BBFC asks government to extend monitoring role to include online pornography
At the inaugural meeting of the Independent Pornography Review taskforce – which brought together politicians, police and charities to discuss how to regulate harmful content on the internet – the BBFC's president, Natasha Kaplinsky, said the organisation hoped to take on the task.
'Legislation has existed for many years to protect the public from violent and abusive pornographic content offline, but online the law has not kept pace,' Kaplinsky said.
She said the BBFC had been classifying offline pornographic content for 40 years and now wanted to extend its remit, taking on a statutory role online. 'We stand ready to better protect audiences online by taking on the formal role of auditing online pornography,' she said.
The Conservative peer Gabby Bertin recommended that the BBFC should audit websites earlier this year when she published a review into harmful pornography, commissioned by former prime minister Rishi Sunak.
She has established a taskforce of 17 people to examine how to bring parity to the regulation of online and offline pornography, reflecting the fact that the vast majority has long been viewed online, where it is subject to relatively little regulation.
'We can't let the taboo around this issue mean that the industry carries on going unregulated,' Lady Bertin said, launching the first session.
She added that better monitoring of pornography online was crucial, given that it is viewed by an estimated 13.8 million UK adults every month, but stressed that the taskforce's work was 'not remotely a moral crusade'.
'When you have such a huge number of people watching this kind of content, you have to make sure that it's regulated. It would be unthinkable for the tobacco industry, the drinks industry or the gambling industry to have no proper scrutiny. This has to come to an end for the pornography industry,' she said.
The Online Safety Act made the regulator Ofcom responsible for ensuring social media and pornography sites have effective age verification mechanisms.
Ofcom also monitors whether sites distributing user-generated pornography are protecting UK viewers from encountering illegal material involving child sexual abuse and extreme content (showing rape, bestiality and necrophilia, for example). However, other forms of harmful pornography that are regulated offline are not subject to similar restrictions online.
Research conducted by the BBFC found that one in three adult users had been exposed to violent or abusive content online in the past three months, seeing material depicting physical violence, non-consensual activity, and adults role-playing as children.
This material would not have been classified as legal for viewing in cinemas or allowed to be sold on physical formats (videos or DVDs) by the organisation, but it does not reach the threshold of illegal content online, so is not part of Ofcom's remit.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
It is a criminal offence under the Video Recordings Act to distribute a pornographic video work that has not been classified by the BBFC.
'This content is violent, it's degrading, it's abusive, it's misogynistic,' Bertin said. 'We know what a detrimental effect it is having on society. It is starting to really play out in how young people have sex, view themselves and view each other.'
Labour MP Jess Asato, one of the taskforce members, echoed the need for greater regulation and commended the government for its commitment last week to criminalising pornographic content featuring strangulation.
'Young women feel under pressure to play out the scripts their male partners learn from pornography and are pressured into painful and dangerous sex acts,' she said. 'Of particular concern to me is content that appears to depict sexual activity with children, featuring adult performers using props such as lollipops and teddy bears. This normalises the sexual abuse of children.'
David Austin, the chief executive of the BBFC, said his organisation had had 'very constructive' conversations with the government over the possibility of taking on an extended role, but would not give details of how it would confront the huge task of monitoring harmful pornographic content online.
A government spokesperson said that the recent decision to ban pornography depicting acts of strangulation came in response to Bertin's review, adding: 'Violence against women and girls is a national emergency, which is why our government is committed to halving it within a decade. Tackling extreme pornography is a vital part of this mission.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
NATO to coordinate regular and large-scale arm deliveries to Ukraine. Most will be bought from US
NATO started coordinating regular deliveries of large weapons packages to Ukraine after the Netherlands said it would provide air defense equipment, ammunition and other military aid worth 500 million euros ($578 million), most bought from the U.S. Two deliveries are expected this month. The equipment that will be provided is based on Ukraine's priority needs on the battlefield. NATO allies then locate the weapons and ammunition and send them on. 'Packages will be prepared rapidly and issued on a regular basis,' NATO said late Monday Air defense systems are in greatest need. The United Nations has said that Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians. Russia's bigger army is also making slow but costly progress along the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line. Currently, it is waging an operation to take the eastern city of Pokrovsk, a logistical hub whose fall could allow it to drive deeper into Ukraine. European allies and Canada are buying most of the equipment they plan to send from the United States, which has greater stocks of ready military materiel, as well as more effective weapons. The Trump administration is not giving any arms to Ukraine. The new deliveries will come on top of other pledges of military equipment. The Kiel Institute, which tracks support to Ukraine, estimates that as of June, European countries had provided 72 billion euros ($83 billion) worth of military aid since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, compared to $65 billion in U.S. aid. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans said that 'American air defense systems and munitions, in particular, are crucial for Ukraine to defend itself.' Announcing the deliveries Monday, he said Russia's attacks are 'pure terror, intended to break Ukraine.' Germany said Friday that it will deliver two more Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine in the coming days. It agreed to the move after securing assurances that the U.S. will prioritize the delivery of new Patriots to Germany to backfill its stocks. These weapon systems are only made in the U.S.
