logo
Ion Iliescu, Romania's first freely elected president after 1989 revolution, has died at 95

Ion Iliescu, Romania's first freely elected president after 1989 revolution, has died at 95

BUCHAREST, Romania — Ion Iliescu, Romania's first freely elected president after the fall of communism in 1989, who later faced charges of crimes against humanity for his role in the bloody revolution, has died. He was 95.
Iliescu, who held de facto military authority during the anticommunist revolt, assumed power after Communist dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, and his wife Elena, were executed on Dec. 25, 1989. More than 1,100 people died during the uprising, 862 of them after Iliescu had seized power. He repeatedly denied any wrongdoing.
Twice reelected, in 1992 and 2000, Iliescu had largely withdrawn from public life by 2017. In recent years, his health had declined. In 2019, he underwent heart surgery, and was diagnosed with lung cancer in June. The hospital in the capital, Bucharest, where Iliescu had been receiving medical treatment since June 9, said on Tuesday that he died at 3.55 p.m. local time after medics 'made all efforts to provide him the necessary care and treatment.'
Romania's government also confirmed his death and extended its condolences to his family and those close to the former president. It added that it would announce plans for a state funeral soon.
In a statement on its official website, Romania's Social Democratic Party, or PSD, which Iliescu founded, called it 'a very sad day for Romania.'
'A prominent figure of the Romanian Revolution and the history of contemporary Romania, Mr. President Ion Iliescu will remain for all of us a symbol of the politician and statesman,' the statement read. 'He had the courage to confront Ceausescu and his dictatorship, and directed Romania irreversibly on the Euro-Atlantic path.'
'He was a strong leader, loved by most, contested by others, as happens in democracy,' it added.
In 2018, military prosecutors charged Iliescu with crimes against humanity for failing to prevent 'numerous situations' in which civilians were needlessly killed during the revolution. Prosecutors alleged he had spread false information through state media, creating a 'generalized psychosis' that fueled chaos and bloodshed.
The charges against Iliescu, who served as a minister in the communist government until he was sidelined in 1971, refer to a five-day period during the uprising, after Ceausescu had fled Bucharest on Dec. 22, 1989. At the time of Iliescu's death, he had never been convicted, and the case remained open.
In January this year, Iliescu's legal woes mounted when prosecutors charged him with crimes against humanity in a second case. Prosecutors allege he implemented policies that led to a violent crackdown on civilian protesters in Bucharest in 1990 who were demanding the removal of former communists from power.
Iliescu had called on coal miners from the Jiu Valley to 'restore order' in the capital. At least four people were killed.
Despite maintaining good relations with the Soviet Union until its collapse in 1991, Romania became a member of the NATO military alliance in 2004 during his last presidential term.
After his last term ended, he served as a lawmaker in the PSD, Romania's most dominant political party since communism ended 35 years ago.
Dominic Fritz, president of the governing coalition partner Save Romania Union party, said in a post on Facebook that Iliescu's passing 'is painful not because of his departure, but because it leaves us with so many open wounds.'
'Many are still waiting for justice,' he said. 'And Ion Iliescu took with him answers to questions that still plague society.'
For two decades after the revolution, Iliescu was Romania's most consequential political figure who helped define the country's new democratic institutions and its constitution, said Cristian Andrei, a Bucharest-based political consultant.
'His legacy spans from the one to oust Ceausescu to being himself a break in Romania's development and transition to full functioning democracy and market economy,' he told the Associated Press. 'He was later accused by a growing number of Romanians of being the continuator of the Communist apparatus … trying to hold on to power in an authoritarian-communist style.'
After President Nicusor Dan's victory in Romania's tense presidential rerun in May, Iliescu congratulated the new pro-Western leader in a blog post, noting that Romania 'is going through a complex period' and faces economic, social, and geopolitical challenges.
'Romania needs coherence, dialogue and a firm commitment to strengthening democratic institutions and its European path,' he said. 'I am convinced that you will exercise this responsibility with dignity and a sense of duty to the nation.'
Dan described the late president on Tuesday as 'the central figure of the 1990s transition' and said that 'history will judge Ion Iliescu.'
'It's our duty to clarify the major cases of that era, so we can move forward with accountability,' he said.
McGrath writes for the Associated Press.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump admin targets lawyer who attempted to halt his client's deportation
Trump admin targets lawyer who attempted to halt his client's deportation

