UCLA was trounced by UConn, but can the Bruins get back to the Final Four next season?
UCLA was trounced by UConn, but can the Bruins get back to the Final Four next season?
UCLA was trounced by UConn, but can the Bruins get back to the Final Four next season?
TAMPA — As the UCLA starters congregated before tip-off against UConn, joy radiated from the Bruins. The players had emphasized in the days leading up to the national semifinal that they expected to be at the Final Four – they were the No. 1 overall seed, after all – but they couldn't hide their smiles when the moment arrived.
Advertisement
On the other side of the court, the Huskies were all business. No one on UConn's roster would be satisfied, let alone happy, if the season were to end Friday.
The difference between a program experiencing its first Final Four in the NCAA Tournament era and one in its 24th, seeking its 12th national title, could not have been more stark. And the disparity bore out during the contest, as the Huskies decisively took down the newcomers, 85-51, the largest margin of victory ever in a Final Four game.
For all of the success the Bruins achieved in a historic season in Los Angeles, they didn't come close to matching the level of UConn. They couldn't complete passes in the half court and turned the ball over on multiple dribble hand-offs. They rushed what open shots they could create. They seemed lost on their defensive execution, miscommunicating on how to handle the Huskies' screening actions inside the arc.
UConn played what its coach Geno Auriemma called a mistake-free game. UCLA was uncharacteristically sloppy. The Bruins lost the game with 14 turnovers in the first half, leading to 19 points for the Huskies; UCLA only had 22 points total at intermission.
Advertisement
'We got exposed,' coach Cori Close said. 'We got our butts kicked today. And it stings right now.'
The Bruins had been in big games throughout the season. A showdown against the then-undefeated defending champions in November. Two matchups against USC with Big Ten regular-season title implications. The conference championship against those same Trojans. And the escalating scale of each game in the NCAA Tournament.
Those experiences weren't enough to prepare them for what awaited against UConn. Something about the Final Four, with the eyes of the entire women's basketball community on that singular game, caused UCLA to shrink in the limelight. Close acknowledged that she wasn't a good enough leader in her first trip to this stage, saying, 'The reality is you have to go experience it.'
Advertisement
'It's hard when we haven't been in this moment, but I still think that we're obviously a much better team than what we showed today,' junior guard Kiki Rice said.
The Bruins won't be able to back up that statement until next season, but they could return the entirety of their roster. Only Angela Dugalić is a senior, and she still has an additional year of eligibility due to medically redshirting the 2022-23 season. All of the continuity this team has built can be carried forward.
But there are no guarantees. Dugalić could go pro, as could Lauren Betts (though she has repeatedly rejected that possibility since she wants to play with her sister) and junior Janiah Barker. Anyone could enter the transfer portal. And what was mostly a healthy season in 2024-25 doesn't have to be next year.
UCLA is poised for future success and has taken meaningful steps forward since this core arrived on campus as the No. 1 recruiting class in 2022. That doesn't mean progress is linear.
Advertisement
Across town, USC was a title contender less than two weeks ago and is now entering the 2025-26 season with two rotation players from their Elite Eight team. Los Angeles Sparks coach Lynne Roberts, who was in attendance Friday supporting Close, coached a Utah team that came within two free throws of beating eventual champion LSU in the 2023 NCAA Tournament; the Utes brought back everyone who averaged more than 10 minutes the following year but suffered injuries and couldn't recapture the same magic.
Opportunities have to be seized in the moment. To be two games away from a national championship and play their worst game of the season should haunt the Bruins.
'Our urgency and our competitiveness, I think we kind of lacked that a little bit today, just recognizing that this is the Final Four and our season is on the line,' Betts said. 'We really need to recognize the moment that we're in and play like it.'
This group at UCLA has bounced back from failures and disappointments. Blowing a fourth-quarter lead in the Sweet 16 to LSU motivated the entire team to improve its toughness in the offseason. Losing the Big Ten regular-season title led to a players-only meeting that resulted in a conference tournament title.
Advertisement
They know how to take the requisite lessons from defeat and get better in the process. When Betts said postgame she hoped the loss would fuel them and inspire some anger in her teammates, she has witnessed that first-hand.
