Fraud victims among top crypto ATM users, Australian regulator says
June 25 (Reuters) - Australia's financial crimes monitoring agency said on Wednesday that it has identified 90 scam victims, money mules and suspected offenders as the top crypto ATM users in the country, amid efforts to address crimes enabled by digital currency.
A nationwide operation led by the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) examined the most prolific crypto ATM users in each state, and based on the transaction values, identified cases likely linked to scams or fraud.
"We suspected that a large volume of crypto ATM transactions were probably illicit, but disturbingly, our law enforcement partners found that almost all of the transactions we referred involved victims rather than criminals," AUSTRAC CEO Brendan Thomas said.
In one instance, AUSTRAC identified a woman in her 70s who had deposited more than A$430,000 into crypto ATMs after falling victim to romance and investment scams.
Earlier this month, AUSTRAC had placed conditions and limits on crypto ATM providers after flagging compliance concerns, with the number of active machines exceeding 1,800.
Lately, the Australian corporate regulator has been cracking down on cryptocurrency exchanges as well, with Binance and Blockchain Global coming under scrutiny.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Australian court rules ABC journalist unlawfully sacked over Gaza post
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation unlawfully sacked journalist Antoinette Lattouf after she shared a social media post criticising Israel 's war on Gaza, the Federal Court ruled. The court found the public broadcaster removed Ms Lattouf from air in December 2023 in part because of her political opinions, specifically those on the Israeli military action in the Palestinian territory. Justice Darryl Rangiah said that the ABC contravened the Fair Work Act and awarded Ms Lattouf A$70,000 (£33,400) in damages. He is yet to decide on additional penalties. The court dismissed the claim that Ms Lattouf, who is of Lebanese heritage, was fired due to her race or ethnic background. Ms Lattouf had been contracted as a fill-in presenter on ABC Radio Sydney 's Mornings programme. Just three days in – on 19 December – she reposted an Instagram story from Human Rights Watch alleging Israel had used starvation as a weapon of war in Gaza, a claim the Israeli government denied. She was removed from her role within hours. Justice Rangiah found the ABC management reacted to an "orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists to have Lattouf taken off air" and acted hastily without identifying which policy she had violated or allowing her a chance to respond. He said the broadcaster's chief content officer at the time, Chris Oliver-Taylor, acted based on little more than a 'suspicion' that she had broken rules and was motivated by desire to "mitigate the anticipated deluge of complaints and criticism". "Within the hour, a decision was made that Lattouf would be taken off air," Justice Rangiah said, adding that the ABC senior staff were in a 'state of panic'. Criticising the ABC for failing to follow procedure, the judge pointed out that Ms Lattouf was neither warned nor provided an opportunity to defend herself. While the ABC contended that her contract had been paid in full and she was merely taken off air to protect its reputation, the judge rejected this defence. He clarified that Ms Lattouf had not been given a formal directive to avoid commentary on Israel's war on Gaza, only general advice to refrain from making controversial posts. The journalist's removal had sparked a national outcry and internal discontent at the ABC, raising concerns about political pressure and institutional support for culturally diverse staff. It had also led to a debate about editorial independence and freedom of expression within public broadcasting. Israel launched its ongoing war on Gaza after over 1,100 people were killed and 251 taken hostage during a Hamas assault on southern Israel in October 2023. Israeli forces have killed over 55,700 Palestinians so far, including 15,000 children, and left almost the entire population of nearly 2 million displaced from their homes and on the brink of starvation, according to the Hamas-run health ministry and UN agencies. Speaking outside court, Ms Lattouf said she had been 'punished for political opinion'. 'Deliberately starving and killing children is a war crime,' she said. 'Today, the court has found that punishing someone for sharing facts about these war crimes is also illegal.' The ABC, which reportedly spent A$1m (£733,998) defending the case, issued a public apology after the ruling. Its new managing director, Hugh Marks, said the matter 'was not handled in line with our values and expectations'. 'We also let down our staff and audiences and this failure has caused understandable concern among the public and inside the organisation,' he said. He acknowledged concerns over the broadcaster's independence and announced that it had reviewed and replaced its internal guidelines for social media use. 'Any undue influence or pressure on ABC management or any of its employees must always be guarded against,' Mr Marks said. Commenting on the case, legal expert Chris Merritt called the judgment a 'slap in the face' for the ABC leadership and criticised the organisation's internal processes as 'amateurish'. Once a dismissal claim was raised under Australia's Fair Work Act, he told Sky News, the onus was on the employer to prove it was lawful, something the ABC failed to do convincingly. The matter escalated to the Federal Court after a mediation attempt between Ms Lattouf and the ABC failed at the Fair Work Commission earlier this year.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Wealthy baby boomer's infuriating question about how Anthony Albanese's new tax will affect his $8MILLION in superannuation