Politico

time4 hours ago

  • Politico

Trump admin targets lawyer who attempted to halt his client's deportation

The motion accuses Schroeder of acting 'in bad faith, unreasonably and vexatiously' and says he 'multiplied proceedings by maintaining positions without bases in fact and law, without making a reasonable, competent inquiry, and for an improper purpose.' DOJ lawyers contend he persisted in claims that the government was deporting Lor under the Alien Enemies Act even though he 'knew that assertion to be false.' Tydingco-Gatewood will make the initial decision on whether to grant DOJ's request for sanctions. Schroeder said his references to the Trump administration's aggressive use of the Alien Enemies Act showed the urgency of determining where Lor was being sent and under what legal framework. 'The point is that notice and opportunity to be heard is a fundamental basis of all rights, and if you don't have that no one can assert any sort of right and the government can do whatever they want,' the attorney said. Some of Schroeder's filings appear to have been hastily drafted. The 30-page TRO request filed in Texas makes fairly clear that Lor is from Laos and discusses the possibility of dozens of 'mainland southeast Asian' immigrants being gathered for deportation, but at one point it erroneously says Lor is from Venezuela. An appeal Schroeder filed, which is still pending, refers to a court order issued in June as dating from 2010. Schroeder said he was working 'under very heightened pressure' because he had 'only hours' to try to forestall his client being moved beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. 'I had to do it very quickly, because he was in Guam and they might have taken him immediately,' Schroeder said this week. 'So, I was just putting the basics together in my mind the way I was seeing it.' Laos appears to be seeking to curry favor with the Trump administration in recent months by being more receptive to deportation of its citizens from the U.S. Lor is of Hmong descent, according to court filings, and like many in that ethnic group his parents are believed to have cooperated with U.S. military forces during the Vietnam War. Those who did so have often faced particular difficulty in getting passports or citizenship documents from Laos' Communist government. However, Laos announced in March that it was encouraging its citizens present in the U.S. illegally to return to Laos. But in June, days after the deportation flight Lor was taken off of due to the litigation, Trump put visa sanctions on the Southeast Asian country for a second time. 'Laos has historically failed to accept back its removable nationals,' Trump wrote.

Trump-Putin Meeting Could Come Soon, Trump says
Trump-Putin Meeting Could Come Soon, Trump says

Time​ Magazine

time5 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Trump-Putin Meeting Could Come Soon, Trump says

