Taiwan detects 24 Chinese military aircrafts near island
Taiwan has detected 24 Chinese military aircraft near the island as a Canadian warship passed through the sensitive Taiwan Strait, Taiwan's Ministry of National Defence says.
The Chinese aircraft included fighter jets and drones and were spotted on Sunday carrying out 'joint combat readiness patrols' with military vessels around Taiwan, the ministry said in a statement.
China's military radioed the Canadian frigate transiting through the Taiwan Strait and warned it to change course, Taiwan media reported.
The Halifax-class frigate HMCS Ottawa was the first Canadian naval vessel to transit the waterway this year, Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said. Its transit came days after two United States ships, a naval destroyer and survey ship, made the passage.
The US and its allies regularly pass through the 180km (112-mile) Taiwan Strait to reinforce its status as an international waterway, angering China.
The US destroyer and ocean survey ship travelled through the strait starting on Monday, drawing criticism from China's military, which said it sent the 'wrong signal and increased security risks'.
Data published by the Taiwan Defence Ministry showed 62 Chinese military aircraft were detected near the island in the 48 hours until 6am on Wednesday (22:00 GMT on Tuesday), coinciding with the US ships' transit.
Washington's latest passage through the Taiwan Strait was the first time since US President Donald Trump took office in January.
It came after Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said they 'opposed any attempts to unilaterally change the status quo [in the Taiwan Strait] by force or coercion'.
'Cross-strait differences' to be resolved peacefully
The US, like most countries, has no formal diplomatic ties with Taiwan but is its strongest international backer and provides military aid to the island to help it maintain its defence capabilities.
While Trump has unnerved Taiwan since taking office with criticism of Taiwan's dominance in making semiconductors, his administration has also offered strong words of support.
Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's claims of sovereignty over the island and says only Taiwan's people can decide their future. Taiwan says it is an independent country called the Republic of China.
Beijing describes Taiwan as its 'core of core interests', regularly denouncing any show of support for Taipei from Washington.
On Thursday, the US Department of State removed a statement on its website that said it does not support Taiwan's independence.
A reference was also added to the webpage about Taiwan's cooperation with a Pentagon technology and semiconductor development project, and it says the US will support Taiwan's membership in international organisations 'where applicable'.
'We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side,' the updated State Department site reads.
'We expect cross-Strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the [Taiwan] Strait.'
Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung 'welcomed the support and positive stance on US-Taiwan relations demonstrated in the relevant content' of the website, his ministry said in a statement on Sunday.
The changes in language were first reported by Taiwan's official Central News Agency on Sunday.
The wording on Taiwan independence was also removed in 2022 before being restored a month later.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
32 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Democrats wooing Musk after the Trump breakup is US plutocracy at its best
It's official: United States President Donald Trump and the world's richest person, Elon Musk, have broken up. At the end of last month, Musk departed from his post as the head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), where he oversaw the mass firing of federal employees and dismantling of various government agencies – all the while benefitting from his own companies' lucrative contracts with the government. Anyway, US 'democracy' has never met a conflict of interest it didn't like. Musk's service at the White House initially appeared to end on an amicable note as Trump praised him for the 'colossal change' he had achieved 'in the old ways of doing business in Washington'. The former head of DOGE in turn thanked the president for the opportunity. But soon after his departure, Musk publicly criticised the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', a tax and spending bill that Trump is currently obsessed with passing, slamming it as a 'disgusting abomination'. There ensued predictably dramatic social media exchanges between the two right-wing billionaires with Trump pronouncing Musk 'so depressed and so heartbroken' after leaving the White House and offering the additional coherent analysis: ' It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome. We have it with others, too. They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different, and they become hostile.' Musk has repeatedly taken credit for Trump's 2024 election victory on account of the gobs of money he donated to the president's campaign and those of other Republican candidates. Now that the relationship is over, Trump has wasted no time in warning Musk that he'll face 'very serious consequences' if he chooses to fund Democratic campaigns in the future. But some Democratic ears, at least, have perked up at the possibility of getting the planet's richest person back on their side – which he abandoned in favour of Trump after having extended support to Democratic former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The political switcheroo was hardly extreme. At the end of the day, ideology matters little when you're just in the business of buying power. California Congressman Ro Khanna, for example, recently opined that Democrats should 'be in a dialogue' with Musk in light of their shared opposition to Trump's big beautiful bill. As per Khanna's view, 'we should ultimately be trying to convince [Musk] that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with.' He went on to list a few of these alleged values: 'A commitment to science funding, a commitment to clean technology, a commitment to seeing international students like him.' Never mind that Musk's main 'value' is a commitment to controlling as much of the earth – not to mention the whole solar system – as he possibly can for the benefit of himself and himself alone. Beyond his mass firing activities while head of DOGE, a brief review of Musk's entrepreneurial track record reveals a total lack of the 'values' that Democrats purport to espouse. Over recent years, reports have abounded of sexual harassment and acute racism at Musk's Tesla car factories. In October 2021, a federal jury in San Francisco ordered Tesla to pay $137m to a Black former employee who claimed he was told to 'go back to Africa' among other abuses suffered at his workplace. Along with violating federal labour laws, Musk as chief executive of Tesla threatened workers over the prospect of unionisation. