Divided Scranton council passes pay raises for its members and mayor
Council President Gerald Smurl, Bill King and Jessica Rothchild voted in favor of adopting the pay-raise ordinances, while Mark McAndrew and Tom Schuster voted against the salary increases, according to an Electric City Television simulcast and video posted on YouTube.
The pay of the mayor will rise from $75,000 to $95,000, a 27% increase of $20,000; while the pay of council members will increase from $12,500 each to $18,000, a 44% increase of $5,500, all effective Jan. 1, 2026.
Under the city's Home Rule Charter, council cannot authorize mayoral and council pay raises during current terms of office, but can raise salaries to take effect in the future.
The term of Mayor Paige Gebhardt Cognetti and the council seats held by Smurl, King and Schuster all expire at the end of 2025. Those positions will be available for nominations in the May 20 primary election and will have winners determined in the Nov. 4 general election.
The Scranton mayoral salary last was raised in phases from 2014 to 2017. Those mayoral salary increases were enacted in 2013 by then-outgoing Mayor Chris Doherty and outgoing council led by Janet Evans. Those phases increased the mayoral salary from $50,000 in 2013 to $60,000 in 2014, and then gave $5,000 bumps per year in 2015, 2016 and 2017, when the salary reached $75,000.
Council salaries have not risen since 1999.
The Home Rule Charter appeared to conflict on whether the council salary increases should apply to all five members at once, or if some members would have to wait longer to get a bump. So, council first amended the ordinance to clarify that the salary increases would apply to all five members come Jan. 1.
'When you look it at out of fairness, that makes sense. They (former enactors of the Home Rule Charter) certainly wouldn't want to establish a system where two or three members of council were receiving one level of pay, while two or three members were receiving a lower amount,' council solicitor Thomas Gilbride said.
McAndrew cast the lone vote against amending the clarification because he was against the pay raises all along. In voting against the salary increases, McAndrew said, 'People are struggling and I just don't have an appetite at this time.'
Schuster said of his dissent, 'I just feel my compensation is sufficient.'
Noting he will not run for reelection, King said the council pay raise is long overdue.
'In 1976, the salary for council was $7,000. Forty-nine years later — actually almost 50 years later, when this is fully enacted — I think (an) $11,000 (increase) is more than reasonable,' King said. 'I feel it's appropriate. That's why I'm supporting it.'
Council also voted 5-0 to adopt an ordinance to raise the salary of the tax collector next year from $53,300 to $72,000, in conjunction with the Scranton School District that pays for half of the salary.
The 35% raise of $18,700 amounts to about 2.5% per year since the last raise for tax collector, in 2011, Smurl previously said.
Council members noted the tax collector took on more duties last year and the pay raise is warranted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
42 minutes ago
- Time Business News
Why SEO Remains Essential in the Era of Multichannel Marketing
In today's digital landscape, businesses are engaging customers through a complex web of touchpoints—ranging from social media and email to paid ads and influencer campaigns. Yet, amidst this flurry of activity, search engine optimization (SEO) retains a uniquely critical role in anchoring and amplifying the effectiveness of all marketing channels. For organizations aiming to synchronize their multichannel strategies and achieve sustainable growth, working with a consultant like Locke Lee can make all the difference. Multichannel marketing—the practice of reaching customers across multiple platforms and mediums—has become the new normal. Brands connect with audiences via Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, YouTube, podcasts, newsletters, and more. According to a 2024 report by HubSpot, over 70% of businesses now use at least four marketing channels to reach their customers. While this opens doors to broader engagement and brand awareness, it also presents challenges: Fragmented user journeys: Customers may discover brands on social, research products via search, and finally purchase through an email link or a marketplace. Customers may discover brands on social, research products via search, and finally purchase through an email link or a marketplace. Content overload: With so much noise online, standing out becomes harder, and customer attention is increasingly fleeting. With so much noise online, standing out becomes harder, and customer attention is increasingly fleeting. Data silos: Tracking customer behavior across channels is complex, making it difficult to attribute results accurately or understand which touchpoints drive conversions. This is where SEO steps in—not just as another channel, but as the connective tissue that unifies and strengthens multichannel strategies. Despite the growth of social and paid media, organic search remains the primary way consumers find information, services, and products. Google alone processes over 8.5 billion searches per day globally (Internet Live Stats, 2025). SEO ensures that when potential customers actively seek solutions, your brand is positioned front and center. In a multichannel context, SEO acts as a persistent, always-on acquisition engine, capturing intent-driven traffic while other channels build awareness or engagement. Effective SEO requires a deep understanding of what