
Pakistan tried hard to instigate Sikhs against India during Operation Sindoor
These allegations were categorically disproven when Prime Minister Narendra Modi made an unannounced visit to the very Adampur airbase on 13 May. Photographs of Modi standing in front of a fully operational and intact S-400 air defence system—the very system Pakistan claimed to have destroyed—exposed the lie. Satellite imagery from multiple independent sources further confirmed that there was no damage whatsoever to any Indian Air Force bases, including Adampur.
In a particularly egregious example of propaganda, Pakistan's Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, made an astonishing claim on 10 May. He alleged that 'India launched six ballistic missiles from Adampur,' with one landing 'in their own general area of Adampur and five have targeted the Indian Punjab general area of Amritsar,' mischievously implying that the strikes were part of a deliberate plan to hit the Golden Temple—the holiest of shrines for Sikhs worldwide. He further claimed that Pakistan had inflicted significant damage on defence installations and the air defence system at the Adampur Indian Air Force base near Jalandhar.
Having failed not only on the military front but also in the diplomatic arena, Pakistan's establishment appears to be falling back on its decades-old playbook—attempting to instigate Sikhs, both within India and abroad, against their own homeland. This renewed propaganda campaign, launched in the wake of a humiliating military setback, reveals more about Pakistan's desperation than any semblance of coherent strategy. However, Pakistan perhaps fails to realise that Punjab and India are no longer in the state they were during the 1980s or early 1990s—and therefore, its abhorrent attempts have proved utterly abortive.
Also read: You're wrong to think Khalistani movement over for India. See Pakistan-backed groups in US
Pannun's propaganda and Pakistan's false narratives
Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, a designated terrorist under Indian law and the self-proclaimed legal counsel of the banned organisation Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), has long functioned as a vocal agent of Khalistani extremism. Now a naturalised US citizen operating from New York, Pannun continues to issue venomous statements against India, despite facing multiple terrorism and sedition charges and being wanted in nearly two dozen cases.
In his latest outburst, Pannun swiftly echoed Pakistan's fabricated narrative following the ISPR's outrageous 9 May claim that Indian missiles from Adampur had struck Amritsar. Within hours, using affiliated social media accounts such as @SFJGenCounsel, he parroted the line that Sikhs were being targeted by the Indian State. His provocative question—'Why are Sikhs target?'—was immediately followed by the inflammatory slogan, 'Modi's missiles kill Sikhs – Khalistan is the answer!'
The speed and substance of Pannun's reaction leave little to the imagination. That his messaging emerged within hours of the DG ISPR's wild and disproven assertions clearly demonstrates that he is either a willing proxy or an unabashed mouthpiece of Pakistan's pernicious propaganda machinery. Far from championing any genuine Sikh cause, Pannun's statements serve as an echo chamber for the very forces that have historically suppressed minority rights within Pakistan, including those of its own beleaguered Sikh population.
What makes Pannun's radicalism all the more disingenuous is his personal origin—he hails from Khankot village, just outside the municipal limits of Amritsar on the Grand Trunk Road to Jalandhar. This locality is hardly a site of grievance or alienation, yet he has repackaged himself as the global face of separatism. In January 2025, his quest for attention saw him reportedly 'gatecrash' an event linked to US President Donald Trump—another publicity stunt designed to mask the hollowness of his cause with spectacle and provocation.
Also read: Kartarpur and Khalistan: Why Pakistan Army has been so eager to open corridor with India
Ground reality in Gurdaspur: Pakistan's fireworks fail to spark fear
Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa, Congress Lok Sabha MP from Gurdaspur, conducted a tour earlier this week of border villages in the Bamial sector (Pathankot) along the Ravi River, as well as settlements in the Dera Baba Nanak, Dhariwal, and Kalanaur sectors. In a personal conversation with this writer, Randhawa shared, 'Even in villages like Naushehra Dhalla and Dhangeran—situated beyond the Ravi's banks—farmers reported not a single bullet, let alone missiles or drones, penetrated Indian airspace.' He added that the administration had ordered limited evacuations, but life remained peaceful. People felt secure because India's air defence systems had neutralised every threat.
