logo
CCI orders another investigation into Google over AdTech dominance charges

CCI orders another investigation into Google over AdTech dominance charges

Fair trade regulator CCI has ordered a detailed investigation into Google's conduct in the online display advertising market on a complaint filed by the Alliance of Digital India Foundation (ADIF).
In an order passed by CCI on Friday, the regulator said it has decided to club the complaint with ongoing investigations in similar cases and directed the Director General (DG) to carry out a consolidated probe into Google's conduct in the AdTech ecosystem.
"The DG is directed to investigate the various alleged practices of Google in Online Display Advertising services and/ or AdTech intermediation services and submit a consolidated investigation report in the matters, accordingly," it added.
The order comes in response to a detailed complaint filed by ADIF alleging that Google has engaged in anti-competitive practices across various layers of its advertising technology stack.
In its complaint, ADIF alleged that Google, through its multiple group entities, has engaged in anti-competitive conduct by self-preferencing its own services in the AdTech ecosystem, including tying and bundling of its publisher ad server (DFP) with its ad exchange (AdX), and linking access to YouTube ad inventory with the use of its demand-side platform (DV360).
ADIF, which represents startups, companies and individuals, also alleged that such practices not only harmed publishers and advertisers but also foreclosed the market for competing AdTech service providers.
The CCI said that the participation of ADIF, which represents key stakeholders in the start-up and digital ecosystem, could bring additional insights to the probe and there was no legal barrier to clubbing the matter with the ongoing investigation.
The Commission said it was prima facie satisfied that Google's conduct warranted scrutiny under Section 4 of the Competition Act, which deals with abuse of dominant position.
It directed that the matter be clubbed with four existing cases and a consolidated report be submitted after investigation.
"Allegations made by ADIF in the present matter already form part of the allegations being investigated in the Publishers Case (supra), in terms of the proviso to Section 26(1) of the Act, the commission decides to club the present matter," the CCI said.
However, in its response, Google denied the allegations and said it operates in a competitive AdTech market in India, with players like Xandr, Amazon Ads and the Trade Desk. It maintained that its products are interoperable and not tied.
However, the CCI said these aspects will be examined during the course of the investigation.
In a separate order, the CCI dismissed a complaint filed by ADIF against Google, concluding that the allegations raised were already examined and settled in previous cases.
The CCI said it is not convinced by the reasons stated by ADIF for distinguishing its allegations from the issues examined in previous orders passed by the regulator.
"The issues examined in the previous order may be 'the same' or 'substantially the same'.
"Therefore, the present matter is directed to be closed forthwith in terms of the provisions of section 26(2A) of the Act," the regulator added.
ADIF had cited four main concerns, including prohibition on third-party technical support advertisements, restrictions on 'Call Ads' on desktops, lack of transparency in ad rankings, and allowing competitors to bid on trademarked keywords.
"All the four instances of alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies as raised by ADIF in the present matter, have already been examined in substance and set to rest by the commission in its previous decisions," the competition watchdog said.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Baidu crashes 75% from peak — is China's AI titan in trouble or just on sale?
Baidu crashes 75% from peak — is China's AI titan in trouble or just on sale?

Time of India

time19 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Baidu crashes 75% from peak — is China's AI titan in trouble or just on sale?

