logo
Campaigners say women deserve better as they seek to decriminalise abortion

Campaigners say women deserve better as they seek to decriminalise abortion

Yahoo14-05-2025

Health professionals, charities and MPs are renewing efforts to decriminalise abortion, declaring that 'women deserve better' and should not face investigation under 'archaic' law.
Organisations say more than 100 women are believed to have been investigated by the police in recent years under the current 164-year-old law, which sees abortion in England and Wales remain a criminal offence.
It is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability.
A new amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill, brought by Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, stating that 'no offence is committed by a woman acting in relation to her own pregnancy', has been backed by a number of groups including royal medical colleges, charities and trade unions.
One – healthcare provider the British Pregnancy Advisory Group (Bpas) – said the change would do away with the threat of investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment currently faced by some women.
It insisted it would not change any law regarding the provision of abortion services within a healthcare setting, including the time limit, the grounds for abortion or the requirement for the approval of two doctors.
It said anyone, including a medical professional, who assisted a woman in obtaining an abortion outside the law would remain liable for prosecution.
Bpas said: 'For every woman who ends up in court, at least 10 others are subjected to prolonged police investigations which can prevent them from getting the mental health support they desperately need and which have resulted in existing children being separated from women whose cases never make it to court. Women deserve better.'
Ms Antoniazzi said the current law is 'unacceptable', adding: 'There is simply no world in which prosecuting a vulnerable woman who may have experienced a medical complication, miscarriage or stillbirth is the right course of action.'
She said her amendment, laid before Parliament on Tuesday, is 'tightly drawn – not changing anything about provision of abortion care, the time limit, the right to conscientious objection or any other aspects of abortion law'.
She added: 'I am confident that, when Parliament has the opportunity to vote on these proposals, my colleagues will agree that never again should a woman be prosecuted for ending her own pregnancy in England and Wales.'
The issue most recently came to the fore earlier this month with the case of a woman who took medication at home during a coronavirus lockdown in 2020.
Nicola Packer, 45, was cleared by a jury last week of 'unlawfully administering to herself a poison or other noxious thing' with the 'intent to procure a miscarriage'.
She had taken prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks for taking such medication at home.
She told jurors she did not realise she had been pregnant for more than 10 weeks.
Following the trial, her friend said she had been 'persecuted' for a 'tragic accident', while the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (Rcog) claimed the trial showed 'just how outdated and harmful' current abortion law is as they backed calls for reform.
The case of Carla Foster, jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant, eventually saw her sentence reduced by the Court of Appeal and suspended, with senior judges saying that sending women to prison for abortion-related offences is 'unlikely' to be a 'just outcome'.
The amendment on decriminalisation is said to have the support of more than 60 cross-party MPs and backers hope for a vote on it as early as next month.
The latest attempt follows repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th-century law – the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act – after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019.
MPs had been due to debate similar amendments removing the threat of prosecution against women who act in relation to their own pregnancy at any stage, but these did not take place after Parliament was dissolved last summer for the general election.
It is expected a separate amendment could be published by a group led by fellow Labour MP Stella Creasy, to not only decriminalise abortion but to 'lock in' the right of someone to have one and protect those who help them.
Ms Creasy last week said the law must be changed so that 'the right to choose is a human right', ensuring no repeat of 'such awful cases and victimisation of vulnerable women again'.
The amendment would not cover Scotland, where a group is currently undertaking work to review the law as it stands there.
Last month, Scotland's women's health minister, Jenni Minto, said she was 'disappointed' that some still have to travel to England for late-term abortions, amid concerns that women in Scotland can only have a termination after 20 weeks in cases where there is either a foetal abnormality or the woman's life is at risk.
Louise McCudden, from provider MSI Reproductive Choices, said: 'No-one should face criminal prosecution for ending their own pregnancy. Our Victorian abortion laws are not only outdated, but inconsistent, with abortion now decriminalised in Northern Ireland but not in England, Wales, or Scotland.
'As one of the world's largest abortion providers, we're deeply concerned to see so many women face prosecution, even jail, in Britain.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How popular is Reform UK at the moment - and who's voting for it?
How popular is Reform UK at the moment - and who's voting for it?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How popular is Reform UK at the moment - and who's voting for it?

