
Land-filling in Tillari command area: TCP dept gets HC notice
The high court of Bombay at Goa on Wednesday called for responses from govt authorities in a PIL related to the illegal filling of low-lying paddy fields in the Tillari Irrigation Project command area at Calangute.The PIL challenges the validity of the Goa Town and Country Planning (Composition of Offences) Rules, 2022, and the compounding order passed by the department in Feb this year, where the department compounded the illegal land-filling .The petitioner, Vinal Diulkar, submitted to the high court that despite the illegal land-filling, the TCP board proceeded to compound the illegality without conducting a site inspection and without following procedure, which is evidence that compounding rules are being misused.Diulkar, who resides just one kilometre away from the illegal construction, submitted to the high court that the paddy fields belong to the comunidade of Calangute and its tenants, and that the affected area falls under the command area that is protected under the Goa Command Area Development Act, 1997, and Rules, 1999.The Feb compounding order was issued despite land-filling occurring to a depth of over 1.5m, three times the permissible limit of 50cm under Section 17A provisions, he submitted.Diulkar submitted that there was no finding in the compounding order regarding the depth of land-filling at the site, which would impact deciding the severity of the offence sought to be compounded.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
SC's verdict on street dogs generates more questions than answers, provides no solutions
The growing number of street dogs in the country, especially in big cities, threatens to rupture, for many, the traditional unanimity on canines being best friends of humans. Stray dogs continue to be cared for by a large, and often vocal, section of the population. But as the animal adapted to the modern urban ecosystem, many people started to regard it as a menace. If animal welfare groups reiterated the dog's traditional ecological roles — as protector, scavenger and predator that keeps pests in check — the arguments of their critics have also been unassailable. Government records show 37 lakh dog bite cases across the country in 2024. The street dog has come to be seen as a public health risk, a carrier of rabies, and a threat to the safety of children, the elderly and working-class people, especially those who work near garbage dumps. So, when the Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of the matter last month, after a child died of rabies in Delhi, expectations were raised that the two-judge Bench would take a measured view to help resolve an ecological predicament that tends to ignite passions. However, its order, issued on Monday, generates more questions than answers. The SC has ordered civic authorities in Delhi to move eight lakh dogs from the streets. It has asked them to start work on shelters for 5,000-6,000 dogs in six to eight weeks. By all accounts, that will be a tough ask in a city where resource constraints and lack of executive will have made the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules — they mandate in situ sterilisation and vaccination of stray dogs — a virtual non-starter. The costs of building such centres, acquiring land, and training professionals to look after the animals were apparently not serious concerns for the Bench. 'How to do it is for the authorities to look into,' it said. At least two SC verdicts have upheld the ABC Rules. Its critics, however, complain that these rules get in the way of public safety. By engaging with such arguments, analysing its earlier verdicts and giving a patient hearing to the ABC supporters, the Court could have paved the way for a less polarised debate — and ultimately laid the ground for more effective street dog management protocols. It also did not cast its eye on glaring data discrepancies on annual rabies cases in the country — 20,000, according to the WHO; about 50, according to government replies in Parliament. The Bench, instead, chose to dismiss the ABC Rules summarily. The furore following the verdict suggests that the Court may have stoked many more fires than it extinguished.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
40 protestors detained for marching towards Parliament, let off
At least 40 people were detained on Tuesday afternoon after a group of dog lovers gathered near the Hanuman Mandir at Delhi's Connaught Place to protest against the Supreme Court order directing removal of all stray dogs from the streets of Delhi-NCR. This is the second day in a row that animal activists have been detained for protesting against the order. Protestors were detained at Civil Lines police station and Model Town police station on Tuesday after they allegedly began marching towards the Parliament. They were subsequently released around 7-8 pm, said police, adding that no case has been registered so far. Police said Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) has been imposed near Parliament, and no gathering is allowed ahead of Independence Day and during the House's ongoing Monsoon Session. The Delhi Police had earlier detained and later booked 27 people late Monday for holding a protest earlier in the day against the SC order. A group of animal rights activists had given a call for a protest at Kartavya Path on Monday evening. 'We want the dogs to be protected. There are no shelter homes to accommodate so many dogs. In the end, they will throw all the dogs outside Delhi, where they will die,' a caregiver told mediapersons while being escorted away by the police. 'As many as 27 people who gathered at Kartavya Path to protest were detained on Monday evening. They were later booked for violating the prohibitory orders under Section 223 (offense of disobedience to an order duly promulgated by a public servant) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita at Kartavya Path police station,' an officer said, adding that those booked did not take permission to hold the protest. In Gurgaon, a peaceful demonstration was held at Galleria Market on Tuesday evening to protest SC order. Dozens showed up despite it being a weekday, said participants. Sapna Dutt (63), a Gurgaon-based yoga teacher, who was at the protest, said, 'We don't want animals on the streets, even dogs don't want to be on the roads. Mass sterilisations should have been held decades ago, but it wasn't done.' Sudhir Sachdeva (53), founder of Delhi-based Stand for Animals told The Indian Express, 'The centres identified in NCR will not be sufficient. If correct measures towards vaccination and sterilisation are taken, rabies and overpopulation of stray dogs can be contained. But this order of removing them from the streets is not right, and not as per law (ABC rules).'


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Four PCS officers promoted to IAS rank
The Union ministry of personnel on Tuesday promoted four Punjab Civil Services (PCS) officers as Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers. These officers are Rajdeep Singh Brar, Bikramjit Singh Shergill, Harsuhinder Singh Brar and Rubinderjit Singh Brar. The promoted police officers with Punjab chief minister Bhagwant Mann. (HT) The appointments, made under the provisions of the IAS (Recruitment) Rules, 1954, and IAS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955, will be on probation until further orders. These are subject to the outcome of pending cases before the Punjab and Haryana high court and the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Chandigarh Bench. 9 PPS officers elevated to IPS At least nine Punjab Police Service (PPS) officers have also been promoted to the Indian Police Service (IPS) cadre. The list of promoted officers includes Mandhir Singh, Snehdeep Sharma, Sandeep Goel, Jasdev Singh Sidhu, Sandeep Kumar Sharma, Gurpreet Singh, Rupinder Singh, Sarabjit Singh and Harpreet Singh Jaggi. The promoted officers on Tuesday called on Punjab chief minister Bhagwant Mann, who congratulated them on their well-deserved elevation. The chief minister praised their dedication and service to the state, expressing confidence that they would continue to uphold the highest standards of policing.