House Democrat on release of Epstein files: ‘Not a good day for the administration'
Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) said the confusion surrounding Thursday's release of files related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein proved to be a sour day for the White House.
'It was not a good day for the administration. If you look at the traffic online over the Epstein release, I have never seen the left and the right come together in a moment on the debacle of what the Epstein files contained,' Moskowitz said Thursday on CNN's 'News Night.'
Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt provided 15 internet influencers with a white binder 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1' on Thursday afternoon.
The move sparked internet backlash from both conservative and liberal writers with large followings who condemned the White House for not publicly sharing the files as promised. Hours later, the Department of Justice released flight logs and other documents related to Epstein and urged FBI Director Kash Patel to present more evidence Friday morning.
The documents released Thursday contained little new information on Epstein, who died by suicide in jail in 2019.
'There is one person who takes the blame for what happened today. It's @PamBondi. I think she should resign,' Laura Loomer, a far right internet personality wrote in a Thursday night post on X.
'She went on Fox News and said the files were on her desk. Then she went on Fox News last night and said we would have files today. She is a total liar. Just face it.'
Loomer also said individuals invited to the White House were told not to disclose Bondi's involvement in distributing binders with information that pertained to Epstein's circle.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), who created a task force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, also raised concerns with the White House's decision to disseminate information to a small group of people before lawmakers.
'I nor the task force were given or reviewed the Epstein documents being released today… A NY Post story just revealed that the documents will simply be Epstein's phonebook,' Luna wrote in a Thursday post on the social platform X.
'THIS IS NOT WHAT WE OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASKED FOR and a complete disappointment. GET US THE INFORMATION WE ASKED FOR!'
However, Luna said in a separate post that she believed Bondi was putting herself 'at risk' by working to release the files and protect the identity of victims.
The attorney general reiterated her intent to share the contents of files in a Thursday statement.
'This Department of Justice is following through on President Trump's commitment to transparency and lifting the veil on the disgusting actions of Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators,' Bondi said.
'The first phase of files released today sheds light on Epstein's extensive network and begins to provide the public with long overdue accountability.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
No Canada! North-of-the-border buyers pull back as trade war heats up
Belligerent rhetoric from the White House about being annexed to the United States and combative trade negotiations are denting Canadian interest in owning American property, just as the housing market south of the shared border is starting to cool. Canadians made up the biggest share of foreign buyers of U.S. residential real estate in 2024, according to the National Association of Realtors, with 13% of the foreign purchase market – followed by China and Mexico at 11% each. In five years out of the last decade, Canadians have led foreign purchases. Miles Zimbaluk came to the Phoenix area from Saskatchewan in the wake of the 2008 subprime crisis, and 'fell in love' with Arizona, he said. A favorable exchange rate and low-priced properties helped convince him to stay, and he founded Canada to USA and Cross Border Insurance, real estate services firms that help north-of-the-border buyers and renters. 'I never expected to see anything like this,' Zimbaluk said in an interview. 'People have absolutely been turned off by the talk of annexation.' The rhetoric has pushed some people to sell the second homes they have owned in Arizona, and others are deciding to hold off rather than buy, he said. In the first quarter of 2025, Canadians have listed more than 700 homes for sale in Maricopa County, compared to 100 homes in the same period last year, Zimbaluk said. Canadians own about 30,000 properties in the county, however. Data from confirms that Canadian interest is waning. Canadians still made up the largest share of online home viewers in the first quarter, at 34.7%, but that's down sharply from 2024, when they represented 40.7% of house-hunters. For now, the slowdown isn't a huge concern, said Jiayi Xu, a economist, but is definitely something to keep an eye on. For the most part, Canadians buy in warmer metros with lower taxes – like Arizona and Florida – and as second-home buyers, are more interested in higher-priced properties, so those are the market segments she's watching most closely. Still, any slowdown in demand isn't helpful for the weakening U.S. housing market. In April, sales of previously-owned homes were at the slowest pace for any April since 2009, according to the National Association of Realtors. The pace of sales set that month was below the 4.06 million mark achieved in 2024, which was the worst year since 1995. In South Florida, real estate agents are 'absolutely' seeing less demand from Canadians, said Jeff Lichtenstein, the owner and broker of Echo Fine Properties, headquartered in the greater Palm Beach area. 