Rwanda Agrees to Take in Up to 250 Migrants Deported from US
The agreement was signed in Kigali in June by US and Rwandan officials, a Rwandan government source told Reuters on condition of anonymity. Washington has already sent an initial list of 10 individuals for vetting.
'Rwanda has agreed with the United States to accept up to 250 migrants, in part because nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement, and our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation,' said government spokesperson Yolande Makolo.
Makolo said Rwanda retains the right to approve each individual proposed for relocation.
'Those approved will be provided with workforce training, healthcare, and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest growing economies in the world over the last decade,' she said.
The US White House, State Department and Department of Homeland Security have not responded to requests for comment.
President Trump has made immigration a cornerstone of his policy agenda and has pledged to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. His administration has explored similar deals with other countries, including sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and Eswatini, formerly Swaziland.
In recent years, Rwanda has positioned itself as a resettlement destination for migrants unwanted in Western countries. However, human rights organisations have raised concerns about Kigali's record on civil liberties and its treatment of political dissidents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
Tariff heat sees Europe boost its focus on Vietnam and Indonesia
[HO CHI MINH CITY / JAKARTA] Europe's engagement with South-east Asia is ramping up, from the recent 150 million euro (S$224.5 millon) investment in a new Vietnam engineering hub by German software giant SAP to the UK's removal of barriers for pharmaceutical exports to Vietnam and the European Union's landmark trade deal with Indonesia. The push is being fuelled by geopolitical tensions and US President Donald Trump's Aug 7 tariff package – a flat rate of 15 per cent on most EU imports, in addition to existing steep duties on EU steel and vehicles – which has made selling to the US market costlier and less predictable for European exporters. Ian Betts, chair of the British Chamber of Commerce in Indonesia, said that South-east Asian markets such as Indonesia and Vietnam are now viewed as a 'strategic hedge' against over-reliance on traditional Western markets as they offer dynamic consumer bases, expanding middle classes and improving regulatory frameworks. Stephen Olson, former US trade negotiator and visiting senior fellow at Iseas-Yusof Ishak Institute echoed the sentiment: 'The EU is clearly attempting to diversify its trade relations away from the US, and Asean is a key focal point.' Recent developments, including the breakthrough EU-Indonesia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) and sector-specific pacts such as the UK-Vietnam pharmaceutical deal, underscore this structural shift. The pivot is supported by recent Allianz Trade surveys before and after the US' 'Liberation Day' tariffs on Apr 2, which found that European export interest towards South and South-east Asia doubled from 7 per cent to 14 per cent as trade links between the regions are intensifying with more free-trade agreements (FTAs). A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up The shifting sentiments were more evident when it came to supply-chain exposures. 'The trade war is creating opportunistic friendshoring (with) the Europe-Asia rapprochement,' Allianz analysts wrote. They pointed out that the Asia-Pacific has now become the preferred relocation destination for German companies with current links to North American supply chains – with 43 per cent opting for this, rising sharply from 28 per cent. 'We see a lot of manufacturing and industrial companies leveraging Vietnam as an expansion, and it creates opportunities for wider exchange (between Vietnam and Europe),' said Thomas Saueressig, member of the executive board of SAP, during a press briefing on Aug 7 to launch its new SAP Labs in Ho Chi Minh City. The German enterprise software giant plans to invest more than 150 million euros over the next five years to strengthen its engineering hub in Vietnam, the second in South-east Asia following the one in Singapore in 2022. '(How we try to boost SAP Labs here) is also a great next signal for more and further increased collaborations and partnerships across industries from Germany, Europe, to South-east Asia, specifically in Vietnam,' he added. Europe is not stopping at Indonesia or Vietnam. The Philippines embarked on a fresh round of FTA talks with the EU in June, with the next one scheduled in October. Negotiations with Malaysia and Thailand are also ongoing at various stages. 'Once (Indonesia-EU CEPA) is signed, I believe it opens the way for further conclusions and negotiations with other Asean member states,' said Edison Bako, executive director at the European Business Chamber of Commerce (EuroCham) in Indonesia. One of the key challenges for these countries, according to Olson, will be navigating differing perspectives on values-driven social issues and climate change – areas that the EU increasingly intertwines with its trade policies. Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto meeting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels on Jul 13. PHOTO: INDONESIA PRESIDENTIAL SECRETARIAT Indonesia-EU CEPA: Catalyst for broader engagement Politically concluded on Jul 14, 2025, the Indonesia-EU CEPA is set for legal finalisation by September and is poised to serve as a template for Europe's wider strategy in Asean. Under the CEPA, approximately 80 per cent of Indonesia's exports to the EU – including textiles, footwear, fisheries, palm oil and electric vehicle (EV)-related components – will benefit from immediate or gradual tariff elimination, boosting export competitiveness and improving market access. In return, EU companies will gain wider access to Indonesia's rapidly growing market of 280 million consumers, with key export opportunities in meat, dairy products and green technologies. Trade between the two sides is projected to grow by 50 per cent or more in the coming years under the new framework. '(The deal) would also open the floodgates in terms of the prospects for environmental sustainability and governance (ESG) standards here in Asean,' added Bako. Europe has emerged as one of the top seven sources of foreign investment in Indonesia, with inflows reaching US$4.59 billion in 2024, up 52 per cent from US$3.02 billion in the previous year, driven by growing interest in the EV, healthcare and resource sectors. 