your audience is searching for and the language they use. By aligning keyword research and content strategy with broader marketing themes, brands ensure consistency in messaging across all channels. For example, blog articles optimized for SEO can provide the foundation for social posts, email campaigns, and even video scripts—creating a cohesive narrative that resonates everywhere your audience encounters your brand. Great content is the linchpin of both SEO and multichannel marketing. Optimized landing pages, resource centers, and blog posts not only rank in search engines but can be repurposed for social shares, email newsletters, and digital ads. A study by Content Marketing Institute shows that organizations integrating SEO with content marketing achieve 60% higher conversion rates compared to those operating in silos. SEO tools provide a wealth of data on search trends, content performance, and audience intent. These insights can: Identify which topics resonate most, guiding content creation across platforms. Highlight gaps in the customer journey, inspiring new touchpoints or messaging. Reveal seasonal or regional shifts in demand, informing paid and organic strategies alike. Informed by robust SEO analytics, marketers can optimize their multichannel efforts for maximum synergy and ROI. With multiple channels publishing similar content, brands risk competing with themselves in search results. A strategic approach to keyword mapping and content differentiation is essential to ensure each asset serves a distinct purpose and audience. Landing pages from ad campaigns, microsites, and social links must be technically optimized for speed, mobile usability, and indexability. Technical SEO audits help maintain a seamless user experience regardless of entry point. Google's evolving focus on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness) means that every digital touchpoint—be it a press mention, review, or social comment—can impact search rankings. A multichannel strategy should include reputation management, consistent branding, and authoritative content. SEO and PPC (pay-per-click) campaigns are most effective when aligned. SEO uncovers high-converting keywords that can inform ad copy and bidding strategies, while PPC data reveals which terms drive the best results, feeding back into organic content creation. Content that performs well organically in search often garners more engagement on social platforms, and vice versa. Moreover, social shares and mentions can indirectly influence SEO by increasing brand visibility and driving referral traffic. SEO-optimized blog posts and resources provide valuable content for email campaigns, keeping subscribers engaged and driving them back to the website. Collaborations with influencers and affiliates often result in high-quality backlinks and mentions, both of which are vital for SEO authority. Centralize Your Content Calendar: Plan topics and campaigns around SEO insights, ensuring every channel supports and amplifies core search themes. Maintain Consistent Messaging: Use SEO research to inform the language and tone across all platforms, reinforcing brand identity. Optimize Landing Pages for All Channels: Every campaign destination should be built with SEO best practices—fast, mobile-friendly, and keyword-optimized. Leverage Unified Analytics: Regularly review combined data from SEO, social, email, and paid channels to identify trends and optimize performance. Foster Cross-Department Collaboration: Encourage SEO, content, social, and paid media teams to share insights, brainstorm campaigns, and solve challenges together. As the customer journey becomes more fragmented and nonlinear, SEO's ability to connect disparate digital efforts and capture high-intent traffic is more crucial than ever. Brands that treat SEO as the backbone of their multichannel marketing will enjoy greater visibility, credibility, and sustainable growth. For businesses seeking to thrive in this environment, partnering with experienced professionals like Locke Lee—who combines technical expertise with a holistic understanding of digital ecosystems—can be transformative. Author Bio: Locke Lee is a seasoned SEO strategist and digital marketing consultant with over seven years of experience helping brands harmonize their multichannel efforts for maximum impact. His approach combines technical mastery with actionable insights, empowering organizations to achieve first-page rankings and long-term growth in a dynamic online world. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Engadget
an hour ago
- Engadget
Google to pay $30 million to settle class-action suit over children's privacy
Google has reached a settlement over a lawsuit that claimed it illegally collected data from child users without parental consent through its YouTube video platform and then sent them targeted ads. The tech giant will shell out $30 million to settle the proposed class-action suit. According to Reuters , the plaintiffs' lawyers said there could be 35 million to 45 million class members. Children aged 13 or younger who watched YouTube between July 1, 2013 and April 1, 2020 could be covered. The proposed settlement was filed last night and now awaits judge approval. This settlement amounts to a slap on the wrist compared to the $170 million fine Google faced in 2019 following a similar suit brought by the Federal Trade Commission for alleged violations of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. Under the terms of that case, YouTube had agreed to stop collecting data on videos aimed at children, and both YouTube and Google were prohibited from future COPPA violations.