Since 1995, when UConn won its first championship, only two teams have won it all in their first trip to the Final Four. Baylor defeated a fellow first-timer (Michigan State) in 2005, and Texas A&M beat a three-time semifinalist in Notre Dame. The experience gap for the Bruins and the Huskies was much larger than either of those situations. Regardless of their internal expectations, there isn't much surprise in UCLA coming up short in this attempt.
This is the only time that the Bruins get to use this excuse, though. Now, they know the standard they need to live up to from the moment they begin offseason workouts and fall practices.
UConn has turned the Final Four into an annual rite of passage for its program. For UCLA, this has to be another stepping stone as the Bruins continue their pursuit of that standard.
Advertisement
This article originally appeared in The Athletic.
UCLA Bruins, Women's College Basketball, Women's NCAA Tournament
2025 The Athletic Media Company
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
True freshmen shine as LSU baseball heads to College World Series
True freshmen shine as LSU baseball heads to College World Series True freshmen playing meaningful baseball in the SEC is a rarity with the talent level among all teams, but LSU baseball head coach Jay Johnson takes a different approach it's paying off. Nobody in our league plays freshmen," Johnson said. "They just don't. We do, and they play pretty darn good baseball." In both rounds of the 2025 NCAA Tournament, the youngsters gave LSU a boost. Derek Curiel remained a fixture near the top of the lineup while pitchers Casan Evans and Cooper Williams made high-leverage appearances. Curiel finished the West Virginia series with five RBI, four hits, including a home run, and three walks. Evans earned the win in relief during the regional championship game by throwing six innings of one run ball with 12 strikeouts. Williams pitched 3.2 scoreless innings in relief after the Tigers fell behind Little Rock. Johnson will continue to rely on the freshmen to move his team through the College World Series and beyond as he continues building the LSU program. "They just need to be themselves," Johnson said. "I'm proud of them for contributing on a team this good. To contribute as much as that has is awesome and they're the foundation of this thing moving forward." LSU will play begin its College World Series journey when the Tigers meet Arkansas at 5 p.m. CT on Saturday.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can women's basketball teams catch up to UConn or South Carolina in a changing era?
For decades, women's basketball was dominated almost exclusively by UConn and Tennessee, and then, for many years, only UConn's dynasty thrived. In recent years, other contenders have emerged periodically, but none have challenged the crown quite as well as South Carolina. Advertisement Until this past season, the Gamecocks and Dawn Staley had arguably taken the mantle from the Huskies and Geno Auriemma. Then, UConn returned to the top of the ladder and cut down the nets for the 12th time in program history, keeping this rivalry and battle for the top of the sport in flux. Slice it anyway, though, and it's obvious: No. 1 might be up for grabs, but it's these two heavyweights that everyone is chasing. NIL, the transfer portal and the recent House v. NCAA settlement, which established revenue sharing in college sports, have upended the landscape. However, due to their rich traditions and coaching acumen, UConn and South Carolina have remained mostly unscathed by the upheaval — and even benefited from it. The Gamecocks and Huskies signed two of the most highly pursued portal players, as Ta'Niya Latson, the nation's leading scorer, left Florida State for South Carolina, and Serah Williams, arguably the best big in the portal, left Wisconsin to choose UConn. This leaves every other coach in the nation strategizing and wondering what it will take to truly and consistently usurp perennial powerhouses UConn and South Carolina on the recruiting trail, the hardwood, or in March. Like much of the rest of big-money NCAA sports, women's basketball coaches are no longer prioritizing only building four-year players but winning with transfers who can be lured with lucrative NIL promises. Advertisement As complicated as the modern era of college athletics has become — a record 1,450 Division I players entered the transfer portal after last season — coaches understand they must work within the confines of this new system, which involves the portal acting as a faster on-ramp for roster building. NIL and revenue share are becoming additional incentives for players to consider other programs if they want to succeed. Fourteen power conference coaches interviewed by said they've completely altered how they build rosters, recruit and develop talent. 'Coaches are questioning, obviously: Is it even worth it to be in this business? What are we doing? What are we doing if we can't build a program and you're starting from scratch every year to build a team without any rules around it?' one power conference coach said. 'What are we doing? And why are we doing it?' 