logo
Divided Scranton council passes pay raises for its members and mayor

Divided Scranton council passes pay raises for its members and mayor

Yahoo29-01-2025

In a pair of 3-2 votes, a split Scranton City Council on Tuesday raised the salaries for the mayor and council members to take effect in 2026.
Council President Gerald Smurl, Bill King and Jessica Rothchild voted in favor of adopting the pay-raise ordinances, while Mark McAndrew and Tom Schuster voted against the salary increases, according to an Electric City Television simulcast and video posted on YouTube.
The pay of the mayor will rise from $75,000 to $95,000, a 27% increase of $20,000; while the pay of council members will increase from $12,500 each to $18,000, a 44% increase of $5,500, all effective Jan. 1, 2026.
Under the city's Home Rule Charter, council cannot authorize mayoral and council pay raises during current terms of office, but can raise salaries to take effect in the future.
The term of Mayor Paige Gebhardt Cognetti and the council seats held by Smurl, King and Schuster all expire at the end of 2025. Those positions will be available for nominations in the May 20 primary election and will have winners determined in the Nov. 4 general election.
The Scranton mayoral salary last was raised in phases from 2014 to 2017. Those mayoral salary increases were enacted in 2013 by then-outgoing Mayor Chris Doherty and outgoing council led by Janet Evans. Those phases increased the mayoral salary from $50,000 in 2013 to $60,000 in 2014, and then gave $5,000 bumps per year in 2015, 2016 and 2017, when the salary reached $75,000.
Council salaries have not risen since 1999.
The Home Rule Charter appeared to conflict on whether the council salary increases should apply to all five members at once, or if some members would have to wait longer to get a bump. So, council first amended the ordinance to clarify that the salary increases would apply to all five members come Jan. 1.
'When you look it at out of fairness, that makes sense. They (former enactors of the Home Rule Charter) certainly wouldn't want to establish a system where two or three members of council were receiving one level of pay, while two or three members were receiving a lower amount,' council solicitor Thomas Gilbride said.
McAndrew cast the lone vote against amending the clarification because he was against the pay raises all along. In voting against the salary increases, McAndrew said, 'People are struggling and I just don't have an appetite at this time.'
Schuster said of his dissent, 'I just feel my compensation is sufficient.'
Noting he will not run for reelection, King said the council pay raise is long overdue.
'In 1976, the salary for council was $7,000. Forty-nine years later — actually almost 50 years later, when this is fully enacted — I think (an) $11,000 (increase) is more than reasonable,' King said. 'I feel it's appropriate. That's why I'm supporting it.'
Council also voted 5-0 to adopt an ordinance to raise the salary of the tax collector next year from $53,300 to $72,000, in conjunction with the Scranton School District that pays for half of the salary.
The 35% raise of $18,700 amounts to about 2.5% per year since the last raise for tax collector, in 2011, Smurl previously said.
Council members noted the tax collector took on more duties last year and the pay raise is warranted.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

YouTube says its ecosystem created 490K jobs and added $55B to the US GDP in 2024
YouTube says its ecosystem created 490K jobs and added $55B to the US GDP in 2024

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

YouTube says its ecosystem created 490K jobs and added $55B to the US GDP in 2024

YouTube released a report on Tuesday that shows just how influential the creator economy has become. YouTube says that its creative ecosystem contributed over $55 billion to the U.S. GDP and supported more than 490,000 full-time jobs, according to research by Oxford Economics. When YouTube talks about its creative ecosystem, it's not just talking about creators. This includes anyone who works with YouTube creators (video editors, assistants, publicists), as well as people who work for creator-oriented companies (Patreon, Spotter, Linktree, etc.). But these figures continue to grow, even in a time when venture capitalists are no longer pouring money into the industry like they were about four years ago. In 2022, YouTube and Oxford Economics reported that its creative ecosystem created about 390,000 jobs and contributed over $35 billion to the U.S. GDP, meaning that these 2024 figures jumped by 100,000 jobs and $20 billion. These numbers are so large because YouTube provides the most consistent and lucrative opportunities for creators. Those who qualify for YouTube's Partner Program can earn 55% of revenue earned from ads; even for mid-range creators (not the MrBeasts of the world), that can amount to several thousand dollars a month. While TikTok and YouTube Shorts have tried to monetize their platforms, the industry hasn't figured out a way to reliably distribute ad revenue among short-form creators. As both a fast-growing and often misunderstood sector, creators have been advocating for American institutions, from banks to the government, to better serve their industry. Some creators struggle to qualify for business credit cards or get certain business loans, regardless of their demonstrable financial solvency. These issues have become common enough to draw attention. Just last week, U.S. Representatives Yvette Clark (D-NY) and Beth Van Duyne (R-TX) announced their bipartisan Congressional Creators Caucus to support and recognize the potential of the creator economy. Sign in to access your portfolio

