Smartphones banned from schools in Afghan Taliban's heartland
AFGHANISTAN: A ban on smartphones in schools issued by Taliban authorities in southern Afghanistan came into force, students and teachers confirmed to AFP on Wednesday, over concerns of 'focus' and 'Islamic law'.
The directive by the provincial Education Department in Kandahar applies to students, teachers and administrative staff in schools and religious schools.
'This decision has been made to ensure educational discipline, focus', the statement said, adding that it was taken from a 'sharia perspective' and that smartphones contribute to 'the destruction of the future generation'.
The policy, which has already taken effect in schools across the province, has divided opinion among teachers and students.
'We did not bring smart phones with us to school today', Saeed Ahmad, a 22-year-old teacher, told AFP.
'I think this is a good decision so that there is more focus on studies,' he added.
Mohammad Anwar, an 11th grader, said 'the teachers are saying if anyone is seen bringing a phone, they will start searching the students.'
Afghan Taliban commander issues warning to TTP
Another 12th-grade student, refusing to give his name, said the ban would hinder learning in a country where girls are barred from secondary school and university as part of restrictions the UN has dubbed 'gender apartheid'.
'When the teacher writes a lesson on the board, I often take a picture so I could write it down later. Now I can't. This decision will negatively affect our studies.'
'Complete ban'
The ban has also taken root in religious schools known as madrassas.
'Now there's a complete ban. No one brings smartphones anymore,' Mohammad, 19 years old madrassa student said.
A number of countries have in recent years moved to restrict mobile phones from classrooms such as France, Denmark and Brazil.
The Taliban authorities have already introduced a ban on images of living beings in media, with multiple provinces announcing restrictions and some Taliban officials refusing to be photographed or filmed.
The Taliban's Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada called last week on officials and scholars to reduce their use of smartphones.
Russia accepts Taliban's nominated ambassador to Moscow
'This is the order of the leaders, and we must accept it,' a 28-year-old security forces member told AFP without giving his name as he was not authorized to speak to the media.
'I have now found a brick phone … I used WhatsApp on my smartphone sometimes, but now I don't use it anymore,' he added.
Some Taliban officials in Kandahar have started sharing their numbers for brick phones and switching off online messaging apps.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
A shared horizon: why Pak-Afghan ties matter
Listen to article Few bilateral relationships in South Asia are as deeply rooted and strategically consequential as those between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Shaped by centuries of interconnected history, overlapping ethnicities and geographic proximity, this bond remains vital not only to the futures of both nations, but to the collective peace and prosperity of the region. Pakistan's approach to Afghanistan has long been guided by a clear strategic principle: peace and stability in one country is essential to the sustainability of the other. From shared borders and interwoven tribes to economic dependencies and cultural affinities, the relationship transcends mere diplomacy. Pashtuns, Hazaras and other ethnic groups straddle both sides of the Durand Line, reinforcing the reality that these are not just neighboring states, but are socially and historically intertwined societies. While international discourse on Afghanistan tends to oscillate between periods of intense focus and indifference, Pakistan's engagement has remained steady. It has pursued dialogue with every Afghan government, irrespective of political orientation, rooted in a belief that only Afghan-led, Afghan-owned peace can yield durable stability. Even amid setbacks and strained moments, Pakistan has consistently chosen constructive diplomacy over provocation, acting from the perspective of regional responsibility rather than tactical convenience. One of the most tangible manifestations of this consistency lies in Pakistan's long-standing humanitarian commitment. For more than four decades, Pakistan has hosted over four million Afghan refugees — many of whom have integrated into local communities, contributing to society and shaping generations of diaspora identity. This effort is one of the largest and most enduring refugee-hosting initiatives in modern history and is a testament to the depth of Pakistan's social resilience and regional empathy. Critically, this refuge has been more than shelter — it has been an investment in people. Over 100,000 Afghan students have graduated from Pakistani institutions, and more than 7,000 are currently enrolled in universities across the country. The Allama Iqbal Scholarship initiative and dozens of school-level programmes