logo
Analysis: Information is power, and Trump wants more control over it

Analysis: Information is power, and Trump wants more control over it

CNNa day ago
Climate change reports, deleted. DEI initiatives, banned. Local TV and radio stations, defunded.
Books, removed from military academies. Names of civil rights leaders, erased from ships. History lessons, purged from museums.
The list goes on and on. President Trump and his government appointees keep asserting more control over ideas and information — which has the effect of taking power away from independent researchers, historians, and the real news outlets that he frequently calls 'fake.'
Friday's abrupt firing of the labor statistics chief is one of the most dramatic examples yet.
But this push for control has been evident all throughout his second term — and the individual headlines should be analyzed as part of a pattern, lest the memories start to fade.
Remember the headlines about vaccine data being deleted from government websites last winter? Or the bogus math on DOGE's 'receipts' page? How about the 'Friday night purge' of impartial watchdogs investigating abuse within the government?
'Trump increasingly is playing the role of information gatekeeper,' Clay Calvert of the American Enterprise Institute wrote a prophetic blog post back in February.
Calvert said Trump was 'dictating access on his terms' – promoting MAGA media outlets while punishing The Associated Press for not adopting Trump's 'Gulf of America' name.
That AP dispute was about control over information. So, too, was the Trump White House's decision to purge a database of transcripts documenting his announcements and public appearances.
The president has also objected to unflattering stories by lodging legal threats against news outlets. In one recent case, he followed through with a defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, which analysts said could have a chilling effect on reporting writ large.
The White House has framed some of its most aggressive rewrites and removals as common-sense corrections. 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History' was the title of one such executive order in March.
Another move to shut down a reliable source of information, the US-funded international broadcaster known as Voice of America, was framed by the administration as a way to curtail 'radical propaganda.' One of the alleged examples was a six-year-old news report 'about transgender migrants seeking asylum in the United States.'
Every administration tries to shape reality to some degree. But 'Trump's statistical purges have been faster and more sweeping — picking off not just select factoids but entire troves of public information,' the Washington Post asserted in March.
One glaring example involves the National Climate Assessment, a congressionally mandated report on climate change. The authors of the assessment were fired and previous versions 'have been hidden from view on government websites,' as CNN's Zachary B. Wolf wrote last week.
Trump's dispute with the Bureau of Labor Statistics further raises the stakes — and the alarms about creeping authoritarianism.
'Suppressing statisticians is a time-honored tool for leaders trying to solidify their power and stifle dissent,' George Stephanopoulos said on ABC's 'This Week' on Sunday. 'It's happened throughout history, most recently in Venezuela and Turkey.'
His guest, Lawrence Summers, the former treasury secretary, said that 'firing statisticians goes with threatening the heads of newspapers. It goes with launching assaults on universities. It goes with launching assaults on law firms.'
'This is really scary stuff,' Summers added.
Yet some Trump aides and allies are publicly defending the firing. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said Monday morning on CNBC that the jobs data 'could be politically manipulated.'
This battle for control isn't happening in a vacuum. There is evidence that media scrutiny and public pressure do make a difference.
Back in March, the Associated Press revealed that an anti-DEI crusade at the Pentagon led to images of war heroes, women, minorities and even the famed Enola Gay warplane being flagged for removal. The embarrassing episode forced Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's aides into a defensive crouch.
Similarly, just last week, the Washington Post reported on the Smithsonian removing Trump's name from an impeachment exhibit at the National Museum of American History.
The whiff of scandal was so overwhelming that the museum issued a statement on Saturday denying any White House pressure and pledging to update the exhibit in the coming weeks.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anti-DEI ETF Issuer Floated for New Fed Governor
Anti-DEI ETF Issuer Floated for New Fed Governor

