
Fire-fighting system was not working: Fire brigade
MUMBAI: The Link Square shopping complex that went up in flames in Bandra on Tuesday was a tinder box waiting to be lit. This damning preliminary finding comes from the Mumbai Fire Brigade a day after 72 fire fighters took 12 hours to contain the raging blaze and 22 hours to extinguish it.
'The fire-fighting system wasn't working, including the sprinklers,' chief fire officer, Ravi Ambulgekar, told HT on Wednesday. An assistant divisional fire officer, who was at the site on Tuesday, added that the system was not working even though the shopping complex regularly submitted Form B, which shows evidence of a working system. 'It is possible it was a manual system, which would have to be operated from the basement, but that wasn't accessible. The fire alarm kept ringing till 3pm on Tuesday,' he said.
The fire is believed to have started in the basement, a large area occupied by popular electronics store Croma. It started in the wee hours on Tuesday, and escalated from a Level 1 fire to a Level 3 fire in just 40 minutes, and then to a Level 4 fire in just over two hours (Each level denotes the severity of a fire and the number of fire tenders that needs to be deployed).
The Link Square shopping complex, on Linking Road, housed 220 shops that sold all kinds of merchandise, ranging from clothes to accessories and electronics. There were also restaurants on the third floor.
The fire brigade says hordes of combustible material in the building fueled the fire's ferocity. The intense heat and smoke in a contained space with poor ventilation made fighting the fire a tough challenge. It was also one reason it took so long to bring under control, said a fire officer present at the site.
The officer reasoned that the fire was already raging in the basement when it came to the attention of the security guard sleeping on the first floor after his shift ended at midnight. It was the security guard, Babulal Paswan, who made the first call to the fire brigade at 4:11am. When fire officers arrived, the blaze had already spread across the basement.
'I smelt the smoke,' said Paswan, 'so I went down to check it but I could only catch glimpses of the fire behind the shutters. Smoke was all around, but there was no way for us security guards to use the extinguishers as we didn't have the keys. So, we called the fire brigade.'
The flames spread rapidly through the three-storey building, leaping from the roof. A senior fire officer at the site said the stench of smoke was perceptible around 1km away, at the Khar Telephone Exchange. At 6:25am, it was declared a Level 4 fire.
'To start with, the topmost basement floor (where Croma was located) was aflame, which made the top floors like lava,' said the assistant divisional fire officer. 'The heat and smoke were so intense, there was little room for the fire fighters – as many as 73 of them – to make much of a difference. The fire had by then reached all three top floors, fuelled by poor ventilation in a building encased in glass and filled with combustible material. We had to break the glass to allow the smoke to get out. The heat and smoke threatened to blind us each time we went too close, almost trapping a few of the fire officers,' he said.
The fire fighters focused on containing the blaze from all four sides. To venture closer, they deployed a fire robot to shoot water at the burning building. The fire was finally extinguished by 1:41am on Wednesday but cooling operations continued all through the day.
The fire brigade has launched an inquiry into the cause of the blaze and the irregularities in the building's fire-fighting system.
The Mumbai Fire Brigade handed over the site to the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) on Wednesday evening. The BMC and the police will take the next steps. 'We have parked two fire engines at the site on standby since there is a huge pile of combustible material there. We are still investigating the cause of the fire and will have a report in two to three days,' said Ravindra Ambulgekar, chief fire officer.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
12 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Link Square owner, agency face legal action for blaze
MUMBAI: The Mumbai Fire Brigade has initiated legal proceedings against the owner of Link Square mall, former MLA Zeeshan Siddique, and Indian Fire Safety System, a certifying agency, for the massive blaze that gutted the shopping complex in Bandra West on April 29. The move follows the submission of a comprehensive, final inquiry report on the blaze, to municipal commissioner Bhushan Gagrani, by chief fire officer (CFO) Ravindra Ambulgekar, on Wednesday. 'As per section 3 of Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006, it is the responsibility of the owner owner/occupied to keep the fire safety system in the building operational, even though the said system was inoperative at the time of the incident. The said system was not functional in the fire that broke out. Therefore the fault lies mainly with Indian Fire Safety System appointed by Link Square Care Co Ltd. Hence, legal action is already initiated against both parties,' said a senior fire official. The report reveals serious failures in fire safety systems, a delayed emergency response, and critical design lapses in the shopping complex. According to the report, the fire began at 2:30am on April 29 on the lower ground floor, but was only reported to the fire brigade at 3:55am by security guards and workers. This 90-minute delay significantly worsened the situation, with fire calls escalating from Level 1 at 4:17 am to Level 4 by 6:25 am. According to the key findings in the report, fire