While criticising the poor condition of roads, education, and healthcare in these frontier regions, Randhawa unequivocally demanded the resurrection of the Border Area Development Project with 100 per cent central funding. He noted that his constituency had borne the brunt of not only the India-Pakistan wars of 1965 and 1971 but also the Pakistan-abetted proxy war of terrorism through the 1980s until 1994. Yet, he observed, 'Operation Sindoor's aftermath saw normalcy, not panic. Pakistan's fireworks [atish-baazi] failed miserably.'
Analysing Pakistan's failed strategy
Pakistan's coordinated disinformation campaign betrays three fundamental miscalculations:
Desperation after defeat: The wild allegations demonstrate that Pakistan's military and political establishment is discouraged, defeated, and running short of ideas after the successful Indian strikes. When satellite imagery and on-ground reality so easily disprove your claims, it indicates poor strategic thinking born of desperation.
Underestimating native intelligence and commonsense: The crude attempt to drive a wedge between Sikhs and India assumes that Punjabis in general, and Sikhs in particular, are naïve enough to believe such transparent propaganda. In an age where private satellite imagery is readily available and even civilian aircraft flight paths are trackable online, such easily debunked claims insult the intelligence of the target audience.
Living in the past: Pakistan seems to believe that scripts which found limited traction among a microscopic minority of misguided youth in the 1980s and early 1990s will work in today's interconnected world. They fail to recognise that today's Sikh community is globally integrated, technologically savvy, and far more aware of Pakistan's own poor treatment of minorities.
Also read: Pakistan ISI is killing Hindus for 45 years. To turn India into a nation at war with itself
The global context: A changed world order
Pakistan's propaganda efforts occur against the backdrop of significant changes in global geopolitics. The United States now views India as a crucial partner in the QUAD—a strategic grouping that, while not a formal military alliance, forms a linchpin of America's strategy to contain China's expanding influence in the Indo-Pacific region.
Even China's supposed support for Pakistan was nothing more than diplomatic boilerplate. When Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi spoke with Pakistan's Ishaq Dar, he merely reiterated that China would 'continue to stand firmly by Pakistan in upholding its sovereignty, territorial integrity, and national independence'—standard diplomatic language that stops well short of endorsing Pakistan's specific actions or claims.
Pakistan's economic vulnerability
Pakistan's economic fragility further undermines its position. The country recently received a $1 billion tranche from the International Monetary Fund as part of its $7 billion Extended Fund Facility lending programme. India abstained from voting on this bailout, citing concerns over Pakistan's poor track record with IMF programmes and the possibility of 'misuse of debt financing funds for state-sponsored cross-border terrorism.'
This financial support resembles an extra oxygen cylinder for a patient on a ventilator—a temporary fix for a systemic problem. Meanwhile, Pakistan faces serious internal challenges, including an intensifying insurgency in Balochistan, where separatist groups like the Balochistan Liberation Army continue to challenge the Pakistani state's authority.
The ceasefire and American involvement
While President Trump claimed some role in facilitating the ceasefire between India and Pakistan on 10 May 2025, no statements indicate any active or formal US mediation that would breach the Simla Agreement. Rather, they reflect America's natural concern—as a global power—that a flashpoint between two nuclear-armed neighbours in South Asia be defused quickly.
Conclusion: A strategy in shambles, a narrative in ruins
Pakistan's political establishment and military high command should now realise that their synchronised propaganda offensive—carried out in concert with fringe figures like Gurpatwant Singh Pannun—has not only failed to achieve its objectives but has collapsed under the weight of its own falsehoods. Instead of inciting unrest or fear, it has exposed a desperate attempt to revive outdated narratives in a geopolitical and domestic landscape that has moved far beyond the vulnerabilities of the 1980s.
The near-instant alignment between the DG ISPR's ludicrous missile claims and Pannun's incendiary statements reveals more than coordination—it reveals orchestration. But neither misinformation nor mischief found traction. On the contrary, first-hand accounts from none other than a sitting opposition party MP—Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa—who toured the very villages supposedly under threat, paint a picture of calm, resilience, and public trust in India's air defence and security apparatus.
