Six men jailed for combined 101 years over gangland attacks
They were sentenced at the High Court in Glasgow on Friday, having been found guilty after a lengthy trial last month.
The crimes occurred in and around Edinburgh in 2022 and 2023.
READ MORE: Nigel Farage's Reform peers demand reignites calls for House of Lords to be scrapped
Michael Heeps was jailed for 23 years – he had been convicted of eight charges, including three attempted murders and being involved in the blazes at HMP Addiewell. The 34-year-old is a trusted lieutenant of Edinburgh crime boss Mark Richardson.
John Murray, 25, was jailed for 17 years for five charges involving two murder bids.
Lee Ridgway, 33, was involved in three of the attempted murders and the incidents at Addiewell. He was sentenced to 22 years.
Dale Bauld, 33, will serve 17 years for his part in two of the violent attacks. Damien Mullen, 26, was imprisoned for 14 years for attempted murder and the torching of the cars.
Ryan McGovern – who had fled the UK – was involved in the Addiewell blazes. The 33-year-old was jailed for eight years.
Lord Mulholland said on Friday: 'The courts and the public will not put up with this type of out-of-control gangsterism.
'The sentences that I impose are intended to punish and deter you and anyone else who is considering engaging in this behaviour.
'The message to the public for those that may be contemplating or emulating you is 'don't, as there will be a very high price to pay'.'
READ MORE: Charity rowers mistaken for 'illegal migrants' by Rupert Lowe arrive in Scotland
Ryan Brown was one of the gang's victims, having been attacked near his home in the capital's Pilton on January 5, 2023. The 30-year-old was walking to a friend's house when a car raced up and a machete wielding assailant 'casually' got out to strike him.
Brown recalled trying to fend off the blows as the weapon was wildly swung at him. He shouted at the balaclava-clad attacker: 'What are you doing, mate?' – but the thug remained silent.
Brown slumped to the ground in agony. He told prosecutor John Keenan KC: "I remember screaming and everyone running over. My hand was literally hanging off.
"I thought I was dying on the doorstep."
He was rushed to hospital, where he was in the operating theatre for 12 hours. This included surgery to repair his hand. Mr Brown told the trial he remains affected by what happened and is expecting further operations. He said speaking about it again was "bringing back bad memories".
Peajmaan Khosrowpour was earlier targeted in a 'high speed chase' between Edinburgh and Dalkeith. He was forced off the road and his car smashed into a wall. The man was left with a 'large gaping wound' to his arm after he was struck with machetes.
He also needed a number of operations, has been left scarred for life and remains physically affected by the incident. A physio has told him his condition is "as good as its going to get".
Robert McLintock was ambushed by masked attackers in late January 2023 in the capital's Ferniehill area. He ended up intensive care and a coma following the assault.
Kieran Jenkins had also been targeted in December 2022 in Bilston, near Edinburgh. They were said to be 'lying in wait' before confronting him as he was in his car. They smashed the vehicle up with bladed weapons. He fortunately escaped unharmed. In a 999 call, Jenkins, however, said the attackers had tried to 'chop him up'.
READ MORE: Major emergency rescue operation launched as man missing in river
Keenan told jurors: "It is plain they planned to attack Kieran Jenkins and cause him harm.
"He was left in no doubt that was their intention. There was no injury, but you can still regard this as a murderous attack."
The fire attacks at HMP Addiewell occurred on January 7, 2023. A total of six vehicles were set alight late at night designed to intimidate prison staff. The court heard how CCTV footage and forensic evidence helped catch the mob, who had also tried to intimidate a witness by leaving a note calling her 'a grass'.