Joe Rogan claims 2 former presidents called Spotify over his COVID commentary
Joe Rogan claims 2 former presidents called Spotify over his COVID commentary

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Joe Rogan claims 2 former presidents called Spotify over his COVID commentary

Podcaster Joe Rogan claimed Tuesday that two unnamed former presidents were involved in the protest against his skeptical discussions about COVID-19. Spotify received backlash in 2022 for allowing Rogan, one of its biggest stars, to spread what progressive critics claimed was COVID misinformation. Musician Neil Young famously removed his content from Spotify in protest over Rogan's rhetoric, saying he no longer wanted to share a platform with him. Advertisement 'And then all of a sudden, I hear that Neil Young wants me removed from Spotify. I was like, 'What the f— is going on? This is crazy,'' Rogan said Tuesday. Then-Biden White House press secretary Jen Psaki commented on the controversy directly. After Spotify announced it would flag podcasts that cover COVID-19, Psaki responded, 'So this disclaimer, it's a positive step, but we want every platform to continue doing more to call out misinformation while also uplifting accurate information.' 'Our hope is that all major tech platforms — and all major news sources for that matter — be responsible and be vigilant to ensure the American people have access to accurate information on something as significant as COVID-19,' she added. 3 Spotify received backlash in 2022 for allowing Rogan to spread what progressive critics claimed was COVID misinformation. YouTube/PowerfulJRE Advertisement But Rogan said that instead of being censored or deplatformed, 'I grew by 2 million subscribers in a month.' 'People started listening,' he said, despite how his critics attacked his reputation. 'And they started listening, like, 'Oh, he's really reasonable and pretty humble about all this stuff and just asking questions.'' Rogan also condemned how media outlets attacked his use of Ivermectin to treat his COVID-19 by referring to it as a horse dewormer. 3 Rogan said that two former presidents reached out to Spotify about his claims on COVID-19. Diego – Advertisement 'I'm, like, 'Why aren't you guys concentrating on the fact that a 55-year-old man is fine three days later during the worst strain?' It was during the Delta where everybody's freaking out. 'This one's going to kill us all.' And I was fine in three days,' he said. Rogan described the whole experience as a 'wake-up call' that opened his eyes about the liberal legacy media. 'It's so dirty. It's such a dirty business,' Rogan said. 'God, I used to have massive respect for journalists. If I had never done this podcast, I would be your regular schmo out there with, you know, just spitting out all the company lines and all the blast all over the news.' 3 Rogan described the whole experience as a 'wake-up call' that opened his eyes about the liberal legacy media. HJBC – Advertisement 'I kind of liked it better then,' he said with a laugh. 'I didn't think the world is filled with demons, money-hungry demons that are willing to sacrifice human lives in the pursuit of revenue.' Spotify founder and CEO Daniel Ek addressed the pushback against hosting Rogan during the company's earnings call in February 2022. 'I think the important part here is that we don't change our policies based on one creator, nor do we change it based on any media cycle,' the chief executive said at the time. 'Our policies have been carefully written with the input from numbers of internal and external experts in this space – and I do believe they're right for our platform.' Fox News Digital reached out to Spotify for comment and did not receive an immediate reply.

