logo
Bihar electoral roll revision: Concerns persist as party reps meet ECI

Bihar electoral roll revision: Concerns persist as party reps meet ECI

Hindustan Times18 hours ago
Concerns persisted even as representatives of 11 parties, including the Congress and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), met top Election Commission of India (ECI) officials to oppose the special intensive revision of the electoral roll in poll-bound Bihar. Congress leader Abhishek Singhvi called the revision a violation of the level playing field. (PTI)
RJD lawmaker Manoj Jha said that the two-and-a-half-hour meeting with chief election commissioner, Gyanesh Kumar, and commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, on Wednesday was not cordial, and the reflection that should have accompanied their concerns was absent. He called the revision a conspiracy to 'displace' tens of thousands of people in Bihar. '...It is also a question of Bihar's identity. You have set out to find doubtful voters in Bihar, and that reveals your intentions…'
Congress leader Abhishek Singhvi called the revision a violation of the level playing field. He added that if voters are left out, it would be an insult to the Constitution's basic structure.
The ECI has said an electoral roll revision was last held in Bihar in 2003, which covered nearly 50 million people, underlining it has a constitutional obligation to ensure that only citizens are on it.
It instructed the electoral registration officers to treat the 2003 electoral roll as 'probative evidence of eligibility, including presumption of citizenship unless they receive any other input otherwise.'
Singhvi noted that 22 years have passed since 2003 and questioned whether all the elections held during this time were wrong and not according to the rules. 'If you had to conduct an intensive revision, why announce it in June? They could have done it after January. The documents you [ECI) are asking for over the last decade have been Aadhaar and ration card.'
He said now one needs a birth certificate, and documents of the father and mother. 'Migrants, already suffering from floods, will keep running around for documents.'
Singhvi said a level playing field has for decades been the foundation of elections. 'Those who are on the voter list [and] without documents will find themselves deprived of their right to vote.'
He said the backward communities will have to run around, without documents, despite their names being on the list. 'This is a violation of the level playing field because it is the foundation of any election and a republic, which in turn is the basis of the basic structure of the Constitution. Any insult to this [voting right] will be an insult to the basic structure.'
Jha echoed Singhvi and said they raised the concerns of Bihar's poor, downtrodden, backward, Dalit, and Muslim communities. 'We submitted how this is…an attempt to displace people; a conspiracy to remove them from the voter roll…If the purpose of any exercise shifts from inclusion to exclusion, what can we say?'
He questioned the rationale for repeating something done 22 years ago. 'There was no answer. Are your employees equipped? No response. What will happen if issues arise within a month? The criteria you use to measure eligibility....most people do not have those documents.'
Jha said he was referring to those lacking sufficient belongings. 'These are poor people enduring both drought and floods, and in the midst of this, you demand documents within a month. If your [ECI] intention is to displace people on a large scale, this story would not end here. There will be a flood on the streets, too.'
He called the right to vote the most important right. '...one vote, one value, whether it is an industrialist or a landless farmer. If you are [ECI] tampering with that right at someone's behest… I hope the ECI reads the writing on the wall.'
Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Liberation general secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya said that the ECI brought up Maharashtra, where Rahul Gandhi has alleged industrial-scale voter rigging, to justify the exercise in Bihar.
'The Commission did not say anything about why there was no prior consultation. For the people of Bihar, this is like notebandi [demonetisation]...they call it votebandi [restricting voting]. They [ECI] did not even indicate expanding the list of documents supporting eligibility, although they may consider something at a later stage.'
Bhattacharya said they made all the points, but the ECI did not say anything. '...these are no concerns [for ECI]. The voting right itself is at stake.'
The ECI said the concerns of the political parties were fully addressed and maintained that the revision was being conducted as per the Constitution. 'The Commission thanked all political parties for appointing more than 1.5 lakh [150,000] Booth Level Agents (BLAs) at the ground level for participating in the SIR [special intensive revision] exercise. ...thanked all political parties for actively participating in the SIR process so that no eligible voter is left out.'
On June 24, the ECI announced the revision, emphasising the need to clean the electoral roll due to rapid urbanisation, frequent migration, increasing numbers of first-time voters, non-reporting of deaths, and the inclusion of names of undocumented foreigners.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Safety of warkaris is of prime importance, and police are alert to prevent any untoward incident: Shinde
Safety of warkaris is of prime importance, and police are alert to prevent any untoward incident: Shinde

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Safety of warkaris is of prime importance, and police are alert to prevent any untoward incident: Shinde

