
Leo XIV says Church must fight 'lack of faith' in first mass as pope
Chicago-born Robert Francis Prevost on Thursday became the 267th pope, spiritual leader of the world's 1.4 billion Catholics and successor to Argentina's Pope Francis, after a secret conclave by his fellow cardinals in the Vatican's Sistine Chapel.
In today's world, Leo warned in his homily to assembled cardinals, there are places or situations where "it is not easy to preach the Gospel and bear witness to its truth, where believers are mocked, opposed, despised or at best tolerated and pitied".
"Yet, precisely for this reason, they are the places where our missionary outreach is desperately needed," said the new pope, 69, standing at the Sistine Chapel altar with Michelangelo's famed fresco of "The Last Judgment" behind him.
The former missionary deplored "settings in which the Christian faith is considered absurd, meant for the weak and unintelligent" and, in an echo of his predecessor Francis, said people were turning to "technology, money, success, power, or pleasure."
"A lack of faith is often tragically accompanied by the loss of meaning in life, the neglect of mercy, appalling violations of human dignity, the crisis of the family and so many other wounds that afflict our society," said Leo in Italian, wearing a white papal robe trimmed in gold as he addressed the seated white-robed cardinals.
In an apparent message to evangelical Christians, Pope Leo also warned that Jesus cannot be "reduced to a kind of charismatic leader or superman".
"This is true not only among non-believers but also among many baptised Christians, who thus end up living, at this level, in a state of practical atheism," he said.
In an unscripted introduction to his homily in English, he also evoked a need to overcome divisions within the Church, telling his fellow cardinals: "I know I can rely on each and every one of you to walk with me".
Many around the world were still digesting the choice of the man sometimes referred to in Rome as the "Latin Yankee" for his decades-long missions in Peru.
"A pope from the United States is almost more surprising than an Argentine and Jesuit pope," such as Francis, wrote the Corriere della Sera daily. Francis was the first pope ever named from the Americas.
Missionary in Peru
The Vatican released video images of the moments after Leo's secret election Thursday, showing him praying at a chapel altar and shaking hands and receiving congratulations in a sea of scarlet-robed cardinals.
The American, a member of the Augustinian order who spent two decades in Peru and was only made a cardinal in 2023, had been on many Vatican watchers' lists of potential popes, although he is far from being a globally recognised figure.
Over the coming days, including during Sunday's midday Regina Coeli prayer and a meeting with journalists at the Vatican on Monday, his actions and words will be closely scrutinised.
He will meet with diplomats on May 16 and on Sunday May 18 will hold an inauguration mass at St Peter's Square, which is expected to draw world leaders and thousands of pilgrims.
Waiting outside St Peter's Friday, Argentine tourist Rocio Arguello said "there were so many people from all over the world" who were riveted by Leo's first appearance the day before, including throngs from Spanish-speaking countries.
"It was very moving when he also spoke in Spanish," said the 39-year-old woman. "When he came out and spoke both languages, it was lovely."
Back in Peru, well-wishers including the bishop of El Callao outside Lima, Luis Alberto Barrera, saluted the Augustinian's engagement in the Andean country.
"He showed his closeness and simplicity with the people," Barrera told AFP, calling the new pope a "good missionary".
In Chicago, locals celebrated his love of baseball, deep-dish pizza and his working-class South Side neighbourhood in the United States' third-largest city.
The Chicago Tribune called him "the pride and joy of every priest and nun" at his local parish, where he went to school and served as an altar boy, while a debate erupted over which of the city's rival baseball teams Leo supported: the White Sox, his brother ultimately confirmed.
Build bridges
In his address to the crowds on Thursday, Leo echoed his predecessor Francis with a call for peace and urging a "missionary Church".
"Help us, and each other, to build bridges through dialogue, through encounter, to come together as one people, always in peace," he said, as world leaders sent pledges to work with him on global issues at a time of great geopolitical uncertainty.
Leo faces a momentous task. As well as asserting his moral voice on a conflict-torn world stage, he must try to unite a divided Church and tackle burning issues such as the continued fallout from the clerical sexual abuse scandal.
As Cardinal Prevost, the new pope defended workers and the poor and reposted articles online critical of US President Donald Trump's anti-migrant policies.
But Trump nevertheless welcomed his election, calling it a "great honour" to have a pope from the United States.