McGovern had fled the UK initially via Campbeltown in Argyll and Bute and onto Dublin. He went on travel to the Netherlands before going to Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand and the United Arab Emirates. He was eventually traced and extradited back to Scotland.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Facing jail, pastor found guilty of 19 charges of sexual and physical abuse against woman and children
A pastor is behind bars for the serial abuse of a woman and several children. Reverend James Haram put his traumatised victims through ordeals branded 'truly awful' by a judge. This included the 51-year-old raping the woman. The youngsters who were preyed upon were often struck with a wooden spoon or a rod. Haram - who had been with the Free Church of Scotland in Glasgow - was found guilty of a total of 19 charges of physical and sexual abuse. The crimes spanned between 1997 and 2020 at addresses in the city as well as Dumbarton, Dunbartonshire and in Ayrshire. Haram was remanded in custody at the High Court in Glasgow and will be sentenced in September. The woman regularly suffered at his hands. He called her names, punched walls, threw household items around in anger and threatened to hit her with a piano stool. He tracked where she went, checked who she was talking to and forced her to take part in religious activities. Haram once mowed over flowers the woman had taken time to grow. The pastor also suggested she should kill herself. The violence escalated with Haram grabbing and choking the woman. She recalled her 'whole body going limp'. Jurors heard the Haram would pester the woman into sex while making biblical references. She was told that she had to 'subject' herself to him. The victim recalled how she would sob with 'tears down her face'. But giving evidence, Haram claimed that 'every sexual encounter was consensual'. He claimed that the woman had 'many wonderful gifts', but that she had used them to 'turn against' him. He called her 'incredibly convincing'. But, the reverend, of Dumbarton, did accept there were 'occasional flare-ups of aggression'. The abuse of the children was said to include carrying out 'modesty checks' on girls to see what they were wearing. Prosecutor John Macpherson put to him that one girl gave 'a fairly graphic account of some savagery' of being 'regularly beaten'. He insisted this was 'wholly fabricated'. Jurors heard he flew into a rage while in a car with two children and claimed he would deliberately crash, killing them all. But, Haram told the trial: 'They knew I did not mean it.' Judge Tom Hughes deferred sentencing for reports. He told Haram: 'I think it is fair to say this has been a deeply distressing case for everyone involved. 'The jury has heard a different version of events from all the witnesses who gave evidence. 'It appears that (what happened) was truly awful - incidents of violence, aggression, all sorts of difficulties and the sexual offending which took place. 'During that period, you appeared to be living a life whereby you were acting in an official capacity as a man of the cloth. 'You have now been convicted of extremely serious offences which will obviously carry a lengthy custodial sentence.' Haram had been on bail, but was remanded meantime. He appeared to be clutching a Bible as he was led to the cells.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Ricky Jones case should not be compared to Lucy Connolly
Ricky Jones, 58, faced trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court after he described far-right activists as 'disgusting Nazi fascists' in a speech at an anti-racism rally last year, in the wake of the Southport murders. The now-suspended councillor, surrounded by cheering supporters in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 2024, was filmed stating: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' Jurors deliberated for just over half-an-hour and found him not guilty on Friday. This caused Conservative and Reform politicians to brand the decision 'two-tier justice' – with shadow home secretary Chris Philp comparing the case to that of Mrs Connolly, who was jailed for 31 months after she posted a tweet calling for 'mass deportation' of asylum seekers and to 'set fire to all the f****** hotels' on the day of the Southport attacks. Former home secretary and Tory leadership candidate Sir James Cleverly also called the jury's decision to clear Ricky Jones 'perverse' in an X post, adding: 'Perverse decisions like this are adding to the anger that people feel and amplifying the belief that there isn't a dispassionate criminal justice system.' Lawyers have said the cases should not be conflated as Connolly and Jones faced allegations of a different nature – and Jones faced trial where Connolly, having pleaded guilty, did not. Peter Stringfellow, a solicitor at Brett Wilson, told the PA news agency: 'Both (Jones and Connolly) said pretty unpleasant things. 