alberta Health Services sparked investigations from the RCMP, Alberta's auditor general and a former Manitoba judge hired by the government. Peter Guthrie ultimately resigned from cabinet as infrastructure minister over the government's handling of the contract scandal, and he was later booted from the United Conservative caucus altogether over his criticism. Smith has denied any wrongdoing, insisting her government is fully co-operating with all investigations.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Rand Paul: Lindsey Graham wants to ‘secretly explode' military budget
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) is using President Trump's legislative agenda to 'secretly explode' the Pentagon's budget by adding $150 billion in military spending onto the national debt. 'This bill is going to spend $300 billion in the first two years … $300 billion on military and border,' Paul, a critic of the House-passed version of the GOP mega bill, told Fox Business host Larry Kudlow in an interview on Wednesday. Paul said the spending cuts in the bill amount to $1.5 trillion over 10 years or about $150 billion per year. 'In the first year or two you will barely offset the new spending. This bill is really a vehicle for Lindsey Graham to secretly explode … the military budget. They want to explode the military budget beyond that cap, that's really what this bill is about,' Paul argued. 'If the new spending weren't in there, it truly would be a bill that would be saving money,' he added. Paul compared lawmakers on Capitol Hill to teenagers maxing out a credit card they got from their parents on 'booze and gambling.' 'Congress is worse than a bunch of drunken teenagers,' he said. The House-passed bill includes $150 billion in new funding for defense and $150 billion to secure U.S. borders and beef up immigration enforcement actions within the country. Paul said earlier this week that he strongly opposes raising the debt ceiling, which would be hiked by $4 trillion under the current legislation. On Tuesday, President Trump said in a post on Truth Social that 'Rand votes NO on everything, but never has any practical or constructive ideas.' 'His ideas are actually crazy (losers!). The people of Kentucky can't stand him,' the president added. 'This is a BIG GROWTH BILL!'