With the choice of Prevost, experts said, the cardinals had opted for continuity with the late Francis, a progressive who shook up the Church in his 12-year papacy.
Italian Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi told the Corriere della Sera that Leo was "a very simple person, intensely kind. He is in the vein of Francis, but less spiky".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Hlabisa is a lesson on getting things done behind chaos
While the GNU continues to be chaotic, Cogta Minister Velenkosini Hlabisa has kept calm and done the unthinkable. The GNU presents a laugh a day. In the last month, Andrew Whitfield got axed, setting an awkward precedent for President Cyril Ramaphosa's defence chief. While bus drivers are taking their own lives, having not been paid since January, a dialogue is on the go that increasingly seems to be evolving into a monologue. Gayton McKenzie has been doing his thing, whatever that might be on the day, and team DA is patting themselves on the back for outsourcing state work to the banks. And we all applauded it, such is our disdain of home affairs. Oh, and the ministers appointed to fix load shedding were busted doing what we already knew they were doing; burning diesel as ferociously as Christians burned Beatles albums. Amid all the chaos and lack of time to consider which connected cadre should feast on which deal, some real good has been done; Transnet even seems to be on the rise, Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's revelations are promising to unlock some gems and South Africa's economic kingpin, Thabo Mbeki, has finally found some guts to start saying some things. Amid the chaos, some things are improving The weather is perfect for sowing the seeds of ideas that may be great for the country and good for the fiscus, even if they aren't politically popular. In a country where a small minority are being squeezed for funding, it's difficult to make financially prudent decisions. But since that money isn't getting to the people it's supposed to, it makes it somewhat easier. Add to that the warring internal factions and it shouldn't be surprising that as the castle of patronage comes down, a couple of things can be improved with the resources. A minister who seemingly gets this and has largely kept a calm demeanor throughout the GNU is Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (Cogta) Velenkosini Hlabisa. During lockdown, we learned just how much power Cogta has and Hlabisa has been wielding it pretty impressively. ALSO READ: IFP reaffirms GNU role, slams NPA and urges reforms within justice system Halbisa takes on municipal functionality On natural disaster management, he's done the unthinkable in South African terms; enhancing the implementation of a 10-year-old framework. It shouldn't be impressive, but since we tend to have a kink of jumping from one policy to the next, doubling down and anchoring a belief in a policy's execution is quite a brave and functional thing. When last have you heard a minister insistent on implementing the plan of a predecessor and making it work? Hlabisa genuinely seems to want to do what's good for the people and when it comes to preventing them from dying, that's quite nice. I'm not sure if it's because nobody knows how to get in his way or whether it's just not profitable to impose themselves on him, the minister has been given some room to manoeuvre and it appears he knows this. It shouldn't be surprising that he's taken on what is probably going to be the most difficult reform of this administration; municipal functionality. Ten years ago, you wouldn't dream of anybody in Jacob Zuma's cabinet thinking of claiming that the national government is bloated, let alone municipalities. ALSO READ: Cogta warns municipalities against wasting R1.2 billion disaster relief Now, the minister is having a right go at the state of municipal affairs and fairly so. It's not like John Steenhuisen is going to criticise anybody's literacy because it will come off poorly, but the way Hlabisa puts it makes it pragmatic in the eyes of the public. 'You can't monitor billions if you can't read,' he said. Why on earth we're even in a position where he's got to say that is beyond me, but thank goodness somebody has finally said it. What's most exciting about this shake up is that it's clearly a long term investment and he's set milestones allowing him to take his time on the matter. It shows a degree of seriousness rather than politricking and perhaps we don't see the results in his lifetime. It feels so good to hear a minister commit themselves to a long term solution to an issue that nobody has really tried to address in 30 years. There's a saying about great men planting trees and I really hope this one grows. We could do with the shade. READ NEXT: Almost 40 municipalities facing sanctions from Treasury over mismanagement

The Star
19 hours ago
- The Star
SACC calls for transparency and unity ahead of National Dialogue