'The ongoing uncertainty in EU-US trade relations is prompting many to look more seriously at Asean,' said Fabian Kieble, chairman of EuroCham in Indonesia. 'Indonesia's EV battery and mining sectors are key areas of interest. The country's push for EVs aligns well with European expertise,' he added. Vietnam-UK sectoral strategy Vietnam has been playing a key role in Europe's Asia strategy, with the UK-Vietnam pharmaceutical agreement – confirmed on the same day as the announcement of CEPA between the EU and Indonesia – symbolising deeper engagement. 'We expect the diversification of trade partners this agreement provides to enhance the UK's resilience against global trade uncertainties while creating new growth opportunities in emerging markets across Asia,' Rachel Finlay, healthcare analyst at BMI, a unit of Fitch Solutions, wrote in a note last month. The deal removes non-tariff barriers for UK pharmaceutical exports and reinforces the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency's standards as an internationally recognised benchmark – a move that could ripple through other Asean markets. 'This agreement also strengthens Vietnam's broader trade relationship with the UK, which could lead to expanded cooperation in other sectors such as finance and clean energy,' Sakshi Sikka, associate director of pharmaceuticals at BMI, added. Clarence Hoe, executive director of Americas and Europe at Enterprise Singapore also observed increased interest from European companies to participate in renewable energy infrastructure projects in South-east Asian markets due to the latter's vast potential and commitment to net zero targets, as well as pro-energy transition policies. Pha Lai thermal power plant in Hai Duong province, Vietnam. The UK and EU are the co-leads of the International Partners Group, which has been working with Hanoi to implement Vietnam's Just Energy Transition Partnership since December 2022. PHOTO: AFP Singapore: Asean's entry point for European firms While emerging South-east Asian economies present huge growth potential, Singapore remains Europe's launch pad into the region, with more than 19,000 European companies operating in the city-state. Recent manufacturing investments by Sanofi, Biotronik, Siltronic and NTS in Singapore highlight the 'queen bee' effect – where global firms cluster their suppliers and partners around the South-east Asian region, said Dino Tan, senior vice-president and head of Europe at Singapore Economic Development Board. Following the Europe-Singapore Digital Trade Agreement, which was finalised last year, London-headquartered fintech Wise expanded its Asia-Pacific hub in Singapore in April to better serve markets in the region. Norwegian gamified learning platform Kahoot launched its Asia-Pacific hub in the Republic in July, using Singapore as a gateway for its regional growth. 'Singapore is deepening regional economic integration within South-east Asia, which will make it easier for companies to do business in our region,' Tan noted. He highlighted initiatives such as the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone, announced earlier this year, as a strategic location that enables European companies to leverage the combined strengths of both Malaysia and Singapore to diversify their supply chains and continue scaling. Additional reporting by Goh Ruoxue in Singapore
Business Times
7 hours ago
- Business Times
Nvidia H20 chips not safe for China: state media
[BEIJING] Nvidia's H20 chips pose security concerns for China, a social media account affiliated with China's state media said on Sunday (Aug 10), after Beijing raised concerns over backdoor access in those chips. The H20 chips are also not technologically advanced or environmentally friendly, the account, Yuyuan Tantian, which is affiliated with state broadcaster CCTV, said in an article published on WeChat. 'When a type of chip is neither environmentally friendly, nor advanced, nor safe, as consumers, we certainly have the option not to buy it,' the article concluded. Nvidia did not immediately respond to a request for comment. H20 artificial intelligence chips were developed by Nvidia for the Chinese market after the US imposed export restrictions on advanced AI chips in late 2023. The administration of US President Donald Trump banned their sales in April amid escalating trade tensions with China, but reversed the ban in July. China's cyberspace watchdog said on Jul 31 that it had summoned Nvidia to a meeting, asking the US chipmaker to explain whether its H20 chips had any backdoor security risks – a hidden method of bypassing normal authentication or security controls. Nvidia later said its products had no 'backdoors' that would allow remote access or control. In its article, Yuyuan Tantian said Nvidia chips could achieve functions including 'remote shutdown' through a hardware 'backdoor.' Yuyuan Tantian's comment followed criticism against Nvidia by People's Daily, another Chinese state media outlet. In a commentary earlier this month, People's Daily said Nvidia must produce 'convincing security proofs' to eliminate Chinese users' worries over security risks in its chips and regain market trust. REUTERS
Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
America is undermining its soft power in sports