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Prison system was days from ‘total meltdown' three times under last government, review finds
Prisons across the UK were 'on the brink of collapse' on three occasions after Rishi Sunak 's last government refused to cut the numbers in jail, an independent review by a former prisons watchdog has revealed. Dame Anne Owers, former chief inspector of prisons, wrote in her 72-page report titled 'Independent Review of Prison Capacity' that the overcrowded system was 'in crisis' between autumn 2023 and the summer of 2024. At one point, there were fewer than 100 spaces left in adult male prisons, with the network at times 'running very close to the edge of capacity' and 'within three days of meltdown', the report said. It remains at nearly 97.5 per capacity, despite Labour's introduction of several early release schemes. Officials were so anxious about potential breakdowns that they maintained an audit of every decision and document 'in case there was a public or parliamentary inquiry', the report found. Interviews for the review found that former ministers and senior officials 'expressed frustration and sometimes anger' at the repeated refusal to back contingency plans, with many convinced that delaying tactics from No 10 were deliberate. 'Many believed that the default position was to do as little as possible as late as possible, with the consequence that the system repeatedly reached the brink of collapse,' Dame Anne said. Pressure on the criminal justice system is set to ramp up this weekend, as police warn they may arrest hundreds of people planning to show support for Palestine Action. Forces are also gearing up for further protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers in Greater London, the North East and East Anglia. Commissioned by justice secretary Shabana Mahmood in February, the review suggests ministers only secured agreement for early release powers when prisons were literally days from being overwhelmed. 'Although departmental ministers were convinced by mid-2023 that some form of early release was both necessary and urgent, this required prime ministerial agreement, which was not forthcoming until the system was within three days of potential collapse, and only in incremental stages,' Dame Anne wrote. From mid-2023, Alex Chalk, who served as justice secretary at the time, reportedly urged the government to approve an early release scheme to free those serving standard determinate sentences. But the report found that his proposals were repeatedly rebuffed. 'Without exception, all those the review spoke to expressed frustration and sometimes anger at the reluctance to accept and then act on the well-documented and imminent crisis, or to agree any coherent plan to avert it,' Dame Anne After the general election was called in May 2024, the report discloses that Mr Sunak convened emergency Cobra meetings to discuss 'invoking emergency powers' to release prisoners early should the system collapse. 'This might be necessary to avert the risk of public disorder if the criminal justice system collapsed during the election campaign,' the report disclosed. The Sunak administration later deployed early release schemes on three occasions, using compassionate grounds provisions to ease pressure as jails neared capacity. Labour minister Ms Mahmood said the report 'lays bare the disgraceful way the last Conservative government ran our prisons'. She said: 'They added less than 500 cells to the prison estate over 14 years, released over 10,000 prisoners early under a veil of secrecy, and brought our jails close to total collapse on countless occasions.' A Conservative Party spokesperson said: 'In office, the Conservatives rightly listened to the public demand to see criminals punished with proper sentences, and to tackle the capacity issues we had plans to use prisons abroad. Labour scrapped those plans and instead chose to release violent criminals back on our streets. 'Labour aren't serious about tackling these issues. They blocked our deportation bill that would have mandated the deportation of all foreign criminals. Whilst Labour and Reform want shorter sentences, the Conservatives will make no apology for ensuring that heinous criminals are kept off our streets and behind bars.'
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump to punish banks for dropping customers
Donald Trump is preparing to punish big banks over their alleged discrimination against conservative customers. The White House is drafting an executive order that will impose penalties on financial institutions for dropping customers based on political grounds. A draft of the order, which was seen by the Wall Street Journal, directs regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions breach the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust laws or consumer financial protection laws. Under the order, which could be signed as early as this week, violators face severe monetary penalties and other disciplinary measures. It also calls on regulators to strike policies that might have contributed to banks dropping certain customers – a practice known as debanking. In the UK, the debanking of Nigel Farage, the Reform leader, by Coutts in the summer of 2023 led to a national scandal. His accounts were closed down after the private bank, which serves the Royal family, decided his views 'do not align with our values' and that he posed a 'reputational risk'. A dossier – which Mr Farage described as a 'Stasi-style surveillance report' – later revealed the bank had cited his Brexit comments, his closeness with Mr Trump and his views on LGBT rights among many reasons he was not 'compatible with Coutts'. NatWest, which owns Coutts, paid Mr Farage an undisclosed sum in March this year to settle the long-running dispute. US banks have been fearful about being the next target of the Trump administration, following his attacks on universities and big law firms. The draft executive order did not name a specific bank, however Mr Trump in January accused the CEOs of JP Morgan Chase and the Bank of America, the largest US banks, of refusing to provide services for conservatives. Both banks denied making banking decisions based on politics. 'Woke capitalism' The criticism of Wall Street giants comes amid growing accusations from conservatives that financial institutions were engaging in 'woke capitalism' and unfairly cutting ties with businesses perceived to be aligned with the political right. Cryptocurrency companies have also said they were shut out of banking services under the Biden administration. Banks have said their decisions are based on financial, legal or reputational risks. In March, the Trump Organisation, which serves as a holding company for most of Mr Trump's business and investments, said it was 'debanked' by Capital One, America's ninth largest bank. The conglomerate sued the bank, alleging it was guilty of 'egregious conduct' by closing more than 300 of its accounts – which it called a 'clear attack on free speech and free enterprise'. The Trump administration is pursuing a broad reform agenda aimed at modifying rules governing financial institutions, including capital requirements, arguing that such action will boost economic growth and unleash innovation.