Kolhapur: The safety of warkaris is the responsibility of the state govt, and the police department is alert to prevent any untoward incident in the wari, said deputy chief minister Eknath Shinde at Pandharpur. He was responding to a question from reporters regarding Shiv Sena MLC Manisha Kayande's claim that "urban naxals" had infiltrated the wari. Kayande raised the issue in the ongoing session of the state legislature on Wednesday. She said that atheist people and their organisations participated in the wari — the pilgrimage of the devotees to Pandharpur — in the guise of creating awareness about the Constitution and environment by organising 'Constitution Dindi' and 'Environment Dindi.' Kayande termed such people "urban naxals" who are using the wari to spread their ideology among warkaris. The state govt is bringing Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, and Kayande claimed that the bill was aimed at stopping the activities of "urban naxals". Her remark has been condemned by the opposition and various warkari groups. Asked about the anger among the warkari groups regarding the claim of "urban naxals" infiltrating the pilgrimage, Shinde said, "Everyone wants a safe wari to take place. It is the govt's responsibility. No single warkari should face trouble. The police are alert and ready for preventive action against any wrong incident. If someone is found indulging in such activities, police will take action immediately. " Dharmik, adhyatmik adishthan above political adisthan: Shinde Shinde said that he has come as a devotee. "For us, warkaris are VIPs. Arrangements have been made so that the time required for darshan has reduced to five to six hours from 15-16 hours. For me, dharmik and adhyatmik adishtan (religious and spiritual power) is above rajkiya adishthan (political power)," said Shinde. During the visit, Shinde and ministers Girish Mahajan and Prakash Abitkar visited Palkhi Sthal—the place where the Palkhis on their way to Pandharpur will rest. He asked the authorities to control the release of water from Ujani dam so that Bhima river (called Chandrabhaga) passing through the town empties the sand beach, allowing warkaris to access the river water for a holy dip. Palkhis of sant brothers meet In Malshiras tehsil, the palkhis of Sant Dnyaneshwar and his brother Sopandev Maharaj meet. The Bandhu Bhet is celebrated by the warkaris walking along with the palkhis. Afterwards, the palkhi of Sant Dnyaneshwar moved and entered Pandharpur tehsil.

ED arguments over in Herald case, it's Gandhis' turn now
ED arguments over in Herald case, it's Gandhis' turn now

Time of India

time41 minutes ago

  • Time of India

ED arguments over in Herald case, it's Gandhis' turn now

Sonia and Rahul Gandhi NEW DELHI: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) claimed before a Delhi court on Thursday that the National Herald case is a "classic case of money laundering". Young Indian Pvt Ltd, in which ex-Congress presidents Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi held a 76% stake, was allegedly created to launder Rs 2,000 crore from Associated Journals Ltd, the company that published 'National Herald' newspaper. "This is a classic case where the offence of money laundering is made against all the accused," submitted additional solicitor general SV Raju, appearing for the ED before the court of special judge Vishal Gogne. He asked the court to take cognisance of the chargesheet. The court was hearing arguments on the point of cognisance of the chargesheet filed against Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi in the money laundering case. The agency concluded its arguments in the case on Thursday. Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi will make submissions before the court on Friday, appearing for Sonia Gandhi. The ED, through the ASG, submitted that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi were beneficial owners and in ultimate control of Young Indian, and that after the deaths of other shareholders they had 100% control. "These two persons controlled the All India Congress Committee. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trending in in 2025: Local network access control [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo They saw that AICC released a Rs 90 crore loan to Associated Journals Limited, or AJL, a Rs 2,000 crore company, the publisher of National Herald newspaper. The purpose was to have Rs 2,000 crore," Raju told the court. Raju claimed Sonia and Rahul Gandhi were responsible for the conduct of business of Young Indian and the fraudulent takeover of properties valued at over Rs 2,000 crore of AJL was with their connivance and consent. The ASG alleged that the shareholding in the venture was just in name and that all the other accused were puppets of the Gandhi family. He added that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi control Congress and wanted to get hold of Rs 2,000 crore instead of the said Rs 92 crore. As per the ED, Congress provided an interest-free loan of Rs 90 crore to AJL, which had assets worth Rs 2,000 crore, for a consideration of just Rs 50 lakh. This debt was allegedly converted into equity in YI's favour. "They deprived AJL's shareholders of their right. YI invested just Rs 50 lakh and got Rs 2,000 crore. YI gained wrongfully and shareholders suffered," he said. The court asked Raju if the shareholders are also witnesses in this case. Calling the matter a little peculiar, the judge asked whether they should not also be made witnesses. "The ED has not investigated the 1,000 shareholders. So will this trial go on without them being witnesses," the court asked. The ASG replied, "The record speaks for itself. This is a classic case of money laundering. The real culprits are these seven persons (including Sonia and Rahul), once you pierce the veil. Today, Sonia and Rahul Gandhi hold almost all shares. They're the beneficial owners of the company."

`Defamation' of Savarkar: court says it can't compel Rahul Gandhi to produce `book' cited by him
`Defamation' of Savarkar: court says it can't compel Rahul Gandhi to produce `book' cited by him

The Print

time41 minutes ago

  • The Print

`Defamation' of Savarkar: court says it can't compel Rahul Gandhi to produce `book' cited by him

Satyaki Savarkar, the complainant in the case, had filed the application in May, claiming no such book as cited by Gandhi existed, and he should be asked to produce it if it did. The Congress leader cannot be compelled to produce the book, said judge Amol Shinde of the special court for MPs and MLAs. Pune, July 3 (PTI) A court here on Thursday rejected a plea by the grandnephew of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar seeking access to a `book' cited by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi while allegedly making defamatory remarks against the late freedom fighter. The court, in its order, said the accused cannot be compelled to disclose his defense before the commencement of the trial. 'The accused may produce any relevant documents during the presentation of his defense evidence. If the accused is compelled to produce such evidence prematurely, it would amount to violation of his fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India, which protects against self-incrimination,' the order stated. 'As per Article 20(3)…'No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that an order cannot be passed directing the accused to file the incriminating documents,' the judge further said. Satyaki Savarkar has filed a defamation complaint against Rahul Gandhi, citing his speech in London in March 2023. As per the complaint, the Congress MP claimed during the speech that V D Savarkar had written in a 'book' that 'he and five to six of his friends once beat up a Muslim man, and he (Savarkar) felt happy'. No such incident ever took place, nor did Savarkar write any such account, Satyaki Savarkar said in his defamation complaint. PTI SPK KRK This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store