logo
Israel army bulldozers plough through homes at West Bank camps

Israel army bulldozers plough through homes at West Bank camps

The Sun16 hours ago
TULKAREM: In the West Bank city of Tulkarem, the landscape has been transformed after Israeli army bulldozers ploughed through its two refugee camps in what the military called a hunt for Palestinian militants.
The army gave thousands of displaced residents just a few hours to retrieve belongings from their homes before demolishing buildings and clearing wide avenues through the rubble.
Now residents fear the clearances will erase not just buildings, but their own status as refugees from lands inhabited by generations of their ancestors in what is now Israel.
The 'right of return' to those lands, claimed by Palestinian refugees ever since the creation of Israel in 1948, remains one of the thorniest issues of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The army said it would demolish 104 more buildings in the Tulkarem camp this week in the latest stage of an operation that it launched in January during a truce in the Gaza war, billing it as an intensive crackdown on several camps that are strongholds of Palestinian armed groups fighting against Israel.
'We came back to the camp and found our house demolished. No one informed us, no one told us anything,' said Abd al-Rahman Ajaj, 62, who had been hoping to collect his belongings on Wednesday.
Born in Tulkarem camp after his parents fled what is now the Israeli city of Netanya, about 12 kilometres (seven miles) to the west, Ajaj said he had not foreseen the scale of the Israeli operation.
Thousands displaced
It began with a raid on the northern West Bank city of Jenin, a longtime stronghold of Palestinian militants, and quickly spread to other cities, including Tulkarem, displacing at least 40,000 people, according to UN figures.
Vacating the camp after a warning of a raid, 'we would usually come back two or three days later', Ajaj told AFP.
Now left without a house, he echoed the sentiments of Palestinians of his parents' generation, who thought their own displacement in 1948 would also be temporary.
'The last time, we left and never returned,' he said.
In Tulkarem, the Israeli army's bulldozers ploughed through the dense patchwork of narrow alleyways that had grown as Palestinian refugees settled in the area over the years.
Three wide arteries of concrete now streak the side of Tulkarem camp, allowing easy access for the army.
Piles of cinder blocks and concrete line the roadside like snowbanks after a plough's passage.
'Eliminate the refugee issue'
Ajaj said the destruction had been gradual, drawn out over the course of the operation, which the army has dubbed 'Iron Wall'.
Beyond the military value of wide access roads, many residents believe Israel is seeking to destroy the idea of the camps themselves, turning them into regular neighbourhoods of the cities they flank.
Residents fear this would threaten their refugee status and their 'right of return' to the land they or their forebears fled or were expelled from in 1948.
The current Israeli government -- and particularly some of its far-right ministers, who demand the outright annexation of the West Bank -- are firmly opposed to this demand, which they see as a demographic threat to Israel's survival as a Jewish state.
'The aim is clearly to erase the national symbolism of the refugee camp, to eliminate the refugee issue and the right of return,' said Suleiman al-Zuheiri, an advocate for residents of nearby Nur Shams, Tulkarem's other refugee camp, where he also lives.
Zuheiri's brother's house was destroyed last week by the bulldozers.
'The scene was painful and tragic because a house is not just walls and a roof. It holds memories, dreams, hopes and very important belongings that we couldn't retrieve,' he said.
Each demolished building housed at least six families on three floors, he added.
The land allocated to the camps was limited, so residents have had little choice but to build upwards to gain space, adding an extra storey with each new generation.
Explosions rock camp
Back at Tulkarem camp, 66-year-old Omar Owfi said he had managed to make two trips into the camp now occupied by Israeli soldiers to retrieve belongings on Wednesday.
He feared becoming homeless if his home was demolished.
'They don't care what the house is worth. All they care about is demolishing. We're the ones losing. We've lost everything,' he told AFP.
'They want to erase the camp -- to remove as many buildings as possible and leave just streets.'
He said he feared for his children and grandchildren, as they dispersed to live with various relatives.
The Israeli supreme court froze the military order for mass demolitions in Tulkarem camp on Thursday, giving the state two months to answer a petition against them, said the Palestinian human rights group Adalah, which filed it.
But the physical damage has already been done as the army's manhunt for militants continues.
As residents retrieved mattresses, wardrobes and air conditioning units from the camp on Wednesday under the surveillance of Israeli troops, gunshots rang out through the streets.
A loud explosion echoed across the city, followed by a column of dust rising as another building was apparently blown up, sending the smell of gunpowder wafting in the wind.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gaza's Popular Forces militia admits coordination with Israel, faces backlash
Gaza's Popular Forces militia admits coordination with Israel, faces backlash

New Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Gaza's Popular Forces militia admits coordination with Israel, faces backlash

GAZA CITY: The head of a Palestinian armed group opposed to Hamas and accused of aid looting in the Gaza Strip confirmed Sunday it was coordinating with the Israeli military in an interview with public radio. Yasser Abu Shabab said his group, known as the Popular Forces, was able to move freely in zones under Israeli military control and communicated their operations beforehand. "We keep them informed, but we carry out the military actions on our own," he said in an interview with Makan, Israel's Arabic-language public radio broadcaster. Abu Shabab also said his group had received "logistical and financial support from several parties", without mentioning Israel directly. "There are things we can't talk about publicly." Last month, the Israeli authorities admitted to providing support to armed Palestinian groups opposed to Hamas in Gaza, without naming them, though local media reports identified the group in question as Abu Shabab's. "It is only good, it is saving lives of Israeli soldiers," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said at the time. Knesset member and ex-defence minister Avigdor Lieberman, however, accused the government of "giving weapons to a group of criminals and felons." The European Council on Foreign Relations think tank describes Abu Shabab as the head of a criminal gang in the Rafah region of southern Gaza that has been suspected of looting aid trucks. Abu Shabab did not address the accusation in his radio interview, and stressed that the only goal of his militia was to defeat Hamas and to provide an alternative for governance in the Gaza Strip. "We do not belong to any ideology or political organisation," Abu Shabab said in the interview, adding that he was seeking to eradicate Hamas's "injustice" and "corruption." "We will continue to fight, no matter the bloodshed," he added. "Right now, Hamas is dying. They know their end is near." Abu Shabab has drawn the ire of Hamas, which has ruled over the Gaza Strip since 2007. On Wednesday, a Hamas military court gave him 10 days to turn himself in to be tried for treason, among other charges. On Sunday, a coalition of Palestinian clans accused the Popular Forces of "shamelessly collaborating with the enemy." "They are rejected by all our people," the coalition said in a statement.

Lula condemns Israel's actions in Gaza as 'genocide' at BRICS summit
Lula condemns Israel's actions in Gaza as 'genocide' at BRICS summit

New Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Lula condemns Israel's actions in Gaza as 'genocide' at BRICS summit

RIO DE JANEIRO: Brazil's president insisted the world must act to stop what he described as an Israeli "genocide" in Gaza, as leaders from 11 emerging BRICS nations gathered in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday. "We cannot remain indifferent to the genocide carried out by Israel in Gaza, the indiscriminate killing of innocent civilians and the use of hunger as a weapon of war," President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told leaders from China, India, and other nations. His comments came as Gaza truce talks between Israel and Hamas resumed in Doha, and as pressure mounted to end the 22-month war, which began with Hamas's Oct 7, 2023, attacks. Lula said Sunday that "absolutely nothing could justify the actions" of Hamas on that day – which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly Israeli civilians. But he also offered fierce criticism of Israel's subsequent actions. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed at least 57,418 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The United Nations considers the figures reliable. The BRICS gathering includes Israel's arch foe Iran, but also nations like Russia, which have close ties with the country. BRICS countries have been in disagreement over how strongly to denounce Israel's bombing of Iran and its actions in Gaza. But one diplomatic source said the text would give the "same message" that BRICS delivered last month. Then Iran's allies expressed "grave concern" about strikes against Iran, but did not explicitly mention Israel or the United States. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is due to visit the White House on Monday for talks with US President Donald Trump, who is pushing to end the war and has said he hopes for a ceasefire deal in the coming week.--AFP

Anwar in Paris: Recalibrating the terms of engagement
Anwar in Paris: Recalibrating the terms of engagement

New Straits Times

time7 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Anwar in Paris: Recalibrating the terms of engagement