President Donald Trump said Wednesday that there's a 'good chance' he will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky soon to discuss a potential ceasefire agreement that could end Russia's three-year war against Ukraine. "We had some very good talks with President Putin today and there's a very good chance that we could be ending the round—the end of that road,' he told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday evening. 'There's a good chance that there will be a meeting very soon." He did not specify where the meeting would take place, and Russia and Ukraine have not commented publicly on the potential meeting. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to TIME that Russia first suggested the meeting, and that Trump is 'open' to the idea of meeting both Putin and Zelensky. The comments about a possible summit came just days before Trump's Friday deadline for Russia to reach a ceasefire deal with Ukraine or face 'very severe' sanctions designed to cripple its oil trade. Earlier on Wednesday, Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff met with Putin in Moscow for about three hours, which Trump described as 'highly productive' and wrote in a post on Truth Social that 'great progress was made.' Following that meeting, Trump held a call with European leaders and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte to provide an update. Secretary of State Marco Rubio was more guarded about the potential meeting between Trump and the leaders of Russia and Ukraine, telling Fox Business on Wednesday evening that it 'remains to be seen' if the meetings take place next week. 'I think it will depend a lot on how much progress we can make,' he said, adding that Wednesday's meeting between Witkoff and Putin gave the Trump Administration a sense of what conditions the Russians would require in order to end the war. 'I don't think you can have a leaders-level meeting if you're not close enough, because then nothing's going to come of that meeting. We want to get it close enough and then we want to give the President the opportunity to come in and close it.' Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with Putin over the past month, calling his continued attacks on Ukrainian cities 'disgusting' and 'a disgrace.' More than 6,700 Ukrainian civilians have been killed in the first half of this year, according to the United Nations. In response, Trump last week demanded that Putin strike a ceasefire deal with Ukraine within 10 days or it could face economic repercussions, including new sanctions on the countries that do business with Russia and additional sanctions on Russia's so-called 'shadow fleet'—a network of obscure oil tankers that it has used to circumvent a price cap on seaborne oil. That deadline expires on Friday. Trump on Wednesday took the first step towards punishing Russia by signing an executive order that imposes an additional 25% tariff on goods from India because it continues to buy oil from Russia. The additional tariff on India is set to take effect in 21 days, bringing the total duties imposed on Indian products up to 50%. Trump suggested that more countries could face secondary tariffs for buying oil in Russia. China, for example, is the largest importer of Russian oil, with $62.5 billion worth of purchases last year, followed by India at $52.7 billion. Zelensky appeared to suggest on Wednesday that the conflict could be nearing a peace agreement. 'It seems that Russia is now more committed to a cease-fire. The pressure on them is working,' he said in an evening address to the nation. 'But the main thing is that they do not deceive us or the United States in the details.' Trump has met in-person with Zelensky at least three times since returning to office, including a Feb. 28 meeting where he lashed out at the Ukrainian president and accused him of prolonging Russia's invasion. The two leaders met again on April 26 on the sidelines of Pope Francis' funeral and in The Hague on June 25. Meanwhile, Trump has not met with Putin during his presidency. If it takes place, it would mark the first in-person summit between an American and Russian president in more than four years. Such a meeting could be seen as a victory for Putin, who has been largely isolated by European leaders and NATO countries who refuse to deal with him.

New Romanian law may have averted NATO clash with Russia after border strikes
New Romanian law may have averted NATO clash with Russia after border strikes

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New Romanian law may have averted NATO clash with Russia after border strikes

Russia narrowly avoided an armed skirmish with Romania, a member of the NATO alliance, after striking just a half mile from its border. Romanian defense officials believe the new law passed by parliament explicitly allowing its armed forces to shoot down Russian drones that fly over its territory prevented the Kremlin from incurring on its territory. Russia struck a gas distribution center in the Ismail Area of Ukraine with Shahed kamikaze drones on Tuesday and Wednesday, so close to Romania's border that Bucharest deployed F-16 aircraft to monitor. No unauthorized intrusions were reported. "They know we passed this law, and in the last two months they have avoided crossing into our airspace," one Romanian defense source told Fox News Digital. Nato Jets Scrambled Amid Russia's Largest Drone Attack On Ukraine Ilie Bolojan, Romania's then-acting president, signed the law, which Romanian parliament had passed in February in response to Russian drones spilling over into its territory during attacks on Ukraine. Read On The Fox News App The law specifies that Romanian authorities must establish the drone's position and identity, attempt contact, intercept and fire warning shots, before neutralizing it. Piloted vehicles can only be destroyed if they conduct an attack or respond aggressively. Romania shares a 380-mile-wide border with Ukraine, though at this time there is no evidence Moscow has deliberately targeted its territory. Ukraine typically receives gas through the Orlovka gas distribution center in Izmail from Greece, Turkey and Romania. Russia Launched Its Largest Aerial Attack Of The War, Ukraine Says If Russia had incurred into Romanian territory and Romania responded by shooting down its drones, a tit-for-tat escalation risks drawing a NATO member state directly into the war. NATO allies agree to Article 5, a collective defense pact that states each would come to the aid of the other in the case of an attack. Earlier this week, drones believed to originate in Belarus, a client state of Russia, landed in Lithuanian territory. Other eastern European states have enacted new laws to fortify their borders from the threat of Russia: Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania pulled out of an international treaty banning the use of landmines over humanitarian concerns earlier this year. Lithuania this week asked NATO to help strengthen its air defenses after a Russian drone carrying explosives entered its territory. "This is not just Lithuanian airspace, not just Lithuania's security — it is NATO airspace, NATO security and also EU security," foreign minister Kęstutis Budrys article source: New Romanian law may have averted NATO clash with Russia after border strikes Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store