Germany's planned spending spree: what it means for the economy
BERLIN, March 5 (Reuters) - Germany is in for a massive ramp-up in spending under an agreement, opens new tab by the parties hoping to form its next government, with a 500 billion euro special fund sought for infrastructure and plans to unshackle defence investment from its debt rules.
Here is what the plans might mean for growth and debt in Europe's largest economy:
CAN THE SPENDING BOOST GERMANY'S AILING ECONOMY?
According to economists, yes.
The IMK economic institute currently expects the German economy to eke out barely 0.1% of growth this year, after two consecutive years of contraction in 2023 and 2024, but said the new proposals could make a big difference.
"If the financial package is implemented quickly, a significant acceleration in growth can already be expected in the second half of the year, and growth for the year as a whole could already move noticeably away from stagnation," said IMK's economic director Sebastian Dullien.
Germany could even reach growth rates of 2% in the coming years provided there are no new shocks, Dullien said.
WHICH SECTORS ARE SET TO PROFIT MOST?
The construction sector can look forward to a boost from the fund to overhaul Germany's creaking infrastructure.
Shares in Heidelberg Materials (HEIG.DE), opens new tab rose by some 14% on Wednesday. Bilfinger saw a 20% spike and Hochtief (HOTG.DE), opens new tab shares were up 12%.
The defence industry also stands to gain. Under the prospective coalition's plans, Germany's strict cap on borrowing known as the 'debt brake' would be amended in the constitution to exempt defence expenditure above 1% of economic output.
This in effect would mean no upper limit on larger defence spending plans.
German defence companies Rheinmetall (RHMG.DE), opens new tab, Hensoldt (HAGG.DE), opens new tab, Thyssenkrupp (TKAG.DE), opens new tab and Renk have notched up gains so far this week of between 16% and 35% on the proposals.
HOW MUCH MORE DEBT WILL GERMANY TAKE ON?
A lot.
Last year, Germany's debt ratio stood at around 64% of gross domestic product, far lower than that of other major industrialised countries such as the United States and France.
Commerzbank chief economist Joerg Kraemer expects that level to climb noticeably in the coming years - by around 10 percentage points due to the new special fund alone.
Increasing defence spending would push up the debt ratio even further, by an extra 2.5 points annually if, for example, it was ramped up to 3.5% of gross domestic product.
"In 10 years, the overall government debt ratio could rise to 90%, although this also depends on inflation and is therefore not easy to predict," Kraemer said.
"This would mean that Germany would quickly join the ranks of the EU's highly indebted states," ZEW economist Friedrich Heinemann said. He predicts Germany's indebtedness could even surpass the 100% mark in 2034.
WOULD THIS COST GERMANY ITS TOP CREDIT SCORE OF AAA?
Not necessarily. The spending plans could increase Germany's debt level to around 72% of gross domestic product by 2029, Scope analyst Eiko Sievert told Reuters - below the previous high of 80% seen in 2010 following the global financial crisis, when Germany was able to maintain its AAA rating.
"Whether this remains possible in the coming years depends also on the implementation of necessary political reforms to strengthen competitiveness and economic growth," Sievert said.
CAN GERMANY FIND ENOUGH LENDERS?
Germany's top credit rating makes it a sought-after borrower.
However, higher interest rates would probably be needed to make German government bonds attractive to investors.
"Investors are likely to demand higher risk premiums for German government debt," says Commerzbank's Kraemer.
The yield on the 10-year German government bond rose from around 2.5% to 2.7% as investors digested news of the debt and spending plans, indicating that interest costs for the state would likely rise.
COULD GERMANY'S SPENDING SPREE INFLUENCE ECB POLICY?
This could well be the case because pumping hundreds of billions of euros into the economy harbours inflation risks.