A civil war has erupted in Reform UK. Zia Yusuf, its chairman, quit the party on Thursday, saying working to get it elected was no longer 'a good use of my time'. It followed a row in which he criticised a "dumb" question from new MP Sarah Pochin to Sir Keir Starmer in Parliament on Wednesday about a ban on burkas. Reform figures - including leader Nigel Farage - had backed Pochin. The infighting is an unwelcome setback for the party, which is riding high in polling among the public and achieved third place in Thursday's Scottish by-election, finishing within 1,500 votes of the winning Labour candidate. In the latest YouGov voting intention tracker, based on surveys from 1 and 2 June, Reform topped the polls on 28%. This compares to Labour on 22%, the Tories on 18% and Lib Dems on 16%. The tracker's more detailed results indicate Reform is most popular among over-50s with some 40% of Britons between 50 and 64 choosing the party in the latest survey. This compares to just 18% favouring Labour and the Tories. Meanwhile, 34% of over-65s are backing Farage's party, compared to 30% who are currently supporting the Tories. In terms of gender, Reform is also the most popular party among British males (31%) and females (25%). In England, it is also leading in the north (32%), Midlands (30%) and south (28%). In London, it is only the fourth most popular party (15%). The party's apparent increasing support translated into MPs during last year's general election, which saw it win five seats: Ashfield, Boston and Skegness, Clacton, Great Yarmouth (though its winning candidate Rupert Lowe is no longer a Reform MP) and South Basildon and East Thurrock. It came in second place in a further 98 constituencies. The party's electoral momentum continued at a local level last month. As well as winning the Runcorn and Helsby parliamentary by-election (which sent Sarah Pochin to the House of Commons), Reform won two mayoralties (Greater Lincolnshire and Hull and East Yorkshire) and control of 10 councils. In the Scottish Parliament by-election for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse on Thursday, Reform came "from nowhere" to finish third - and within 1,500 of first. After not putting a candidate forward in 2021, Reform's Ross Lambie won 7,088 votes, compared to the SNP's 7,957 and Labour's 8,559. In 2021, Reform UK finished a lowly 13th, with just 58 votes. Deputy leader Richard Tice said: "We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP, so it's an incredible result.' But if the popularity of Reform UK is gathering momentum, internally, the party has been hit by a series of high-profile internal problems. Formerly a Tory member, Yusuf came to prominence in June last year as a major Reform donor - giving £200,000 to the party - ahead of the general election A businessman who co-founded a luxury concierge service app called Velocity Black, which he reportedly sold for £233m in 2023, he was labelled a "star of the show" by Farage. And after Reform won its first Commons seats in the election, Yusuf was appointed chairman with a brief of "professionalising the party, building national infrastructure and continuing to grow membership". He was at the heart of another Reform "civil war" in March when the party stripped MP Rupert Lowe of the whip and reported him to the police, accusing him of making 'threats of physical violence' towards Yusuf. The Crown Prosecution Service said last month no criminal charges would be brought against Lowe, who then accused his ex-colleagues of a 'sinister' attempt to use the police to silence him. Yusuf also appeared to have an increasingly prominent role representing Reform in the media. After last month's local elections, it was him - not any of Reform's MPs - who spoke for the party on the BBC's flagship Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg politics programme. But just one month later, he was out following his clash with senior figures in the party. On Wednesday, Pochin asked Starmer during Prime Minister's Questions whether he would support a ban on burkas. A day later, Yusuf said on social media it had been 'dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do'. Shortly after that, he announced he was quitting as Reform's chairman, saying that working to get the party elected was no longer 'a good use of my time'. Party leader Farage said he had only 10 minutes' notice Yusuf was going to resign, adding he was 'genuinely sorry' he was departing. Reform has set out a number of policies in recent months. The party has said it would reinstate the winter fuel allowance and scrap the two-child benefit cap in what is a clear attempt to target Labour supporters angry at the party's welfare cuts. More controversially, Reform has vowed to make "big savings" by scrapping the UK's net zero, asylum hotel and DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) policies. Farage has also said it would lift the income tax threshold to £20,000: something the Institute for Fiscal Studies questioned, saying it would cost up to £80bn. Starmer seized on this, saying Farage's "fantasy" economics would lead to a Liz Truss-style economic meltdown. Quite how this translates into how the public continues to view the party remains to be seen. But with the next general election still four years away, there are plenty more twists and turns to come for Farage & Co. The policies Reform UK and Nigel Farage have announced this year (Yahoo News UK) The tightrope Farage is walking on race – and why he can only lose (The Telegraph) Reform-led councils in 'paralysis' as dozens of meetings cancelled in first weeks (The Independent)

Calls to Ban Burqas in the UK Rekindle Debate Over Religious Freedom and Public Safety
Calls to Ban Burqas in the UK Rekindle Debate Over Religious Freedom and Public Safety

Epoch Times

time4 hours ago

  • Epoch Times

Calls to Ban Burqas in the UK Rekindle Debate Over Religious Freedom and Public Safety