'Some of it is uncertainty, some of it is not feeling as welcome,' Lichtenstein told USA TDOAY. 'As a country, we're making a lot of news. We're in the news a lot. None of that is good for tourism or buying real estate." To be sure, many Canadians are motivated by factors other than politics. Home prices have risen dramatically, particularly in the sunnier metro areas favored by snowbirds, making now a good time to cash out on a purchase made some time ago. It also makes buying an iffier proposition, particularly when coupled with an unfavorable exchange rate. The "loonie" has weakened compared to the U.S dollar in recent months, making it more expensive for Canadians to buy American goods. 'We think Canada's economy has slipped into a trade war-induced recession that will last through the end of 2025 unless a deal is reached to immediately reduce U.S. tariffs,' analysts at Oxford Economics wrote in a June 13 report. 'Job losses and higher prices due to the pass-through of tariffs and worsening supply chain strains will weigh on disposable income and consumer confidence. This will cause households to rein in spending and likely extend the recent weakness in the resale housing market.' Read next The US is short millions of housing units. Mass deportations could make it worse. What's more, the longstanding sense of America as a welcoming haven with friendly people has been damaged, real estate agents say. Lichtenstein notes that the White House's stance on South- and Central American immigrants is likely to be felt in the Miami area, making it a one-two punch for Florida real estate. 'A lot of people are saying they don't feel comfortable being in the U.S.,' Zimbaluk said. While no-one is concerned for their safety, per se, he has heard of some people with Canadian license plates having nasty notes left on their windshields. 'There's just so much uncertainty. Everyone is trying to find their own way.' This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: No Canada! Why fewer snowbirds are buying U.S. homes Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House says Trump will push TikTok deadline another 90 days
President Trump will sign another executive order this week extending the deadline for TikTok's parent company to divest the video sharing app, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday. 'As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark,' Leavitt said in a statement shared with The Hill. 'This extension will last 90 days, which the Administration will spend working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure.' Leavitt's confirmation came just hours after Trump said earlier in the day he would likely extend the divesture deadline to prevent a ban on TikTok from taking effect in the United States. When asked whether he would give the popular video-sharing platform another extension, the president told reporters aboard Air Force One, 'Probably, yeah.' 'Probably have to get China approval, but I think we'll get it,' Trump said as he traveled back from the Group of Seven summit in Canada. 'I think President Xi [Jinping] will ultimately approve it.' The expected order will mark the third extension from Trump since he took office in January. The law requiring TikTok's China-based parent company ByteDance to divest from the platform or face a ban on U.S. networks and app stores was signed by former President Biden last year. The law initially went into effect on Jan. 19 — the day before Trump was sworn into his second term — causing the platform to go dark for a few hours after the Supreme Court upheld the divest-or-ban law. But the platform was quickly brought back online after Trump pledged to issue an executive order once back in office to give the company an extension. The president made good on that promise, giving TikTok's Chinese parent company ByteDance 75 days beyond the initial January deadline to divest form the platform amid national security concerns. The White House finalized a deal on TikTok in early April, but it fell apart when Trump announced sweeping new 'reciprocal' tariffs, including significant import taxes on Chinese goods. The president extended the TikTok deadline by another 75 days, which was set to expire on June 19. Brett Samuels contributed reporting. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Memo: Risks loom as Trump moves toward direct participation in Israel's attack on Iran