Scranton council president apologizes for not stopping derogatory remarks
Scranton council president apologizes for not stopping derogatory remarks

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Scranton council president apologizes for not stopping derogatory remarks

Scranton City Council President Gerald Smurl apologized Tuesday for not stopping derogatory remarks made during public comment at the June 3 weekly council meeting. Smurl's apology that opened council's meeting Tuesday came in response to comments the prior week by resident Bob Bolus opposing having the rainbow flag flying at City Hall for Pride Month, as well as other remarks Bolus directed at a pro-LGBTQ resident, Angela Ramone, who was in attendance at that meeting. The events also resulted in several other residents attending Tuesday's council meeting to express support for LGBTQ people and condemn hate speech, according to an Electric City Television simulcast and video of the weekly meeting posted online. According to ECTV videos and minutes of council meetings, preceding events at council meetings included: April 29: Ramone advocated for LGBTQ protections and challenged council members to voice support for them. May 13: Ramone expressed opposition to a bill in the state Legislature that would ban transgender athletes from competing in sports in the state and 'require genital inspections for any player that is accused of being transgender, specifically playing in women's sports. This bill is incredibly, incredibly invasive and disgusting and hurtful.' May 27: Bolus spoke about his efforts and intent to run for mayor of Scranton. Ramone noted a prior Bolus felony conviction makes him ineligible to serve as city mayor. June 3: Noting June is Pride Month, Councilwoman Jessica Rothchild said having a rainbow pride flag raised on June 1 on a City Hall flagpole was a great way to have the LGBTQ community feel welcome and a part of the city. Bolus spoke directly to Ramone, who was seated in the gallery, as having made false comments the prior week about Bolus that 'disparaged' his name. He warned Ramone against battling him and 'mouthing off about me.' Bolus then called the pride flag raised June 1 at City Hall a 'slap in the face' to veterans and likened it to an affront to the 'Rule of God,' among various other remarks. Ramone reminded council of its rules prohibiting anyone speaking during public comment from addressing any individual council or audience member, and asked that council enforce its rules. Resident Doris Koloski said she's glad the pride flag is being flown and it wouldn't be needed 'if people didn't act like Mr. Bolus.' Resident Norma Jeffries said no one has a right at council 'to degrade or bash' anyone because of who they are, and chastised Smurl for not gaveling down Bolus. Councilman Bill King agreed with Koloski and Jeffries and told Smurl he needs 'to start using that gavel because our rules were violated and it's not acceptable.' On June 6, Smurl submitted to council a letter of apology that he read aloud at Tuesday's meeting. 'I understand a lot of hateful statements were made and some were directed towards speakers and council members. It is my job as council president to not allow hateful and derogatory remarks to be directed at any one individual. As council president, I take full responsibility for not doing my job to maintain order at last week's meeting. I apologize for not performing my job properly,' Smurl's apology said in part. 'Going forward, I will fulfill my duties that I promised to uphold when I was sworn in as council president.' Scranton city councilman Gerald Smurl walks out of council chambers at Scranton City Hall before a council meeting in 2022. Also at Tuesday's meeting, Bolus said, 'I make no excuse for last week.' He read a lengthy statement that noted Rothchild on June 3 expressed opinions about Pride Month and the pride flag and he should be allowed to express his opinions. As his speaking time ran out, Bolus was saying he filed a lawsuit to have the pride flag removed from City Hall. Bolus filed that lawsuit Friday in Lackawanna County Court on a pro-se basis, meaning representing himself without an attorney. This lawsuit as a 'mandamus petition for extraordinary relief' sought to compel the removal of the pride flag from City Hall, as well as having it barred from display there and at all public buildings in the county. Also on Friday, Lackawanna County Judge Terrence Nealon dismissed Bolus' lawsuit on various procedural errors, including that he did not properly file or serve the action or name defendants. Nealon dismissed the case 'without prejudice,' meaning Bolus could try to do it again properly. Bob Bolus Sr. (COURTESY OF BOB BOLUS SR.) Some residents who spoke Tuesday in support of the LGBTQ community urged people to speak out against intolerance. 'When someone stands at this podium and spews dehumanizing rhetoric and it's met with a 'thank you' or no response at all it sends a message, a message that hate has a place here. Silence is not neutrality. It comes off as complicity,' resident Jessica McGuigan said. 'We are living in a moment where lines are being drawn across the country, in our own backyards, and the fear, the rhetoric of fear, division and dehumanization is not abstract. It's being written into laws, spoken from pulpits and shouted at school board meetings.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store