North Korea tours mooted as South looks to mend ties
Koo Byung-sam, a spokesperson for South Korea's Unification Ministry, which handles inter-Korea affairs, refused to comment on a "particular issue".
But Koo said he understood individual tours were not in violation of international sanctions.
Tourism is one of a narrow range of cash sources for North Korea that are not targeted under United Nations sanctions over its nuclear and weapons programs.
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung has pledged to improve strained relations with Pyongyang that have reached their worst level in years.
In a bid to ease tensions, Lee suspended anti-North Korea loudspeaker broadcasts along the border and ordered a halt to leaflet campaigns criticising the North's leaders by anti-Pyongyang activists.
The president has said he will discuss further plans with top security officials to resume dialogue with North Korea, which is technically at war with the South.
North Korea recently opened a beach resort in the city of Wonsan, a flagship project driven by leader Kim Jong-un to promote tourism.
But the tourist area is temporarily not accepting foreign visitors, according to a July 16 note by DPR Korea Tour, a website operated by North Korea's National Tourism Administration.
North Korea first needs to open the area to the outside world, the Unification Ministry spokesperson said, when asked if South Koreans could travel to Wonsan.
South Korea once ran tours to North Korea's Mount Kumgang area, but suspended them in 2008, when a South Korean tourist was shot dead by a North Korean soldier.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Herald Sun
5 hours ago
- Herald Sun
US to leave UN cultural body, citing 'national interest'
Don't miss out on the headlines from Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News. The United States said Tuesday it would quit UNESCO, saying the UN cultural and education agency, best known for establishing world heritage sites, is biased against Israel and promotes "divisive" causes. "Continued involvement in UNESCO is not in the national interest of the United States," State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said. UNESCO called the US departure -- which it said will take effect in December 2026 -- regrettable, but unsurprising, and said its financial impact would be limited. President Donald Trump had already ordered withdrawal from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation once before, in 2017 during his first term. President Joe Biden then reestablished US membership. "I deeply regret President Donald Trump's decision to once again withdraw the United States of America from UNESCO," Director-General Audrey Azoulay said, adding the move contradicted fundamental principles of multilateralism. "However regrettable, this announcement was expected, and UNESCO has prepared for it". In recent years, Azoulay said, UNESCO had "undertaken major structural reforms and diversified our funding sources", including with private and voluntary governmental contributions. The US share of UNESCO's total budget currently stands at eight percent, she said. This compares to an estimate of nearly 20 percent a decade ago, according to a UNESCO source who asked not to be named. No staff redundancies were planned, Azoulay said. Bruce described UNESCO as working "to advance divisive social and cultural causes" and being overly focused on UN sustainability goals, which she described as a "globalist, ideological agenda." - 'Same as seven years ago' - Bruce also highlighted what she said was the body's anti-Israeli position in admitting Palestine as a state. "UNESCO's decision to admit the 'State of Palestine' as a member state is highly problematic, contrary to US policy, and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric within the organisation," Bruce said. The administration has also objected to UNESCO's recognition of heritage sites in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem as Palestinian. Azoulay said the reasons put forward by the US "are the same as seven years ago" although, she said, "the situation has changed profoundly, political tensions have receded, and UNESCO today constitutes a rare forum for consensus on concrete and action-oriented multilateralism". Washington's claims "contradict the reality of UNESCO's efforts", she added, "especially in the field of Holocaust education and the fight against antisemitism". The source at UNESCO described the US move as "purely political, without any real factual base". The organisation had already been "forced" to do without US money for several years after the 2017 departure, the source told AFP. UNESCO adapted but new sources of funding would still need to be found, the source said. - 'Always welcome' - Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar said he welcomed the US decision. "This is a necessary step, designed to promote justice and Israel's right for fair treatment in the UN system," he said on X. French President Emmanuel Macron meanwhile said, also on X, that UNESCO had his "unwavering support" that would not weaken after the US departure. The UN organisation describes its mission as promoting education, scientific cooperation and cultural understanding. It oversees a list of heritage sites aimed at preserving unique environmental and architectural gems, ranging from Australia's Great Barrier Reef and the Serengeti in Tanzania to the Athens Acropolis and Pyramids of Egypt. The UNESCO source said that the US will continue to be represented on the world heritage committee even after leaving the organisation formally, just as it had in 2017. Trump was not the first to pull the United States out of UNESCO. President Ronald Reagan ended US membership in the 1980s, saying the agency was corrupt and pro-Soviet. The United States reentered under the presidency of George W. Bush. The American return under Biden was a major success for Azoulay, who became UNESCO chief in 2017, also because it included a pledge to pay back the US's contribution arrears to the tune of $619 million. On Tuesday, Azoulay said the US could always return to the fold in the future. "The United States of America is and always will be welcome," she said. burs-jh/as/dc Originally published as US to leave UN cultural body, citing 'national interest'
Perth Now
9 hours ago
- Perth Now
Protester's fears for vision after arrest
