Brinsley man jailed over 'extreme' assault on woman
Warning - this article contains distressing content.On the day of the attack, Kelham stamped on and kicked his victim's head several times after punching her and pulling her on to the landing by her hair.The woman managed to run outside to get help, but Kelham chased her, police said, and threw her to the ground before kicking her in the head twice.Officers arrived minutes later, by which time Kelham had already posted about what he had done on social media and fled in a car.
'Cowardly and disgraceful'
After ramming a police car to make his escape, Kelham's vehicle was spotted by officers in Derbyshire later that day and he was arrested.Det Sgt Parminder Ahluwalia said Kelham "deserves" his prison sentence."His decision to subject his victim to the extreme and prolonged assault he did that morning was cowardly and disgraceful," she said."In contrast to Kelham's cowardly behaviour, the victim deserves immense credit for the strength and bravery she's shown in helping us lock him up."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Only a quarter of those found with cannabis are charged by police as forces are accused of going soft on 'war on drugs'
Police forces have been accused of going soft on cannabis after figures revealed three in four people caught with the drug last year were let off with an informal warning. Data shows that despite 68,513 people being found in possession of cannabis, only 17,000 were charged. The rest were largely subject to a 'community resolution', which does not go on an individual's criminal record and, in most cases, simply means a warning not to do it again. The maximum penalty for possession of cannabis, which is in the same category as amphetamines, ketamine and 'date rape' drug GHB – is five years in prison or an unlimited fine. Last week, 14 police and crime commissioners called on policing minister Dame Diana Johnson MP to upgrade cannabis to a class A drug and said it was more harmful to society than heroin. They also hit out at Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan 's backing for the decriminalisation of possession of small amounts of the drug. The latest figures, which are from a Freedom of Information request and are based on a 12-month period up to September 2024, show a wide discrepancy between police forces. Avon and Somerset have the most robust approach, charging almost four in five people it caught last year, but Thames Valley and Hampshire charged only one in eight. The 14 police and crime commissioners also hit out at Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan's (pictured left) backing for the decriminalisation of possession of small amounts of the drug In Wales, Dyfed-Powys charged just 8.6 per cent, while North Wales and South Wales forces took action against more than half. The Metropolitan Police charged 2,929 and gave out-of-court sanctions to 11,057. Overall, 51,495 people caught with cannabis last year did not face court. Of those, 44,482 were dealt with via a community resolution, 3,619 were given a caution, 1,008 received an official warning and 2,386 were given an on-the-spot fine. Avon and Somerset's former police and crime commissioner Mark Shelford said Sir Sadiq's call to decriminalise possession of small quantities was 'extremely foolish and dangerous', and accused him of 'pandering to a certain group in society who think this is cool and does no harm'. Devon and Cornwall Police and Crime Commissioner Alison Hernandez said cannabis decriminalisation had proved a 'dangerous social experiment' elsewhere in the world. Kevin Moore, ex-head of Sussex CID, described variations in charging rates as 'two-tier justice', and said many forces are 'in all likelihood' influenced by past sentencing and feel putting offenders before a court 'is a waste of everyone's time'. Dyfed-Powys attributed its low charge rate to a 'policy to expand the number referred to treatment via an adult community resolution'.