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020, he violated local regulations to keep his factories up and running, underscoring a general contempt for human life that, again, should not be a 'value' that anyone aspires to. To be sure, not all Democrats are on board with the proposal to woo Musk back into the Democratic camp – but he may be getting a growing cheering squad. In addition to Khanna's advocacy on his behalf, New York Democratic Congressman Ritchie Torres seems prepared to give Musk his vote as well: 'I'm a believer in redemption, and he is telling the truth about the [big beautiful] legislation.' Anthony Scaramucci, Trump's former White House director of communications, has, meanwhile, suggested that Democrats could 'bring Elon Musk back into the fold as a prodigal son' by foregoing more left-wing policies – as if there's anything truly left-wing about the Democratic Party in the first place. Newsweek's write-up of Scaramucci's comments observed that 'It would be a coup for Democrats if they could court the influence of the world's richest man once more.' It would not, obviously, be a coup for democracy, which is supposed to be rule by the people and not by money. And yet a longstanding bipartisan commitment to plutocracy means the US has never been in danger of true democracy. Instead, billions upon billions of dollars are spent to sustain an electoral charade and ensure that capital remains concentrated in the hands of the few – while Americans continue to literally die of poverty. Now it remains to be seen whether the Trump-Musk breakup will drive Democrats into Musk's arms. But either way, the country's plutocratic values remain rock solid – and that is nothing less than a 'disgusting abomination'. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Qatar Tribune
15 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
President Trump warns Musk of ‘serious consequences' if he funds Democrats
Agencies Washington United States President Donald Trump has warned billionaire former ally Elon Musk against funding Democratic candidates in the country's 2026 midterm elections as the pair's volcanic break-up continued to play out on the world stage. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' Trump told US network NBC News in an interview published on Saturday, without spelling out what the repercussions might be for the tech mogul, whose businesses benefit from lucrative US federal contracts. Trump aides, various Republicans, and key wealthy donors to the GOP have urged the two to temper the bitter feud and make peace, fearing irreparable political and economic fallout. But, asked whether he thought his relationship with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO was over, Trump said, 'I would assume so, yeah'. The interview featured Trump's most extensive comments yet on the spectacular bust-up that saw Musk criticising his signature tax and spending bill as an 'abomination', tensions escalating after he went on to highlight one-time links between the president and the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. By Saturday morning, Musk had deleted his 'big bomb' allegation that Trump featured in unreleased government files on former associates of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019. The Trump administration has acknowledged it is reviewing tens of thousands of documents, videos, and investigative material that his 'MAGA' movement says will unmask public figures complicit in Epstein's crimes. Trump was named in a trove of deposition and statements linked to Epstein that were unsealed by a New York judge in early 2024. The president has not been accused of any wrongdoing, but he had a long and well-publicised friendship with Epstein. Just last week, Trump had given Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Vice President JD Vance said Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after Trump, though he also tried to downplay his attacks as the frustrations of an 'emotional guy'.
Qatar Tribune
15 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Asia caught between US-China power plays ahead of tariff deadlines
Agencies Caught in the undertow of swirling power plays between China and the United States, Asia has become like a piece of driftwood battered by the pounding of opposing tides. With key tariff deadlines approaching in July, and in light of lingering trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies, many countries in the region are facing a delicate, pragmatic choice: bow to Washington's growing pressure to crack down on supply chains and enforcement – or preserve the economic ambiguity that underpins their deep ties with Beijing? Asian countries have entwined their supply chains, technology, markets and investment with Beijing – accounting for one-third of China's total trade volume, or US$1.89 trillion last year. Meanwhile, some of them may need security assurances from the US amid the growing Chinese influence in the region, analysts said. China remains the top trading partner for 18 countries across the region and has been the largest trading partner of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) for 15 consecutive years. Meanwhile, economic asymmetry and military advantage have often translated into Beijing's leverage in market power while, for many in the region, Washington represents security, diversification and strategic rebalancing, with its military presence, investment and advanced technology, analysts said. That leaves many Asian economies walking a tightrope – benefiting from China's vast market while remaining wary of the risks of over-dependence. For much of Asia, maintaining ties with both while caught in between has become a survival strategy. As ongoing negotiations between the administration of US President Donald Trump and Asia unfold behind closed doors and prospects remain cloudy, 'it's too early to talk about 'camps' in Asia, as Asia can't afford to do without either China or the US', said Vivek Kelkar, an independent analyst based in India. Some regional leaders, such as Malaysia's Anwar Ibrahim, have been verbally supportive of China because their geography and economy do not allow them to be anything else, but they may also be aware that, without the US, they are vulnerable to Chinese domination across both economics and politics, Kelkar said. Both China and the US have shown a willingness to exercise power by weaponising supply chains and trade, Kelkar added, but there was no sign yet that Asia would cave in quite the way Trump envisages. 'Asia is trying to manage a careful balance while messaging Washington that Asia has alternatives,' he said. For instance, Malaysia's chief negotiator, Mastura Ahmad Mustafa, told domestic news outlet The Star that although her country's tariff talks with the US were in progress, those negotiations were only one part of Malaysia's broader strategy to cushion the potential impact on exporters. In a report published on Thursday, she said that it was hard to know whether the two sides could reach a deal before a 90-day pause on tariffs is lifted in July, and that the Malaysian government had 'begun rolling out contingency measures' such as market diversification and economic reforms. In April, Trump imposed a 10 per cent universal tariff on all imports effective April 5, in an effort to address America's trade deficits. His administration also announced higher 'reciprocal' tariffs on goods from select countries from April 9 – including 25 per cent for South Korea, 24 per cent for Japan, 36 per cent for Thailand, 46 per cent for Vietnam, and 49 per cent for Cambodia. However, a grace period was granted later that month for all countries except China, delaying the implementation of these higher tariffs until July 9 and giving governments time to negotiate possible exemptions or adjustments with Washington.