have widened access to education, especially for Afghan girls. Many of these graduates now serve as civil servants, doctors, entrepreneurs and educators in Afghanistan, applying skills they acquired across the border. Pakistan's support is also visible inside Afghanistan itself. Institutions such as the Liaquat Ali Khan Engineering Faculty in Balkh, Rehman Baba School in Kabul, and healthcare facilities like Jinnah Hospital and the Nishtar Kidney Centre reflect long-term, needs-based investments. These projects are not mere diplomacy by brick and mortar, they are foundations of development that serve Afghan society daily. Infrastructure cooperation has emerged as a central pillar of Pakistan's regional strategy. The Torkham-Jalalabad highway, internal road systems in Nangarhar, and the Chaman-Spin Boldak and Peshawar-Jalalabad railway carriageways aim to transform Afghanistan from a landlocked buffer zone into a connective hub. With links to Central Asia, the Gulf and South Asia, Afghanistan's geostrategic value can only be realised through regional cooperation; and Pakistan is prepared to support that transformation. That said, the relationship has not been free of strain. Historical tensions, amplified by shifting alliances and India's influence in Afghan politics, have at times sowed mistrust. However, even when faced with hostile rhetoric and misinformation, Pakistan has not walked away from engagement Pakistan's response to the events of August 2021, when the Afghan government collapsed and a new political order emerged, further reinforced its commitment. While many Western nations reneged on promises to rebuild Afghanistan, Pakistan refused to balk out and kept acting in good faith. Beyond individual policies and initiatives lies an essential truth: for South and Central Asia to realise their collective potential, Afghanistan must be brought into the regional fold. Be it through trade corridors, energy transit lines or counterterrorism coordination, a peaceful and integrated Afghanistan benefits every stakeholder. However, to realise that vision, both countries must commit not only to cooperation, but to trust-building. The future of bilateral relations lies not just in high-level visits or official declarations, but in robust people-to-people diplomacy. Academic exchanges, youth collaborations, cultural forums and decentralised trade. It is also essential for the international community to engage with this relationship with nuance and depth. Too often, global actors view Afghanistan through short-term security lenses, ignoring the subtleties of regional dynamics. Ultimately, Pakistan cannot resolve every challenge Kabul faces. Nor can it dictate the course of Afghan politics. But what it can do — and has done — is to remain a constant: a consistent, empathetic and regionally grounded partner. In today's geopolitical terrain, where alliances are transactional and interests fleeting, this reliability carries immense value. Pakistan and Afghanistan are more than neighbours. They are linked by history, kinship and shared trials. As both countries navigate turbulent times and shifting alliances, they must resist the temptation to retreat into suspicion. Instead, they must recognise that no enduring regional peace is possible without their cooperation — and that true partnership is not a matter of strategy alone, but of shared destiny. The real question is not whether the Pak-Afghan ties matter. The real question is whether both nations — and their allies — are ready to nurture these ties with the long-term seriousness they deserve.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Trump says Iranians reached out but it's 'very late to be talking'
US President Donald Trump gestures after returning early from the G7 Leaders' Summit in Canada, at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, US, June 17, 2025. Photo: Reuters Listen to article US President Donald Trump said he was considering Wednesday whether the United States will join Israeli strikes on Iran and said that Tehran had reached out to seek negotiations on ending the conflict. Speaking as he watched installation of a new flagpole at the White House, Trump added that his patience "had already run out" with Iran and repeated his call for the Islamic republic's "unconditional surrender." "I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do," Trump told reporters on the South Lawn when asked if he had decided whether to launch US air strikes. "I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate." Read More: PM Shehbaz terms Iran-Israel conflict threat to regional, global peace Trump said Iran had even suggested sending officials to the White House for talks on Tehran's nuclear program in a bid to end Israel's air assault, but added that it was "very late." "I said it's very late to be talking. We may meet. There's a big difference between now and a week ago, right? Big difference," Trump added. "They've suggested that they come to the White House. That's, you know, courageous, but it's, like, not easy for