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
French police deploy their latest weapon in the fight against small boat smugglers... days after gendarmes began slashing dinghies with knives
French police are reportedly using jet skis to deploy nets in the sea to in an attempt to deter small boats crossing the English Channel. The new tactic comes just days after footage emerged of French officers using a knife to slash a dinghy packed with migrants before dragging the deflated vessel back to dry land. It is thought that dropping the nets in shallow water will jam the propeller of any small boats in the vicinity and bring them to a halt. The Sun reported that both this measure, and the move to puncture the boat on Friday, are trial methods in an attempt to crack down on the number of migrants reaching the UK. Emmanuel Macron will visit Sir Keir Starmer this coming week and the newspaper says the French President will outline these methods as a strategy to stop the small boats on Thursday. This will soon reportedly become routine for officers rather than being trialled - possibly signalling early success. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Over the last few months, we have been working together on new ways to crackdown on the criminal gang operations, with the French now bringing in important new tactics to stop boats that are in the water. 'We need to stop at nothing to boost our border security.' Former Home Secretary Priti Patel first suggested the idea of using UK border guards on jet skis to physically stop migrant boats. She had wanted Border Force to mimic tactics used by the Greek Navy, which has physically pushed boats trying to cross the Aegean back into Turkish waters. The UK plan mooted in 2020 and 2021 saw officials learning how to redirect migrants back to French waters using high-powered armoured 'personal water craft '. But the pushback plan was cancelled in 2022 before a High Court legal challenge. The PCS union, which represents Border Force staff, had also threatened to strike. The latest methods to puncture the boats now implemented by French police - which were aired by the BBC - comes after the force previously said French law prevented them from interfering with boats more than 10 feet from the coast. That rule is in the process of being scrapped, but some officers appeared to be acting early, prompting anger from refugee charities. Number 10 hailed the actions of French cops on Friday as a 'significant moment' that could have 'a major impact' on smuggling gangs. Downing Street said the change in stance from French law enforcement was thanks to the Prime Minister's 'reset' in relations with Europe, as he has looked to heal the wounds caused by the Brexit years. A spokesman said: 'No government has been able to get this level of cooperation with the French. That is important. 'We are looking to see France change its maritime tactics, and that is down to the Prime Minister's efforts to reset our relationship across Europe.' Kate O'Neill, advocacy coordinator at Project Play, said: 'This is not a new tactic… it's something that has been happening for a long time in Calais and surrounding areas.' She also warned it was a 'dangerous' tactic as children were 'often in the middle of the boats'. Ms O'Neill added: 'The events taking place in the BBC coverage are not only upsetting to watch, but show clear evidence of police officers endangering a child.' She added: 'While talks are ongoing to allow the interception of boats in shallow water, it remains illegal at this time under maritime law and violates the obligations of the UK and France under international law – including the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. 'This footage highlights the danger involved in intercepting and slashing boats in the water, and we implore decision makers to consider the potentially fatal consequences of allowing this to take place even more frequently.' A total of 517 people crossed the Channel across eight boats yesterday - bringing the annual total to 21,117.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE 'Devastated' couple who spent £45k inheritance on building illegal log cabin in national park say they were 'led in blind' after council orders them to demolish it
A couple who cleared out their retirement savings to build an illegal off-grid cabin in one of Britain's most protected national parks say they are 'devastated' after planners ordered they knock it down. Andrew and Debbie Melbourne insist they knew 'nothing' and were 'led in blind' about planning laws preventing the construction of their 1,200 sq ft fully insulated spruce cabin which boasts stunning views over the South Downs. Following a complex planning investigation and abject fury from neighbours, the couple were pursued through the courts and now have two months to knock the vast single-storey structure down or face jail. Speaking to MailOnline at their now partially-dismantled cabin near Waterlooville, in Hampshire, Debbie broke down in tears as she said: 'It would have allowed us to foresee our dream. It was something for our boys and a legacy. 'Normal people like us don't know the laws of the land. At no point ever were we told about Article 4 restrictions or that this was in the national park.' Andrew, 56, a former music teacher, added: 'We were led in blind basically. It's absolutely devastating, we spent two years researching what we could and couldn't put on the land. 'There were no disclosures that we were on the South Downs National Park. If we'd known we wouldn't have bought it. Absolutely I regret it, I wouldn't have done it, I've lost all my inheritance through this. 'We've had loads of grief from the council, lies from the council. Half a dozen people up on the other side don't like what we're doing. I was a teacher in the area and they just want to discredit my name.' The couple purchased their half-acre plot on land off Lovedean Lane last year for around £20,000 before buying a German-made prefabricated log cabin online for £25,000. The site is one of over 80 individual plots on a controversial land banking scheme owned by Gladwish Land Sales, who once had their name emblazoned across a whopping 31 Non-League football teams and courted criticism in the early noughties through their fan-targeted matchday programme ads. The concept sees developers buy a field before dividing it into smaller parcels and selling those off to buyers who are often told they will get planning in the future which may not be granted. Andrew said he had never heard of land banking before and said he bought the land privately from the vendor. The dad-of-two, who plays the trombone in local Ska and Jazz bands, insists there were no disclosures on the plot being inside a National Park or it being subject to an Article 4, which removes permitted development rights which allow certain types of minor building works to take place. 