Just as Pakistan's Chinese-supplied missiles and drones were intercepted with near-total precision, its information warfare too was neutralised—not by counter-propaganda, but by hard evidence, satellite imagery, and local testimony.
In an age of real-time verification, global transparency, and hardened Indian resolve, Pakistan's disinformation playbook is no longer just obsolete—it is dangerously self-defeating. What remains is not a blow to India, but a mirror held up to Pakistan's own strategic bankruptcy and narrative decay.
KBS Sidhu is a former IAS officer who retired as Special Chief Secretary, Punjab. He tweets @kbssidhu1961. Views are personal.
(Edited by Prashant)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
30 minutes ago
- News18
Who Is Paul Kapur? Trump's Indian-Origin Pick As Key Diplomat For South Asian Affairs
Last Updated: Paul Kapur is a South Asia security expert and professor at the US Naval Postgraduate School, known for his work on nuclear policy and regional strategy. Paul Kapur, US President Donald Trump's nominee for South Asia, said India and the United States share common interests like a free and open Indo-Pacific, which is not dominated by China, along with expanding trade, tech sharing, and access to energy. Speaking at an event, Trump's Indian-origin nominee also said that he would 'pursue security cooperation where it is beneficial to the US interest, seeking opportunities for bilateral collaboration in trade and investment". 'We will promote long-standing security interests with India, Pakistan through the pursuit of peace and stability and fight against terrorism," Kapur said. WHO IS PAUL KAPUR? Security expert Paul Kapur was nominated by Trump as the Assistant Secretary of State for South Asian Affairs in February this year. If his nomination is confirmed, Kapur would succeed Donald Lu, who completed his term on January 17, 2025. Paul Kapur is known for his extensive research on South Asian security and nuclear policy, and works as a professor in the Department of National Security Affairs at the US Naval Postgraduate School. Additionally, Paul also played a key role in shaping US foreign policy on South and Central Asia. Kapur studied for his BA at Amherst College and did his PhD at the University of Chicago. According to some media reports, Kapur has authored multiple influential publications on South Asian security, nuclear policy, and international relations. His books include Jihad as Grand Strategy: Islamist Militancy, National Security, and the Pakistani State (Oxford University Press, 2016), Dangerous Deterrent: Nuclear Weapons Proliferation and Conflict in South Asia (Stanford University Press, 2007), India, Pakistan, and the Bomb: Debating Nuclear Stability in South Asia (Columbia University Press, 2010), and The Challenges of Nuclear Security: US and Indian Perspectives (Palgrave MacMillan, 2024). Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
India needs better regulatory framework to attract investments: Swiss diplomat
Switzerland's State Secretary for Economic Affairs Helene Budliger Artieda has said a good regulatory framework and cut in red tape in India is important to attract Swiss investments. She said businesses here have raised concerns about bureaucratic hurdles. India and the four European nation bloc EFTA has signed a free trade agreement on March 10, 2024, which is expected to come into force from October 1. Under the pact, India has received an investment commitment of USD 100 billion in 15 years from the grouping while allowing several products such as Swiss watches, chocolates, and cut and polished diamonds at lower or zero duties. Also Read: India is a preferred place for Swiss businesses: State Secretary for Economic Affairs Live Events The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) members are Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland. She said for USD 100 billion investments, "we need to have the best framework conditions and this was part of the business roundtable meeting in the presence of Minister Goyal". "That will be important that red tape will be cut as much as possible. Even in Switzerland, companies always complain that there is too much red tape. It will be very important that India creates a good framework for Swiss investments to come in," she told reporters here after meeting Goyal on June 10. The Indian minister was here on a two-day official visit to meet businesses to attract investments into India. On the issue of Swiss government suspending the most favoured nation (MFN) status clause in the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Switzerland, Artieda said there has been some misunderstanding on this. "But it really has no connection whatsoever... I think it's important to know that both India and Switzerland share a double taxation treaty and that treaty is valid and that means there will not be any issue," she said. In a statement in December 2024, the Swiss