logo
Companies vying for Trump's attention are sponsoring the Easter Egg Roll

Companies vying for Trump's attention are sponsoring the Easter Egg Roll

Yahoo19-04-2025

The White House's annual Easter Egg Roll will have major corporations sponsoring activities this year, which ethics experts say would not have passed muster under previous administrations.
The White House on Friday announced details for the annual event, which has taken place in some form for more than 100 years. Among the companies sponsoring stations are Amazon, Meta and YouTube — all tech companies whose leaders have sought a closer relationship with President Donald Trump in his second term.
'In addition to the classic Egg Roll and Egg Hunt — both featuring real, small- and medium-sized eggs donated by American egg farmers — guests will enjoy a wide array of entertaining activities thanks to the White House Historical Association and its partnerships,' the first lady's office said in a statement.
It comes as tech giants have looked to make inroads with the Trump administration, with industry titans attending the president's inauguration. Trump and his administration have also sought to boost companies that publicly align with him, including when the president showcased Tesla cars — and bought one — alongside his billionaire adviser Elon Musk, who also serves as CEO of the EV company.
Ethics experts said the arrangement for Monday's egg roll was highly unusual, and a break from tradition about not corporatizing the White House and its grounds.
'From the president and his family on down, the White House, and indeed the federal government, there are too many conflicts and other complex entanglements with the companies reportedly solicited,' said Norm Eisen, a longtime Trump critic who served as President Barack Obama's special counsel for ethics and government reform and currently chairs the State Democracy Defenders Fund. 'That opens up at least the appearance of influence peddling.'
The White House and the White House Historical Association — a private nonprofit that has worked with administrations of both parties for decades — did not respond to requests for comment.
'No way,' said Richard Painter, former chief White House ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush and another regular detractor of Trump, on whether this would have happened under any other presidency. 'You can't have corporate logos associated with the White House.'
A spokesperson for Google, YouTube's parent company, emphasized in a statement that the video platform has partnered with the White House in years past and it does so 'in line with the administration's process.'
'YouTube's participation in the White House Easter Egg Roll has become an annual tradition,' the company said, adding that 'our goal is to provide an opportunity for kids to meet their favorite creators, and we look forward to having a presence once again this year.'
It isn't clear how, exactly, the sponsorships will be displayed. But Amazon is backing activities across the South Lawn on Monday, sponsoring the 'Reading Nook' and 'Family Photo Opportunity.' Meta will sponsor the 'AI-Powered Experience and Photo Opportunity.' And YouTube will host the 'Bunny Hop Stage.'
'During my years as ethics czar in the White House, when my duties included overseeing these kinds of compliance issues … I never would have allowed this,' Eisen said.
He added that White House senior staff involved in the planning 'are subject to the ethics laws implicated, such as those prohibiting the appearance or the reality of a conflict.'
GALA, a blockchain company sponsoring a 'Digital White House Egg Hunt Game,' has already been promoting its involvement in the event. It is highlighting the game on its website next to a picture of the Easter Egg Roll's logo, saying the game is 'bringing an added layer of fun to one of the most iconic events of the season.'
The company said in its announcement that it is "honored to partner" with the event.
Industry trade groups — including egg farmers and candy makers — are also listed as event partners, and some have supported the event for decades.
'America's egg farmers are immensely proud to be part of this treasured tradition every year. As a legacy partner of the White House Easter Egg Roll, we are honored that real eggs are a key element in this iconic national celebration,' Emily Metz, president and CEO of the American Egg Board, said in an announcement on the organization's website.
Meta declined to comment and Amazon did not respond to a request for comment.
It isn't the first time corporate backing has made its way to White House events. In 2016, Obama hosted a 'South by South Lawn' event at the White House, which his administration said 'was made possible thanks to support' from companies including Hyatt, Starbucks and Target.
But some of the tech companies sponsoring stations this year are facing intense scrutiny. Meta is in the midst of a major antitrust trial — and some in Washington fear Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's relationship with Trump could affect the case. A federal judge also recently ruled in a case originally brought by the Biden administration and 17 state attorneys general that parts of Google's ad business was an illegal monopoly, a decision the company pledged to appeal.
CNN previously reported that the White House had hired event production company Harbinger to solicit outside sponsors for this year's Egg Roll, with sponsorship offers ranging from $75,000 to $200,000. (POLITICO has not independently confirmed the sponsorship prices.) The money raised from the sponsors, CNN reported, will go toward the White House Historical Association.
Painter said he was approached several times under the Bush administration about auctioning off White House tours or lunch at the White House, but had to bring down the hammer. 'You can't use the White House for any kind of fundraising,' Painter said. 'Corporate logos should be nowhere to be seen [at the White House].'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret
I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret

Business Upturn

time28 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret

By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 11, 2025, 12:44 IST In what appears to be a shift in tone, Elon Musk on Tuesday posted that he regrets some of his recent remarks about President Donald Trump, saying, 'They went too far.' I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025 This comes just days after Trump addressed their ongoing feud, stating he wished Musk 'very well' and suggesting the tech mogul might be seeking a conversation. In a gesture that caught attention, Musk had responded with a heart emoji on X (formerly Twitter), sparking speculation about a possible reconciliation. Tensions between the two escalated last week after Musk called Trump's proposed 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' a 'pork-filled abomination' and accused the President of suppressing Jeffrey Epstein-related files. The latter post, which Musk later deleted, reportedly infuriated Trump, who retaliated with harsh criticism and even threatened to sever government contracts with Musk-led firms. The feud intensified when Musk countered by threatening to halt NASA-linked SpaceX missions and claimed Trump would have lost the 2024 election without his support. He also floated the possibility of impeachment. However, Musk's latest message—posted at 12:34 PM on June 11—marks a notable departure from his confrontational stance, possibly signaling the beginning of a de-escalation. While no official conversation has been confirmed, both camps appear to be softening their positions, leaving the door open for future dialogue. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.

Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill

time31 minutes ago

Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Congress includes more than tax breaks and spending cuts — it also seeks to pour billions of dollars into the administration's mass deportation agenda. Republican leaders capitalized Tuesday on the demonstrations in Los Angeles, where people are protesting Trump's immigration raids at Home Depot and other places, to make the case for swift passage of their sprawling 1,000-plus-page bill over staunch Democratic opposition. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act delivers 'much-needed reinforcements,' including 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, $45 billion to expand migrant detention facilities and billions more to carry out at least 1 million deportations a year. 'All you have to do is look at what's happening in Los Angeles to realize that our law enforcement needs all the support that we can possibly give them,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. The focus on some $350 billion in national security funding comes as action on the massive package is lumbering along in Congress at a critical moment. Trump wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July. But Senate Republicans trying to heave it to passage without Democrats are also running up against objections from within their GOP ranks over the details. At the same time, Democrats are warning that Trump's executive reach into California — sending in the National Guard over the governor's objections and calling up the Marines — is inflaming tensions in what had been isolated protests in pockets of LA. They warned the president's heavy-handed approach has the potential to spread, if unchecked, to other communities nationwide. 'We are at a dangerous inflection point in our country,' said Rep. Jimmy Gomez, who represents the Los Angeles area. 'Trump created this political distraction to divide us and keep our focus away from his policies that are wreaking havoc on our economy and hurting working families," he said. "It's a deliberate attempt by Trump to incite unrest, test the limits of executive power and distract from the lawlessness of his administration.' At its core, the bill extends some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that would otherwise expire at the end of the year without action in Congress, cutting some $1.4 trillion in spending over the decade to help offset costs. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill's changes to Medicaid and other programs would leave an estimated 10.9 million more people without health insurance and at least 3 million each month without food stamps from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. At the same time, CBO said the package will add some $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. One emerging area of concern for Republican leaders has been the bill's status before the Senate parliamentarian's office, which assesses whether the package complies with the strict rules used for legislation under the so-called budget reconciliation process. Late Monday, Republicans acknowledged potential 'red flags' coming from the parliamentarian's office that will require changes in the House bill before it can be sent to the Senate. Leaders are using the reconciliation process because it allows for simple majority passage in both chambers, were GOP majorities are razor-thin. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Republicans are preparing to address the concerns with a vote in the House, possibly as soon as this week, to change the package. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer seized on the House's upcoming do-over vote as a chance for Republicans who are dissatisfied with the package to reassert their leverage and 'force the bill back to the drawing board.' 'They say they don't like parts of the bill — now is their opportunity to change it,' Schumer said. On Tuesday, Vice President JD Vance was dispatched to speak with one GOP holdout, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has pushed for deeper spending reductions in the bill to prevent skyrocketing deficits from adding to the nation's $36 trillion debt load. Other Republican senators have raised concerns about the health care cuts. But Republicans are in agreement on border security, deportation and military funding, over the objections of Democrats who fought vigorously during the committee process to strip those provisions from the bill. The package includes about $150 billion for border security and deportation operations, including funding for hiring 10,000 new ICE officers — with what Johnson said are $10,000 hiring bonuses — as well as 3,000 new Border Patrol agents and other field operations and support staff. There's also funding for a daily detention capacity for 100,000 migrants and for flights for 1 million deportations annually. The package includes $46 billion for construction of Trump's long promised wall between the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, the bill includes $150 billion for the Pentagon, with $5 billion for the military deployment in support of border security, along with nearly $25 billion for Trump's 'Golden Dome' defense system over the U.S. Separately, the bill adds another $21 billion for the Coast Guard. Democrats have argued against the deportations, and warned that Trump appears to be stirring up protests so he can clamp down on migrant communities. Rep. Nanette Barragan — whose district represents the suburban city of Paramount, where the weekend Home Depot raid touched off protests — implored Americans: 'Listen to the words of this administration: They're using words like insurrection. They're using words like invasion.' She warned the administration is laying the groundwork for even steeper actions. 'That's a concern,' she said. 'That is dangerous. It's wrong.'

Gavin Newsom Compares Donald Trump to Emperor Palpatine
Gavin Newsom Compares Donald Trump to Emperor Palpatine

Newsweek

time36 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Gavin Newsom Compares Donald Trump to Emperor Palpatine

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Gov. Gavin Newsom's office shared a meme portraying President Donald Trump as Star Wars villain Emperor Palpatine. In the video, Palpatine's voice reads out a Truth Social post by Trump talking about the riots in Los Angeles. The Democratic governor and Republican president have clashed over the latter's decision to send in National Guard troops and Marines to quell the disorder that erupted from protests against federal immigration raids in Los Angeles. A ONCE GREAT AMERICAN CITY HAS BEEN OCCUPIED! — Governor Newsom Press Office (@GovPressOffice) June 10, 2025 This is a developing article. Updates to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store