US doubts and Iranian defiance after ceasefire
In Washington, Al Jazeera's Shihab Rattansi reports growing doubts over the effectiveness of US strikes, as leaked intel suggests minimal impact on Iran's nuclear program—contradicting official claims.
He also notes Trump's shift away from regime change rhetoric. Meanwhile in Tehran, Al Jazeera's Tohid Asadi says crowds are celebrating in the streets, with many Iranians seeing the ceasefire as a sign of resilience despite the heavy toll.
Main image: Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
38 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Trump claims Iran strikes caused ‘severe' damage despite inconclusive intelligence
THE HAGUE, June 25 — US President Donald Trump said today that the damage to Iranian nuclear sites from missile strikes over the weekend was severe, though he also acknowledged that the available intelligence on the matter was inconclusive. His comments followed reports by Reuters and other media outlets yesterday revealing that the US Defence Intelligence Agency had assessed that the strikes had set back Iran's nuclear programme by just a few months, despite administration officials saying the programme had been obliterated. 'The intelligence was very inconclusive,' Trump told reporters before joining a Nato summit in The Hague. 'The intelligence says we don't know. It could've been very severe. That's what the intelligence suggests.' Later, during the same round of comments, Trump argued that Iran's nuclear deal had been set back 'basically decades, because I don't think they'll ever do it again'. Trump was sitting alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, who both also cast doubt on the reliability of the DIA assessment. Rubio said the US was opening an investigation into the leak of the DIA report. He also suggested the report's contents had been misrepresented in the media. — Reuters
The Sun
40 minutes ago
- The Sun
NATO chief: US ‘totally committed' to collective defence pledge
THE HAGUE: NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said on Wednesday that the United States was 'totally committed' to the alliance's mutual defence clause, after President Donald Trump appeared to cast doubt on it. 'For me, there is absolute clarity that the United States is totally committed to NATO, totally committed to Article Five,' Rutte told reporters ahead of a summit meeting of alliance leaders. On his way to the summit, Trump refused to commit to NATO's Article Five clause, the basic agreement that says an attack on one member is an attack on all. 'Depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five,' Trump told journalists in comments sure to rattle America's European allies. 'I'm committed to being their friend,' he said. Rutte said that there was, however, an 'expectation' that the Canadians and the Europeans would ramp up their spending, with the US long complaining that it paid too much to defend countries in Europe. NATO allies, later on Wednesday, are to sign off a pledge to spend 3.5 percent of GDP on core defence spending -- just over the current US level -- plus another 1.5 percent on broader security-related areas such as cybersecurity and infrastructure. 'This is fair, that we spend the same as the US is spending,' said Rutte.
Herald Malaysia
40 minutes ago
- Herald Malaysia
Catholic nuns protest social net cuts as US Senate considers bill
Over 60 congregations and Catholic women religious groups call for promoting economic justice and immigrant protection Jun 25, 2025 Catholic sisters from about 50 congregations, along with supporters and social justice groups, gather outside the US Capitol to urge Congress to reject budget cuts to social assistance programs and oppose attacks on immigrants, in Washington, DC on June 24. (Photo: AFP) By Kate Scanlon, OSV News As the Senate continued its consideration of a sweeping package for President Donald Trump's agenda, Catholic women religious held a demonstration on Capitol grounds June 24, urging lawmakers not to cut programs such as Medicaid or SNAP that support people with low incomes. At an event called "Sisters Speak Out," representatives of more than 60 congregations and organizations of Catholic women religious called for policies promoting economic justice and justice for immigrants. Sister Eilis McCulloh, a Humility of Mary sister and a grassroots education and organizing specialist for Network, a Catholic social justice lobby, told OSV News that those gathered have concerns that the legislation would adversely "impact all the communities that we all serve and minister in and alongside." "It's going to slash Medicaid for 60 million people," Sister McCulloh said of the House's version of the bill. "It's going to decimate the immigrant communities. It's going to take food away from children. And we knew that as sisters and associates and partners in mission, that now is the time for us to speak up and speak out and say that you know this, this is not going to happen in our name." House Republicans passed in May what Trump calls his "one big, beautiful bill" -- and as such, later named the One Big Beautiful Bill Act -- which would enact key provisions of his legislative agenda on tax and immigration policy. Trump has called for the Senate to follow suit by July 4, even urging them to skip their upcoming scheduled recess for the holiday. "To my friends in the Senate, lock yourself in a room if you must, don't go home, and GET THE DEAL DONE THIS WEEK," Trump wrote June 24 on his website Truth Social. "Work with the House so they can pick it up, and pass it, IMMEDIATELY. NO ONE GOES ON VACATION UNTIL IT'S DONE." But whether the Senate will do so remains to be seen, as some rural state members of the Republican majority have raised objections to Medicaid cuts, among other sticking points, such as artificial intelligence regulation. Catholic leaders, including the U.S. bishops, have alternately praised and criticized various provisions in the House's version of the package, objecting to provisions such as its cuts to Medicaid, while praising a provision that would eliminate funds to health providers who also perform abortions. The bishops said in a May letter to members of Congress that provisions that would cut Medicaid and SNAP "are unconscionable and unacceptable." Mercy Sister Mary Haddad, president and CEO of the Catholic Health Association of the United States, told attendees at the rally that "as Congress debates the future of Medicaid, we urge lawmakers to remember that health is not just about treatment. It's about prevention. It's about dignity. It's about ensuring everyone has the foundation they need to thrive." The bill, Sister Haddad said, "would replace coverage with uncertainty and compassion with red tape." "When people lose coverage, they delay care, they rely on the emergency room, and they experience a worsening of their health conditions," she said. "Providers are left absorbing more of the cost, stretching already thin margins to a burned-out workforce. Senators carry a profound responsibility as they consider this legislation. I urge them to be guided by a simple principle: Medicaid and its recipients deserve a future rooted in stability, access, and health, not cuts and consequences." Conversely, some pro-life organizations are urging the Senate to pass the measure with a provision that would strip funds from entities that perform elective abortions. Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America told reporters on a June 23 press call that "we have a Congress that seeks to defund abortion businesses and the reconciliation bill, and we are waiting today and tomorrow to find out if that language stays in the bill." Republicans hold 53 seats in the upper chamber, and can only afford three defections from their members if they are to pass the