Greens candidate Hannah Thomas has revealed new details about the moment she was seriously injured while being arrested during an anti-Israel protest. Ms Thomas said she didn't know how much vision – if any – she'd be able to recover after the incident left her with a serious injury to her eye. She had been was protesting outside SEC Plating in Belmore, Sydney on Friday June 27 when she was involved in an altercation with NSW Police. 'It all happened very fast,' Ms Thomas told 10 News+ on Tuesday. 'I remember feeling that impact to my head and just thinking, 'oh my God, what was that'? 'I just could not believe that I'd been punched. That level of force to my head. I just totally did not see it coming. Then I was dragged away to another point.' Hannah Thomas was arrested during an anti-Israel protest. Credit: Supplied Former greens candidate Hannah Thomas after a protest in Belmore, Sydney. Supplied Credit: Supplied She said she then became worried about the injury to her eye. 'At that point I realised the extent, just because of the throbbing, and I was like, 'oh my face just does not feel normal',' she said. 'I think at that point I was already like, 'oh my God, I think my sight might be affected'.' Protesters claim SEC Plating provides components used in a class of jets operated by the Israeli Defence Force, these claims are strongly denied by the company. Ms Thomas denied doing anything to provoke the incident such as lashing out or spitting at officers and said the road to recovery remained a daunting prospect. 'Just complete shock. I think that I would have never expected that morning when I went to the protest, that would have been the outcome,' she said. 'Even if I don't lose the eye, I don't know how much vision I'm getting back. I won't know for some months because I'll have at least one more surgery.' Hannah Thomas has revealed new details after she was seriously injured while being arrested at an anti-Israel protest. Channel 10 Credit: Channel 10 Ms Thomas stood against the Prime Minister in his Sydney seat of Grayndler at the election earlier this year. Although unsuccessful, she is now employed as a media officer for the Greens party. 'I can't look at a screen for too long at the moment, I don't know what happens with my career because of this injury,' she said. Ms Thomas disagreed with the idea that by refusing move on orders from the police the protesters were putting themselves at risk and said real change was needed to prohibit similar incidents from occurring. 'I mean, I would disagree. I think protest is a fundamental right. And I think what makes us unsafe at protests are police. '[I would like to see] the charges against me dropped and I would like the officers involved to be charged and taken off duty. 'I think the level of violence towards protesters at the moment is escalated, and it's because [of the] anti-protest laws, which has really licensed police to crack down. 'I think if nothing changes, there'll be more injuries.' A critical incident team is investigating the circumstances surrounding the incident, and will be reviewed by the Professional Standards Command and oversighted by the LECC. Ms Thomas is due in court over the protest on August 12.
West Australian
14 hours ago
- West Australian
Middle East unrest: On the supply of aid to Gaza, Australia sides with Hamas over Israel
Overnight, Penny Wong and 27 other foreign ministers condemned Israel over shortages of food and water in the Gaza Strip so severe that Palestinians brave gunfire to save themselves and their families from starvation. The Gazans' plight is an outrage against humanity. But it might be fair to ask whether Ms Wong and her counterparts are playing into a analysis of the conflict between Israel and its Muslim opponents that ignores a truth so obvious it should not need to be stated: Hamas can end a war it started at any time. The lopsided approach is not only due to the enormous public pressure generated by haunting images of malnourished children. It acknowledges the reality of diplomatic influence. Hamas, a terrorist organisation that celebrates the murder of Jews, is almost immune to international public opinion. Israel would struggle to survive without US military aid and relies on less-visible support from the rest of the Western world. Hamas, fighting a last-ditch effort to survive in Gaza, was delighted by the Western gesture of support against what it calls the 'fascist occupation government'. Israel's 'criminal goal' it said, was 'killing and humiliating Palestinians'. That characterisation of Israel is shared by hundreds of protesters who gathered on the Parliament House forecourt in Canberra on Tuesday. The Australian government's rhetorical support did not satisfy them. They want a full break in diplomatic ties with Israel and sanctions against its leading ministers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Some held signs that said: 'Albo - Wong Accessories to Genocide'. Israel's failure to provide the basics of life to Gaza is one of the terrible consequences of a war it did not start. The Israeli government decided it would no longer work with the United Nations food distribution network because the aid, it said, was falling under Hamas's control. Israel set up its own system, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which isn't functioning properly. A Wall Street Journal reporter last Tuesday watched food being issued at Khan Younis in the south of the strip. Thousands of Palestinians surged forward when a barbed-wire fence was opened to an aid centre. American security contractors tried to keep control but couldn't hold back the crowd. As gunshots rang out, the food was looted in 15 minutes of chaos. The reporter couldn't work out who was shooting, but wrote that the aid workers rely on Israeli soldiers for protection. That places hungry Palestinian men in proximity of nervous armed Israeli soldiers, who don't have non-lethal arms to protect themselves against perceived threats. Ms Wong and the other foreign ministers wrote that over 800 Palestinians have died seeking aid. The figure comes from Hamas officials and is disputed by Israel. The situation is exacerbated by the refusal of Mr Netanyahu's right-wing government to allow a new government to emerge in Gaza. With their agreement, the Palestinian Authority could return from the West Bank or non-Hamas Gazans could take power. Instead, the territory is left in anarchy while Israel tries to eradicate Hamas and find the 20 hostages estimated to have survived 715 days in captivity. 'We control Gaza,' former prime minister Ehud Olmert told the New York Times. 'It's incumbent upon us to make sure that the proper arrangements are made.' While disappointed in Ms Wong's position, Australian Jewish leaders also expressed concerns about the lack of food in Gaza. At the same time, they believe Hamas has to lose its control over the strip's food supply to be properly defeated. 'I share the government's concern about the delivery of aid and humanitarian suffering in Gaza,' Zionist Federation of Australia president Jeremy Leibler said on Tuesday. 'The practical reality is that Hamas hijacks aid and uses it to extort its own people. Hamas intentionally interferes with alternative aid delivery mechanism for this very reason – it is their last remaining leverage.' Israel deserves criticism. But too many critics in Australia and elsewhere refuse to acknowledge the Jewish state has rights too, including to defend itself. By emphasising the actions of one side, the critics oversimplify a complex conflict and contribute to an environment in which self-righteous activists feel emboldened to harass Jews, including some of those leaders willing to accept their opponents' arguments.
