
NGT seeks inspection records of all cracker units in Virudhunagar
The directive comes amid a spate of fatal accidents at cracker units. The NGT bench termed the recurring deaths a result of 'systemic regulatory failure' and expressed concern over non-compliance with safety norms. The rising deaths year after year points to gaps in enforcement, the bench comprising judicial member Pushpa Sathyanarayana and expert member K Satyagopal observed, as PESO and state counsels pointed fingers at each other.
The PESO counsel admitted to widespread violations, including illegal sub-licensing and the prohibited use of mobile phones inside factory premises - a clear violation of Rule 10(6) of the Explosives Rules, 2008, which bans ignition sources like mobile phones and radios within 15 metres of areas where explosives are stored or handled.
So far, PESO has cancelled the licences of 10 units and suspended several others. However, the casualty data remains grim. In 2022, 18 people were killed in cracker unit accidents - 12 in PESO-licensed units and six in units licensed by the district magistrate. The toll rose to 39 in 2023, with 35 deaths reported from PESO units. This year alone, 43 deaths have already been recorded, 42 of them in PESO-supervised units.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
3 days ago
- Hindustan Times
NGT fines Ghaziabad civic body ₹17.45 lakh for illegal waste dumping at Apsara Border
The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has imposed an environmental compensation of ₹17.45 lakh on the Ghaziabad municipal corporation for allegedly dumping municipal solid waste in violation of waste management rules. The order, delivered on July 31 while disposing of a petition by Laxmi Narain, a resident of Chikambarpur village, directed that the amount be deposited with the Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) within two months. The NGT said the compensation would be used to remediate environmental damage in accordance with a plan to be drawn up by a committee comprising officials of the Central Pollution Control Board, UPPCB, and the Ghaziabad district magistrate. Narain had complained that the corporation was dumping waste at the Apsara Border area — in the Ghaziabad–Dilshad Garden stretch near GT Road — causing foul odour and air pollution, and posing a risk of disease outbreaks and groundwater contamination due to leachate seepage. 'We accordingly, in exercise of power under Section 15 read with Section 20 of the NGT Act, 2010, and invoking the principle of 'Polluter Pays,' impose environmental compensation of ₹17,45,000 upon respondent 1, which shall be paid within two months,' the tribunal said. It added that the corporation had 'miserably failed to comply with the provisions of the Municipal Solid Waste Rules, 2016, and committed illegalities in management, transportation, processing, and disposal of the solid waste' in the area. The NGT said the compensation would be used to remediate environmental damage in accordance with a plan to be drawn up by a committee comprising officials of the Central Pollution Control Board, UPPCB, and the Ghaziabad district magistrate. When contacted, corporation officials said they intended to seek a review. 'We are analyzing the order in detail,' said Mithilesh Kumar, city health officer. The case was based partly on an inspection by UPPCB officials on March 3, 2025. Their report said the site — measuring about 1,600 sqm — temporarily held waste from four wards, with around 40 metric tonnes of garbage lying there at the time. While no leachate or sewage was found entering the adjoining stormwater drain, the site was 'in an unhygienic condition' with a foul smell, and waste scattered in the area due to the absence of a boundary wall. The report also noted that no consent to operate or establish had been obtained from the pollution board for the site. Earlier, the tribunal had directed the municipal commissioner to file a compliance report. In an affidavit dated November 9, 2024, the corporation said the site was a secondary garbage collection centre (SGCC) set up a few years ago to temporarily store waste from four wards. It said five other SGCCs in the area had been closed in the past four to five years, and that most problems at the Apsara Border site occurred during the monsoon but were addressed promptly. On March 1, 2025, the corporation submitted another affidavit stating it had decided to shift the SGCC to a new facility in Chikambarpur within two months. In a third affidavit dated July 4, 2025, it said the Apsara Border site had been cleared and was now proposed to be used as a zonal office, with tendering for the work underway. However, the tribunal said the corporation had failed to specify where the new collection point was located or whether it complied with the Municipal Solid Waste Rules, 2016. 'No specific reply could be given,' it noted, adding that the July 4 affidavit was 'silent' on compliance regarding the new site.


Hindustan Times
4 days ago
- Hindustan Times
NGT steps in after hill collapse in Rajasthan, locals blame illegal mining
The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has taken suo motu cognisance of media reports about a hill collapse at Nari village in Rajasthan's Jhunjhunu district following heavy rainfall, officials said. NGT took suo motu note of a hill collapse in Jhunjhunu after heavy rain.(Pexel) Locals have blamed unregulated illegal mining for the incident in which a portion of the hill collapsed with an explosion-like sound. The incident led to cracks in nearby buildings, causing widespread panic, the locals said. The NGT has issued notices to various authorities and transferred the case to its Central Zone Bench in Bhopal for a hearing on September 17. The order passed by the NGT on August 4 was based on media reports about the hill collapse in the Chirawa area after heavy rainfall. The villagers have blamed illegal and unregulated mining activities carried out in the area by private contractors for the incident. The NGT noted that the incident was a violation of the Environment Protection Act, 1986, and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. Also Read: Illegal mining razes Aravalli hill despite FIR It has issued notices to the Jhunjhunu district collector, Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board, Department of Mines and Geology, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, and the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB).