safety systems were non-functional despite a compliance certificate issued in January 2025 by the contractor, Indian Fire Safety System. The mechanical ventilation system in the basement was non-operational, severely hindering smoke clearance. The building's glass facade lacked mandatory ventilation openings, trapping heat and smoke. The emergency exits were either blocked or inaccessible. Highly flammable materials, including electronics, garments and cosmetics were stored in dense clusters, accelerating the fire spread. Firefighters faced thick smoke, intense heat and poor visibility, making entry from all directions extremely difficult. BA (breathing apparatus) teams were repeatedly forced to withdraw due to dangerous conditions. Despite the deployment of over 10 water hose lines, and the involvement of senior fire officials, the fire escalated to the building's upper levels, severely damaging its structure. On May 2, a joint site inspection was carried out by the joint commissioner (vigilance) and senior officials from the fire and building departments of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC). While no unauthorised construction was found and structural layouts matched approved plans, the fire exposed glaring lapses in safety maintenance and emergency preparedness. Aftab Siddique, a local civic activist from Linking Road, where the shopping complex is located, claimed, 'The number of affected units inside the complex is 390, not 210, as initially reported. Well-known restaurants like Tap and Global Fusion were completely destroyed. Each unit has suffered massive financial losses. Everything was reduced to ashes.' Despite repeated calls and messages, Zeeshan Siddique, former MLA and the owner of Link Square, was unavailable for comment.


Hindustan Times
16 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Espionage case: Hisar court rejects YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra's bail plea
A Hisar court on Wednesday denied bail to YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, who was arrested last month on espionage charges. A day earlier, Jyoti's lawyer Kumar Mukesh had filed the bail application and the matter was placed before judicial magistrate first class Sunil Kumar today, who rejected the bail plea. On June 9, the court extended her judicial custody by two weeks till June 23. On May 26, Jyoti was sent to 14-day judicial custody by the court. Talking to HT over the phone, her lawyer Kumar Mukesh said that he had objected to the sections imposed against Jyoti Malhotra in the first information report (FIR). 'As the investigation is currently underway in the case, the police were against her bail plea. After hearing both sides, the court rejected the bail plea. She went to Pakistan High Commission in Delhi in 2023 and at that time, the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was in force but the Hisar police booked her under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Act, which was Section 124-A (sedition ) under the IPC at that time. This section was kept in abeyance, which is why she can't be prosecuted this,' Kumar added. He said that the FIR was registered on the basis of her questioning on May 15, which is not legally permissible because a person can't become a witness against himself/herself. 'The police could not place any evidence which proves that she was involved in spying. The Hisar superintendent of police (SP) himself said that she had no access to any military or defence related information but she has connections with some Pakistani operatives. If they have not recovered any information from her possession related to sharing sensitive information, then Sections 3 (spying) and 5 (communicating secret information to unauthorised individuals) of the Official Secrets Act, should be dropped from the FIR. The police should provide call details with such operatives. The police will have to prove that any of her Pakistani contacts are intelligence operatives,' he added. Travel blogger Jyoti, 33, a resident of Hisar, was arrested on May 16 for allegedly sharing sensitive information with Pakistani operatives.


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
‘15 RTI pleas, protests & a long legal battle'
Mumbai: Advocate Godfrey Pimenta, upon learning of Kurla's Hotel City Kinara fire that killed eight in Oct 2015, said they promptly decided to hold a dharna outside the Vinoba Bhave Nagar police station, demanding the immediate arrest of those responsible. Despite being threatened with arrest for holding the protest, they proceeded with it, joined by grieving parents. "Subsequently, we submitted 15 to 20 applications under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, seeking extensive documentation from the licence department and the buildings and factories department of the BMC, Mumbai fire brigade, HPCL, and other relevant agencies. Equipped with substantial information obtained through the RTI Act, we filed a formal complaint with Maharashtra Lokayukta, seeking compensation for the bereaved families. We also organised protests at Kurla, and held a dharna at Azad Maidan, demanding a CBI inquiry," said Pimenta. In a gesture reminiscent of Munnabhai MBBS, he said they left flower bouquets along with 'Get Well Soon' placards outside the home of the then municipal commissioner Ajoy Mehta. In Feb 2017, the Lokayukta granted a compensation of Rs 1 lakh. Pimenta said they then approached Bombay High Court. "We are deeply gratified by the recent judgment and would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to senior counsel Naushad Engineer and his team, as well as advocate Jayesh Mestry, who appeared pro bono in support of this just cause."tnn