Baidu stock 2025 : Long considered China's Google, Baidu has watched its shares fall nearly 75% from its 2021 high, and investors are wondering if the company is just undervalued or truly in trouble in an ever-changing world of tech, as per a report. How Baidu Rose to Power After Google Left China But in 2021, Baidu was at its height. After Google's departure from mainland China due to censorship issues in 2010, Baidu emerged as the search engine of mainland China, as per The Motley Fool. Its income skyrocketed from 319 million yuan in 2005 to over 124 billion yuan ($19.5 billion) in 2021, according to the report. That popularity boosted its stock to an all-time high of $339.91 per share, a 12,489% rise since its IPO, as per The Motley Fool report. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program ALSO READ: Blade and Joby stocks soar after $125 million rideshare deal — is this the future of flying taxis? by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Physiotherapist: The Fastest Way to Overcome Knee Pain and Swelling Wellnee Undo Baidu's Massive Stock Decline But that momentum has dissipated. In 2025, Baidu is trading at about $88 a share and is up less than 4% year to date, well behind other tech stocks in a rebound year, as per the report. Why Baidu's Core Business Is Losing Steam Its core business, online advertising, has been hardest hit by shifting user behavior, according to The Motley Fool. In 2021, the majority of Baidu's approximately $78 billion revenue was derived from its search- and display-based advertising services, as per the report. But social media apps such as Douyin (China's TikTok), Tencent's WeChat, and other mobile-centric platforms fundamentally altered individuals' manner of searching for information and engaging with digital content, as reported by The Motley Fool. Live Events ALSO READ: Blade and Joby stocks soar after $125 million rideshare deal — is this the future of flying taxis? Baidu Bets Big on AI, Cloud, and Autonomous Driving By 2024, online marketing revenue comprised only 55% of Baidu's business, according to the report. On the other hand, its non-advertising businesses—particularly its AI Cloud business—are growing more robustly, as per The Motley Fool. That unit currently accounts for around 24% of total revenue and features such items as its ERNIE large language model, in-house AI chips like Kunlun 800, cloud infrastructure, and its Apollo autonomous vehicle platform, as reported by The Motley Fool. What's Going On With iQiyi, Baidu's Struggling Streaming Arm? There's also iQiyi , Baidu's video equivalent of Netflix, once a major growth driver, it has of late not been able to churn out breakout content or garner sustained ad revenue, according to the report. Baidu has even contemplated spinning it off completely to concentrate more on cloud and AI, reported The Motley Fool. Baidu's 2025 Forecast: Flat Revenue and Falling Profits Even with its expansion into high-growth segments, Baidu's financials have been slow. The analysts consensus projected flat revenues and a 17% drop in earnings in 2025, as reported by The Motley Fool. The firm's online marketing services and iQiyi segments are expected to remain weak, but its AI Cloud business could grow rapidly enough to offset those declines, as reported by The Motley Fool. However, Baidu's earnings will come down because of its higher investments in its AI Cloud platform, driverless vehicles, and fresh media content for iQiyi, according to the report. Analysts See Modest Growth for Baidu in 2026 While, for 2026, analysts have projected Baidu's revenue and EPS to rise 5% and 3%, respectively, reported The Motley Fool. "That stabilization would be a step in the right direction, but Baidu would still be a slow-growth stock with limited upside potential," wrote The Motley Fool. FAQs Why has Baidu's stock dropped so much since 2021? Baidu's stock is down about 75% from its peak because of weak ad revenue, rising competition, and slower earnings growth despite big AI investments, as per The Motley Fool report. Is Baidu still the top search engine in China? Yes, but its dominance is fading as more users turn to social media platforms like Douyin and WeChat for information and entertainment, as per The Motley Fool report.

Green regulators can seek bank guarantees from polluters: Supreme Court
Green regulators can seek bank guarantees from polluters: Supreme Court

Business Standard

time23 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Green regulators can seek bank guarantees from polluters: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that environmental regulators, such as the Pollution Control Boards, can impose environmental compensation and seek bank guarantees from polluting entities as part of their preventive measures against potential environmental damage. 'We hold that the environmental regulators, the Pollution Control Boards, can impose and collect as restitutionary and compensatory damages fixed sums of money or require furnishing bank guarantees as an ex-ante measure towards potential environmental damage in exercise of powers under Sections 33A and 31A of the Water and Air Acts,' the Supreme Court said. A Bench of Justices PS Narasimha and Manoj Misra held that such actions by State Boards are lawful and fall within their powers. However, the Bench stressed that this authority must be exercised fairly and transparently. 'While we hold that the Boards have the power to direct the payment of environmental damages, we make it clear that this power must always be guided by two overarching principles. First, that the power cannot be exercised in an arbitrary manner; and second, the process of exercising this power must be infused with transparency,' the judgment said. The court emphasized that such action must be distinguished from a penalty. 'There is a distinction between a direction for payment of restitutionary and compensatory damages as a remedial measure for environmental damage or as an ex-ante measure towards potential environmental damage on the one hand; and a punitive action of fine or imprisonment for violations under Chapters VII of the Water Act and VI of the Air Act on the other hand.' The Bench also referred to the polluter pays principle in Indian environmental jurisprudence, stating that actual environmental degradation is not a prerequisite for demanding compensation. Instead, the potential for environmental harm is sufficient. 'The actual degradation of the environment is not a necessary condition for the application of the polluter pays principle, as long as the offending activities have the potential of degrading the environment," the judgment said. The Court also echoed the view taken by the National Green Tribunal in Swastik Ispat Pvt Ltd, where the tribunal had upheld the use of bank guarantees as a lawful method of securing environmental compliance. In the present case, the Delhi Pollution Control Committee had appealed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court, which had held that it was not empowered to levy compensatory damages under Section 33A of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, and Section 31A of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The High Court ruled that such action amounted to a penalty under Chapters VII and VI of the respective Acts, and as such, the procedure for imposing and collecting compensatory damages outlined thereunder should be the only method available.

Airtel launches cloud service, says will have cost advantage over rivals
Airtel launches cloud service, says will have cost advantage over rivals

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Airtel launches cloud service, says will have cost advantage over rivals

Synopsis Bharti Airtel has launched its own sovereign cloud service under the 'Xtelify' brand to compete with hyperscalers like AWS and Google. The company says its integrated network-cloud model offers a 30–40% cost advantage. Already serving clients like Singtel, Globe Telecom, and subsidiaries, Airtel aims to scale the platform into a sizable long-term business targeting Indian enterprises with secure, scalable, and cost-effective cloud solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store