IF the French were expecting a deferential guest, they did not get one. When Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim rose to speak at the Sorbonne on Friday, his address was both a nod to France's intellectual tradition and a measured challenge to its strategic assumptions. Woven with references to Sartre and Montesquieu, Camus and Tocqueville, and the Pirenne thesis to boot, it was a tour de force in intellectual diplomacy — at once appreciative and unsparing, gracious, yet audacious. The visit, the first by a Malaysian leader to France in 15 years, was a success by most diplomatic metrics. There were new Airbus orders, deeper energy cooperation with Petronas, joint ventures in AI and carbon capture, and warm nods to rising student exchanges. But the real significance lay in Anwar's message, and its subtext: Southeast Asia is done being spoken for, let alone spoken down to. If Europe wants to be present in the Indo-Pacific, it must learn to listen. Anwar is no stranger to rhetorical flourish. But behind it was a sharp proposition: Europe must stop seeing Southeast Asia as a theatre for its anxieties — about China, about global disorder, about the fraying of Pax Americana — and start engaging it as a self-assured, diplomatically agile region that neither courts conflict nor shirks complexity. The Sorbonne speech was neither anti-Western nor triumphalist. It was something rarer: calibrated, with measured cadence. "We are used to being described," the prime minister said. "We are less accustomed to being heard." In one line, he captured decades of misapprehension. From colonial missions civilisatrices to the strategic templates of today's think tanks, Southeast Asia has often appeared in Europe's imagination as either a developmental ward or a geopolitical flank. Yet Asean, as Anwar reminded his audience, is the world's fifth-largest economy and a laboratory of democratic metamorphosis — not perfect, but incrementally improving. He did not shy away from hard topics. On Ukraine, he upheld international law but cautioned that "our region — and Asean in particular — is not a geopolitical mirror to be held up to another's crisis". On Gaza, he called the war a "collapse of conscience" and criticised the selective application of humanitarian concern. On Iran, he backed non-proliferation but insisted that dialogue, not double standards, must anchor global order. President Emmanuel Macron received the message with composure. At their joint press conference, he echoed Anwar's call for a ceasefire in Gaza, reaffirmed France's support for a two-state solution, and condemned Israeli strikes on Iran as lacking legal basis. He also nodded to the broader point: that universal values must not be applied selectively. Sure, not all that glitters is gold but it was still a rare moment of moral convergence, if not full alignment. But it was in trade — not war — where Anwar delivered his firmest message. Europe, he implied, cannot ask for deeper economic ties while clinging to regulatory structures that feel increasingly skewed. For many in Southeast Asia, the EU's standards — however well-intentioned — function less as neutral guardrails and more as protectionist obstacles. Agricultural exports, processed foods and pharmaceuticals face layers of certification and restrictions. European negotiators tend to arrive assuming their standards are not just high, but self-evidently the model for others to adopt. That presumption is now being met with measured resistance. Malaysia, like many of its peers, is not asking for lower standards. It is asking for honest conversations about the practical effects of high ones. Patent terms, for example, are contentious. The EU seeks longer periods of exclusivity. In developing countries, this affects access to life-saving medicines. And that we cannot, and must not, do. The imbalance goes deeper. Southeast Asian nations are expected to meet stringent environmental, labour and governance criteria, yet often find little flexibility in return. There is little allowance for differences in legal systems, social compacts or development stages. The European position thus begins to resemble leverage masquerading as principle. "That means seeing regulation as dialogue to come to a formula for mutual gain, not fiat pointed at the head for capitulation," Anwar said. "Let us be clear: we do not ask for indulgence. We ask only that Europe meet us where we are, not where its models presume we ought to be." Europe hopes that bilateral deals, like the one still under negotiation with Malaysia, will evolve into a full Asean-EU free trade agreement. But that ambition may remain stalled if the substance of the relationship lags behind its symbolism. "Consensus ad idem is as crucial in geoeconomics as it is in geopolitics, and some say even more," Anwar quipped, invoking a legal phrase meaning meeting of minds. Still, the mood in Southeast Asia is shifting. Engagement will remain strong, but deference is no longer part of the deal. Condescending collocutors, vous n'êtes pas le bienvenu. Anwar said: "We welcome partners. But we welcome them as equals." Europe should take note. In an increasingly multipolar world, engagement is not a favour bestowed but a partnership earned. If the after-dinner tête-à-tête, originally set for 10 minutes, but which lasted three-fold longer, is anything to go by, then somewhere along the way, Anwar and Macron must have struck the right chords. Tocqueville once wrote that democracy is not just a system of rules but also a habit of the heart. And so, increasingly, is diplomacy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store