Buzz Feed
an hour ago
- Buzz Feed
Debate Over Banning Social Media For Kids Under 14
Last month, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that he plans to ban social media in France for people under the age of 15. "We cannot wait," he said of the ban. In France, it's a pressing issue: Macron's announcement comes in the wake of the murder of a high school teaching assistant who was stabbed to death by a 14-year-old student, which has stirred up a conversation about the radicalization of children online. His plans involve adding age verification to some sites. Online age verification is a big topic in itself at the moment, with the swift implementation of the United Kingdom's Online Safety Act being implemented across the web. These age checks are ostensibly meant to protect minors from pornographic content and other harmful material, and of course apply to websites such as PornHub; however, the law also includes social media sites like X (Twitter), Reddit, Discord, and Bluesky, as well as sites such as Spotify and YouTube. Sites use methods like ID scanning and "AI" facial recognition software to "verify" users' age. In the wake of the implementation of the OSA in the UK, Americans are growing concerned that age verification will soon be implemented in the US, too. Critics worry that "age verification" is a path to censorship, surveillance, and even broader data harvesting than we have now. ...Which brings us to this little tidbit: in Florida this year, a federal judge blocked the enforcement of a state law that banned social media accounts for children under 14. While the judge appreciated concerns about the effect of social media on kids, he stated that the 2024 law was "likely unconstitutional." tuned in to this general conversation, when I saw this post on the popular Ask Reddit page from user Lola_girl_10 asking, "Do you support banning social media for anyone under 14 years old? Why?" I had to know what people had to say. Here are the best comments from the conversation: "I support it in theory, but how do you implement it? Does it require me to use my government ID to use the internet? I want less surveillance, not more…" "Yes. I mean, most platforms require users to be over 13, but kids half that age are addicted to them. But the Online Safety Act isn't the way to do it." "Let's start with the basics. How do you define social media? Is YouTube social media? Is Reddit? Are forums like Stack Exchange or GitHub social media? How about online video games? Niche platforms for marginalized and vulnerable populations?" "No, because we don't live in a world where anyone proposing this type of legislation cares about protecting children. Every single one of these proposals is nothing but a power grab that will be used to further eliminate privacy and control free speech." "Parental controls are available for things like this." "I don't support it because that requires age verification, and that makes it impossible to be anonymous." "In theory, yes. Social media, in my opinion, is like a drug, one to be used responsibly when you have a level of brain development that understands the impact it's having." "Yes, and I think we should also ban online gaming for young children." "Ban phones from schools and classrooms; otherwise, it'll take a cultural shift of parents actually parenting instead of handing their toddler a tablet as soon as they can be entertained by it. Any laws requiring ID or verification should be avoided." "Honestly? I support torching all 'social' media to the ground and salting the earth. They are evil. Facebook and Twitter data centers ought to be nuked." "Not at the expense of my privacy or risking my identity." "I don't support it in the way the UK has just done it. Neither the government nor corporations should be invading the privacy of citizens to make up for the failures of bad parents." "Probably. I listened to a podcast once that made the point that we massively restrict all these things that we know are bad for kids — alcohol, tobacco, etc. — but when it comes to social media, we do nothing, despite research showing a clear link between social media use and child/adolescent suicide." "Yes. But my kids are already banned. If you let your kids loose on the internet, then you're a bad parent." "I have two 13-year-olds and we have explained to them in great detail why they are not allowed to use social media. They. Do. Not. Need. It." "Yes, 100%. But 18 would be better. 'Social'-focused media like Instagram and Facebook are a societal cancer." "Yes, I support banning social media for kids under 14 — and not in a 'boomer killjoy' way, but a protect-your-brain-before-it's-fried kinda way." "No. And I'm not falling into the 'but it's the children!' trap either. The current actions are to establish control, and I feel like it's happening everywhere at the same time, from Australia to the EU and the UK to the US, as if it is a coordinated thing." "Yeah, I support banning social media for anyone under 14 because at that age, kids often aren't emotionally ready to handle the pressure, comparison, and potential dangers online. Giving them more time to develop offline social skills and confidence can help protect their mental health." And finally: "I'm just glad I grew up on the net before all this." So, what do you think about curbing kids' access to social media? Is it a terrible idea, a great idea, or perhaps a good idea that's pretty much unenforceable? I want to hear all your thoughts and opinions in the comments below — or, if you want to write in but you prefer to stay anonymous, you can check out this anonymous form: Who knows — your comment could be included in a future BuzzFeed article. Please note: some comments have been edited for length and/or clarity.