US President Donald Trump during an executive order signing ceremony in the South Court Auditorium at the White House in Washington. NEW YORK – The pre-teen boys who play for Venezuela's Cardenales Little League are on their way to the upcoming Little League World Series. Credit is due to their talent and diligence – and an exemption from President Donald Trump's travel ban personally granted by Secretary of State Marco Rubio last week. Unfortunately, before this special waiver, their participation was far from guaranteed. In July, a different Venezuelan Little League team, Cacique Mara, was denied US visas and a chance to play in a different event in South Carolina. The harsh, differential treatment of two youth teams is a new phenomenon in American sports. For decades, the US was recognized for its openness to international athletes and competition. Sports generated goodwill, as well as diplomatic, cultural and economic benefits, making it a US soft power. Now, the unwillingness to welcome athletes from everywhere is eroding it. For as long as Americans have played organized sports, foreigners have been on the team. Major League Baseball has profited from immigrant talent since the 1870s, for example. But it was only during the middle decades of the 20th century that athletes began migrating to the US in large numbers for the express purpose of training and playing a sport. These days, we are accustomed to seeing foreign-born players competing in – and dominating – top leagues, such as the National Basketball Association. Lesser-known, but just as important, is the growth of athletes at the amateur and semi-professional level. Consider college sports. During the 1999-2000 academic year, 3,589 international athletes comprised 2.4% of the National Collegiate Athletic Association's top-tier Division I athletes; by 2023-24, that number had ballooned to 13,198 or 7%. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Four men arrested in Bukit Timah believed to be linked to housebreaking syndicates Singapore Criminal trial of Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and five others starts Aug 11 Singapore Profile of Kpod user has shifted from hardcore drug users to young people: Experts Tech Former data analyst creates AI tutor that assesses students based on Singapore schools' criteria Opinion I used to be impatient. Then I became a granddad Life Pixar film-maker, We Bare Bears creator Daniel Chong on the lessons his S'porean parents taught him Opinion Recognising our imperfections is part of what makes Singapore whole Business The risks of using 'decoupling' to own two properties Several factors draw them. First, there's the money. American sports have more of it than any other country. The big salaries paid at the professional level are an obvious attraction. But so, too, are the opportunities at the collegiate and youth levels. Thanks to media rights revenue, for example, US colleges and universities fund scholarships, facilities and coaching at a scale and quality unavailable anywhere else in the world. Overseas athletes aren't just attracted to superior gym facilities, of course. Sticking with basketball as an example, long before aspiring European players have ever heard of an NCAA Final Four, they've likely fallen for an American basketball culture that represents freedom and self-expression. At a time when America's image abroad totters, Steph Curry and his 3-point shooting skills remain popular everywhere. What government, anywhere, doesn't wish that its values could be similarly embraced by global youth culture? Saudi Arabia's recent, expensive embrace of sports as public diplomacy (sportswashing, in the eyes of many) is just one example of a country trying to emulate American success and co-opt some of the narrative. Money alone can't buy American soft power success. A country also needs values that it can sell, and a government willing to make the effort. For example, since 2002, the US State Department has hosted a Sports Diplomacy Division intended to foster cultural exchanges and open up countries to American businesses along the way. Shaquille O'Neal, Ken Griffey Jr., and Cal Ripken Jr. have been among its most prominent envoys, presumably to the benefit of the NBA, MLB and their media partners. Meanwhile, a cultivated image of openness has long been matched by an immigration policy that welcomes individuals with extraordinary abilities, including athletes. If someone wants to come to the US to compete, train and earn, that person has been, for the most part, welcome in recent decades. The country's role as host for major international competitions – such as the FIFA World Cup (in 1994 and 2026) and multiple Olympic games (with Los Angeles on tap for 2028) – strengthens this perception and serves as a platform for promoting American soft power. Trump's travel bans and immigration policies, ostensibly created to preserve national security, undermine those efforts. Though not targeted specifically at athletes, they are already casualties. In June, the State Department denied visas to members of Senegal's national women's basketball team, who were planning a US training camp, and Cuba's national women's volleyball team, who were intending to compete in a tournament in Puerto Rico. But players visiting the US temporarily – say, for a tournament or training camp – aren't the only ones who are experiencing a different kind of welcome, either. Foreign-born athletes who plan to enroll in colleges and universities this fall experienced significant visa delays and uncertainties this spring. Most issues in the latter category were eventually resolved, but the message both at home and abroad was unmistakable: It's your passport–not your talent or determination–that decides whether you get to play. Athletes lose out. The US loses more. In the increasingly intense battle for global loyalties, Americans need ambassadors and events that showcase their best values and culture. Sports do that, and the US shouldn't willingly squander its lead. BLOOMBERG