The South African Council of Churches (SACC) has expressed concern over the upcoming National Dialogue Convention, calling for greater transparency, inclusivity, and accountability in the lead-up to the event scheduled for August 15 and 16, 2025. In a statement following an emergency meeting of its national church leaders on August 11, the SACC said the gathering was held to reflect on the 'diverse views of the Christian leaders in the SACC and establish a united response to the country's temperature as relates to the National Dialogue.' The intervention from the SACC comes as momentum around the National Dialogue is threatened by a growing number of withdrawals and concerns around the process. Several prominent legacy foundations, including the Steve Biko Foundation, Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation, WDB Foundation, Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group, announced their withdrawal last Friday. ActionSA, AfriForum, the Solidarity union, and the Freedom Front Plus have also pulled out of the National Dialogue, raising further questions about the inclusivity and legitimacy of the process. The church leaders believe that postponing the National Convention 'would have been a wise route to consider,' to allow space for reflection and alignment around the core needs of the South African people. Such a delay, they said, could help to 'maximise unity through an inclusive journey from the start.' The SACC said in a media statement dated 2 July 2024: 'It is our experience that for such an effort to be successful, it does need to be protected from narrow political interests; and must be seen and experienced as being in the control of the people rather than a few who speak on behalf of others. It must be inclusive of all sectors of society to ensure its legitimacy in the eyes of the people.' They warned that 'the concerns raised about the readiness to host the National Convention in their totality must be addressed to build confidence in society.' They said this can only happen through 'transparency, accountability, and adherence to all procurement laws.' The SACC said the dialogue must be guided by societal ownership and leadership, and that any misdirection of resources 'needs to be clearly spelt out' with 'appropriate steps' taken. Calling on the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) to lead with integrity, the SACC said: 'At this juncture, the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) should provide moral leadership that will unite us all.' They added that the group was formed 'to make sure that in everything related to the National Dialogue, it becomes the face of its leadership, and the voice of reason to speak truth to all actors at all times.' The SACC acknowledged the latest public commitment from EPG co-chairs, Prof Tinyiko Maluleke and Mr Roelf Meyer, who said: 'The EPG will be reaching out to the foundations and the Presidency to seek solutions to the issues they have raised. ''The EPG will also be reaching out to the political players who have opted out of the process. Such is the nature of an authentic National Dialogue that the door must remain open for everyone to join the process.'

IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Poetic Licence: When the whip hand claims the wounds
America has discovered a new export from South Africa: not wine, not platinum, not coal, but victimhood. In the latest US human rights report, Afrikaners are cast as the persecuted minority, their fate packaged for American audiences as a morality tale of white farmers under siege. It's a story that plays neatly into the anxieties of Trump's conservative base: white Christian families displaced, driven from "their ancestral lands", "refugees" waiting to be saved. But like most exports, this one has been stripped, refined, and rebranded for foreign consumption. In this telling, land reform becomes theft, and the farmer's hand is always the one that bleeds. What goes missing is the other half of the story: the millions dispossessed of land through centuries of conquest, war, and apartheid laws. Their wounds are too messy, too dark, too political to make it into the glossy packaging of a Washington report. There is an absurdity here, the kind that only history can provide. The descendants of colonisers, beneficiaries of forced removals and racial privilege, are suddenly reimagined as the dispossessed. The narrative flips like a coin, and somehow, those who once held the whip now wear the cloak of victimhood. It is the ghost of colonial inversion: the old order rearranged to look like a new injustice. The Trump Administration has gone further, turning the myth into policy. By opening its doors to Afrikaner refugees, the US offers sanctuary to white farmers while keeping its borders shut to Haitians, Palestinians, and Mexicans fleeing real wars, famines, and state collapse. Refugee status becomes a privilege extended selectively, not a human right, but a political tool. Suffering, it seems, only counts when it comes in the right shade. This weaponisation of human rights reporting reduces the global conversation to theatre. America plays the role of saviour, while South Africa is cast as the villain; its land reform recast as persecution, its attempts at justice reframed as vengeance. In the process, the real crises, gender-based violence, township poverty, shack fires, and the daily grind of inequality slip off the stage entirely. It is easier to cry for the farmer than for the domestic worker. Easier to imagine exile than to confront the stubborn reality of shacks without toilets, schools without books, hospitals without medicine. White tears travel better across the Atlantic; black wounds are too easily ignored. Perhaps this is the most dangerous part of the narrative: it silences the majority by amplifying the myth of minority persecution. It makes the knife of dispossession vanish from the body of the nation, leaving only the hand that once gripped the blade to be bandaged and comforted. America may choose to buy this export, but South Africa cannot afford its price. Our future doesn't depend on comforting illusions, but on confronting the truth of our history, and finally, after centuries, returning the land to those from whom it was stolen.