Fury at plans to turn Canterbury Cathedral entrance into Airbnb
Canterbury Cathedral's historic entrance could be transformed into an Airbnb-style holiday let, prompting criticism of the 'Church's continued commercialisation'.
Christ Church Gate, built in the early 16th century, serves as the main entrance to Canterbury Cathedral and is one of the most photographed Christian landmarks in the country.
However, church authorities have proposed to convert the historic tower into 'unrivalled' Airbnb-style accommodation featuring a one-bedroom apartment featuring an open-plan kitchen and living room, a biofuel fire, a breakfast bar and two lavatories.
The Dean and Chapter of Canterbury described the accommodation, which would replace office space on the first and second floors, as 'high quality' and said that it would provide a long-term use for the building.
However, the plans to transform the Grade-I-listed gate, which is the main entrance to the cathedral and believed to have been built between 1504 and 1521, have divided Christians as well as members of the local community.
Dr Gavin Ashenden, former chaplain to the late Queen Elizabeth II, who has since converted to Catholicism, described this as the 'continued commercialisation' of the Church.
Dr Ashenden, who was a choral scholar at King's Canterbury, said: 'As The Church of England continues its meltdown, it's no surprise that they have to go to ever increasing links to raise money.
'To give credit where it is due, at least turning this famous cathedral gateway into an Airbnb doesn't involve the degree of blasphemy and irresponsibility that some of the other money making ventures like turning the cathedral into a nightclub involved. Perhaps local residents should be grateful. It's just Airbnb rather than a casino.'
Hilary Brian, chair of the Canterbury Society, branded the idea 'outrageous' and urged Cathedral authorities to change their minds.
'The gate is such an important piece of Canterbury's history, and it should be preserved,' she told Kent Online.
'It seems such a shame to see one of the city's biggest landmarks disregarded in this way.'
'Centuries-old practice of hospitality'
A Canterbury Cathedral spokesperson said: 'The best long-term way to care for our historic buildings, and ensure that they are maintained for future generations, is for them to be used and loved by residents and visitors.
'The rooms in the Gate remain unrefurbished and, in their current condition, are of limited use.
'As we consider how these rooms could be used, the Cathedral is working closely with historic building specialists, conservation architects and planners to bring them into use.
'This will help us continue our centuries-old practice of hospitality and welcome as we seek to serve the wider community, both here in Canterbury, and across the world. We are looking to share more information as plans unfold.'
Purcell Architects, the company which would transform the historic building, said in documents submitted to the council: 'It is clear from the layout and fixtures, including the large fireplaces and windows originally with shutters, that they were designed for domestic use.'
This is not the first time that cathedrals have been accused of becoming increasingly secularised and commercialised. In 2019 Southwark Cathedral was accused of promoting the ' antithesis of the Christian gospel ' by allowing its nave to be used as a catwalk to sell clothes by fashion designer, Julien MacDonald.
Norwich Cathedral also faced criticism for 'treating God like a tourist attraction' after it installed a 55-ft helter skelter in its nave.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump wins tax breaks for US with threat of ‘revenge' raid on foreign business
Donald Trump has extracted tax breaks for US companies after threatening to impose a 'revenge' levy on foreign businesses that moved money out of the US. G7 countries are to abandon plans to make US companies pay a minimum level of corporation tax in return for Mr Trump dropping the threat of 'revenge tax'. Scott Bessent, the US Treasury secretary, said that he has asked both houses of the US Congress to remove a Trump's tax proposal, known as Section 899, from the budget bill after an agreement with the other G7 countries. Section 899 is part of Mr Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax and spend bill, and would have enabled the US president to retaliate against countries that harm American interests with 'discriminatory' tax policies by taxing any money taken out of the country. The power threatened to be hugely costly to British businesses. Some of Britain's biggest companies, including AstraZeneca, BAE and Barclays, have significant operations in the US that could be at risk of being targeted. Fears had mounted that the powers could be used on the UK as a way of forcing Sir Keir Starmer to water down or abolish Britain's digital service tax, which applies to US tech giants. On Thursday night, Mr Bessent wrote on X: 'After months of productive dialogue with other countries on the OECD Global Tax Deal, we will announce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests. 'President Trump paved the way for this historic achievement. On January 20, the President issued two executive orders instructing [the US] Treasury to defend US tax sovereignty, and as a result of President Trump's leadership we now have a great deal for the American people.' Mr Bessent said the G7 had agreed not to impose what is known as OECD Pillar 2 on US companies. That refers to a 15pc minimum corporate tax rate, which was agreed in principle by 140 countries to be imposed on companies with global revenues of more than €750m (£639m). The idea was to stop multinationals shunting profits from one country to another to take advantage of lower tax rates. Economists complained that it would be only a matter of time before the minimum rate was hiked, locking countries into ever-higher taxes, globally enforced. Joe Biden was an enthusiastic backer of a global minimum rate of corporation tax. Mr Bessent said: 'By reversing the Biden administration's unwise commitments, we are now protecting our nation's authority to enact tax policies that serve the interests of American businesses and workers.' Mr Trump had claimed that the tax deal 'not only allows extraterritorial jurisdiction over American income but also limits our nation's ability to enact tax policies that serve the interests of American businesses and workers'.