'I have to change. I have to pivot and plan for 50 percent attrition,' another power conference coach added. 'Time will tell if you can build a program (in this era). If I can't build a program, I'm not going to be doing it very long.' Advertisement Playing time, star roles and scholarships are no longer enough for coaches to retain players. Notable star players like Latson, Olivia Miles (Notre Dame to TCU) and Cotie McMahon (Ohio State to Ole Miss) switched programs. They were among roughly 300 power conference players who transferred this offseason — an average of about four players per power conference team. More than 20 percent of the transfer pool had already changed schools at least once. Among the 40 returning starters off Sweet 16 rosters, 10 transferred. Many coaches said this season's top portal players signed deals of upward of $700,000, and some unheralded underclassmen, due to their longer eligibility, were seeking deals of $ 300,000 or more. By comparison, the WNBA supermax this season is less than $250,000, with only four players receiving it. Meanwhile, less than a quarter of the league makes $200,000 or more. Yet, at the college level with limited post players in the portal, many coaches said programs needed to offer a premium of that kind to sign even a marginal big. Advertisement 'If you were a post player in the portal a month ago and you averaged three points a game at the Power 4, most of them were asking for $200,000 plus,' one power conference coach said. 'And you're like, 'You averaged 2.5 points per game.' ' Even highly successful programs are learning they might need to reset expectations after every season, given the uncertainty of attrition and what those defections mean for their own needs from the portal. Look no further than UCLA. The Bruins appeared in their first Final Four of the modern era and, in a previous era of the sport, would have been considered a prime contender in the 2025-26 season due to the experience returning players gained. Yet, after the Bruins' successful run, the entire freshman class, as well as Londynn Jones, a 31-game starter, and Janiah Barker, the Big Ten's Sixth Player of the Year, decided to transfer. It means UCLA coach Cori Close will be starting essentially from scratch after this core's graduation, rather than steadily building a program, with backups becoming role players and then starters, that is capable of taking down UConn or South Carolina in the Final Four. Advertisement Notre Dame was ranked No. 1 during the season, and despite a late collapse, seemed poised for a strong upcoming season. But after the Irish lost Miles to TCU, freshman key contributor Kate Koval to LSU and two other players, they dropped out of 's post-transfer top 25. USC seemingly has prime minutes up for grabs after losing star JuJu Watkins to an ACL tear. Still, Kayleigh Heckle and Avery Howell, two freshmen who figured to be centerpieces next season, entered the transfer portal. 'You had to think about sitting out a year, you had to think about the perception,' one power conference coach said about previous transfer implications. 'Now it's just normalized. If you lost two or three kids in a year, it used to be like, 'Oh my gosh, what's wrong at that school?' And that's just not the notion anymore.' Some coaches likened the roster turnover to coaching at the junior college level. 'If I can keep the kid for two years,' one said, 'I feel like I've won the lottery.' Advertisement Although most coaches are frustrated with the lack of oversight and guardrails in place from the NCAA over the past few seasons, they understand that it's also a shifting reality for them. In this era of limited regulation and hazy guidance, coaches and universities that are quick to adapt have had the upper hand, whether that means getting their collectives more involved (generally seen as acceptable among all coaches) or tampering with athletes (seen as illegal, but not currently regulated as such). Now, with the settlement finalized over the weekend, actual regulation is taking effect. As of last Saturday, college athletes were required to report NIL deals worth more than $600 to the newly established College Sports Commission for approval. On July 1, universities can begin making revenue share payments to athletes. The impact of these regulations on athletes' deals is currently unknown. Still, the NCAA has been clear that the NIL-specific regulation is intended to protect athletes from false deals, not to hinder their earning power. However, because the settlement had been pushed back — a decision was expected two months ago — universities and collectives were able to front-load deals, which created an arms race across conferences, which drove up the total 'cost' of rosters. Advertisement asked 12 coaches what they expect it would cost, between revenue share and NIL, to build a roster that could contend for their respective conference title. Multiple Big Ten and SEC coaches estimated the cost between $2.5 million and $3.5 million. Multiple ACC and Big 12 coaches said that building a championship roster costs between $1.5 million and $2.5 million. Most of those numbers exceed even the WNBA's team salary cap of just under $1.51 million. However, this number is a moving target. With impending legislation, coaches are uncertain about how it may change in the coming seasons, particularly with the establishment of revenue sharing and the creation of the College Sports Commission. Coaches said that while the leverage has shifted almost entirely to players, there are no safeguards in place for the programs or the collectives that act on their behalf. This movement leaves many coaches working on a year-to-year basis, unsure of what their rosters will look like or how much money they will have to fill potential holes. 