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

Anti-DEI ETF Issuer Floated for New Fed Governor

An ardent supporter of President Donald Trump, whose firm last month launched an anti-DEI exchange-traded fund, said he has had a "constructive conversation with the President's team" about his candidacy to replace outgoing Fed Governor Adriana Kugler. James Fishback, 30, head of Miami-based Azoria Capital, said in a phone interview that he arrived in Washington D.C., today following his conversation with the team. His comments follow reports from Florida's Voice that his candidacy for a seat on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors is gaining support. The posts didn't disclose sources for the information. Invest in Gold American Hartford Gold: #1 Precious Metals Dealer in the Nation Priority Gold: Up to $15k in Free Silver + Zero Account Fees on Qualifying Purchase Thor Metals Group: Best Overall Gold IRA "I'm steeped in markets," Fishback said, adding that he spent a decade trading interest rate derivatives at a hedge fund. Fishback, who unsuccessfully sued Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell to open closed Fed meetings to the public, wrote in an X post Tuesday that the Fed must lower rates by at least one full point at its next meeting in mid-September, cutting them to 3.5% from 4.5%. SPXM Trails VOO Early On Fishback's firm last month launched the Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM), which invests in 400 to 500 U.S. large-cap companies that do not hold diversity, equity and inclusion hiring targets, according to its fund page. The fund has gained 1% since its July 8 launch, trailing the 1.7% gain in the S&P 500, as measured by the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). SPXM has pulled in $28.2 million in net inflows since it launched. Its top three holdings include Nvidia Corp. (NVDA), Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) and Apple Inc. (AAPL), and it holds a 4% allocation to the First American Funds Inc. X Government Obligations Fund. 'James has said that, if he is asked by President Trump, he would be honored to serve the president and the nation on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors,' Azoria's Chief Operating Officer Kabir Singh Bawa wrote in an email. 'We're grateful for his leadership at Azoria and, if given the opportunity, are confident he would serve Americans well at the Fed.' 'A New Era' A Fishback appointment would deepen ties between the Trump administration and the $11.8 trillion U.S. ETF industry. The president's media company, Trump Media and Technology Group Corp. (DJT), is aiming to list the Trump Social Bitcoin ETF and has filed trademark applications for three ETFs under its brand. The firm founded by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Key Square Group, had sought to launch an exchange-traded fund, and former DOGE official Vivek Ramaswamy's Strive Asset Management runs a handful of ETFs, including the anti-ESG Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). "There's nothing wise about Jerome Powell keeping rates at the same level today—when inflation is 1.8%—as they were in December 2022, when inflation was 6.5%," Fishback wrote in his tweet. A U.S. District Court judge has rejected Fishback's lawsuit to open to the public meetings on setting interest rates. Bloomberg's Eric Balchunas wrote on X that Fishback would be the first ETF issuer on the Federal Reserve board. 'It's a new era that's for sure,' he wrote. Editor's note: This story has been updated to include comments from James Fishback and to more accurately reflect the source of the quote in the sixth | © Copyright 2025 All rights reserved

Carney on Trump: ‘We'll speak when it makes sense'
Carney on Trump: ‘We'll speak when it makes sense'

Politico

timea few seconds ago

  • Politico

Carney on Trump: ‘We'll speak when it makes sense'

His comments come just days after President Donald Trump raised tariffs on Canadian exports from 25 to 35 percent, escalating trade tensions. Carney sounded in no hurry to get Trump on the line — or back to the negotiating table. 'We'll speak when it makes sense,' Carney said. Carney told reporters that Trump reaffirmed his commitment to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement last week. He noted the USMCA gives Canada tariff-free access to 85 percent of Canadian exports to the U.S. The prime minister signaled he's in no rush to start the review of USMCA, set for next year, saying it would begin 'about nine months from now.' Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc told POLITICO last week that he spoke with his Mexican counterpart about kickstarting renewal talks 'as early as this fall.' Carney was in British Columbia to announce C$1.2 billion in support for Canada's softwood lumber industry, and to help it pivot to doing more business within the country in the face of rising duties imposed by the United States. Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand and Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne are in Mexico for a series of meetings that are to include Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Anand and Champagne are laying the groundwork for a future meeting in Mexico between Carney and the Mexican leader.

Trump administration escalates probes of rivals with Russia grand jury
Trump administration escalates probes of rivals with Russia grand jury