them to do." When asked if it was too late for negotiations, he said: "Nothing is too late." Trump had favored diplomatic route to end Iran's nuclear program, seeking a deal to replace the one he tore up in his first term in 2018. But since Israel launched strikes on Iran six days ago Trump has moved in behind the key US ally and is now weighing whether to use US military power against Tehran too. Trump issued a series of bellicose statements on social media on Tuesday, saying that Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was an "easy target" and calling for Iran's "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!". Asked on Wednesday what he meant by his earlier statement, Trump replied: "Two very simple words. It's very simple -- unconditional surrender." "That means I've had it, okay? I've had it. I give up, no more, we go and blow up all the nuclear stuff that's all over the place," Trump said. Trump meanwhile backed Prime Minister Benjamin Netahyahu to continue Israel's offensive against Iran. Iran has hit back with salvos of ballistic missiles. Also Read: Field Marshal Asim Munir to meet US President Trump at White House Asked what he had told Netanyahu in a call on Tuesday, he said: "Keep going. I speak to him every day, he's a good man, doing a lot." The US president however rebuffed Russian President Vladimir Putin's offer to mediate in the Israel-Iran conflict, saying Russia should end its own war in Ukraine first. "He actually offered to help mediate, I said 'do me a favor, mediate your own. Let's mediate Russia first, okay? You can worry about this later," Trump said. Iran later denied it had offered to send officials to Washington. No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House. The only thing more despicable than his lies is his cowardly threat to 'take out' Iran's Supreme Leader. Iran does NOT negotiate under duress, shall NOT accept peace under duress, and certainly NOT… — Mission to UN, NY (@Iran_UN) June 18, 2025 "No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House," Iran's mission to the UN said in a post on X. "The only thing more despicable than his lies is his cowardly threat to "take out" Iran's Supreme Leader." The US military said it is "prepared to execute" any decision President Donald Trump might make on matters of war and peace, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Wednesday, even as he declined to confirm preparations of strike options on Iran. "If and when those decisions are made, the Department (of Defense) is prepared to execute them," Hegseth told the Senate Armed Services Committee Meanwhile, Iranians jammed the highways out of the capital Tehran fleeing from intensified Israeli airstrikes. Read More: Why is Iran's Fordow nuclear site in Israel's crosshairs? In the latest bombing, Israel said its air force destroyed the headquarters of Iran's internal security service. "As we promised - we will continue to strike at symbols of governance and hit the Ayatollah regime wherever it may be," Defence Minister Israel Katz said. The Iranian Red Crescent said Wednesday that an Israeli attack took place near its building in Tehran, on the sixth day of an air war between Iran and Israel, noting that the strike appeared to not be targeting the aid group. In a statement on its Telegram channel, the Red Crescent reporting an "attack by the Zionist regime near the Red Crescent Peace building." Earlier, Khamenei, 86, rebuked Trump in a recorded speech played on television, his first appearance since Friday. He warned the United States and Israel of 'irreparable damage' if they continue military provocations against the Islamic Republic. Khamenei said the Iranian nation 'will never be subdued' and that any attempt at foreign military intervention would be met with full force. He declared that Iran's armed forces are prepared to defend the country and enjoy the full backing of the government. 'The Zionist regime made a grave mistake and will face consequences,' Khamenei said, referring to recent violations of Iranian airspace. 'Iran will not forgive this breach and our people will not remain silent.' 🔴 Leader: Our nation will not forsake the blood of their martyrs, nor will they remain silent in the face of violations of their airspace. 🔴 Leader: The Zionist regime made a grave mistake and will face the consequences of its actions. — Press TV 🔻 (@PressTV) June 18, 2025 He added that Iran would respond with strength to both 'imposed war' and 'imposed peace', saying the nation would not bow to threats or coercion. 