government announced the suspension of the MFN clause in the DTAA between India and Switzerland, potentially impacting Swiss investments in India and leading to higher taxes on Indian companies operating in the European nation. She also said implementation of the trade agreement will help increase exports of Swiss watches and chocolates in India. Also Read: Govt may help MSMEs register products abroad: Piyush Goyal Swiss companies will have the advantage of preferred access to markets in India for both watches and chocolates due to this pact. Further she added that Switzerland is confident of achieving the USD 100 billion investment commitment in 15 years in India. "I am very confident we will achieve that," she said. India-EFTA two-way trade was USD 18.65 billion in 2022-23 (of this, USD 17.14 billion with Switzerland) compared to USD 27.23 billion in 2021-22. The trade deficit was USD 14.8 billion in the last fiscal year. In 2024-25, India's imports from EFTA bloc increased to USD 22.5 billion from USD 22 billion in 2023-24. Exports stood at USD 1.96 billion in the last fiscal year, up from USD 1.94 billion in 2023-24. Switzerland is the largest trading partner of India in the bloc, followed by Norway. EFTA countries are not part of the European Union (EU). It is an inter-governmental organisation for the promotion and intensification of free trade. It was founded as an alternative for states that did not wish to join the European community. India is negotiating a comprehensive free trade agreement separately with the EU -- the 27-nation bloc. India has received about USD 10.83 billion in foreign direct investments (FDI) from Switzerland between April 2000 and March 2025. It is the 12th largest investor in India. The FDI inflow was USD 931.88 million from Norway, USD 29.41 million from Iceland and USD 105.93 million from Liechtenstein during the period.


NDTV
32 minutes ago
- NDTV
Exclusive: Top Defence Official On Challenges, Timelines Of Deliveries
Show Quick Read Summary is AI-generated, newsroom-reviewed New Delhi: India's Operation Sindoor that smashed terror infrastructure deep inside Pakistan has reignited interest in homegrown defence technology and hardware. In an exclusive interview to NDTV, Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh explained the need for ensuring that import in this industry becomes an exception and not the norm. He also pointed out the critical need for defence vendors and manufacturers for sticking to timelines for deliverables, and also acknowledged challenges that often come in the way, such as geopolitical factors. "It is a problem that is not confined to our own industry. I think geopolitical factors also played a part and many of our contracts got held up. Let's take a few examples. The S-400 [missile system] got held up because of the conflict [Ukraine-Russia] there. The fourth and the fifth batteries are now probably going to come next year after almost a two-year delay," Mr Singh told NDTV. He said GE's F-404 engines got held up and as a result, disrupted Tejas' supply chain and delayed deliveries of the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) to the forces by two years. "So some of these are linked to global supply chain issues. Others could be internal management failures or inability to plan. What I can do is of course ensure that contract signings are done on time," the 1989-batch Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer from the Kerala cadre told NDTV. He said the government holds vendors accountable for long delays. The defence secretary said that on the day of the delivery in a project that was to be completed in one year, for example, India can't have a situation where it is forced to go for emergency procurement. "... There are vendors that seek time after two or even three years more to fulfil contracts. Obviously, I'm not saying it's a factor which affects only the domestic manufacturers. It affects global manufacturers as well. But somewhere accountability will have to be ensured when it comes to contract fulfilment as well, both from the public and from the private sector," Mr Singh said. During Operation Sindoor, India's homegrown air defence network stopped Pakistani missiles and drones effectively, highlighting the importance of having indigenous systems work together. On the intervening night of May 9 and 10, when Pakistan launched drone and missile attacks on Indian military and civilian areas, they met the homegrown impenetrable wall of self-defence called the 'Akashteer' system. It is part of the Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS) designed by the Indian Air Force (IAF). The IACCS was the tip of the spear in the air defence (AD) component of Operation Sindoor. India's integrated AD system - which includes AD systems of the army, navy and the air force - was brought together by the IACCS, which gave the forces a net-centric operational capability, vital to modern-day warfighting.