logo
Accused bank robber in Port St. Lucie fled in Mercedes-Benz. Have you seen it?

Accused bank robber in Port St. Lucie fled in Mercedes-Benz. Have you seen it?

Yahooa day ago

PORT ST. LUCIE – Police said a woman accused of robbing a PNC Bank on June 6 is suspected to have left in a black Mercedes-Benz GL450, the agency stated June 9.
Police about 1:40 p.m. June 6 went to the incident at the bank in the 1300 block of Southwest Gatlin Boulevard, which is at Southwest Savona Boulevard, Sgt. Dominick Mesiti, police spokesperson, has said.
The alleged robber is described as a woman in a maroon and white shirt and multi-colored ball cap with sunglasses and a white purse.
Police reported she approached a teller and demanded money. The teller thought she saw the woman armed with a handgun. The alleged robber was given an undisclosed amount of money before she left the bank.
Surveillance video showed her get in a 2010-2015 black Mercedes GL450 parked behind the bank on a side street.
Those with information are asked to call Master Detective R. Giaccone at 772-807-4401 or Treasure Coast Crime Stoppers at 800-273-TIPS.
Will Greenlee is a breaking news reporter for TCPalm. Follow Will on X @OffTheBeatTweet or reach him by phone at 772-267-7926. E-mail him at will.greenlee@tcpalm.com.
This article originally appeared on Treasure Coast Newspapers: Police said PNC Bank robber fled in a Mercedes-Benz. Have you seen it?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CCTV captures terrifying moment hired thug with sawn-off shotgun opens fire at homes amid bitter gangland feud
CCTV captures terrifying moment hired thug with sawn-off shotgun opens fire at homes amid bitter gangland feud

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

CCTV captures terrifying moment hired thug with sawn-off shotgun opens fire at homes amid bitter gangland feud

Shocking footage captures the moment a hired gunman fires at homes amid a bitter gangland feud. Kieran Morgan, 30, was caught on camera wielding a sawn-off double-barrelled shotgun opening fire in broad daylight and in the early hours in another appalling attack. He also fired a shotgun in a busy takeaway in a third shooting committed within the space of a few weeks. Zaki Shazad, 22, was the 'organiser' of the attacks, but was operating on behalf of unknown more senior underworld figures, Minshull Street Crown Court heard. A judge said the shootings had 'all the hallmarks of a dispute between serious organised criminals'. Miraculously, no one was hurt in any of the incidents, which happened in March and April 2023. Now Morgan has been sentenced to 18 years in jail, and Shazad to 16 years in prison. The first shooting happened on March 12 on Doric Avenue in Heald Green, Stockport. Morgan, with another man, was wearing a mask and dark clothing when he approached and fired a shotgun at the house. He then threw a homemade explosive device towards the property, but it bounced off a wall before Morgan picked it up and threw it at a higher trajectory where it 'went off like a firework'. Greater Manchester Police said that forensic testing later the device contained hydrochloric acid. Morgan then fled the scene in a Mercedes. The second shooting happened in broad daylight at a house on Wilmslow Road in Heald Green on April 21, when a family including a child were packing up their car for Eid celebrations. Morgan arrived at the scene in the afternoon with a hold-all bag, containing the shotgun. Wearing a face mask, he opened fire towards the property. No-one was hurt but there was damage caused to the house. The third shooting took place at the Drip burger bar on Kingsway nine days later, on April 30. Morgan entered the restaurant, immediately firing one shot before firing another soon after. One hit a wall next to a TV, and the other hit the counter. Staff were behind the counter at the time and customers were in the front of the restaurant. Prosecutor David Farley said those inside were 'clearly and understandably terrified'. Morgan fled on a bike. Shazad was the 'organiser' of the shootings. Messages sent between the pair on Snapchat show that Morgan was to be paid £1,000 by him for the 'jobs'. Shazad, of Ranford Road, Levenshulme, was found guilty of conspiring to possess a firearm with intent to endanger life. Morgan, of Petworth Avenue, Chadderton, pleaded guilty to the same offence. Police said that the three shootings were linked after officers received intelligence. They trawled through CCTV footage which helped to identify Morgan, who was seen wearing a Canada Goose jacket. He later posted a picture of himself on social media wearing the same jacket. His face was also seen on one CCTV clip after he had removed a balaclava. Shazad was also sentenced after he was caught trying to smuggle in cannabis to a relative who was in HMP Berwyn in North Wales. He pleaded guilty to conveying a list A article into prison and possessing cannabis. Defending Morgan, Keith Harrison said the defendant has suffered from 'recurring mental health problems'. For Shazad, David Bentley said that he was involved in assisting Morgan, but that he was not the 'Mr Big'. After the hearing, Detective Inspector Lee Newburn, of GMP, said: 'Violence, particularly this kind of revenge violence, will not be tolerated on the streets of Manchester. We have seen two dangerous individuals locked up for their parts in a number of firearms discharges targeting properties where innocent people were present. 'It is miraculous that no-one was seriously injured during these firearms discharges, but they could very easily have been. One of the victims of these shootings has described to me how scared she now is to go out in public and just how shaken she is about what happened. Nobody should be made to feel like this. 'We continue to work very closely with the communities in and around Greater Manchester to ensure that we protect them from this kind of violence, and we are grateful for the intelligence that we receive from them in relation to illegal activity on a daily basis. 'We also work closely with the Greater Manchester Violence Reduction Unit (VRU), which is a multi-agency team we are part of, and we seek to prevent violence from occurring by addressing underlying issues and educating those who may be at risk of re-offending. 'We do this by providing valuable input in prevention work that our partners are carrying out on an ongoing basis, working behind the scenes to manage serious incidents before they occur. That is why we are asking, if you know anyone who is using, or possesses, an illegal firearm, we urge you to get in touch with us as, for each firearm we recover, that's potentially a life saved."