Indian Express
6 days ago
- Indian Express
Buddha Nullah woes: NGT raps dyeing industry for ‘years of negligence', directs MoEF&CC & PPCB to submit report on violations by CETPs
The National Green Tribunal (NGT), in its latest order, has criticised the dyeing industry in Ludhiana for 'years of unchecked pollution and institutional failure'. This stems from the NGT's concern over the long-standing issue of inadequate pollution control measures by the industry's common effluent treatment plants (CETPs). The NGT, in its order, has set a two-month deadline for the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) to complete its ongoing proceedings into the matter, and directed the Punjab Pollution Control Board (PPCB) to submit a comprehensive report on violations by the CETPs, along with environmental compensation calculations and recovery. All parties are to file compliance affidavits at least a week before the next hearing, scheduled for October 7. Acting on multiple petitions filed by the Public Action Committee (PAC), the NGT documented 'extraordinary levels of non-compliance with environmental clearance conditions', most notably the illegal and continued discharge of effluents directly into the city's highly polluted stream, Buddha Nullah — earlier known as Buddha Dariya — in 'blatant violation of binding environmental safeguards'. It has also issued notices to the authorities concerned to fix this issue at the earliest. In the petitions, the dyeing industry in Ludhiana has been accused of polluting the Buddha Nullah — already carrying domestic and industrial waste — with its toxic discharge, as the nullah water further mixes into Sutlej River, whose water is used for drinking purposes. The industry's three CETPs with the capacity of 15 MLD, 40 MLD, and 50 MLD were found to be in gross and prolonged violation of their environmental clearance mandates — flouting the zero liquid discharge (ZLD) condition, absence of consent to operate, as well as unauthorised and direct discharge of wastewater into Buddha Nullah since their inception. In its compliance report, the MoEF&CC had also confirmed that the 15-MLD CETP, run by Bahadur Ke Textiles & Knitwears Association, is 'continuously discharging 15 MLD treated water to Buddha Nullah'. The 40-MLD and 50-MLD CETPs, run by Punjab Dyers Association, are 'continuously dispatching 40 MLD and 50 MLD treated waste water, respectively, to the Buddha Nullah'. According to the NGT order dated July 22, a copy of which was uploaded on Tuesday, it has been informed by the authorities concerned that the environmental compensation, totaling over Rs 10 crore, has already been imposed on the CETPs — Rs 4.5 crore on the 15-MLD unit, Rs 2.96 crore (40-MLD unit), and Rs 2.49 crore (50-MLD unit). 'Despite these penalties and other revoked permissions, the CETPs continue to operate and pollute,' the NGT noted. On the core violation of the ongoing discharge of treated effluent into Buddha Nullah, the NGT said it is in 'clear defiance' of specific conditions, under which these CETPs were granted environmental clearance. Asserting the CETPs have 'entirely failed' to implement zero liquid discharge (ZLD), it noted: 'There is no system to recycle effluent, no return pipeline to industries, and no destruction mechanism via reverse osmosis or evaporators — as was mandated.' The NGT, citing the MoEF&CC audit, further noted 'a pattern of total regulatory failure' including no online monitoring of effluent; no MoUs between CETPs and member industries regulating flow and quality; effluent transported without CETP tankers, manifest system or GPS tracking; hazardous waste generated but no authorisation obtained; no functional environmental management cells or green belt development; and no compliance reporting to MoEF&CC or Punjab Pollution Control Board (PPCB). It emphasised that 'the failures exist since the inception of CETPs', resulting in prosecution under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. While a high-level committee has been formed by the Punjab government, to address pollution in Buddha Nullah, the NGT flagged serious gaps, noting the PPCB and the state Environment Department were excluded — despite being legally accountable. It also objected to the unexplained inclusion of NGT in the committee's mandate, urging a 'clearer and more effective oversight framework'. The NGT action follows three 'original applications' and as many 'execution applications' filed by PAC Mattewara — a coalition of local residents and environmental advocates. The tribunal recognised the presence and grievances of affected citizens during hearings, and recorded their complaints against continued pollution. It further directed the MoEF&CC to consider hearing citizen representatives as part of its ongoing enforcement drive. 'This order marks a watershed moment in the long-running struggle for environmental justice in Ludhiana. It confirms years of administrative failure, industrial disregard for law, and the pivotal role of citizen-led action in bringing accountability,' PAC member Kapil Arora, also a petitioner, said.