
Exercise may benefit colon cancer patients as much as some drugs, study finds
Regular exercise after treatment cuts the risk of death in cancer patients by more than a third, a new study has found.
Sports and movement could help stop the disease from coming back, as well as boosting mood, energy levels and strength, researchers found in a trial which could "transform" medical practice.
Various types of moderate intensity exercise met the bar, including 40 minutes of brisk walking, a half-hour jog, circuit classes, cycling, or swimming.
What did the study involve?
The CO21 Challenge trial recruited 889 people with colon cancer from six countries, including the UK.
All patients had had surgery and chemotherapy for their cancer and were deemed well enough to exercise, but were not very active.
One group was given a highly tailored three-year exercise programme, which included in-person coaching sessions for the first six months, and regular meetings with a physical activity consultant.
The other group were simply offered materials promoting exercise and nutrition.
After five years, the risk of dying, relapse or developing a new cancer was 28% lower in the group with bespoke exercise plans - even though adherence to the programme decreased.
And after eight years, the risk of death had fallen to 37%.
2:33
Margaret Tubridy from North Belfast said she was "chuffed to bits" after taking part in the study.
"I had never been to a gym before, but once I was shown how to use the machines and do the exercises, I loved it," the 69-year-old said.
"Now I do weight training twice a week, pole walking, and I'm in a walking group... I am stronger, fitter, and my anxiety is better."
The paper adds to a stash of evidence of the multifarious benefits of exercise, from treating depression to reducing the chances of dementia.
Professor David Sebag-Montefiore from Leeds University, who was not involved with the new study, called it an "exciting breakthrough".
The "great appeal" of such exercise is that it "offers the benefits without the downside of the well-known side effects of our other treatments".
Why recommendations might not be adopted
Colon cancer kills around 9,500 people a year in the UK.
Dr Marco Gerlinger, professor of gastrointestinal cancer medicine at Queen Mary University of London, told Sky News the results indicate that "exercise has a similarly strong effect as previously shown for chemotherapy, which is really quite impressive".
"The exercise is after patients have completed their chemotherapy, so it can't replace it.
"But the effect size of exercise is similar to what chemo achieves. So it's not a replacement, but further reduces the risk."
Patients are usually keen to know what they can do to reduce the chances of the cancer returning, he added.
"Oncologists can now make a very clear evidence-based recommendation."
But he said support from a professional would very likely be necessary, and other experts raised concerns about the costs of labour-intensive programmes.
Caroline Geraghty, senior specialist information nurse at Cancer Research UK, which part-funded the CO21 Challenge through Stand Up To Cancer, said: "This trial has the potential to transform clinical practice, but only if health services have the necessary funding and staff to make it a reality for patients."
Dr Joe Henson, associate professor in lifestyle medicine at the University of Leicester, said: "Leading the exercise sessions in Leicester, I saw first-hand that this reduced fatigue, lifted people's mood, and boosted their physical strength.
"We know that physical activity regulates several key biological processes that could explain these results, and further research will help us uncover why exercise is having such a positive impact."
The findings were published yesterday in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
Great Exhibition Road Festival: What is the weirdest thing in the universe?
London's Exhibition Road will close to traffic this weekend as the famous museums and institutions of South Kensington combine for the Great Exhibition Road the series of free events taking place along the street, three researchers affiliated with Imperial College London (ICL) will take to the stage to try to answer one small question - what's the weirdest thing in the universe? For ICL research fellow Mariana Carrillo Gonzalez, the answer is to be found far away from our own planet."My object is black holes," she holes are regions of space where matter has collapsed in on itself, meaning they have such strong gravity that not even light can escape there's a key problem with them for scientists, explains Mariana."We still have no clue how they work."We can't observe them, we just observe the effects of a black hole. We observe the light that goes around the black hole and we observe how it deforms space and how things move... but we really can't see it because there's nothing that can escape from a black hole."We can prove they are there, we just have no idea what's inside," she adds."I think that's just a very weird thing." Nevertheless, Rita Ahmadi argues her research specialism is even more bizarre - "Quantum physics, by which I mean the physics of subatomic particles."They have behaviours that are different from the classical physics that you see around yourself, so the rules are different," the postdoctoral researcher rules include that "they can be observed in two different states at the same time, which is called superposition", while they also have an unusual problem when trying to observe them as "any interaction with a quantum system changes the state of the quantum system".Rita says such peculiarities mean "we know that the mathematics of quantum mechanics work properly so we know that the model works... but still we cannot make sense of that".Even so, quantum science is still seen as hugely important for the future."My research is quantum computing and I'm building devices out of that even without understanding if it makes sense." The other researcher taking part is Fernando Ernesto Rosas De Andraca whose area of expertise is another one full of conundrums."I took human consciousness as the weirdest thing I can think of," he says."Our best guess is that consciousness is somehow generated by the brain but most people would argue that single neurons are not conscious."So you have these little parts that are not conscious, you put them together and they are conscious and that's very strange."He also points to other arguments such as "the only thing you cannot doubt is your consciousness, but at the same time consciousness is this thing that nobody else can see so everybody else can doubt it".Elaborating further, Fernando brings up artificial intelligence (AI), declaring it as something he has become "completely obsessed" with."Most people believe that current AI systems are not conscious... but I think most people agree that there is no fundamental limits to say it will never be conscious so then the question is at one point it might become so," he says."We then get into a different arena that we have to be concerned about things like creating a system that can suffer." The reason for such existential arguments is the festival, which seeks to celebrate science and the arts for people of all ages through activities like insect yoga, quantum discos and robotics."We're always trying to find different and creative ways of exploring some of the topics that we study at Imperial," says James Romero, who is one of the festival organisers for the university."In this case it's challenging the researchers to tweak the public lecture format into a different format and introducing a competitive element into it."Once the three researchers have presented their arguments, a vote will be held with those in the crowd deciding which phenomena should be considered the weirdest in the universe."We thought that the researchers might be too polite to be competitive but clearly that's not necessarily the case," says James, having listened to their arguments."I came from Oxford," replies Rita. "I take debates very seriously."The Weirdest Object in the Universe debate is free to attend and will take place in the Sir Alexander Fleming Building at Imperial College London at 15:30 BST on Saturday.


BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Birmingham prehistoric giants exhibition set for summer opening
An exhibition featuring life-sized 3D models and partial skeletons of giant prehistoric animals will open this developed by the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, will display animals that roamed the Earth after the extinction of the dinosaurs 66m years them will be the Otodus megalodon, known as the mightiest shark of all time, the woolly mammoth, and the Gigantopithecus blacki – an Asian primate the size of about three exhibition will open at Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery on 2 August before travelling to the National Museum of Scotland in Edinburgh in January. Visitors will be able to learn about the processes behind palaeontology, including the methods around fossil discovery and said there would also be immersive projections to transport audiences the natural habitat of the colossal lifeforms. 'Inspiring installation' They said the exhibition served as a "poignant reminder of nature's fragility" and the urgent need to protect Mensah and Sara Wajid, co-chief executives of Birmingham Museums Trust, said the "inspiring installation" captured the imagination with its "monumental scale" and delivered a vital message about Nick Fraser, keeper of natural sciences at National Museums Scotland, said the exhibition helped to shine a light on creatures which existed in the "relatively neglected" period since the dinosaurs' extinction. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Ange Postecoglou was right man to lead Tottenham forward
The temptation is to say that now Levy will be under pressure. That this time he has raised the stakes. Except that was said every time he pushed a manager out the door. Whether it was Pochettino after his transformational effect on the club, or Mourinho six days before a Carabao Cup final. In that respect nothing ever changes – Levy just sails onwards. He makes what he will describe in a statement as a hard but necessary decision and then a few years later he says the same. Postecoglou gambled everything on winning the Europa League – not just his reputation but the league season too. He did that as injuries engulfed him and also amid the strong sense that alternative coaches were being sounded out. Indeed, there was not a significant word of support from Levy in the crucial final weeks, and that too has an effect on a manager and the relationship with his players and the club's support. Yet Postecoglou pulled it off. Imagine what might be possible with some solidarity. Levy hedged his bets, even dragging out his decision until 16 days after the final in Bilbao and was generally expected to go into next week until Telegraph Sport broke the news of Postecoglou's departure on Friday. By then, with not a word from the club, it had become a self-fulfilling prophecy. The manager had been damaged by the club's failure to back him, and therefore the manager had to go. There feels like change coming at Spurs, with the departure of Donna Cullen – the director who was Levy's closest aide at the club. Vinai Venkatesham has been dropped in as the new chief executive. Yet while Levy is in place one can only assume that the same man is running the club. That is, unless those who control Joe Lewis's majority stake feel differently about it. For Postecoglou, there is a lot to be said for going out this way – with the Europa League in his grasp, and the gratitude of the supporters. He will find himself considerably wealthier on Saturday morning and also with a reputation enhanced. He answered a lot of the questions about his tactical flexibility in the last rounds of the competition and especially the final when United failed to hide their weaknesses as well as Spurs did theirs. Whatever the next Spurs manager achieves, he cannot win the club's first trophy in 17 years. Postecoglou will be due a slice of any future success – having broken the streak and changed the sense of what is possible. His successor will also know that the key to longevity at the club can be confusing. Is it finishing in the Premier League top five places to qualify for the Champions League? Is it winning knockout competitions? Or is it winning knockout competitions that earn qualification for the Champions League? Postecoglou saw Spurs' first trophy in 17 years as the most effective agent for change and went all out to win it. For Levy, one suspects league position is everything. Now he has the benefit of Uefa's Champions League funds he certainly has a better hand to deal to Postecoglou's successor. Although the next man will know that, when things start to go badly, he will be on his own.