"The ECB will have to take into account that inflationary pressure will rise again as a result of the planned expansionary fiscal policy in Germany," said Cyrus de la Rubia, chief economist at Hamburg Commercial Bank.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
Pakistan likely to hike defence spending but slash overall budget in 2025-26
ISLAMABAD, June 10 (Reuters) - Pakistan will unveil its annual federal budget for the coming fiscal year later on Tuesday, seeking to kickstart growth while finding resources for an expected hike in defence expenditure following the conflict with India last month. Islamabad will also have to contend with remaining within the discipline of its International Monetary Fund programme and the uncertainty from new trade tariffs being imposed by the United States, its biggest export market. Media reports say the government is likely to present a 17.6 trillion rupee ($62.45 billion) budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, down 6.7% from this fiscal year. It has projected a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of GDP, against a targeted 5.9% deficit in 2024-25, the reports say. Analysts said they expect an increase of around 20% in the defence budget, likely offset by cuts in development spending. Pakistan allocated 2.1 trillion Pakistani rupees($7.45 billion) for defence in the outgoing fiscal year, including $2 billion for equipment and other assets. An additional 563 billion rupees ($1.99 billion) was set aside for military pensions, which are not counted within the official defence budget. India's defence spending in its 2025–26 (April-March) fiscal year was set at $78.7 billion, a 9.5% increase from the previous year, including pensions and $21 billion earmarked for equipment. It has indicated it will step up expenditure following the May conflict with Pakistan. The government of Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has projected 4.2% economic growth in 2025-26, saying it has steadied the economy, which had looked at risk of defaulting on its debts as recently as 2023. Growth this fiscal year is likely to be 2.7%, against an initial target of 3.6% set in the budget last year. Pakistan's growth lags far behind the region. In 2024, South Asian countries grew by an average of 5.8% and 6.0% growth is expected in 2025, according to the Asian Development Bank. Expansion of the economy should be aided by a sharp drop in the cost of borrowing, the government says, after a succession of interest rate cuts by the central bank. But economists warn that monetary policy alone may not be enough, with fiscal constraints and IMF-mandated reforms still weighing on investment. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said on Monday that he wanted to avoid Pakistan's boom and bust cycles of the past. 'The macroeconomic stability that we have achieved, we want to absolutely stay the course,' he said. 'This time around we are very, very clear that we do not want to squander the opportunity.' The budget is expected to prioritize expanding the tax base, enforcing agriculture income tax laws, and reducing government subsidies to industry, to meet the terms of a $7 billion IMF bailout signed last summer. Just 1.3% of the population paid income tax in 2024, according to the tax authorities, with agriculture and the retail sector largely outside of the tax net. The IMF has urged Pakistan to widen the tax base through reforms which include taxing agriculture, retail, and real estate. Ahmad Mobeen, senior economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said that he expected the revenue target for 2025-26 will be missed. 'The shortfall will mostly be owing to lack of optimal implementation of announced measures as well as absence of meaningful structural reforms to widen the tax net in general,' said Mobeen. ($1 = 281.8400 Pakistani rupees)
Daily Mirror
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
5 Liverpool stars at risk of exit once Florian Wirtz and Milos Kerkez arrive
Florian Wirtz could set Liverpool back around £118m if he arrives at Anfield this summer and the club's spending could hit around £200m at this early stage, meaning they will be forced to sanction some outgoings Liverpool will be forced to balance the books this summer should they complete lucrative deals for Florian Wirtz and Milos Kerkez, who are the club's top transfer targets. The Reds are being quoted around £118million by Bayer Leverkusen for German playmaker Wirtz in what is set to be the most expensive deal in Premier League history. Bournemouth left-back Kerkez, meanwhile, should set Liverpool back around £45m, which would take their summer spending to almost than £200m on three players after completing a move for Jeremie Frimpong. Liverpool will need to make sure they remain within the Premier League's PSR financial rules and therefore Arne Slot will have to sanction a handful of exits. After winning the Premier League, it makes sense for the Dutchman to trim his squad slightly and freshen it up. There are a handful of players whose futures are uncertain at Anfield and could be on the chopping block. Mirror Football has taken a look at five players who could be on their way out of Liverpool once they have started splashing the cash this summer. Harvey Elliott The midfielder has become a clear candidate for the exit door at Liverpool after he recently spoke out to confirm he wants to play regularly and doesn't want to "waste years of his career" on the subs bench. Elliott played just 18 times in the Premier League last season as Liverpool romped to the title, with 16 of those coming as a substitute. But should Wirtz