'However, I'm afraid the conflation of the two after that is a problem. It comes from people who've got some sort of political agenda, in my view. 'They were facing completely different allegations and a massive part of those different allegations is the racial element. 'If you look at the Connolly case … her intention is of a racial nature.' Connolly pleaded guilty last year to a charge of inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X. On July 29 last year, she posted: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it.' 'She directs everybody to the fact that this was a racial comment,' Mr Stringfellow said. 'She pleads guilty to that intention … she accepted that she had intended to stir racial hatred. 'The Jones case is different because one, he's facing a completely different allegation: he's facing encouraging violent disorder. 'And the difference with him is he's saying: 'That's not what I was intended to do'.' Mr Stringfellow added that, in the case of Connolly, racially aggravated discourse on social media did translate into real-life violence across the country – whereas Mr Jones' comments at a rally did not cause a violent disorder. 'What she (Connolly) did, what followed her comments about threatening to burn people in hotels, is that that's precisely what then happened – and people were attempting to burn people in hotels.' Ernest Aduwa, partner at Stokoe Partnership Solicitors, said comparisons between Jones' and Connolly's cases were 'misplaced'. 'We need to be honest about what is going on here. The verdict in the Ricky Jones case was not political, it was legal,' he said. 'A jury listened to the evidence, tested it and decided unanimously he was not guilty. 'That is not bias or 'two-tier justice' – it is the justice system doing what it is supposed to do: separating facts from noise. 'Comparisons with the Lucy Connolly case are misplaced. 'Lucy Connolly pleaded guilty. There was no trial, no cross-examination, no jury. She admitted the specific offence: stirring up racial hatred online. 'Ricky Jones faced a different charge … with a high burden of proof. 'The jury decided the Crown had not met it. 'That does not mean the protest was not passionate or loud – it means there was not enough evidence to prove intent to incite violence. That distinction matters. 'I understand why emotions run high. But flattening two different situations into one misleading narrative does no favours to justice. 'The fact that a black man at a protest can receive a fair trial and be acquitted should be seen not as an injustice, but as proof the system can still get it right.' He added: 'The law is not perfect, but it must rest on evidence – not opinion, pressure, or politics.' Laura Allen, head of the protest and public order team at Hodge, Jones and Allen lawyers, said the two cases involved different decisions that need to be put in their legal context and it is 'frankly offensive' to the ordinary members of the public who sat on the jury to suggest they had not acted appropriately. If there is anything close to a two-tier system in the British justice sector it is one that historically 'has not favoured ethnic minorities', although work has been done to try to repair that situation, according to Ms Allen. A judge made a ruling on Connolly's sentence after she had said she was guilty, while a jury listened to the evidence during the trial and found him not guilty. Ms Allen said they are 'just two very different things and it is not possible to compare them in the way that Nigel Farage is choosing to do as part of his political grandstanding'. She said: 'He (Farage) is suggesting that these 12 people, about whom I assume he knows nothing, have not made their decision on the evidence but on some other ulterior motive. 'They are 12 members of the jury, picked at random, who have done their civic duty, have listened to the evidence in the case and concluded they could not be sure that Ricky Jones was guilty. 'Due to the way our jury system works they are not required, and certainly are not permitted, to explain the reasons for their decision.' She added: 'All we know is that the jury found Ricky Jones not guilty. We don't know why. We also don't know the political background of any of these people. We don't know their views on immigration or on race. 'We don't know any of that stuff and that is the whole point.'
