HC and SC judges on a par; we've no administrative control over HCs: CJI B R Gavai
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The apex court passed this order while asking a Telangana neta, who had made scandalous allegations against an HC judge, to tender unconditional apology to the judge.
CJI: Duty of SC to protect judges from false allegations
The politician had made the allegations against the judge in a petition seeking transfer of his case from Telangana HC to Bombay HC's Nagpur bench.
The lawyers who signed the petition were also asked by SC to apologise to the judge.
Dictating the order in the open court, CJI Gavai said, "When scandalous allegations are made against HC judges, it is the duty of SC to protect them.
We notice that now-a-days it has become a trait with lawyers to criticise HC judges. It has also become a trait in matters involving influential political figures. It has become a habit of politicians to allege that he would not get justice before the HC concerned and seek transfer of his petition outside the state.
Such practices cannot be allowed to be continued."
Elaborating on the position of HCs and their judges in the three-tier justice delivery system, the CJI-led bench also comprising Justices R Vinod Chandran and A S Chandurkar, said, "HC judges are constitutional court judges and enjoy the same immunity and privileges as SC judges.
Under the constitutional scheme, judges of HCs are not inferior to SC judges." "Though as an appellate court, SC can reverse, uphold or modify HC judgments, it has no administrative control over HCs or judges of HCs," the bench said.
It said that a constitution bench of SC had categorically ruled that not only the petitioner, who makes the scandalous allegations against a judge but the lawyers who draft the petition containing these allegations and file it in court are also liable for contempt of court.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The bench said the politician and the lawyers have tendered unconditional apology to SC. "In our view since the allegations are made against the HC judge, it will be appropriate for the contemnors to tender such apology to the HC judge." SC indicated that on tendering of unconditional apology, the HC would not proceed to take coercive action against the petitioner and his lawyers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab issues SOP for EWS admissions in private schools under RTE Act
Amid complaints of admissions being denied in the absence of clear guidelines, the Punjab government on Thursday finally issued the standard operating procedure for admitting children from weaker sections and disadvantaged groups to private unaided schools under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009. According to these guidelines, all private schools, except minority schools, shall admit children belonging to EWS and disadvantaged groups to the extent of at least 25% of the total seats as mandated by the RTE Act. The guidelines issued by the school education department to 'streamline the admission process' under Section 12(1)(c) of the RTE Act have laid down the applicability criteria for schools, eligibility conditions for students, category-wise seat reservation, neighbourhood criteria for candidate school mapping, and norms for fee reimbursement. According to these guidelines, all private unaided schools, except minority schools, shall admit children belonging to EWS and disadvantaged groups in nursery or LKG or UKG or Class I, whichever is the entry level class of the school, to the extent of at least 25% of the total seats as mandated by the RTE Act. Children belonging to weaker sections (family income below ₹8 lakh per annum), Scheduled Caste (no income limit), and backward class or other backward class (non-creamy layer), war widows' children, and destitute parents' children will be eligible for these seats. The government has sub-classified the 25% seats, reserving 12.5% for EWS category children, 5% for SC children, 5% for BC/OBC children, and 1.25% each for war widows' children and destitute parents' children. The order stated that 25% of seats would be calculated based on the total admissions in the entry-level class during the previous academic year. For newly registered schools, 25% seats would be calculated on the basis of the approved class strength. HC ordered implementation in Feb The SOP has come almost six months after the Punjab and Haryana high court ordered all private unaided schools in Punjab to reserve 25% of their Class 1 seats for children from such backgrounds. The high court, in its February 19 order, also directed the state government to ensure strict enforcement of the ruling in the 2025-26 session. However, there were repeated complaints that private unaided schools were refusing or delaying admissions to children, citing the absence of any guidelines on eligibility criteria, selection and admission procedures, and free reimbursement. Social activists waging legal battle Social activist and former IAS officer Jagmohan Singh Raju, on whose PIL the high court passed the February 19 order, filed a contempt petition last month alleging violation of the court's directions whereby the court ordered the implementation of the Right to Education (RTE) provisions by private schools in the state. On August 11, the high court sought a comprehensive affidavit from the school education department. 'These guidelines are just the first step. These should have come much earlier. The real work starts now, as a lot still needs to be done. The government needs to ensure private schools notify the seats as per the provisions and give wide publicity to create awareness among the eligible beneficiaries,' said Raju, who has filed PILs and nearly 100 RTI applications on this issue. Another social activist, Onkar Nath, a former additional deputy comptroller and auditor general, welcomed the guidelines. 'We just received the government order and need to study the SOP thoroughly before offering any comments,' he said. School mapping, fee reimbursement According to the guidelines, children residing within a one-kilometre radius of the school will receive first priority for draw/admissions, and children residing within a radius of 3 km of the school will get second preference. Thereafter, in the case of unfilled vacancies, the applicants residing beyond 3km but within a 6km radius will be considered. The school transportation cost will be borne by the parents or guardians, wherever applicable. 