arrive at Anfield, that could further limit his opportunities and Liverpool will know that selling Elliott would stand them in good stead as far as PSR is concerned because he is a home grown player. Elliott said: "It's just a situation that me and the team have to have a conversation about because I'm coming into an age now where I'm 22, I'm going to be 23 next season," said Elliott when asked if he is considering leaving Liverpool. "I don't really want to be wasting years on my career because it's a short career. You don't know what's going to happen. I need to reflect. I need to see if I'm content in doing what I'm doing and how can I improve as a player because that's the most important thing. "I just want to improve and be the best possible version of myself. If that's to go somewhere else, then it's a decision that I'm going to have to make and I just need to see what happens. Nothing makes me want to leave. I love the club, I love the fans, the team. I support them as well. But most importantly, it's just about what's best for my career." Federico Chiesa The Italian has barely played for Liverpool since joining from Juventus for £10m last summer, with injuries significantly halting his progress. In fact, Chiesa started just four times in all competitions and featured only 14 times in total - scoring twice - as he struggled to make an impact for Slot. Chiesa looks way down the pecking order at Anfield and there are also still doubts over his fitness levels after experiencing a number of setbacks and the Daily Mail have claimed he is considering moving back to Italy. The player himself admitted he would sit down with his agent and family to discuss his future but said he "wouldn't mind" staying with Liverpool despite enduring "frustration" with his situation. He told Corrirere dello Sport: "The year is over. But it's an experience I would do again. Soon I will sit down at the table with the club, Fali (Ramadani, his agent) and my family to find the best solution. I wouldn't mind staying in Liverpool at all. "In the autumn Liverpool were going three times as fast as the others, an incredible intensity. At the beginning I felt the frustration… The desire to play was there, I put it aside, I understood the situation." Darwin Nunez Since joining Liverpool for £85m in 2022, Nunez has been something of a 'nearly man' - always chipping in with goals but never becoming the main man at Liverpool. There was so much hope for the Uruguayan after he arrived from Benfica off the back of netting 34 times from 41 appearances. The forward can pop up with an important goal and clearly has talent but he is yet to justify his huge price tag and continues to be only a squad player under Slot. This season he only started eight times in the Premier League but it was in the cup competitions where he made his mark as he chipped in with seven goals across the season - down from 18 in 2023-24. Nunez is now being linked with a move away after being linked with Arsenal and even Manchester United, while Saudi Pro League clubs are also believed to be weighing up a move. With Luis Diaz appearing to be the first choice striker at Liverpool, Foot Mercato have claimed Al-Hilal are among those monitoring the player. Kostas Tsimikas With Kerkez coming in, it wouldn't make logical sense for Liverpool to have three left-backs, so you'd bank on one of the other two leaving the club. While Andy Robertson has appeared to fall out of favour under Slot in the last season, he remains the more experienced option who has been with Liverpool for eight seasons. Tsimikas will be the more frustrated player if - after he began to finally challenge Robertson at left-back - Kerkez comes in and replaces him immediately, therefore he could be looking to leave in the near future. Various reports have claimed Liverpool don't see Tsimikas as their main left-back long term and that he could be used as one of the players to make way for more financial leeway. He has played 114 games for Liverpool in total and clocked 28 appearances in the 2024-25 campaign but when the Reds search for players to shift, Tsimikas should be high up on the list. Joe Gomez Gomez nearly left Liverpool for Newcastle last season before the Magpies pulled the plug on the deal and was hoping for new lease of life after Slot took over from Jurgen Klopp. But Gomez had a hugely frustrating campaign that was hampered by hamstring injuries - which forced him to miss a total of 28 games. He hasn't played since February and only managed a total of 17 appearances in all competitions. Now, Slot could be ready to cash in on the injury-prone defender if an offer comes in for him this summer. According to the Liverpool Echo, Gomez is facing a "transfer crossroads" moment and it would not be a surprise if he left the club after ten years on Merseyside.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
How a Luxembourg village divided Europe