'The blood of our martyrs will not be forsaken,' he said, warning that wise leaders should avoid speaking to Iran 'in a threatening tone' as history shows the Iranian people resist domination. Regional tensions have escalated since Friday, when Israel launched airstrikes on multiple sites across Iran, including military and nuclear facilities, prompting Tehran to launch retaliatory strikes. Also Read: IRGC targets Mossad centre in Tel Aviv: Iranian media A Washington-based human rights organisation had reported Wednesday that the death toll from Israeli airstrikes across Tehran and other populated areas has risen to around 585 killed with at least 1,326 people injured since the attacks started last week. Israeli authorities said at least 24 people have been killed and 804 injured since Iranian missile attacks struck 40 different locations acrosss Israeli territory. IRGC launches 'advanced weapons' Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) earlier announced that the country had carried out fresh strikes on Israeli targets, utilising its newly developed Fattah-1 hypersonic missiles The IRGC's statement emphasised that the Fattah-1 missile had successfully penetrated Israeli air defense systems, delivering a powerful blow to the occupying regime. The missile's high speed and maneuverability reportedly allowed it to bypass advanced defense mechanisms, underscoring Iran's technological advancements in missile technology. The IRGC's statement concluded with a stern warning to Israel and its allies, indicating that any retaliatory actions would be met with decisive responses. Iran fired over 400 ballistic missiles and hundreds of drones since June 13, the Israeli Government Press Office said in a statement. Read More: Trump demands Tehran's 'unconditional surrender' as Israel-Iran air war continues The Iranian attacks resulted in over 40 confirmed impact sites, the office said, without specifying the exact locations. Israeli media confirmed that the latest salvoes set off air raid sirens across the country, including in the Tel Aviv region, where explosions and fires were witnessed. Simultaneously, explosions were also reported in Tehran and Karaj, located west of the capital. Iran's armed forces stated on June 17 that their air defense systems remain operational, tracking and intercepting 28 'hostile aircraft' within 24 hours, including a spy drone attempting to gather intelligence on 'sensitive' locations. These developments come in light of Trump declaring that the US now holds "complete and total control of the skies over Iran." Additional American fighter jets have reportedly been deployed to the Middle East as tensions surge.
Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Kandahar schools ban smartphones citing sharia and discipline
An Afghan money changer checks a smartphone at his foreign currency kiosk along a road in Kabul on June 18, 2025. Photo: AFP Listen to article A ban on smartphones in schools issued by Taliban authorities in southern Afghanistan came into force, students and teachers confirmed to AFP on Wednesday, over concerns of "focus" and "Islamic law". The directive by the provincial Education Department in Kandahar applies to students, teachers and administrative staff in schools and religious schools. "This decision has been made to ensure educational discipline, focus", the statement said, adding that it was taken from a "sharia perspective" and that smartphones contribute to "the destruction of the future generation". The policy, which has already taken effect in schools across the province, has divided opinion among teachers and students. Read More: Taliban ban windows to prevent women's 'exposure' "We did not bring smart phones with us to school today", Saeed Ahmad, a 22-year-old teacher, told AFP. "I think this is a good decision so that there is more focus on studies," he added. Mohammad Anwar, an 11th grader, said "the teachers are saying if anyone is seen bringing a phone, they will start searching the students." Another 12th-grade student, refusing to give his name, said the ban would hinder learning in a country where girls are barred from secondary school and university as part of restrictions the UN has dubbed "gender apartheid". "When the teacher writes a lesson on the board, I often take a picture so I could write it down later. Now I can't. This decision will negatively affect our studies." The ban has also taken root in religious schools known as madrassas. "Now there's a complete ban. No one brings smartphones anymore," Mohammad, 19 years old madrassa student said. A number of countries have in recent years moved to restrict mobile phones from classrooms such as France, Denmark and Brazil. Also Read: Senior Taliban official urges reversal of education ban on Afghan girls The Taliban authorities have already introduced a ban on images of living beings in media, with multiple provinces announcing restrictions and some Taliban officials refusing to be photographed or filmed. The Taliban's Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada called last week on officials and scholars to reduce their use of smartphones. "This is the order of the leaders, and we must accept it," a 28-year-old security forces member told AFP without giving his name as he was not authorized to speak to the media. "I have now found a brick phone ... I used WhatsApp on my smartphone sometimes, but now I don't use it anymore," he added. Some Taliban officials in Kandahar have started sharing their numbers for brick phones and switching off online messaging apps.
