Victory for press freedom
Image: Supplied
The lifting of the gag order on Independent Media in the Artsolar litigation is a victory for press freedom. The importance of free speech and expression as a valuable characteristic in a democratic society cannot be underestimated.
In their efforts to provide the public with information about controversial yet important events, journalists in South Africa face constant intimidation, sometimes brutal, deadly assaults, which constrict their ability to convey truthful information about cardinal and pivotal issues.
It was Sir Winston Churchill, who in 1949, offered these profound words: 'A free press is the unsleeping guardian of every other right that free men prize, it is the most dangerous foe of tyranny. Under a dictatorship, the press is bound to languish. A vigilant press will continue to be the fourth estate, the vigilant guardian of the rights of the ordinary citizen.'
When the public's right to know is threatened, and when the rights of free speech are in jeopardy, all other liberties that we hold dear are endangered. We must never yield to any attempt that seeks to destroy, through mob violence or censorship from the elite, the right of conscience, the freedom of opinion, and the press.
Section 16 {1}{A} of the constitution of South Africa guarantees 'the right to freedom of expression, which includes, freedom of the press and other media'
The right to freedom of expression upholds the rights of all to express their views and opinions freely. It is essentially a right which should be promoted to the maximum extent, possibly given its critical role in democracy.
It is how people receive factual information, which is essential to intelligent self-governance, that is, democracy.
Freedom of expression is a concept that defines a specific liberty or a specific way of exercising liberty. Nobody should interfere with others' freedom to act as they please.
There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. There is only one basic human duty: the duty to take the consequences. The sine qua non of a democratic society is the freedom of expression. Our freedom to express our views is sacrosanct..The United Nations had declared May 3rd as World Press Freedom Day.
When a free press is imperilled, muzzled or banned altogether, every other freedom is limited too, and democracy itself is threatened. It was Thomas Jefferson who said, 'Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press and cannot be limited without being lost'.
Freedom of the press should be sacrosanct unless one lives in a totalitarian state. The muzzling of our journalists is nothing less than a full assault on the basic principles of press freedom.
FAROUK ARAIE
GAUTENG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
When Truth Is Curated: Wikipedia, Groupthink, and the Slow March Toward ‘New Speak'
Wikipedia are increasingly not about truth, but about control. Image: Independent Media In George Orwell's 1984, the most chilling threat to freedom wasn't surveillance. It was the control of language, the quiet and deliberate rewriting of history, and the creation of a society where independent thought was replaced by consensus, enforced through a simplified vocabulary called New Speak. When you erase nuance, you erase resistance. Today, knowledge is increasingly and overwhelmingly digital, and we are dangerously close to that precipice - not through a dystopian regime, but through an algorithmic democracy where the loudest, most persistent voices curate what we accept as fact. My own experience with Wikipedia is, in many ways, incidental. I am one of thousands whose biographies have been misrepresented, edited without consent, or laced with innuendo under the guise of neutrality. The policies designed to uphold factual accuracy are, paradoxically, used to entrench falsehoods - so long as those falsehoods are 'cited' from sources deemed acceptable by an 'anonymous' collective. But this is not an appeal for sympathy. It is a warning. Wikipedia - and platforms like it - are increasingly not about truth, but about control. They present themselves as democratic, yet the very architecture of these platforms discourages complexity and dissent. A handful of privileged so-called editors, hiding behind usernames and policies, can override context, intention, and sometimes even evidence. Edits disappear into oblivion. Counter-arguments are labelled as 'non-notable.' The subject of the article - especially if they are a living person - is given no real recourse. This is not just an attack on the individual. It is a systemic erosion of independent thought. And it is happening in plain sight. We are told that Wikipedia is merely a reflection of reliable secondary sources. But what happens when those sources are part of a self-referential loop? When a handful of ideologically motivated outlets repeatedly cite one another, and Wikipedia calls that 'verification'? When attempts to correct biased or outdated information are treated as vandalism - not because they are wrong, but because they challenge the orthodoxy? This is how groupthink begins. And when it is codified in the language of neutrality, it becomes indistinguishable from truth. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading We live in a world where truth is curated, more so now than ever before. Where Google's search results prioritise one narrative over another. Where visibility is conflated with credibility. Where to exist digitally is to be defined by those who claim to know you - whether or not they have ever met you, spoken to you, or understood the context in which you live and work. And the consequences of this are far-reaching. It does not only affect entrepreneurs, or public figures, or politicians. It affects journalists, artists, scientists, and students. It affects anyone who dares to think differently, speak inconvenient truths, or operate outside of dominant cultural or political paradigms. When there is only one permitted version of a story, dissent becomes not just unpopular - it becomes impossible. To be clear, I am not opposed to Wikipedia. The original vision - of a collaborative, global commons of knowledge - is admirable. But the platform has drifted far from that ideal. Its increasing opacity, reliance on gatekeeping, and algorithmic enforcement of 'approved narratives' make it ripe for exploitation and manipulation. We must resist the creeping comfort of consensus. We must remain vigilant against the subtle conversion of open-source into closed-mind. We must teach our children to read between the lines, to ask who benefits from a given version of the truth, and to understand that curation is not neutrality - it is authorship and even potentially, censorship. If we do not challenge the systems that increasingly define what can be known, we may find ourselves living in a new kind of Orwellian age. Not one of overt censorship, but of silent erasure. Not through fear, but through convenience. A world where truth is no longer pursued - but simply uploaded. And in that world, New Speak won't need to be taught. It will be all that's left. *Dr. Iqbal Survé is a South African medical doctor, entrepreneur, and philanthropist. He is the Executive Chairman of Sekunjalo Group and has long been an advocate for media transformation, technological sovereignty, and truth in a democratic society.