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
Plans to limit Airbnb-style lets delayed over fears it would 'kill' tourism
Proposals to introduce a Highland-wide restriction on holiday lets have been delayed amid concerns it could 'kill off' tourism in the region. The blanket proposals would have implemented measures that would have seen applications for short-term lets scrutinised more intensely by council officers. However, councillors instead opted for a more 'pragmatic' and 'sensible' approach, which would allow local areas the power to decide on restrictions. Rural councillors accused the proposals of letting Inverness 'make decisions for them' and resulted in the city councillors' proposal being withdrawn until a later date. Councillors ultimately found an alternative proposal, originally tabled by Aird and Loch Ness councillor Chris Ballance, to be more appropriate. His proposal, which was spearheaded by vice convenor Ken Gowans, delayed any blanket control zone of short-term lets until council officers could prepare a report on the consequences. His suggestion was supported by other councillors such as Wester Ross' Biz Campbell, who said: 'We do not cut off the hand that feeds us.' The plans would also give councillors the chance to implement local area restrictions, as have been successfully implemented in the Badenoch and Strathspey area. Councillor Gowans said the more tentative approach, which could still result in an overall clampdown across the region in the future, was 'pragmatic' and 'sensible.' In support of a scrapping the blanket ban, Skye councillor John Finlayson said: 'The introduction of any short-term let control areas across Highland should only be considered at a local level.' He said: 'No area, no local members and no communities need Inverness or other councillors from other areas to make decisions for them.' Fellow Skye councillor Ruraidh Stewart said the proposals could 'kill off Highland tourism,' but asked to scrap all restrictions on short-term lets as the current legislation 'has brought out the worst in communities.' Inverness councillor Michael Gregson told councillors the traditional Highland bed and breakfast experience was being lost to Airbnb-style visits with 'no welcome.' He said problems with housing in the Highlands are being created by companies buying multiple properties for short-term lets, and houses that could be used as homes lay empty. Councillor Gregson added: 'We are losing what could be valuable income in non-domestic rates and council tax.' Inverness councillor Duncan Macpherson said locals who feel like they are living next to 'miniature hotels' have 'no recourse' against the coming and going of visitors to their area of residence. However, after a period of debate in the chamber, they later agreed to withdraw their proposals. Inverness councillors Michael Gregson and Duncan Macpherson brought forward proposals in the hope it would tighten controls on short-term lets across the Highlands. They argued that the 7,011 short-term lets that have been approved, compared to just four refusals, highlight the scale of holiday lets across the region and a lack of action to restrict them. As part of their proposal, the council would have asked the Scottish Government to review short-term let licensing to allow applications to be rejected on the grounds of 'overprovision.' They also believed the council did not have enough powers with the current licensing legislation to reject applications. Edinburgh was the first council area to introduce the stricter controls back in 2022. In the Highlands, the Badenoch and Strathspey ward brought a control zone into their area last year. A short-term let control zone gives councils extra powers to manage short-term lets in an area that is particularly popular with holiday lets. While all holiday let hopefuls have to apply for a short-term let licence, in a control zone, applicants also need to apply for planning permission, which further scrutinises their proposals. A council report identifying how individual areas could implement restrictions similar to Badenoch and Strathspey will be prepared for September. The report will also include further information on a region-wide Highland clampdown of short-term lets, which could still be implemented. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Taxpayers will be left counting the cost for years to come if Labour rebels block welfare cuts
Taking the PIP FOR those Labour MPs excitedly plotting against the PM while virtue-signalling about the cruelty of cutting benefits, we have a reality check. According to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the welfare Bill would actually RISE by a further £8billion even if the changes were fully implemented. Spending on health-related benefits would reach a whopping £61billion by the end of the decade. That's up by £25billion on the figure in 2019-20, before Covid. If Labour rebels block the changes, this figure balloons to £66billion. It now looks inevitable Starmer will be forced to retreat, having abandoned his pledge to stand firm and instead offering 'conversations' with the rebels. Labour MPs might well feel better and pat themselves on the back on Twitter for being 'progressive' — once again the buzzword of the Left. But taxpayers will be left counting the cost for years to come. The PM, meanwhile, stands seriously weakened less than a year after winning a landslide. What a self-inflicted disaster. Angela Rayner says lifting 2-child benefit cap not 'silver bullet' for ending poverty after demanding cuts for millions Red-handed DO as I say, not as I do. They should carve that mantra in stone above the entrance to the Department of Energy. Ed Miliband loves telling ordinary folk to make expensive sacrifices to save the planet. Yet it's somehow no surprise that His Greenness flew at least one Net Zero official on a 10,000-mile round-trip to Brazil on a pointless mission to check whether hotels they considered booking for him and his team were suitable. Apparently we must all ditch the gas boilers that keep us warm. But pumping out tonnes of CO2 is completely fine if it's in pursuit of a perfect hotel suite for the minister. Miliband's hypocrisy will probably go down badly with the Climate Change Committee quango. It says his failure to lift expensive green levies from electricity bills means punters aren't buying enough electric cars or heat pumps. It seems even his eco warrior mates don't think he's up to the job. No to Nanny BRITS generally hate being told what to do — especially when it makes no sense. So why don't the busybodies presiding over our increasingly nanny state just leave us alone? Since when was having a pint or a flutter such a danger to society? Why must we constantly be told to watch where we're going, hold the handrail, mind our heads and our words — even our thoughts? No one asked for any of this. Nanny doesn't know best. We do.
