‘15 RTI pleas, protests & a long legal battle'
Despite being threatened with arrest for holding the protest, they proceeded with it, joined by grieving parents.
"Subsequently, we submitted 15 to 20 applications under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, seeking extensive documentation from the licence department and the buildings and factories department of the BMC, Mumbai fire brigade, HPCL, and other relevant agencies. Equipped with substantial information obtained through the RTI Act, we filed a formal complaint with Maharashtra Lokayukta, seeking compensation for the bereaved families.
We also organised protests at Kurla, and held a dharna at Azad Maidan, demanding a CBI inquiry," said Pimenta. In a gesture reminiscent of Munnabhai MBBS, he said they left flower bouquets along with 'Get Well Soon' placards outside the home of the then municipal commissioner Ajoy Mehta.
In Feb 2017, the Lokayukta granted a compensation of Rs 1 lakh. Pimenta said they then approached Bombay High Court. "We are deeply gratified by the recent judgment and would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to senior counsel Naushad Engineer and his team, as well as advocate Jayesh Mestry, who appeared pro bono in support of this just cause."tnn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
26 minutes ago
- NDTV
'Not Given Autopsy Report, Saw It In News': Sunjay Kapur's Sister To NDTV
New Delhi: Mandhira Kapur, the sister of Sona Comstar Chairman Sunjay J Kapur, narrated how her 80-year-old mother struggled to come to terms with the fact that her only son was no more, amid a barrage of insensitive comments from some sections. The first shock the family got was the details of the postmortem report coming in the media in bits and pieces and the family not getting it directly, Mandhira Kapur told NDTV. Her brother who headed the Rs 30,000 crore mobility tech company died on June 12 while playing polo in London; the autopsy report indicated the cause as a cardiac arrest. Some reports had said a bee stung Sunjay Kapur in his throat, which led to complications and his death. Mandhira Kapur told NDTV the postmortem report does not mention any bee or bee sting. Sunjay and Mandhira Kapur's mother, Rani Kapur, had written to the British authorities asking for more details about the circumstances surrounding her son's death. The letter had created quite a stir. Mandhira Kapur defended her mother's decision to write that letter, as any mother would want to know what happened to her son. "How do you tell a mother that her 53-year-old, very fit son died of a bee sting? And that's all we've heard. We don't know anything else. We were told he swallowed a bee and got stung," Mandhira Kapur told NDTV. "... No one was answering our questions. So, as a mother, she has a right to know what happened to her son. And under British law, she has the right. It's as simple as reaching out. If no one's answering us, we have got to reach out to someone to get an answer. For my mother, for us to know what happened to this healthy person," Mandhira Kapur said. "How has a bee gone into his mouth and how has he died of a bee sting? The postmortem report doesn't mention the bee. In fact, it's all denied now that there was even a bee. It was a cardiac arrest that happened while he was playing polo," she said. The most tragic part in all this was seeing the postmortem report of her brother from details reported by the media, Mandhira Kapur said. "We didn't get the postmortem report. I got it through the media. So how can a bee now turn into a cardiac arrest of a healthy person who, from what I've heard, had his heart checked and didn't have any problems and suddenly had 40 per cent of an artery blocked?" she said. On whether the postmortem report was sent to her mother, Mandhira Kapur said, "It was not sent to her. I got it from the media. I'm the one who shared it with her, and I only got one page. Then it was sent to me through a relative. There were three pages. That's how we got it (postmortem report)," she told NDTV. Rani Kapur - who said she has majority shareholder status - had alleged she was coerced into signing documents supporting the nomination of her daughter-in-law, Priya Sachdev Kapur, as a non-executive director. After that, Sona Comstar sent a cease-and-desist letter to Rani Kapur. On the claim by Sona Comstar that Rani Kapur did not hold any shares since 2019, Mandhira Kapur said that just as the world is finding out, "we are also finding out." As chairman of Sona Comstar from 2019 onward, Sunjay Kapur continued to guide the company's strategic direction and under his chairmanship, the company expanded its global footprint across India, the US, Mexico, China, and Serbia, successfully listed on BSE and NSE, and entered future mobility domains such as sensors and software through the acquisition of a majority stake in Novelic.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
14 years after Paramakudi riots, CBI refuses to disclose status of investigation under RTI Act