Lafayette woman claims two pit bulls mauled her dog to death
Lafayette woman claims two pit bulls mauled her dog to death

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Lafayette woman claims two pit bulls mauled her dog to death

LAFAYETTE, La. () — A Lafayette woman said she has lost her beloved pet in the worst way imaginable. Connie Cordova said her two-year-old dog Mercedes was mauled to death by two of her neighbor's dogs, both pit bulls, as she watched, helpless. Cordova says she let Mercedes outside around 6 p.m. on Saturday. Cordova says she was in her bathroom getting ready to go to a restaurant with family, when suddenly she heard screams and whimpers that sounded like her dog. She said she ran to her window and saw her fence had been broken through by two dogs, and that the pit bulls began attacking Mercedes. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now 'The black one had her by the neck, the brown one had her by her back legs,' Cordova said. 'By the time I made it outside, the black one would not let Mercedes go, he just kept shaking her like a rag doll and he wouldn't stop.' Cordova reported the incident to Lafayette Police on Saturday and Animal Control on Monday. She said officers with Animal Control arrived at her neighbor's residence early Monday morning and took custody of the pit bulls. 'I went out this morning and filled out a report for vicious animals, and showed them pictures of my dog, what they did with her,' Cordova said. 'Animal Control came out this morning to issue a citation and pick the pitbulls up.' She says her entire family is heartbroken over the loss of Mercedes. She describes her as a gentle dog, who brought joy, comfort and unconditional love to everyone she came across. 'She was their best friend, she'd kiss the kids, and she'd hug you, like a human being,' Cordova said. 'I always had good times with her, she traveled with us wherever she went and now I have nobody.' Sluggish start to Atlantic hurricane season | Tracking the Tropics Former LSU football player arrested after motorcycle crash kills Texas woman Lafayette High graduate wins award for French Immersion education Louisiana Senate adds $1.2 billion to budget for one-time projects Bannon calls for special counsel probe of Musk Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Ex-senator's wife, convicted in bribery scheme, seeks new trial
Ex-senator's wife, convicted in bribery scheme, seeks new trial

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Ex-senator's wife, convicted in bribery scheme, seeks new trial

Sen. Bob Menendez takes a selfie with his wife, Nadine, and businessman Wael Hana. The three were co-defendants in an 18-count federal corruption indictment. (Courtesy of U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York) The wife of former Sen. Bob Menendez has asked a federal judge to overturn her bribery conviction, saying prosecutors wrongly forced her to change lawyers less than a year before her trial over a 'manufactured' conflict of interest. Nadine Arslanian Menendez had to hire new attorneys in a hurry last year after prosecutors said they might call attorney David Schertler, who had represented her for nearly two years, as a trial witness to testify about information he'd shared with the prosecution during pre-indictment negotiations. But prosecutors never called Schertler to the stand during a three-week trial in Manhattan that ended in April, when jurors found Nadine Menendez guilty of accepting bribes including gold bars, cash, and a luxury car in exchange for power and political influence and of trying to hide her actions from federal investigators. Prosecutors' 'improper government interference' with her legal representation violated her Sixth Amendment right to counsel of her choice, her new attorneys, Sarah R. Krissoff and Andrew Vazquez, wrote in a motion filed Friday. 'To be clear — the Government has broad discretion to choose which witnesses to call and which evidence to offer in proving its case. But the Government cannot create a conflict, forcing Mr. Schertler to be a witness against his own client and to withdraw from the case, and then secretly decide not to call Mr. Schertler or offer any evidence regarding the Government's allegations that created the conflict in the first place,' the attorneys wrote. Prosecutors also never bothered to alert Barry Coburn, the defense attorney who replaced Schertler, that they decided against putting Schertler on the stand, preventing her from rehiring him, Krissoff and Vazquez wrote. 'If Mrs. Menendez had known that there was no longer any conflict, Mrs. Menendez would have elected to bring Mr. Schertler and his firm back into the case at any point, up until the last day of trial. Whether the Government's conduct was careless or intentional, the result is the same: Mrs. Menendez's fundamental constitutional rights were violated,' the attorneys wrote. Such a constitutional infringement created a structural error in the case and necessitates an acquittal or new trial, they argued. The conflict dates back to August 2023, about a month before the indictment, when Schertler met with prosecutors and claimed that mortgage and car payments totaling more than $50,000 that businessmen Wael Hana and Jose Uribe paid toward Nadine Menendez's Englewood Cliffs home and Mercedes-Benz convertible were loans — not bribes, according to court documents. Prosecutors used that information to file new obstruction of justice charges against the Menendezes, and they told the couple they planned to question Schertler before a jury on the matter, creating a conflict between Nadine Menendez and her lawyer. Besides their objections about Schertler's withdrawal, Krissoff and Vazquez repeated the former senator's oft-repeated complaint that the case should have been tried in New Jersey and not Manhattan. They also contend prosecutors improperly used summary exhibits and failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that bribery and obstruction of justice occurred. Nadine Menendez, who was tried after her husband and co-defendants to accommodate her medical treatment for breast cancer, is scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 11. In an earlier trial that started in May 2024, a jury convicted Hana, real estate developer Fred Daibes, and the former senator last July. Last August, Judge Sidney H. Stein slapped Bob Menendez with an 11-year sentence; he's now scheduled to report to prison on June 17. Hana and Daibes reported to prison last month to begin serving their sentences — just over eight years and seven years, respectively. Sentencing for Uribe has been repeatedly postponed and is now set for Oct. 9 because he testified against his co-defendants in a cooperation deal with prosecutors. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store