'The school shall receive fee reimbursement for the expenditure incurred by the school to the extent of per-child expenditure as determined by the Government of Punjab, or the actual school fee, whichever is less. Detailed guidelines in this regard shall be issued later,' it said. Punjab was among the four states that did not reserve seats in private schools under the RTE Act, 2009. In 2011, the then-Punjab government framed the Punjab RTE Rules by making a provision that children from the economically weaker and disadvantaged categories must first seek admission in government schools. They can approach unaided schools for admission only after getting a no-objection certificate from government schools on the grounds of non-availability of seats or other reasons, it said. In its February 2025 order, the high court declared Rule 7(4) of the Punjab RTE Rules, 2011, as contrary to Section 12(1)(c) of the RTE Act, 2009. 'It is settled by the principles of interpretation of statute that in case of conflict between statutory rules and the Act, the Act prevails,' the court ruled. Following the court ruling, the state cabinet also decided to remove Rule 7(4) of the Punjab RTE Rules, 2011.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Supreme Court reserves interim order on stray dogs
A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its interim order on the issue of managing the stray dog population in the National Capital Region. The court's intervention comes just days after a two-judge bench initiated suo motu proceedings and ordered relocation of strays from the streets to dedicated shelters. 'Everyone who has come to intervene must take responsibility,' Justice Vikram Nath orally observed. The bench headed by Justice Nath, which also comprises Justices Sandeep Mehta and N V Anjaria, directed all intervenors to file affidavits with supporting evidence. A host of senior advocates, including Kapil Sibal, Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Sidharth Luthra, appeared on behalf of animal rights organisations and individuals in support of stray dogs and sought a stay on the two-judge bench order of August 11. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who appeared for the government, argued in favour of relocating stray dogs to shelters. 'Sterilisation does not stop rabies. Even if you immunise that does not stop mutilation of children,' he argued. 'There is a vocal minority view against a silent majority view,' he added. Mehta said that while the 2023 Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules exist, they are inadequate and the SC must intervene to address the issue. The 2023 ABC Rules deal with the management of the stray dog and cat population. The Rules, which reclassify them as 'community animals', include provisions for community animal feeding and specify that stray dogs cannot be displaced from their regular place of habitation. However, the apex court order on August 11 had specifically directed that the strays should not be brought back to their habitat after sterilisation. Chief Justice of India B R Gavai had on Wednesday re-assigned the suo motu case taken up by a bench headed by Justice J B Pardiwala to the three-judge bench headed by Justice Nath.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Rules don't apply to him: Gavin Newsom warns Trump will run for third term
California Governor Gavin Newsom launched a scathing attack on US President Donald Trump on Thursday, warning that the Republican leader's political manoeuvres could open the door to an unprecedented third term in at the Japanese American National Museum in Los Angeles, Newsom announced a special statewide election for November 4 to decide on a mid-decade redistricting plan. The measure, he said, was designed to protect California's congressional representation as Republican-led states pursue maps that could tilt elections in their move comes in response to redistricting pushes in Texas, Florida, Ohio, Indiana and Missouri -- all Republican-controlled states -- that could cement GOP dominance in key congressional districts ahead of the 2026 midterms.'WAKE UP, AMERICA' The California Governor accused Trump of orchestrating a campaign to manipulate the electoral map, undermine democratic institutions and potentially remain in power beyond the constitutionally mandated two "Trump will be running for a third term. Mark my word.""I received, in the mail, a 'Trump 2028' hat.""These guys are not screwing around." Breaking911 (@Breaking911) August 14, 2025"Wake up, America, wake up. You will not have a country if he rigs this election. You will have a president who will be running for a third term. Mark my words -- I wasn't exaggerating when I said that. I received in the mail a Trump 2028 hat from one of his biggest supporters," he said."These guys are not screwing around. The rules do not apply to him. The most corrupt president in history doesn't believe in free enterprise — it's crony capitalism." he framed California's special election as a direct countermeasure to what he called Trump's 'anti-American' tactics. He alleged that the president and his allies were engaged in gerrymandering to shield themselves from voter backlash and to retain unchallenged political AGENTS STAGE APPARENT RAIDThe governor's press conference faced an unexpected move when federal agents appeared outside the venue. According to Newsom, US Border Patrol officers arrived in the Little Tokyo neighbourhood while he and other Democratic leaders — including Attorney General Rob Bonta and Senator Alex Padilla -- were addressing the team posted about the incident online, mimicking Trump's well-known social media style: 'BORDER PATROL HAS SHOWED UP AT OUR BIG BEAUTIFUL PRESS CONFERENCE! WE WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED!'US Border Patrol Sector Commander Gregory Bovino told KNBC-TV the agency was conducting roving immigration enforcement patrols in the area and confirmed that one individual had been detained for being in the country Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, also present at the event, alleging the timing was deliberate. "There's no way this was a coincidence," she told reporters.- EndsTune InMust Watch