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has declined to share details of its probe into the 2011 Paramakudi riots under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005. Fourteen years after seven persons belonging to the Scheduled Caste were killed and many others injured in police firing and the violence that followed on September 11, 2011, at Paramakudi in Ramanathapuram district the CBI's Special Crimes Branch in Chennai invoked exemption provisions of the Act to reject queries about the status of the case. The RTI Act petition was filed by C. Selvakumar, who sought copies of the FIR, names of investigating officers, details of accused persons, and information on whether any interim or final report had been filed in the case. In his response, the Chief Public Information Officer said: 'In view of the provisions under Section 8(1)(g), 8(1)(h) and Section 24 of the RTI Act, the requisite information cannot be provided to you and accordingly your application is rejected.' Mr Selvakumar's first appeal alleging the response was incomplete, false and misleading was dismissed by the First Appellate Authority, which upheld the CPIO's decision. He then approached the Central Information Commission (CIC). After hearing both parties, Information Commissioner Anandi Ramalingam ruled that the CBI was exempted from disclosure under Section 25 of the RTI Act. While closing the appeal, she directed the agency not to cite Section 8(1)(h) and Section 24 together to deny information. Enquiry commission's findings A one-man commission of inquiry headed by Justice Sampath had earlier concluded that the police opened fire in 'self-defence.' The report praised the officers for the 'admirable way' in which they handled the tense situation but criticised the conduct of some personnel after the riots, calling it 'disgraceful' and contrary to police standing orders, citing instances of rioters being beaten up. However, the State government rejected what it described as the commission's 'disparaging remarks' against the police. The firing occurred when large numbers of members of the Scheduled Caste assembled in Paramakudi to pay homage to their leader Immanuel Sekaran on his 54th death anniversary. Violence broke out after the arrest of Tamizhaga Makkal Munnetra Kazhagam (TMMK) leader John Pandian, whose supporters demanded his release. The protest escalated, leading to riots, arson, injuries to policemen, and the subsequent firing. Prosecution sanction withheld Police sources said the CBI, which took over the probe on the orders of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, had sought the State government's sanction to prosecute certain officers. The then AIADMK government denied the request. As a result, the case has not yet been chargesheeted. It was not clear whether a departmental inquiry or disciplinary action was insisted any official for the high-handedness, some of which was captured on camera, in the riots, the sources said.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Ambergris — banned whale vomit — worth Rs 2.98 crore seized in Rural Ahmedabad, two arrested
The Special Operations Group (SOG) of the Ahmedabad Rural Police on Sunday arrested two men with 2.976 kg of illicit sperm whale vomit (ambergris), police said. Based on a tip-off, the Ahmedabad Rural SOG conducted a raid near the Sarkhej-Sanand Highway, close to Gibpura village that falls under Sanand police station. During the operation, two suspects who were allegedly in possession of ambergris were apprehended. The seized quantity of ambergris weighed 2.976 kg, with an estimated international value of Rs 2.98 crore. 'Two mobile phones worth Rs 2,000 and Rs 700 in cash were also seized,' said Superintendent of Police, Ahmedabad Rural, Om Prakash Jat. The arrested persons include Yogesh Tulsi Makwana (30) from Bhavnagar and Pantukumaar Bharatbhai Patel (37), a resident of Sabarmati, Ahmedabad. 'During questioning, the arrested accused revealed that the ambergris was provided to them by one Bharat Vallabh Sarvaiya, a resident of Bhavnagar, and that they were searching for potential buyers due to its high-market value. The seized ambergris has been verified by the Range Forest Officer and FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) experts, and the accused have been handed over to the Forest Department, Sanand, for legal action under the Wildlife (Protection) Act,' said the Ahmedabad Rural Police. Trade of ambergris is banned in India as the sperm whale is a schedule 1 species under Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, and Convention of International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). With this latest seizure, a total of 7.88 kg of ambergris has been seized in three cases in Ahmedabad district in the last three-and-a-half months. The previous two seizures were made by the Crime Branch of Ahmedabad City Police with 2 kg of ambergris seized on August 6, and 2.904 kg confiscated on April 30. Ambergris, which means gray amber in French, is a waxy substance that originates from the digestive system of the protected sperm whales. Traditionally, it is used to produce perfumes that have notes of musk.
