USC Watches Big Ten Rival Add 4-Star Power Back
USC Watches Big Ten Rival Add 4-Star Power Back originally appeared on Athlon Sports.
USC continues to hold the top spot in the national recruiting rankings. One Big Ten rival, however, added a four-star power back who was on the Trojans' radar early on the trail.
Advertisement
Amari Latimer chose Wisconsin in shutting down his college football recruiting process Saturday. The 6-foot-1, 220-pound Latimer held a litany of scholarship offers. Including the Trojans, who offered back on Feb. 6. Ironically, Latimer's offer came before USC skyrocketed to the top of the rankings with an aggressive February blitz.
The native of Tyrone, Georgia pulled in approximately 50 scholarship offers. The Sandy Creek High star reeled in one other Californian offer, but from Atlantic Coast Conference representative Cal.
So how did Wisconsin win over the power back compared to USC, Cal, Big Ten champion Oregon and the long list of power conference suitors for him? His father explained it to Evan Flood of 247Sports.
Sep 7, 2024; Los Angeles, California, USA; USC Trojans running back Woody Marks (4) runs the ball against Utah State Aggies linebacker Clyde Washington (42) during the second quarter at United Airlines Field at Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. Jonathan Hui-Imagn ImagesJonathan Hui-Imagn Images
"Their relationship is one that Amari sees as almost like a big brother, an authoritative type big brother," said Giimere Sr. "Amari values their conversations."
Advertisement
He's verbal commit No. 15 for Luke Fickell and the Badgers coaching staff. The Badgers even offered him before USC and Lincoln Riley made their pursuit -- as Wisconsin got on Latimer during the summer of 2023.
Latimer became drawn to the pipeline of backs who have strolled through Madison. Names like Jonathan Taylor and Heisman Trophy winner Ron Dayne come to mind. He's also going to join his older brother Geimere Latimer on the roster, as the cornerback came via the transfer portal.
But now USC has a future 220-pound locomotive to game plan for in Big Ten play. The Trojans visit Camp Randall in the 2026 season.
Related: USC's New College Football Playoff Odds Revealed
This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 29, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
21 minutes ago
- New York Times
NHL contract grades: Aaron Ekblad gets term but takes discount to stay with Panthers
Defenseman Aaron Ekblad signs an eight-year deal with a $6.1 million AAV with the Florida Panthers. Harman Dayal: Ekblad's passionate rant about what it meant to him to be a Florida Panther during the Stanley Cup Final foreshadowed his willingness to take a sweetheart discount. The 29-year-old's $6.1 million cap hit is a notable decrease from the $7.5 million AAV on his expiring contract. $6.1 million for a top-pairing right-shot defender is a very team-friendly number, especially in a skyrocketing cap climate where player salaries are rapidly inflating. It's only $600,000 higher than what Nic Hague, a 17-minute per game No. 4/5 defenseman, signed for in Nashville yesterday. It's less than what Alex Romanov re-signed for with the Islanders. Advertisement Ekblad isn't a perfect player. His foot speed can be an issue at times. Durability is often a question mark — he's missed more than 25 percent of the regular season in four of the last five years (though this year was PED suspension-related). But overall, he's a two-way beast on the blue line. Ekblad eats massive all-situations minutes and wins very tough matchup assignments. He contributes secondary offense and is rock-solid defensively in high-leverage minutes. And for the faults Ekblad does have, like his so-so foot speed, D partner Gustav Forsling's speedy defensive tools and puck-moving ability are the perfect stylistic complement to compensate. During this year's Stanley Cup win, Ekblad averaged 23:59 per game and scored 13 points in 19 games. The Panthers controlled nearly 58 percent of scoring chances and 61 percent of goals with Ekblad on the ice at five-on-five. The win here for Ekblad was securing eight years of term, which no other team could have offered. That security is significant considering all the injuries he's suffered in his career. Ekblad is guaranteed $48.8 million of total compensation on this contract. AFP Analytics projected that he would have gotten $7.8 million annually on a seven-year deal in free agency, which equates to a total of $54.6 million. That's an extra $5.8 million in total value compared to what Ekblad actually signed for, but the perfect fit in Florida clearly outweighed the modest bump in total compensation he would have received on the open market. Contract grade: A- Shayna Goldman: The Ekblad extension does two things: It adds more fuel to the tax advantage fire and it locks up another Panthers core player at a team-friendly price. Yes, Ekblad benefits from playing in the state of Florida. His take-home pay is better than it would be anywhere else, and the Panthers don't have to compensate extra for that. It's a part of the equation in the grand scheme of things. But that likely isn't the driving force behind this cost-effective contract. It's the fact that he gets to be a part of something really special in Florida. Advertisement Ekblad played through some tough seasons in Sunrise until the team became playoff-caliber, a contender, and now a back-to-back champion. The team has shown a complete and total commitment to winning, and that buy-in trickles down from ownership to the locker room. So, while other teams could offer more, why would he leave that? Maybe in different surroundings, he could put together all of his skills a little differently to become a star defenseman. But the payoff is staying with the team that drafted him first overall back in 2014, in a situation he clearly knows agrees with him, with a strong chance to win the Stanley Cup again. And that third ring wouldn't just be another championship, it would solidify the Panthers as a dynasty. That can be worth taking the hometown discount for. From the team perspective, the Panthers know how to get the best out of Ekblad. He may not be a true number one defenseman, but he is a key cog in Florida's top-four. Ekblad can provide steady defense in tough minutes, and while he isn't the driver of Florida's offense, he clicks well with the dynamic forward group there. Between all of his strengths and his flaws, he is a known commodity versus an unknown UFA that management has to hope will mesh with their group. Just think about how the team experimented last year to replace Brandon Montour, which eventually led to the Seth Jones trade. So that takes some of the risk out of a long-term signing, especially in this market, where a top-four right-handed defenseman was never going to come in at this price point. The wild card is how he ages. That was going to be a concern anywhere Ekblad signed long-term. And some of his comps show why there's reason to worry, from Christian Ehroff, Jason Garrison, to Brent Seabrook. Even if his game falls off a cliff down the line (which isn't projected to be the case — he is projected to be worth more than his $6.1 million cap hit in seven of eight years of this deal), it will be after Florida's window closes, anyway. On the flip side, some comps paint a much more encouraging picture, like Mattias Ekholm and Alex Pietrangelo. Ekholm may be the best blueprint for Ekblad, as a fellow number-two defenseman with a strong all-around game. Contract grade: A-
