Mumbai now loudspeaker-free after CM intervened, say police
EVEN AS the issue of removal of loudspeakers from mosques by police in the past few weeks led to opposition by some religious organisations, Mumbai Police Saturday said the city is now 'loudspeaker-free'. Officials said that it was Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis who held a series of meetings with delegations from the two communities to amicably resolve the issue.
Confirming that its personnel successfully completed a comprehensive crackdown on public address systems at all religious structures, Mumbai Police Commissioner Deven Bharti on Saturday said that Mumbai is now 'loudspeaker-free from all religious structures'.
Earlier this year, the Bombay High Court had directed the government to ensure that action was taken against loudspeaker violations.
The police commissioner, refuting claims of selective targeting, made it clear that religious structures of a particular community were not singled out. While the ban on permanent loudspeakers is now in effect, the police commissioner clarified that temporary permissions for the use of loudspeakers will be granted during religious festivals.
In the past few days, however, some Muslim organisations had alleged that the police were taking down all loudspeakers irrespective of whether they were violating norms or not. Some delegations had also met senior police officers and also written to CM Fadnavis against it.
Sources in the government said that CM Fadnavis held a series of meetings with delegations representing Hindus, Muslims and others to amicably resolve the controversial loudspeaker ban on places of worship'.
An official said, 'Fadnavis had made it clear that the state government will strictly adhere to the rules and directives of the High Court. And it would be applicable to all.'
He also indicated that the state will not allow any confrontation or law and order issue arising on the subject. 'Therefore, before initiating any action, Fadnavis who also holds the Home portfolio, held detailed discussions with top police officers in order to guide them how to go ahead with the drive,' the official said.
Apart from that Fadnavis also spoke to Muslim leaders and impressed upon them the significance of adhering to Court orders on loudspeakers. On June 25, a group of Muslim delegation met Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar, complaining that police were removing loudspeakers from mosques in the state.
NCP leader Nawab Malik, along with former AIMIM MLA Warris Pathan, his party legislator and daughter Sana Malik, Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Asim Azmi, and others, had called upon Ajit Pawar to raise their concerns.
The deputy CM assured them he would look into the matter. At the same time, he also brought to their notice Bombay High Court order, which prescribed permissible decibel limits mandatory for all places of worship.
According to the Bombay High Court ruling, the permissible sound level for loudspeakers is 55 decibels during the daytime and 45 decibels at night. In addition, loudspeakers are not permitted between 10 pm and 6 am.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
40 minutes ago
- India.com
Hindi Imposition Row: Maharashtra cancels three-language policy for primary education, sets up panel to make recommendations
Mumbai: The Devendra Fadnavis-led Maharashtra government on Sunday decided to withdraw two GRs (government orders) on the implementation of the three-language policy. This comes amid a growing chorus against the introduction of the Hindi language in Maharashtra schools from classes 1 to 5. While addressing the media on the eve of the monsoon session of the state legislature, Chief Minister Fadnavis also announced the formation of a committee under educationist Dr Narendra Jadhav to suggest the way forward and implementation of the language policy. The panel has sought three months to study the issue and prepare a report. Fadnavis alleged Uddhav Thackeray had accepted the recommendations of the Dr Raghunath Mashelkar committee to introduce a three-language policy from class 1 to 12 when he was chief minister and set up a committee to implement the policy. 'The state cabinet has decided to withdraw the Government Resolutions (GR) issued in April and June regarding the implementation of the three-language policy from class one. A committee headed by Dr Narendra Jadhav will be formed to recommend implementation (of the three-language formula),' Fadnavis said. He said the government will take a fresh decision based on the report of Dr Jadhav, a former member of the Planning Commission and ex-Vice Chancellor. 'The other names of the committee will be announced in some days. The panel will study the Mashelkar Committee's report and suggest from which standard (class 1 or otherwise) the three language formula will be implemented,' he said. When was GR Issued? The Fadnavis government had issued a GR on April 16, making Hindi a compulsory third language for students in classes 1 to 5 studying in English and Marathi medium schools. Amid backlash, the government issued an amended GR on June 17 making Hindi an optional language. The move was criticised by the Opposition- Shiv Sena (UBT), MNS, and NCP (SP)- which dubbed it the 'imposition' of Hindi in Maharashtra. Fadnavis acknowledged the difference of opinion over finalising the grade (class 1 or 5) for implementing the three-language formula. 