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Ricky Jones case should not be compared to Lucy Connolly
Ricky Jones, 58, faced trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court after he described far-right activists as 'disgusting Nazi fascists' in a speech at an anti-racism rally last year, in the wake of the Southport murders. The now-suspended councillor, surrounded by cheering supporters in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 2024, was filmed stating: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' Jurors deliberated for just over half-an-hour and found him not guilty on Friday. This caused Conservative and Reform politicians to brand the decision 'two-tier justice' – with shadow home secretary Chris Philp comparing the case to that of Mrs Connolly, who was jailed for 31 months after she posted a tweet calling for 'mass deportation' of asylum seekers and to 'set fire to all the f****** hotels' on the day of the Southport attacks. Former home secretary and Tory leadership candidate Sir James Cleverly also called the jury's decision to clear Ricky Jones 'perverse' in an X post, adding: 'Perverse decisions like this are adding to the anger that people feel and amplifying the belief that there isn't a dispassionate criminal justice system.' Lawyers have said the cases should not be conflated as Connolly and Jones faced allegations of a different nature – and Jones faced trial where Connolly, having pleaded guilty, did not. Peter Stringfellow, a solicitor at Brett Wilson, told the PA news agency: 'Both (Jones and Connolly) said pretty unpleasant things. 'However, I'm afraid the conflation of the two after that is a problem. It comes from people who've got some sort of political agenda, in my view. 'They were facing completely different allegations and a massive part of those different allegations is the racial element. 'If you look at the Connolly case … her intention is of a racial nature.' Connolly pleaded guilty last year to a charge of inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X. On July 29 last year, she posted: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it.' 'She directs everybody to the fact that this was a racial comment,' Mr Stringfellow said. 'She pleads guilty to that intention … she accepted that she had intended to stir racial hatred. 'The Jones case is different because one, he's facing a completely different allegation: he's facing encouraging violent disorder. 'And the difference with him is he's saying: 'That's not what I was intended to do'.' Mr Stringfellow added that, in the case of Connolly, racially aggravated discourse on social media did translate into real-life violence across the country – whereas Mr Jones' comments at a rally did not cause a violent disorder. 'What she (Connolly) did, what followed her comments about threatening to burn people in hotels, is that that's precisely what then happened – and people were attempting to burn people in hotels.' Ernest Aduwa, partner at Stokoe Partnership Solicitors, said comparisons between Jones' and Connolly's cases were 'misplaced'. 'We need to be honest about what is going on here. The verdict in the Ricky Jones case was not political, it was legal,' he said. 'A jury listened to the evidence, tested it and decided unanimously he was not guilty. 'That is not bias or 'two-tier justice' – it is the justice system doing what it is supposed to do: separating facts from noise. 'Comparisons with the Lucy Connolly case are misplaced. 'Lucy Connolly pleaded guilty. There was no trial, no cross-examination, no jury. She admitted the specific offence: stirring up racial hatred online. 'Ricky Jones faced a different charge … with a high burden of proof. 'The jury decided the Crown had not met it. 'That does not mean the protest was not passionate or loud – it means there was not enough evidence to prove intent to incite violence. That distinction matters. 'I understand why emotions run high. But flattening two different situations into one misleading narrative does no favours to justice. 'The fact that a black man at a protest can receive a fair trial and be acquitted should be seen not as an injustice, but as proof the system can still get it right.' He added: 'The law is not perfect, but it must rest on evidence – not opinion, pressure, or politics.' Laura Allen, head of the protest and public order team at Hodge, Jones and Allen lawyers, said the two cases involved different decisions that need to be put in their legal context and it is 'frankly offensive' to the ordinary members of the public who sat on the jury to suggest they had not acted appropriately. If there is anything close to a two-tier system in the British justice sector it is one that historically 'has not favoured ethnic minorities', although work has been done to try to repair that situation, according to Ms Allen. A judge made a ruling on Connolly's sentence after she had said she was guilty, while a jury listened to the evidence during the trial and found him not guilty. Ms Allen said they are 'just two very different things and it is not possible to compare them in the way that Nigel Farage is choosing to do as part of his political grandstanding'. She said: 'He (Farage) is suggesting that these 12 people, about whom I assume he knows nothing, have not made their decision on the evidence but on some other ulterior motive. 'They are 12 members of the jury, picked at random, who have done their civic duty, have listened to the evidence in the case and concluded they could not be sure that Ricky Jones was guilty. 'Due to the way our jury system works they are not required, and certainly are not permitted, to explain the reasons for their decision.' She added: 'All we know is that the jury found Ricky Jones not guilty. We don't know why. We also don't know the political background of any of these people. We don't know their views on immigration or on race. 'We don't know any of that stuff and that is the whole point.'