A retiree with an $8million superannuation balance he shares with his wife has publicly asked how to arrange his finances to avoid Labor's proposed super tax hike. Under Labor's tax plan, Australians with more than $3million in super will pay an additional 15 per cent tax on the portion of their earnings above $3m. Given only an estimated 80,000 Australians have super balances above the $3m threshold, the new tax would currently affect about 0.05 per cent of the population. The limited scope and applicability of the tax hike hasn't stopped the country's top-earners from scrambling for advice on how best to shield their account balances. Enter the anonymous boomer who recently asked Sydney Morning Herald columnist Noel Whittaker whether his $8million Self Managed Super Fund (SMSF), through some eleventh-hour readjustments, could be spared the additional tax. The frugal fellow explained the facts as follows: the man, aged in his mid-to-late 80's shares the SMSF with his wife, with 58 per cent allocated to his account and 42 per cent to his wife's. In the 2025/26 financial year, they will both draw the minimum pension of nine per cent, totalling about $333,000. His first question to Mr Whittaker was: if they sold enough assets to bring the balance below $6million by June 30 next year, would they be exempt from the new tax? The answer: it depends. The tax is calculated per member, meaning if a single account held more than half the $6million balance, that account would be liable, he said. Assuming the pensioner reduced his personal super account to $3million on which he earned $400,000 over the next financial year, Mr Whittaker estimated the extra tax would cost him only $7056. His second question, which answered in the affirmative, concerned whether pension withdrawals affected the relevant balance for tax purposes. Mr Whittaker clarified that the tax only applies to the portion of a super balance over $3million. So, in his example, a balance of $3.4million would be liable to pay $7056 in tax. According to ATO data, the average Australian man has a super balance of $182,000 while the average woman has $146,000. Calculations by the Australia Institute estimate 97 per cent of Australians currently in the workforce will never have $3million in superannuation let alone the roughly $4.64million held personally by the boomer in question. Sympathies, then, were understandably in short supply among readers of the article. 'Accumulation of huge wealth with huge tax concessions and still not wanting to pay a fair share to fund a more equitable society doesn't seem right,' one user wrote. '$8millilon and they're whingeing abut paying just a little extra tax,' another user said. Another reader wrote: '$8million in super... far out! That is more than enough for two people to retire on. 'Super IS NOT an inheritance vehicle to ensure wealth is passed down the generations whilst paying the least amount of tax.' While few sympathise with the efforts of Australia's wealthiest to avoid the new tax rate, others have called out the fact the $3million threshold is not indexed to inflation. It's a position shared by the Greens, who Labor will likely have to rely on to secure the bill's passage through parliament given the Coalition's stated opposition. Economists estimate that, by 2040, a $3million threshold would be worth about $2million in today's dollars, meaning more Aussies will creep into the affected bracket. AMP economist Diana Mousina has been outspoken in her criticism of the decision not to index the bill, claiming it would eventually affect a wide swathe of earners. While the figures are widely contested, Ms Mousina calculated the average 22-year-old earning average wages for life would eventually reach the $3million threshold. 'Do you think that the proposed $3million superannuation cap tax won't impact you because the Labor government said it only impacts 0.5 per cent of people now? Think again,' she said.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Wild moment teenager who 'stole taxi' crashes on road spikes - before cop performs a dramatic takedown
Dramatic footage has captured the moment police used road spikes to apprehend the 17-year-old driver of an allegedly stolen taxi during a high-speed chase. Queensland Police allege the teenager broke into multiple Cairns homes across Edmonton, Mount Sheridan and Woree in the early hours of Monday morning. The Mooroobool boy, who police said is a well-known youth offender, is alleged to have first stolen a Mitsubishi Outlander from a Savage Close address about 11.15am. He allegedly abandoned that vehicle after driving over police spikes on Links Drive before he stole a nearby Toyota Camry taxi after forcibly removing its driver. The 59-year-old taxi driver suffered a minor back injury and was taken to Cairns Hospital for treatment. The teenager then allegedly drove the taxi dangerously around Cairns before hitting a second set of road spikes on nearby Mayers Street at around 11.35am. In footage obtained by Seven News, an officer could be seen hiding behind a boat parked on a suburban road before he threw the spikes across both lanes. The teenager attempted to avoid the spikes, but clipped the edge and crashed into a parked Hyundai, sending the unoccupied vehicle careening out of frame of the camera. The officer who deployed the spikes could then be heard repeatedly yelling for the boy to get out of the vehicle. Moments later, the teenager exited the crumpled vehicle and was tackled to the ground by the officer, and a struggle ensues before he restrained him. 'Get your f***-ing hands behind your back c***,' the officer shouted. 'Do not f***ing move.' A second officer arrived to assist, and the teenager was placed under arrest as emergency vehicles converged on the scene. The 17-year-old was charged with two counts each of attempted enter dwelling with intent, unlawful use of a motor vehicle and dangerous operation of a vehicle whilst adversely affected and speeding more than 40km/h and one count of robbery. He was refused bail and appeared in Cairns Children's Court on Wednesday, where he pleaded guilty to unlawful entry, unlawful use of motor vehicle, dangerous driving while intoxicated and attempted unlawful entry, the Courier-Mail reported. A local businesswoman Gillian Tap claimed her daughter was almost hit by the runaway taxi when it ran a red light. 'If she was seconds quicker she could have been killed. She was shaken up from it, this is just terrible,' she said. The boy is expected to be sentenced for non-indictable offences on July 15 while more serious offences will be dealt with by way of committal mention. No application for bail was made. He was treated at Cairns Hospital for a minor head injury.