eNCA
a day ago
- eNCA
'How much worse could it get?' Gazans fear full occupation
DEIR EL-BALAH - "When will this nightmare end?" wonders Amal Hamada, a 20-year-old displaced woman who, like most Gazans, feels powerless before the threat of full Israeli occupation after 22 months of war. Rumours that the Israeli government might decide on a full occupation of the Palestinian territory spread from Israel to war-torn Gaza before any official announcement, sowing fear and despair. Like nearly all Gazans, Hamada has been displaced several times by the war, and ended up in Deir el-Balah in central Gaza, where the Israeli military carried out operations last month for the first time in the war. "We've lived through many wars before, but nothing like this one. This war is long and exhausting, from one displacement to another. We are worn out," the woman told AFP. Like her, Ahmad Salem, 45, wonders how things can get worse in a territory that already faces chronic food shortages, mass displacement and daily air strikes. "We already live each day in anxiety and fear of the unknown. Talk of an expansion of Israeli ground operations means more destruction and more death," Salem told AFP. AFP | - "There is no safe space in Gaza. If Israel expands its ground operations again, we'll be the first victims," he said from a camp west of Gaza City where he had found shelter. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was to chair a meeting of his security cabinet later on Thursday to seek approval to expand military operations in Gaza, including in densely populated areas. - 'Just animals' - 'We read and hear everything in the news... and none of it is in our favour," said 40-year-old Sanaa Abdullah from Gaza City. "Israel doesn't want to stop. The bombardment continues, the number of martyrs and wounded keeps rising, famine and malnutrition are getting worse, and people are dying of hunger", she said. "What more could possibly happen to us?" Precisely 22 months into the devastating war sparked by Hamas's October 2023 attack, Gaza is on the verge of "generalised famine", the United Nations has said. Its 2.4 million residents are fully dependent on humanitarian aid, and live under the daily threat of air strikes. AFP | - The Israeli army announced in mid-July that it controlled 75 percent of Gaza, including a broad strip the whole length of the Israeli border and three main military corridors that cut across the territory from east to west. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) says that more than 87 percent of the Gaza Strip is under unrevoked evacuation orders or designated as an Israeli military zone. The remaining areas are the most densely populated. The city of Khan Yunis in the south, Gaza City in the north, and Deir el-Balah and its adjacent refugee camps in the centre. "Now they speak of plans to expand their operations as if we are not even human, just animals or numbers," Abdullah laments. "A new ground invasion means new displacement, new fear and we won't even find a place to hide", she told AFP. "What will happen if they start another ground operation? Only God is with us." AFP | Eyad BABA A widening of the war "would risk catastrophic consequences for millions of Palestinians and could further endanger the lives of the remaining hostages in Gaza", senior UN official Miroslav Jenca told the Security Council on Tuesday. The October 2023 attack that sparked the war resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, the majority of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed at least 61,258 people in Gaza, mostly civilians, according to figures from the Gaza health ministry which the United Nations considers reliable.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma: Women continue to face poverty and inequality
ANC veteran and former anti-apartheid activist Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma. Image: Timothy Bernard / Independent Newspapers As South Africa commemorates Women's Month, ANC veteran Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma says women continue to bear a disproportionate burden of poverty, and that there should be equal opportunities between women and men. Dlamini-Zuma said this is because the system is still working against women despite constitutional protections and legislative efforts. She was speaking during her visit to the Independent Media newsroom on Tuesday. Every year, in August, South Africa celebrates Women's Month to pay tribute to the more than 20,000 women who marched to the Union Buildings on August 9, 1956, in protest against the extension of the pass laws to women. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading During Women's Month, South Africa celebrates women as active agents of change and social transformation. The commemoration also allows the country to take stock of achievements and challenges that remain while mobilising support for the further development of women. Dlamini-Zuma, who is also the former chairperson of the African Union (AU) executive council of ministers, said this is because South Africa has become a patriarchal society where men hold primary power and predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege, and control of property. She said one of the root causes for this is that some parents taught their children that men are more capable than women. 'And we allow this thing instead of bringing girls and boys equally. I was fortunate because my parents, especially my dad, always said we all go to school, especially the girls, because I don't want to see you sitting in a toxic situation for the sake of food. 'He would also tell us that education is the only thing that nobody can take from you. He said this is the only thing he will leave with us. So we were lucky that way,' said the former anti-apartheid activist. Dlamini-Zuma said the pay gap between men and women needs to be addressed. She said while the government has resolved the issue, this persists in the private sector, despite research showing that companies with more women in management are more competitive than those without female leaders. According to the Business Case for Change study by the International Labour Organisation, companies that promote parity in management positions increase their profits by 5% to 20%. A study conducted by the consultancy group McKinsey revealed that companies with more gender diversity at the top are 21% more likely to have above-average profitability, adding that women tend to bring diverse perspectives and styles on how to solve problems. Women leaders tend to place higher emphasis on teamwork and collaboration, and research published in Harvard Business Review found that when a woman joins corporate leadership ranks, employee engagement and satisfaction skyrocket, boosting productivity and profitability while creating more cohesive, more effective teams. Dlamini-Zuma said, however, despite this evidence, many companies still have more men in the management positions. She added that what is even worse is that women are still the face of poverty, adding that they are poorer than everyone else. She stated that this is because it is difficult for women to access financial resources. 'Even when they have good ideas, women find it difficult to access funding from financial institutions. Everything is just against women. Regardless of our Constitution, it is generally very difficult to be a woman, including the fact that women also face additional challenges such as gender-based violence and many others,' she said, adding that this is one of the reasons the economy remains stagnant. 'No country will reach its full potential without involving women. It won't happen and we will always be crying about the economy not growing,' said Dlamini-Zuma, who also added that women should be given equal opportunities as men.