New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
Commissioner Tony Petitti defends CFP proposal with 4 automatic bids for Big Ten, SEC
Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti defended his proposal that his conference and the SEC should each receive four automatic bids to a 16-team College Football Playoff, but left room for other ideas, as part of a 30-minute conversation on Monday with Fox Sports' Joel Klatt. Petitti, who had not previously publicly discussed CFP expansion or slotting this spring or summer, said his focus for automatic qualifiers is to encourage teams to compete in more challenging regular-season games and 'reduce the role of the committee.' Petitti's preferred plan would allow for two automatic qualifiers for both the ACC and the Big 12, plus one spot for the highest-ranked champion outside of the Power 4 conferences and three at-large teams. Advertisement 'The alternative to this system is expanding the field and giving the committee more to do,' Petitti told Klatt. 'If you go to 16 and you have 11 at-large, you've just added even more decision-making. The answer is, well, at that point, it gets to be easy, because you'll cover everybody. No, because the more spots you put into the system, the more difficult decisions you're facing. 'Teams start to look more alike, as we all have a tough road loss. Some of them may have stumbled at home in a tough conference game. The sequencing of when you play, you might be at a really difficult place, and then have to go on back home and play somebody else or be on the road for two weeks. That journey is really relevant. So, I think you make it harder.' One year into a 12-team College Football Playoff, the tournament seems likely to expand to 16 teams for the 2026-27 season. The Big Ten and SEC have the control to reshape the upcoming system, which was granted by other conferences through a memorandum of understanding last year. The Big Ten and SEC trended toward approving what's called the 4+4+2+2+1 plan, until conference meetings in May. Officials and coaches from the ACC, Big 12 and SEC touted a plan for five conference champions and 11 at-large teams in a 16-team field. It was the first time the SEC and Big Ten appeared on opposite sides of constructing a new CFP model. The CFP must inform ESPN/ABC by Dec. 1 whether it plans to stay at 12 teams beginning in 2026 or expand. With significant differences in scheduling — the Big Ten and Big 12 have nine league games, the SEC and ACC each play eight — and little crossover in nonconference games, Petitti wants each conference to determine which teams qualify for the CFP. That's why he wants to set up three CFP play-in games. In the Big Ten, both championship participants would qualify, as would the winner of games between No. 3 and No. 6 and between No. 4 and No. 5. Last year, the play-in games would have involved Iowa at Indiana and Illinois at Ohio State. Advertisement 'It just is a way to also normalize your conference schedule, because it really is hard to sometimes tell the difference among our own teams,' Petitti said. 'A lot of times they don't play each other. 'Look at Ohio State last year. Ohio State lost two Big Ten conference games. Technically, they finished fourth in the conference at 7-2. By the end of the playoff run, they were clearly the best team in the country. So, I think it's an indication of, it's hard to figure this stuff out during the course of the season.' If conferences choose their own CFP qualifiers, Petitti said leagues will set up better nonconference matchups among the power conferences. 'The goal is to play more nonconference games, because if you're qualifying for the CFP off your conference record, and then a play-in game, the fact that you play a tough SEC or ACC or Big 12 team and maybe get beat on the road, or whatever the result is, that might impact your seeding down the road, but it's not going to impact your access,' Petitti said. 'There's three at-larges, so yeah, it does a little bit. But at the end of the day, that loss isn't fatal.'
USA Today
31 minutes ago
- USA Today
Report: Ohio State basketball nonconference February game in the works vs. ACC power
Generally, when the conference college basketball season gets into full swing, we rarely see teams step outside the Big Ten to play teams. According to a report from CBS Sports, however, there appears to be something in the works between Ohio State and another school not in the Big Ten. In a post to X (formerly Twitter) on Monday, Matt Norlander cited sources that told him that the Buckeyes and Virginia Cavaliers are working on a February 14, Valentine's Day game. According to the story, "the game will be organized by Intersport, with the neutral-site venue soon to be determined. The goal is to house the one-off game at an arena that's practical for OSU and UVa fans. Nashville is under consideration as a destination, sources added." Playing these types of games used to be commonplace, but once television contracts, conference realignment, and resistance from conference administrators got in the way, it's a rare sight to see teams have these types of nonconference tussles late in the season. But, it's a trend that seems to be taking off more as of late. Other notable nonconference games before all the March Madness include Baylor vs. Louisville (also on Feb. 14, in Fort Worth, Texas) and Duke vs. Michigan (Feb. 21 in Washington, D.C.). This, after we saw Gonzaga at Kentucky in 2024 and Duke vs. Illinois last season at Madison Square Garden. Not exactly a big population, but a trend in the right direction nonetheless. As more details emerge about the Buckeyes and Cavaliers, we'll bring them to you. Contact/Follow us @BuckeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Ohio State news, notes and opinion. Follow Phil Harrison on X.
