logo
Major bank rejects NatWest takeover offer weeks after SCRAPPING car loans arm despite bosses saying it's not for sale

Major bank rejects NatWest takeover offer weeks after SCRAPPING car loans arm despite bosses saying it's not for sale

The Sun12-05-2025

A MAJOR bank reportedly rejected a takeover bid from NatWest despite bosses saying it wasn't for sale.
Santander turned down a bid worth around £11billion for its UK retail banking arm as it was deemed too low earlier this year.
The approach by NatWest, which was being advised by investment banks Morgan Stanley and UBS, is no longer being considered, the FT reported.
It comes weeks after Santander said it would scrap the car loans arm from its core UK operation following a major car mis-selling scandal.
Since NatWest's approach, Santander has raised €7billion from the sale of a large stake in its Polish retail banking arm.
The Spanish-headquartered bank said it would use some of the cash from the sale to invest in other regions as it focuses its attentions away from Europe and to the Americas.
It has launched an aggressive expansion of its corporate and investment bank in the US, led by its chief executive Ana Botín.
Meanwhile, the bank has announced more than 2,000 job cuts in the UK since last October and confirmed plans to shut 95 bank branches.
The rejected offer comes after Santander was reported to be looking at ditching its car finance arm from its core UK operation.
The bank has already set aside £295million to compensate any customers who were mis-sold finance agreements when buying cars.
Ms Botín stated in February that the bank was not up for sale but city analysts suggested shedding its car finance division could make Santander more appealing to potential buyers.
Benjamin Toms, of RBC Capital Markets, told The Telegraph: "Shifting of the consumer finance business out of the UK subsidiary could be an important step in this sale process.
What is the Bank of England base rate and how does it affect me?
"Given the ongoing litigation in the motor finance space, removing this product from the equation, will likely help with the marketability of the Santander UK asset."
A Santander spokesperson said: 'As we have said, the UK is not for sale and is a core part of Santander's diversified business model which is proven to deliver attractive, sustainable returns over the long term."
The Sun asked NatWest to comment.
Santander axing bank feature
Santander is today scrapping its text alerts service allowing users to get notified when certain things happen to their accounts.
Previously, you could set up free text and email alerts for various updates, like your weekly balance or large withdrawals.
However, from today, customers who have set up these alerts will no longer receive them.
Santander said it was making the change so customers can "get a more detailed view" of their account activity on online or mobile banking.
However, consumer rights expert Martyn James said the move could "only be a bad thing for consumers".
He said: "With the closure of the bank networks, it's more important than ever that banks and financial institutions make sure we know about the important things that affect our money.
"Text alerts are vital as people actually read them and act on them. We forget about checking our online accounts - or go in to denial about them - and most people don't read their app messages."
If you relied on the alerts, you'll now need to check your Santander account manually, either via the app, online, or by calling customer services.
For those who are not a fan of app banking, you might want to consider switching banks altogether.
Many still offer free text alerts and some are even offering cash incentives to switch.
How do I switch bank accounts?
SWITCHING bank accounts is a simple process and can usually be done through the Current Account Switch Service (CASS).
Dozens of high street banks and building societies are signed up - there's a full list on CASS' website.
Under the switching service, swapping banks should take seven working days.
You don't have to remember to move direct debits across when moving, as this is done for you.
All you have to do is apply for the new account you want, and the new bank will tell your existing one you're moving.
There are a few things you can do before switching though, including choosing your switch date and transferring any old bank statements to your new account.
You should get in touch with your existing bank for any old statements.
When switching current accounts, consider what other perks might come with joining a specific bank or building society.
Some banks offer 0% overdrafts up to a certain limit, and others might offer better rates on savings accounts.
And some banks offer free travel or mobile phone insurance with their current accounts - but these accounts might come with a monthly fee.
Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tottenham sue Sir Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos
Tottenham sue Sir Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos

Telegraph

time27 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Tottenham sue Sir Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos

Tottenham Hotspur have taken High Court legal action against Sir Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos. In a commercial listing under 'general commercial contracts and arrangements', Tottenham have lodged a claim against Ineos Automotive Limited, which is a subsidiary of the multinational Ineos company that co-owns Manchester United. Spurs and Ineos had announced a multi-million pound five-year deal in December 2022 to promote the Ineos Grenadier car as the club's 'official 4x4 vehicle partner'. However, talks have been ongoing since at least February over Ineos withdrawing two years before the expiry of the deal. Those negotiations appear to have failed to find an agreement, with the Tottenham claim lodged on June 12, less than a month after they beat Manchester United in the Europa League final to secure a place in the Champions League. Spurs and Ineos have been in partnership since 2020, when the petrochemicals company was named as the club's 'official hand sanitiser supplier' during the pandemic. Ineos, however, have been cutting ties with a number of leading sports organisations in recent months, notably Sir Ben Ainslie's sailing team and the All Blacks rugby union team. Telegraph Sport revealed in February that New Zealand Rugby was also taking legal action against Ineos for an alleged breach of contract after a six-year deal to 2027 ended early, although an agreement has since been reached. Ineos has said that it is being forced into cost-cutting by Europe's 'extreme' green carbon taxes and has issued warnings over what it called the 'deindustrialisation' of the continent. Ratcliffe also blamed energy prices and carbon taxes earlier this year for forcing the closure of Ineos's synthetic ethanol plant at Grangemouth in Scotland, resulting in the loss of 80 direct roles and an estimated 500 indirect jobs. Significant financial measures have already been introduced at Manchester United since Ratcliffe bought a 27.7 per cent minority stake in December 2023, including increased ticket prices and the loss of hundreds of staff. Upon the announcement of the Grenadier deal in 2022, Spurs had said: 'Our partnership with Ineos Grenadier represents the coming together of an innovative British brand with an iconic London football club – both of whom are committed to pushing boundaries and daring to do things differently, while staying true to authentic values and traditions.' In a statement, Ineos told Telegraph Sport that it had exercised 'a contractual right to terminate' its partnership with Tottenham last December. 'Ineos Automotive has been a partner of Tottenham Hotspur since 2022, taking on a partnership agreement that Ineos Group had in place with the club since 2020,' said a spokesperson. 'Like any business, we have to be diligent in how we operate and where we invest marketing budgets. It's completely normal for partnerships to be reviewed on a regular basis, and we've decided that the partnership wasn't working out for us. We have the right to terminate the partnership.'