'We had no idea we couldn't do anything on this land, we had no idea it was part of the South Downs National Park, the maps are quite ambiguous, they are not very clear,' Andrew added. A quick Google search of the South Downs National Park boundaries takes you to an interactive map titled 'Do I live in the National Park?', it shows the Melbournes' plot inside the boundary. Building began without planning permission in April last year and saw the couple level a vast area at the top of their plot where the cabin now sits. Andrew reckons they removed well over ten tons of mostly chalk soil. 'The whole idea was to start up a community garden, we wanted to put in the lodge so people could use it while working here,' Andrew claims. The cabin was up in five months and the couple say it would have been totally off-grid featuring a kitchen, office space, shower rooms, living quarters and a compostable toilet with its own on-site water supply. Despite the facilities to make the cabin habitable, the couple, who have lived in the area for 35 years, claim they had no intention of living in it. As the project progressed, trees were cut down and a garden which slopes down the hill towards a bridleway was created. Trees, shrubs and bushes were planted with the intention of creating a Japanese 'miyawaki forest' that would grow quickly into a miniature dense woodland. A road leading from an entrance gate up the side of the hill and to the cabin was also carved into the hillside without planning permission. It didn't take long before planners from East Hampshire District Council and the South Downs National Park Authority began issuing warnings and notices. Between September 2024 and February 2025 officers served a Planning Contravention Notice, two Enforcement Notices and a Stop Notice to the Melbournes. Despite multiple warnings, the couple 'ploughed on regardless', as one exasperated neighbour who looks out on to the 'eyesore' cabin, said. That neighbour, along with several others, had watched the 'upsetting' project unfold from their homes on Glamorgan Road, which overlooks the Melbournes cabin plot from an opposing hillside, and decided to take action. They added: 'We saw them clearing the site with a mini digger and thought, hang on? On the one hand they're claiming the land is for eco purposes and bee farming but then they're pulling down trees during nesting season. 'Every morning I make a cup of coffee, I look at that, I go to my office, I get up to get something, I look at that. I can't avoid it. 'They had a chance to engage in a process but they've just ploughed on regardless of the planning enforcement notices. Anyone in their right mind would have sought legal advice.' Another neighbour on the road said: 'The thing that galled us was that they were constantly ignoring the law, advice and notices they were issued. 'They could have gone to any one of the authorities for proper advice and they chose not to. 'Every time somebody spoke to them and tried to get to the bottom of what they were doing they seemed to change their story.' One lady who wished to remain anonymous alleged the couple had objected to people walking along the bridleway past the cabin. 'He's obviously tried to do that to stop people looking at what he's doing,' she claimed. Despite some objections, one local carpenter said he didn't think the cabin was that bad, noting: 'It blends into the landscape doesn't it? It's natural isn't it? But they didn't have planning, unfortunately.' The cabin was 80 per cent finished in May when the Melbournes, threatened with a High Court hearing in June, signed a legally binding contract agreeing to remove the building. As part of the agreement they were ordered to remove all materials, gates, fences and other forms of development, including the groundworks and paths they'd carved out of the landscape and return the site to its original condition. They were slapped with a £3,500 fine by East Hampshire District Council and told the cabin must be gone in 56 days or face a custodial sentence. The couple are in the process of dismantling the cabin and have already removed the roof and flooring. The Melbournes reckon they have lost well over £50,000 on the project and get emotional when asked about their next move. 'It was something for our boys and a legacy, it would've been great for our grandson,' says Debbie, as she wipes away tears after struggling to comprehend the situation. She added: 'We have got no savings left now, we invested in something we thought would be good for the community. It's been a complete nightmare. The plot is going on the market this week. 'We will recoup some money and maybe find another piece of land that's not in a national park.' Andrew added: 'We were going to retire but it's all gone sour.' Councillor Angela Glass, EHDC's Portfolio Holder for Planning and Enforcement, said: 'We are delighted this legal agreement has been signed and we now expect the development to be cleared over the next couple of months. 'This is the culmination of many months of complex legal and enforcement work by our determined team of officers to reach this position. 'I want residents to understand that if people breach planning rules, then we have the means to take action against them.' Councillor Sara Schillemore, the local ward councillor for Catherington, said: 'Residents were appalled to see this unsightly structure being erected in one of the most picturesque and valuable viewpoints in East Hampshire. 'It's vitally important that we protect our precious landscape and residents will be thrilled to see the development removed. East Hampshire Enforcement Officers worked hard for many months to achieve this result, and I sincerely thank them.' Tim Slaney, Director of Planning at the South Downs National Park Authority, said: 'I'm delighted we've reached a resolution to this breach of planning that was harming this wonderful nationally-designated landscape. 'I would like to thank East Hampshire District Council which pursued this enforcement case with determination, making it clear we will not tolerate blatant breaches of planning.' The agreement sets out a 56-day deadline to carry out the work. Failure to comply with this type of legal agreement can lead to enforcement proceedings in the High Court which can lead to costly legal fees and even a custodial sentence.