I am in the most EU-ish bedroom in the EU. That is to say, I am lying in a refurbished room in the handsome 14th-century Chateau de Schengen, in the little village of Schengen, Luxembourg. From my casements, opened wide onto the sunny Saarland afternoon, I can see the exact stretch of the river Moselle where, on a boat floating between Germany, France and Luxembourg, the Schengen Agreement was signed in 1985. This was the agreement that sealed Free Movement as Europe's defining ideal – one whose consequences are still unfolding. I've been in Luxembourg for a week, on assignment, and this week has given me an insight into why the nations of the EU undertook their bold, remarkable experiment of no more borders. The first and obvious motivator was war. Luxembourg can look oddly new, or newish. Ancient-sounding villages are full of blocky 1960s houses. Supposedly medieval churches are clearly modern, lacking the rich patina of age. This is because they were all flattened in war – especially the last German offensive of the second world war, the Battle of the Bulge – which raged across snowbound Luxembourg from December 1944 to January 1945. As a result, much had to be rebuilt or heavily restored. Reviving international trust took even longer, as the war here was brutal. In little towns like Diekirch, teenage Nazi conscripts casually gunned down innocent civilians in the streets. The angered Allies felt no huge need thereafter to take German prisoners alive. The yearning to overcome this evil trauma – and reconcile – was one big driver of the EEC, which reached its frontierless, post-national apotheosis here in Schengen. But another was sheer practicality. Yesterday, my local guide, Anna, told me how she once had to show her passport every day to cross the Moselle to and from Germany. She can remember the queues and frustration. She recalls a crimped, claustrophobic Europe – like an office with too many cubicles. Nowadays the quaint old customs houses have been turned into tourist bureaux or posh chocolatiers, and everyone breezes between countries with total freedom. The other day I drove a meandering route through the rustling green winelands and must have crossed between Lux and DE half a dozen times, barely noticing. At its best, Schengen is indeed wonderful. But there's the geopolitical rub. Schengen at its Platonic best is magnificent. In practice, it may be turning into a tragic failure. A primary reason is migration – not within Europe, but without. To illustrate my point, Anna told me another story of Luxembourg. She explained how, in the 1970s, the now-prospering little Duchy required workers. As she put it, with bracing candour: 'We chose the Portuguese because they were poor and wanted the work, but also because they are European, Christian, Catholic, like us. We felt they would assimilate.' And so they have. You can see unexpectedly good selections of Douro wines in Luxembourg supermarkets. Otherwise, the 15 per cent of the population that is Portuguese is barely discernible. Schengen might, perhaps, be in much less trouble if every other country had followed those careful Luxembourg policies. But they didn't. France drew people from its old empire – Algeria, Morocco, sub-Saharan Africa. Germany imported millions of Turks, then another million Syrians under Merkel's idealistic Willkommen policy of 2015. Britain turned to the Caribbean, then Pakistan, India, Bangladesh. Combining open internal borders with sovereign external migration policies – inviting millions from far outside Europe – was, in retrospect, bound to create a problem. It's like a flat share where everyone agrees to leave their doors open and split the rent, but each person gets to invite their own guests, who then stay forever, use the bathroom, and host loud parties. Irritation is guaranteed. Some housemates will get seriously annoyed. Take, for example, the Somali migrant population in Holland. Tens of thousands of them moved to the UK under Free Movement. The UK could do nothing to stop this – as Britons duly noted. This is one example of how Free Movement, which peaked with Schengen, led quite directly to Brexit. It was perhaps sheer bad luck that Schengen coincided with one of the most ill-conceived experiments of recent times: multiculturalism plus mass immigration. Or maybe it wasn't coincidence, and they derive from the same well-meaning, liberal universalism – only this time taken too far. Frontiers are intrinsically sad – divisions within humanity made all too real Whatever the case, as I write this in my room in the Chateau de Schengen, I can also read the daily and unhappy news that springs from Europe's mass immigration experience: of riots and deaths in France following the football victory of Paris Saint-Germain; of another call for an inquiry into rape gangs in the UK; of a hard-right Polish politician becoming president, vowing to keep Poland migrant-free; of once-peaceful Sweden – now 'the bombing capital of the West'. Or I can read about de facto blasphemy laws in Britain and Denmark, introduced to placate militant Islam. And I can read of endless terror shifting across Europe untracked, leading even mainstream politicians in Germany, Austria, Italy to argue for the suspension of Schengen. Yes, of course there are multiple good, successful stories of integration and assimilation across Europe. But for many Europeans, judging by the remarkable electoral shift to the hard right, the good is now majorly outweighed by the bad. Is there any hope for that faded but shimmering Schengen ideal of a borderless Europe? I'd like to think so. Frontiers are intrinsically sad – divisions within humanity made all too real – even if Robert Frost knew what he was talking about when he said 'good fences make good neighbours'. The day is closing here in the Chateau de Schengen, and the summer sun sets lazily over the Auxerrois vines. They have a nice restaurant in the hotel, which has a classic French menu. I want to eat French food in Luxembourg while looking at Germany. It feels Schengen-y. But as the waitress brings my tranche de foie gras maison, the capricious Luxemburg weather turns. It's been in the forecast for a while – now it has arrived: a cold wind from the Ardennes is sweeping down the Moselle valley. The rain lashes the ancient gardens, and the waiters drift toward the windows, watching as the parasols surrender to the storm.