The 100-year saga of one man's attempt to pay off the national debt
The 100-year saga of one man's attempt to pay off the national debt

Telegraph

time27 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The 100-year saga of one man's attempt to pay off the national debt

Gaspard Farrer may be just a footnote in history, but he will be remembered fondly by Rachel Reeves. A £585m fortune held by the wealthy banker, who died aged 85 almost 100 years ago, has finally been donated to the public purse after a seven-year legal battle. Mr Farrer, a former partner at the now-defunct Barings Bank, is thought to have left £500,000 in 1927 as a gift to the nation in response to the UK's huge national debt after the First World War. But rules stipulated that the so-called National Fund, established in 1927, could only be made available when it was enough to pay off the national debt in full. It means that for years, the fortune has been locked away from successive governments. However, a 2022 High Court ruling ordered the funds to be released – a decision upheld after the fund's trustees lodged an appeal. They were finally paid to the Debt Management Office (DMO) in the financial year ending in April, according to a Freedom of Information request seen by The Telegraph. The DMO offers a little-known scheme that allows taxpayers to voluntarily contribute to paying off the national debt. Last year, donations reached a record £585,112,933 – almost entirely due to the payment of the 1927 National Fund. It was one of 16 donations – three of which were left in wills and 13 were one-off payments. In the nine years prior, just £175,000 per year on average has been donated to the scheme. The legal wrangling for Mr Farrer's money began under Theresa May's government which successfully used a niche legal argument to prise open the savings pot. The bid to tap into the pot used cy-près jurisdiction – meaning 'as near as possible' – which is applied primarily to charitable trusts whose original purpose became impossible to fulfil. The funds were being looked after by Zedra Fiduciary Services who acted as the defendant in the case. The Telegraph contacted representatives for Zedra for comment. The cash is now on the Exchequer's balance sheet, but will make just a 0.02pc dent in Britain's £2.7 trillion national debt, which has grown to the same size as the entire economy. The funds were originally set aside as a £500,000 investment in assets, including gilts, by a donor who remained anonymous for decades. After the government of the day lodged its legal bid to obtain the money in 2018, Mr Farrer's identity was at last revealed. The fund quietly grew in value for years until its transfer to the Treasury was revealed in a request made to the DMO by accountancy firm RSM. The documents confirmed it had received Mr Farrer's fortune. Chris Etherington, partner at RSM, said: 'It is generosity of a level that the Chancellor could not have expected. It could provide some inspiration as to how additional revenues could be generated for the Exchequer.' 'No prospect of the fund ever paying off national debt' When Mr Farrer's donation was first made, Sir Winston Churchill said the money was 'inspired by clear-sighted patriotism and makes a practical contribution towards the ultimate – though yet distant – extinction of the public debt.' But doubts have grown over the years that the money would ever actually fulfil its original purpose. John Glenn, a former culture minister, said in response to a parliamentary question in 2018 that 'there is no realistic prospect of the fund ever amounting to a sum sufficient to pay off the whole of the national debt'. Mr Farrer's donation was held in the form of a charitable trust and was on paper one of the most well-endowed of its kind in the country. John Picton, a reader in law at the University of Manchester, said using the fund to pay off national debt would be a 'missed opportunity' to donate to more worthy causes. He added: 'It's a missed opportunity because the fund could have been kept in charity. I think it's unimaginative, personally.' Mr Picton suggested the money could go towards a charitable fund for the Armed Forces, or to support the work of the country's museums and art galleries. He said: 'In Gaspard Farrer's time, the national debt was associated with war debt and paying it off had a patriotic motivation and that's long lost.' 'But now the national debt, rather than having patriotic sentiments attached to it, is just a large number we all live with and grows throughout time. It's unthinkable now that people would want to voluntarily pay to reduce it.' Mr Farrer's only other surviving legacy is his 11,438 square foot mansion in Kent. He commissioned the legendary architect Sir Edwin Lutyens to design the property, which was built in 1911. The eight bedroom house was recently placed on the market for £3.5m.

Did late-season slide hinder Forest's recruitment?
Did late-season slide hinder Forest's recruitment?

BBC News

time30 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Did late-season slide hinder Forest's recruitment?

When I look at Nottingham Forest and the market that they were in at the beginning of this past season compared with the market they are potentially in now, I still think it would be the same whether they had qualified for the Champions League, Europa League or Conference they got into Europe's top-tier competition, I don't think they would have been able to attract anyone more high you could say it has hindered them as they may have to sell more high-profile players to fund signings, but from the perspective of players in the market, I don't think it is massively I think about player attraction, I feel, for example, if Newcastle ended up in the Europa League instead of the Champions League, they would have probably been able to draw a higher-profile player than Forest could have done if they had got in the Champions with Chelsea, if they didn't get that Champions League place, they still would have been able to draw a higher-profile player than Forest just because of the club and how much time has been spent in those European spots in recent the attraction would have been there of Champions League football, but I don't believe the market would be any different to what they would have looked at had they finished first to Williams was speaking to BBC Sport's Nicola Pearson

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store