'In true professional sports, I know I have this player under contract for four years and I can prepare for that player to go into free agency, or I know I have $200,000 coming off the books ahead of next year. Here, it's free agency every single year, and the tampering is out of control,' one coach said. 'So, please tell me how I do this. Tell me how to manage a roster when we don't know the rules.' Advertisement Regulation around NIL, collectives and revenue share could provide some stability, but even so, coaches expect both tampering and transfer numbers to remain high every season. From the 2020 high school recruiting class, 17 of the top 25 (and seven of the top 10) players transferred before the end of their college careers, including Angel Reese, Kamilla Cardoso and Hailey Van Lith. In the 2021 class, 13 of the top 25 players transferred, and 18 of the top 25 players in the 2022 class, now rising seniors, transferred. This attrition has had a ripple effect on how college coaches prioritize high school recruiting. Many staff chose not to send multiple (or any) coaches on the road this offseason for the first high school recruiting evaluation period, valuing hosting immediate impact players over seeing talent who wouldn't be on campus for a few years. That signals a significant shift in the overall recruiting philosophy. Five years ago, the lifeblood of almost every program was high school recruiting. Now, the portal offers another option. Multiple coaches said that their focus on high school recruits has decreased from 95-100 percent of their recruiting efforts to somewhere between 50-70 percent. Nearly 80 power conference freshmen transferred this offseason, so coaches also realize that bringing in a freshman doesn't necessarily mean stability. Advertisement As coaches prepare for summer workouts before the 2025-26 season and make plans to attend high school recruiting events, they recognize that their priorities might look different a year from now. Regulations from the House settlement could remove some of the challenges of the past few seasons. Still, coaches will have to navigate a landscape that once seemed unimaginable in college sports. However, one challenge remains the same: UConn and South Carolina are the hunted. 'The job is just different now,' one coach said. 'You just have to make up your mind if you want to deal with the other stuff.' This article originally appeared in The Athletic. South Carolina Gamecocks, Connecticut Huskies, Sports Business, Women's College Basketball 2025 The Athletic Media Company
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Bruins general manager Don Sweeney talks in depth about the process that ended with Marco Sturm being named head coach
No matter the topic, be it coaching style, playing structure, player development, what he expects and demands from players, or talking about his family, Sturm's energy was evident. He checked the boxes Sweeney was looking for in the search for the franchise's 30th head coach. Sweeney knew Sturm from his five seasons in Boston, but it was the hockey journey of his post-playing days that the GM wanted to dive into deeper. Advertisement 'We got into his path and his passion and his command of the steps that he's taken to be ready for this opportunity,' Sweeney told the Globe at the NHL Scouting Combine on Friday. 'And while we were going through it, the third or fourth time we met up, the passion just about why he was coaching, and the fact that he'd spent a lot of time away from his family, the sacrifice he's made to be a coach despite being a successful player and still had the passion to really take the reins of the head coaching job in the NHL. He's put his time in.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Sweeney revealed details about the 'laborious' search to find a coach to lead a Bruins team that will look much different from the one that started the 2024-25 season, and the edition that ended the campaign. Advertisement 'It's an encompassing process in the fact that it's laborious from the standpoint of the amount of time you want to spend and need to spend with each person, but it's insightful in a lot of ways,' said Sweeney. 