'The decision (on language policy) has been taken in the interest of Marathi students. If three languages are taught, students will get credit in the academic bank,' he added. Fadnavis Slams Uddhav Thackeray: Fadnavis said the then CM Thackeray had appointed an 18-member Mashelkar Committee on September 21, 2020, comprising reputed figures from the education sector, on how to implement the NEP. A GR was issued on October 16, 2020. 'The committee submitted a 101-page report on September 14, 2021. The panel stated that apart from the Marathi language, English and Hindi languages should be taught in classes 1 to 12. The report was tabled in the state cabinet on January 7, 2022. The minutes of the cabinet meeting are available,' he said. He claimed Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Vijay Kadam, who runs an educational institution, was a member of the Mashelkar committee. Fadnavis also claimed Uddhav didn't mention that his government disagreed with the Mashelkar committee's report. 'At that time, Uddhav didn't say that his government was not accepting the three-language formula. The then government set up a sub-group on the Mashelkar Committee's report,' he added. Accusing Uddhav Thackeray of playing politics over the language issue, Fadnavis said the Shiv Sena (UBT) chief was opposing the Hindi language as he wants to 'lay red carpet for the English language'. Fadnavis said the Mahayuti government headed by him issued the two GRs in April and June as part of the sub-group set up by the then Thackeray-led MVA government. 'We changed the decision to make the Hindi language mandatory and made it optional,' he added. (With PTI Inputs)
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘Bihar will throw Act in dustbin': Tejashwi, Pappu Yadav join thousands at protest against Waqf Amendment
Thousands of people from different parts of the country gathered at Patna's Gandhi Maidan on Sunday to take part in a protest to oppose the Waqf Amendment Act. Several politicians, including MPs and MLAs, also attended the protest organised under the banner of Imarat-e-Shariah, a Muslim organisation active mainly in Bihar, Odisha and Jharkhand. The Leader of Opposition in Bihar Assembly, Tejashwi Yadav, Dipankar Bhattacharya of the CPI(ML), Rajya Sabha member Imran Pratapgarhi, and Lok Sabha member Pappu Yadav were also at the gathering, along with other MPs and MLAs from the INDIA bloc. The Congress state president also read out messages of support from Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi and party national president Mallikarjun Kharge. Addressing the gathering, Tejashwi Yadav said the RJD has been opposing the Act both in Parliament and on the streets. '…When the Amendment Bill regarding Waqf came to Parliament in 2025, we strongly opposed it in both Houses. And not just that, when the JPC (Joint Parliamentary Committee) was formed and after the Bill was passed, our party also went to the Supreme Court against it… Whether in the House, on the streets, or in the courts, we will fight this battle everywhere…,' he said. 'Those who are in power now are on their way out… When the government of the poor comes to power, Bihar will throw this Act into the dustbin…,' he said. Assembly elections are set to be held in Bihar later this year. Tejashwi also alleged that attempts were being made to disenfranchise the poor and those in minority communities by making changes to the electoral rolls. 'Your land is being taken away and now they are going to take away the voting rights of the poor, backward, Dalit, extremely backward, and poor from the minority communities… The Election Commission has issued a notification that they are going to make a new list of 8 crore voters, and this new list has to be made in just 30 days… You all should stay alert, be careful that no one's name is removed from the voter list, this is a big conspiracy. After the voter list, they will remove names from the pension list as well,' he claimed. Pappu Yadav made similar allegations, saying, 'By taking away the voting rights of 4.7 crore poor people through the Election Commission, they (NDA) want to contest elections in Bihar… This is a proxy war… Within one month, they want to make those 4.7 crore people (of Bihar) who are outside, homeless.' Maulana Faisal Rahmani, the head of Imarat-e-Shariah, described the protest as a milestone and not a conclusion. 'This movement will continue until the Waqf Act is withdrawn,' he said. He criticised the Act as unconstitutional and anti-minority, citing alleged violations of Articles 13, 14, 25, 26, and 300A of the Constitution as well as Supreme Court judgments. 