The Hill

timea minute ago

  • The Hill

Trump administration escalates probes of rivals with Russia grand jury

The Trump administration's launch of a grand jury probe into Obama-era officials marks an escalation in its use of the justice system to go after political adversaries, amid mounting pressure to release the Epstein files. It's the first sign the Justice Department is acting on criminal referrals made by Trump intelligence officials, including after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accused officials of a 'treasonous conspiracy' related to Russian interference in the 2016 election. The documents released by her office, however, do not appear to back that claim, instead largely showing officials discussing what they acknowledged shortly after the election — that Russia was never able to manipulate vote totals. Nonetheless, the White House broke with the practice of maintaining secrecy around grand jury proceedings, confirming the probe in pointing to 'the compelling case' outlined by Gabbard, which they argue 'exposed clear and blatant weaponization by corrupt intelligence officials acting at the behest of the Democrat Party and likely former President Obama.' The White House further argues the Obama officials 'worked to sabotage the Trump administration.' 'It doesn't get more serious than this. This is a criminal conspiracy. The evidence is clear there's a criminal conspiracy here and nobody is above the law,' Mike Davis, an ally of President Trump who runs The Article III Project, said on Fox News. The administration's attempts to focus attention on the Russia findings come as Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi face pressure, including from many Republicans, to release more information related to the case of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Among the possible targets are former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who in a joint op-ed blasted the accusations against them as 'patently false' while falsely minimizing Russia's 2016 efforts. 'Every serious review has substantiated the intelligence community's fundamental conclusion that the Russians conducted an influence campaign intended to help Mr. Trump win the 2016 election,' the two wrote. 'Contrary to the Trump administration's wild and baseless claims, there was no mention of 'collusion' between the Trump campaign and the Russians in the assessment,' they added. CIA Director John Ratcliffe said beyond Clapper and Brennan, he also made referrals for former FBI Director James Comey as well as Hillary Clinton. Critics argue that launching a grand jury probe is yet another instance of Trump weaponizing the government against his political foes. He has previously revoked security details from those he disagrees with, targeted universities that do not align with his administration's policies and gone after law firms with ties to Democrats. And over the weekend, the Office of the Special Counsel acknowledged a probe into former special counsel Jack Smith. The court action quickly prompted criticism that the Trump administration was abusing the Justice Department. 'Trump – 'the hunted' – has indeed become the hunter – facts and law, be damned. These folks are using the court of law to shape the court of public opinion. They're also making a mockery of grand jury secrecy rules, which are in part designed to protect uncharged individuals,' Anthony Coley, who served as a spokesman for the Obama Justice Department, wrote on X. The probe comes after Bondi announced the creation of a 'Strike Force' to investigate claims related to the 2016 election. It's not clear where the grand jury has been empaneled — a detail that could matter in the Democrat-heavy jury pool of Washington, D.C., which might be skeptical of claims of wrongdoing in an election Trump won. It's also not clear what conduct it might be exploring. Republicans have, at turns, accused intelligence officials of lying to Congress in the prior reviews of Russia's interference in the 2016 election and the intelligence community response. But the documents supplied by Gabbard — which accuse leaders of 'suppression of intelligence' — largely show figures like Clapper discussing how Russia was not able to manipulate the vote even as the adversary tried to sow chaos in the 2016 election. Gabbard also released a previously classified House Intelligence Committee Republican assessment that called into question whether Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to help Trump win; however, all assessments found the country was seeking to impact the election. Trump on Tuesday denied that he had any involvement in the Justice Department's decision to open a grand jury investigation, though he has not hidden his approval of the move. 'Pam is doing a great job,' Trump said on CNBC of Attorney General Pam Bondi. 'I have nothing to do with it. I will tell you this, they deserve it. I was happy to hear it.' Davis, who runs the conservative advocacy group the Article III Project, argued those being investigated could face potential perjury charges related to their previous testimony about Russian interference in the 2016 election. He also pointed to potential conspiracy charges, arguing that the alleged ongoing 'cover-up' would mean that the statute of limitations has not expired. 'I would say to these lawfare Democrats, lawyer up,' Davis said on Fox News. 'Because justice is definitely coming.' Some lawmakers have said any eventual charges could actually be fruitful in fighting the claims forwarded by Gabbard and others. 'The reason I want her to bring charges is that there is not a court in the United States that will do anything other than to laugh hysterically over the bulls‑‑‑ that Tulsi Gabbard is peddling right now,' Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, told The Hill last month when the DNI first began releasing documents. 'They're not dumping documents. They're making up lies,' Himes added. The issue of Russian interference in the 2016 election has been a fixation for Trump for roughly eight years, as he has repeatedly claimed he was the victim of 'spying' and politically motivated probes around Russia's influence campaigns. Gabbard's findings, and the decision to launch a grand jury investigation, also carry political ramifications for the White House. Some Democrats, including a spokesperson for Obama, have dismissed the Russia claims as an attempt at distracting from the Epstein controversy. 'The real politicization is the calculated distortion of intelligence by administration officials, notably Mr. Trump's directors of national intelligence and the C.I.A., positions that should be apolitical,' Brennan and Clapper wrote in their op-ed. 'We find it deeply regrettable that the administration continues to perpetuate the fictitious narrative that Russia did not interfere in the 2016 election.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store