President Trump is becoming ever more emphatic in his backing of Israel's attack on Iran, with the chances rising by the hour that he will greenlight direct U.S. involvement. The president discussed the crisis in the White House Situation Room with his closest advisers on Tuesday afternoon. Afterward, according to the Israeli news organization Haaretz, he spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The road ahead is complicated, not least because there are stark differences within Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) support base regarding the merits of getting involved in foreign conflicts in Iran or anywhere else. Then there is the vexing question of what, precisely, the goal would be if the U.S. joined military operations — and how it would be achieved. Would it be limited to destroying the Iranian uranium enrichment facility at Fordow, which is literally built inside a mountain? Or would it be regime change in Tehran? Then there are questions of economics and logistics, such as the effect of an all-out war on oil prices and on crucial mercantile traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. On Tuesday, Trump adopted his most belligerent stance yet on Iran in a series of social media posts. Most blatant of all was an all-caps post that demanded 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' It was not clear what exactly Trump meant by surrender. The message from the president came shortly after one that had warned, 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but he is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!) at least not for now.' Trump's words were directed at Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and it was notable in part because of media reports in recent days that Trump had put the kibosh on an Israeli plan to kill Khamenei at the start of the latest phase of the conflict. Trump's use of the word 'we' — in seeming reference to a direct alliance between the U.S. and Israel when it comes to the attack on Iran — was not lost on anyone either. He had written on social media about an hour before, 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran.' It's a far cry from the beginning of the Israeli strikes on Iran, just five days previously, which were met by a quick statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio seeking to maintain at least some distance between the U.S. and Netanyahu's government. 'Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' Rubio said. But as Trump seems to be moving closer to a joint U.S.-Israeli assault on Iran, he is encountering pushback even from within his own base. A range of prominent figures in MAGA World have expressed skepticism, and sometimes outright indignation, at the idea of the U.S. entangling itself in another conflict in the Middle East. Figures like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), former Trump chief strategist Steve Bannon, commentator Tucker Carlson and several online influencers are part of a populist conservative movement that has grown far more dubious of military involvements in the two decades since President George W. Bush and his coterie of neoconservative advisers launched wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. On Monday, Greene took aim on social media at 'fakes' who were 'slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war.' On Tuesday, she emphasized the need to cater to Americans who want their leaders to work on kitchen-table issues, like 'cheap gas, groceries, bills, and housing,' rather than having the government's energy and resources 'going into another foreign war.' Carlson has become one of the main right-wing media voices expressing opposition to foreign military adventuring, and skepticism about the assumption that the U.S. should back Israel in almost any endeavor. On Monday, he published a long on-camera interview with Bannon in which the erstwhile strategist began by saying that one of the main pillars of the MAGA coalition from the start of Trump's rise was to 'stop the forever wars.' 'I'm a big supporter of Israel,' Bannon said, 'and I'm telling people, hey, if we get sucked into this war … it's going to not just blow up the [MAGA] coalition, it's also going to thwart what we're doing' on the domestic front — specifically in terms of Trump's hard-line policies on immigration. It bears emphasizing that the risks for Trump in directly joining the Israeli assault are not limited to the split in his political base. For a start, there is the perennial problem with military operations that the late Secretary of State Colin Powell dubbed 'mission creep.' Powell was referring to the tendency for objectives to become more and more expansive over time, to a point where it becomes politically difficult to either withdraw troops or declare victory. At the same time, there are voices within the GOP coalition loudly insisting that Trump should give Israel the utmost backing. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has said that the U.S. should go 'all-in' behind Israel if Iran does not come to an agreement over its uranium enrichment program. If Trump were to confound current expectations, he would keep the U.S. out of the direct conflict. But he would also be open to criticism from the most vehement supporters of Israel, within his own party and beyond, that he had blinked at a crucial time, passing up on what they see as a potentially transformative moment. Either way, the potential risks and rewards are profound — especially for a president who has previously expressed pride in his ability to keep the U.S. out of new wars. The Memo is a reported column by Niall Stanage. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