'They're breaking down your team at some point in time. Now, our team looks far different than it did in the first part of last year, right? You go through the trade deadline; you realize that there's a much smaller core group of guys and what you're going to do is hypothetical in a lot of ways. So, you get into not as much your personnel side of things. The first phases for me have always been about what you are as a coach and then, how are you going to play, how do you expect your team to play? And then you can get into the personalities of how you interact with players and how things have gone. In some cases, guys have been head coaches and what experiences they've learned, what they might want to do differently, and things like that.' While the meetings are set to learn about the candidates, Sweeney finds they often have other benefits. 'You are gaining a lot of knowledge both about your own team and about your interactions, and how you need to continue to work . . . It's a chance to have some feedback and a bit of a critical eye, to tell you the truth, and you have to be receptive to things you need to do differently,' said Sweeney. 'Are these things the organization is willing to do differently? Because that's what a coach is presenting, he's not presenting how we see it, but at the end of the day I'm always pointing it back, 'No, no, no, don't ask how I see it. How do you see it? How do you want to play?' ' Advertisement Sweeney went through several rounds of interviews as he whittled his list and 'I did two initial screenings with most of the candidates and then we did very thorough Zoom calls, so the coaches were fully presenting, and I had [assistant GMs] Jamie Langenbrunner and Evan Gold in those meetings,' said Sweeney. 'I followed up with, once we talked about all the candidates that we had on Zoom, I followed up with secondary things that [Langenbrunner and Gold] had pointed out that maybe we can pull on this string and maybe we can ask this follow-up question, and then we narrowed it down to the four guys we felt comfortable with. And at that point in time, we brought four candidates in to meet, and [team president] Cam [Neely] and I sat down with them. Now, by the same token, after those meetings, I called up Evan and Jamie because they had been part of [the process], as well. Marco did come and meet with [chief executive officer] Charlie [Jacobs] and Cam, as well, when I made my recommendation.' Sweeney declined to name the other finalists. As for the qualities and reasons that made Sturm stand out above the others, there were numerous. 'I don't think it's the narrative of just bringing back a former player. I think it's a player who has passion, has familiarity with the marketplace, and knows what the expectations are, which is healthy in a lot of ways,' said Sweeney. 'He's got eyes wide open.' Advertisement Sweeney pointed to Sturm's extensive coaching experience from the prep school level to international competition, and his time in the NHL and AHL. All of those experiences helped him build a résumé for this job. Sturm began his NHL coaching career in the Kings organization as an assistant under Todd McLellan. Part of Sturm's duties consisted of helping a team that was always stout defensively evolve offensively to become more well-rounded. Sturm then decided he needed head coaching experience and took the top job with the Ontario Reign, Los Angeles's AHL affiliate, in 2022. 'He embraced the opportunity to go down and lead his own team and then he got a chance to work with some pretty good younger players there and develop them and watch them go on to be NHL players,' said Sweeney. Sturm's ability to work with and gain the trust of LA's development staff also impressed Sweeney, who said he will be adding another assistant to holdovers Chris Kelly, Jay Leach, and Bob Essensa. 'They trusted Marco at the NHL level as an assistant, now as a head coach working in the development side of it, watching him run his own team,' said Sweeney. Related : Sturm became adept at holding players to a standard they would need to follow in order to be successful in the NHL. 'He has enough confidence and pushback to say, 'Hey, this is the right path for this player. This is my recommendation. I respect what the organization wants to do, but I also have an understanding of what I think needs to be done as a coach,' ' said Sweeney. 'And I like that.' Advertisement The ability to coax and coach players should benefit some of the Bruins' core younger players, including Mason Lohrei, Matt Poitras, and Fabian Lysell, among others. 'These guys and the next guys, to tell you the truth. This has a longer-term growth opportunity for the organization because Marco's seen the success of those players. He can hold them to that standard,' said Sweeney. 'He can also have a conversation saying, 'I told [Kings defenseman] Brandt Clarke the same thing, Mason, if you don't go up and defend and play with a conviction, you might be able to run a power play but they're not going to trust you, they're not going to play you in the playoffs, they're not going to put you in situations that you can't handle and you have to respect that part of the game.' So, we're going to do that as an organization, but he can walk that walk. I like that part. I like the fact that he's put some guys in those situations, he's given him opportunities while also holding them to a standard.' Jim McBride can be reached at