Calls by British MPs to ban burqas have reignited public debate over the wearing of Islamic face veils in public spaces. The burqa, the most concealing of all Islamic veils, covers the face and body, typically leaving only a mesh screen for the wearer to see through. The renewed controversy was Starmer dismissed the suggestion, saying, 'I am not going to follow her down that line.' Pochin's proposal revealed internal divisions within Reform and opened the floodgates for broader political commentary. Party Chairman Zia Yusuf publicly criticised Pochin's question as Related Stories 1/2/2025 8/10/2018 He resigned on Thursday, citing that continuing in his role was no longer a 'good use of my time.' Other Reform MPs, however, backed Pochin's position. Richard Tice and They further Tice called for a 'national debate' and questioned whether burqa-wearing women were truly making a free choice. From the Conservative benches, Nick Timothy Advocacy group 'If you care about freedom, care about the women forced to wear the burqa. It's time to ban the burqa,' the group said. Zia Yusuf sits behind Sarah Pochin as she speaks at a Reform UK press conference in London on May 27, not all responses aligned with this view, as Liberal Democrat and Labour MPs pushed back. Lib Dem MP Joshua Reynolds Labour MP Mike Tapp Tapp added that if a woman is being forced to wear an item of clothing, 'then that's likely to be part of a bigger problem within that relationship.' He said the government is working to strengthen laws addressing violence against women and girls, including coercive control, making it as serious as physical abuse. The Muslim Council of Britain 'Instead, we will continue to focus on what matters to all Britons: the cost of living crisis, the strain on our NHS, and the need for unity, dignity, and real solutions,' it said. Recurring Debate in the UK This is far from the first time the UK has grappled with whether to regulate or ban Islamic face veils such as the burqa and niqab. While no nationwide ban has been enacted, the topic has surfaced periodically over the past two decades. The UK has repeatedly debated banning Islamic face veils like the burqa and niqab, but no national law has ever been passed. The issue gained attention in 2006, when then-Foreign Secretary Jack Straw publicly expressed discomfort with face veils, sparking national discussion and controversy. In 2013, Conservative MP Philip Hollobone introduced a bill to Local people protest following comments made by former Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson against the wearing of Burkas by Muslim women, outside the Hillingdon Conservative Association office in Uxbridge, England, on Aug. 9, issue resurfaced in 2018 when His remarks were widely condemned as Islamophobic, though he defended them as a critique of oppressive dress codes. Despite periodic calls for bans, successive UK governments have upheld the Currently, a Bans Across the Continent Several European nations have already implemented full or partial bans on face-covering garments such as the burqa, often citing national security, social cohesion, and secularism. France led the way in 2011 with a nationwide public ban. Austria, In Germany, while some states prohibit face veils in schools and public spaces, there is no nationwide ban on wearing them publicly. In 2021, the EU's highest court ruled against two Muslim women in Germany who were suspended from their jobs for wearing hijabs at work, saying employers may require employees not to wear religious clothing if they work in a job that deals with the public. These measures have However, governments argue they are essential for promoting open communication and safeguarding public order. According to the The group, which includes leading legal and community figures, is expected to present its recommendations by August 2025. PA Media contributed to this report.

Labour urged to publish impact of rent reforms as eviction delays soar
Labour urged to publish impact of rent reforms as eviction delays soar

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Labour urged to publish impact of rent reforms as eviction delays soar

Ministers are being urged to publish a report into the impact of rental reforms on the courts as landlords face eight-month delays to repossess their property. Government departments are required to complete a justice impact assessment for any new bills that are likely to impact the UK courts system. Labour's Renters' Reform Bill is set to become law this summer and will include the removal of Section 21 'no-fault evictions'. There are fears the change will force landlords to rely on the courts to regain possession of their properties, adding to existing backlogs. Private landlords faced an eight-month wait from making a claim to the courts to their properties being repossessed in the first four months of 2025, according to the latest government data. Chris Norris, chief policy officer for the National Residential Landlords Association, said: 'The justice system is simply not ready for the impact of the Bill. 'In the interests of transparency, the Government should publish the Justice Impact test. The Government also needs to come clean about how it defines the courts being ready for the reforms. Warm words are no substitute for clear objectives for the justice system.' Justice impact assessments are an internal process and not usually published by government departments, but previous ministers have committed to publishing court reviews ahead of implementing rental reforms. The former Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee in a 2023 report said: 'It is not clear whether the Government fully appreciates the extent to which an unreformed courts system could undermine its tenancy reforms.' Furthermore, in a consultation in 2022, the then-government acknowledged that Section 21 was preferred by landlords to other means of eviction – such as Section 8 – as it was perceived as 'quicker and more certain'. Richard Atkinson, president of the Law Society, said of the Renters' Rights Bill: 'The bill will not be effective without further investment in the justice system.' Mr Atkinson also urged the Government to 'provide greater funding and more clarity to the enforcement provisions so that justice is accessible to renters and landlords alike'. In addition to concerns about the justice system, a report has warned impacts of the bill will add almost £900 a year to the average tenancy. The legislation will limit landlords to just one rent increase per year capped at the 'market rate' – the price that would be achieved if the property was newly advertised to let. Landbay said property owners were planning to increase rent by an average of 6pc, which would add £74 to the average monthly rent, or £888 a year. Dr Neil Cobbold, director at property software company Reapit UKI, said: 'The Government's decision not to share the Renters' Rights Bill justice impact test raises serious questions about transparency and accountability. The estimate of changes in the number of court and tribunal cases is a vital tool for understanding how the legislation will affect the property sector – including case volumes – and whether the justice infrastructure is in place to support the change.' The Bill is currently going through the House of Lords before being sent back to the Commons and is expected to receive Royal Assent by summer 2025 and be implemented before the end of the year. An MHCLG spokesman said: 'As was the case under previous governments, Justice Impact Tests are internal government documents and it is not standard practice for them to be published. 'We are fully focussed on ensuring the justice system is ready for our reforms, which will create a fairer housing market, and are working closely with the Ministry of Justice and HM Courts and Tribunal Service to ensure all necessary preparations are in place.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store