'We accept the 1995 Waqf law. But these amendments are nothing but a bid to take away our places of worship and heritage buildings. This law undermines the spirit of brotherhood in the country,' Rahmani had told The Indian Express. The voices from the crowd echoed the voices on the stage. Under the scorching sun, thousands of people, both old and young, packed the Gandhi Maidan. A man from Madhubani, holding both the Tricolour and a black-and-white Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind flag, said on the condition of anonymity, 'There has been a consistent pattern of anti-Muslim actions, starting with NRC and continuing with Triple Talaq and now with Waqf. This law is an attack on Shariat, but we want to proceed peacefully. We are here for that reason.' 'Our mosques, schools, and lands are all under Waqf for our protection… All religions are treated equally under the Constitution. So why are we being divided by the government?' an elderly attendee asked.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Mangaluru lynching result of hate crime: Report
Five days after terrorists killed 26 tourists in Pahalgam, a 39-year-old Muslim ragpicker from Kerala was beaten to death near a cricket ground near Mangaluru. According to an independent fact-finding report, the lynching was not a spontaneous act of violence but a direct consequence of the 'hate-filled atmosphere that followed the April 22 attack'. According to an independent fact-finding report, the lynching was not a spontaneous act of violence but a direct consequence of the 'hate-filled atmosphere that followed the April 22 attack'. (File photo) On April 27, Mohammed Ashraf, who collected discarded plastic to sell, was lynched in Kudupu, a village on the outskirts of Mangaluru, after allegedly picking up an empty water bottle near a local cricket match. The report — published by the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR), and All India Lawyers Association for Justice (AILAJ) — called his murder a 'hate crime' shaped by communal mobilisation and police apathy. The 164-page report, Lost Fraternity: A Mob Lynching in Broad Daylight — A Betrayal of the Promise of the Constitution, was released on Saturday. 'As a consequence of this hate propaganda, many people have internalised this hate. Acting out of this hate a mob lynched a Muslim ragpicker – Mohammed Ashraf — next to a cricket ground,' the report stated. As per the report, the incident took place in a village with no Muslim residents. It cited CCTV footage as showing that Ashraf was walking slowly along a dirt road, carrying a gunny bag. The fact-finding team quoted his brother Jabbar as saying: 'Sachin, one of the accused, started beating him up. All the others in the cricket ground joined him and beat my brother to death.' The family learnt of the incident only after the police tracked a call Ashraf made from a scrap dealer's phone. The post-mortem examination was conducted without informing them. 'After reaching here, I realised that something is wrong. That something else had happened and he said nothing about Pakistan,' he said. Meanwhile, home minister G Parameshwara made a public claim: 'I was told that he shouted 'Pakistan Zindabad' when a local cricket match was going on… Few people got together and beat him… Later on, he died.' According to the report, this statement was not based on any police finding or complaint and surfaced only after arrests were made: 'Until this time, neither the police nor any media outlet had reported any claims that the deceased person had shouted the slogan 'Pakistan Zindabad' as justification for his murder.' The next day, the minister appeared to walk back his comment. 'It was not my statement. It was an expression made by those who were involved in that lynching… They have said that he said it during the investigation… But even that, a witness who would second that no? We don't even know if he said it.' 'By modifying and stating this unevidenced claim of the accused without verification, the home minister facilitated a travesty of justice, and gave fodder to the media to ask questions not about the man's killing, but about his alleged speech of 'Pakistan Zindabad',' the report said. The fact-finding team said the police failed at every step. The body was discovered at 1.30 pm, but the FIR was filed the next day at 11.25 pm. Until then, only an Unnatural Death Report (UDR) was registered, despite visible injuries. 'The version that there were no visible injuries was not only misleading but dangerously delayed justice.' Police also did not apply Supreme Court guidelines on lynching cases. When asked about the Tehseen Poonawalla judgment, the assistant investigating officer told the team: 'We don't know much about the Tehseen Poonawalla guidelines, you talk to the higher officials about the same.' Ashraf's identification was eventually made possible by a scrap dealer named Syed Ali. Kudupu, where the lynching occurred, has witnessed growing communal segregation. In 2023, Muslim vendors were excluded from the local temple fair. 'Such pressures by groups to exclude Muslim vendors speak to the presence of right-wing groups in the region and the anti-Muslim sentiments they have succeeded in normalising, which are often precursors to violent acts like mob lynchings,' the report noted. Home minister G Parameshwara did not respond to queries regarding the investigation at the time of publishing.
