logo
Federal court invalidates Gulf oil drilling lease

Federal court invalidates Gulf oil drilling lease

Yahoo28-03-2025

(Image credit: U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management)
In a legal setback for fossil fuel advocates, a federal court has invalidated a large offshore oil and gas lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico, ruling Thursday in favor of environmental groups that sued to block the lease after it was scheduled for auction in 2023.
U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta, an Obama appointee in the District of Columbia, found unlawful a 73-million acre offshore oil and gas lease sale, one of the largest in history, that the Interior Department held in March 2023. Oil and gas leases are contracts in which private companies rent tracts of federal land or water from the government usually for the purposes of drilling or extracting raw materials.
The court ruled in favor of groups that had sued the Interior Department, finding that the agency failed to adequately consider the potential harms of climate changing emissions from fossil fuel production arising out of the lease as well as the impact to the nearly-extinct Rice's whale, which lives exclusively in the Gulf of Mexico. The most recent scientific survey in 2017-18 estimated that only about 50 of the endangered whales are still alive, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Gulf energy industry could face challenges with some of Trump's promises
The judge ordered additional briefing from the parties regarding what remedies the court should impose.
The Interior Department, through the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management under the Biden administration, had previously canceled the lease sale nearly three years ago. However, U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, a centrist Democrat from West Virginia, inserted a provision into the Inflation Reduction Act that forced the Interior Department to resurrect the sales along with two others that were similarly canceled. Separate litigation remains ongoing to decide the fate of the two other sales, one in the Gulf of Mexico and the other in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).
The next Gulf oil and gas lease is scheduled for auction in 2025, and two others are proposed to take place over the next five years. After leases are sold, it typically takes many years before platforms and other infrastructure are built and drilling begins.
For various reasons, some companies purchase leases and don't use them at all. Hundreds of oil and gas leases currently sit idle as fuel prices have been relatively stable for several years on the global energy market. The last oil and gas lease auction in ANWR this year drew no bids.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal judge blocks Trump executive order that requires proof of US citizenship to vote and limits mail-in ballots
Federal judge blocks Trump executive order that requires proof of US citizenship to vote and limits mail-in ballots

CNN

time34 minutes ago

  • CNN

Federal judge blocks Trump executive order that requires proof of US citizenship to vote and limits mail-in ballots

A federal judge in Massachusetts on Friday blocked part of President Donald Trump's executive order that seeks to revamp how elections are run in the United States. Judge Denise Casper issued a preliminary injunction halting requirements to show written proof of US citizenship when registering to vote in elections and Trump's effort to prohibit states from counting mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day. The mail-in ballot ruling applies only in states that filed the lawsuit. Non-citizens are already prohibited from voting in federal elections, but opponents of the executive order argue that requiring the documentary proof of citizenship will deter people from registering. Casper, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, cited examples such as college students or immigrants who don't have access to a birth certificate or passport. The executive order, Casper wrote, 'would burden the States with significant efforts and substantial costs to revamp voter registration procedures and would impede the registration of eligible voters, many of whom lack ready access to documentary evidence of citizenship (e.g., U.S. passport and other forms of identification that reflect citizenship).' The lawsuit is one of several that challenge Trump's election executive order. It was brought by California, Nevada, Massachusetts, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin. A federal judge in Washington, DC, previously ruled against the provision forcing registrants from providing documents proving their citizenship. This story is breaking and will be updated.

Trump Tries to Humiliate GOP Senator by Claiming He ‘Snuck' Into White House Picnic
Trump Tries to Humiliate GOP Senator by Claiming He ‘Snuck' Into White House Picnic

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Tries to Humiliate GOP Senator by Claiming He ‘Snuck' Into White House Picnic

Donald Trump appeared to make a dig at Sen. Rand Paul by suggesting he 'snuck' into Thursday night's congressional picnic—despite having been invited after a war of words with the White House. Addressing the bipartisan crowd on the White House lawn, Trump seemed to allude to a recent dust-up between himself and Paul, who has vocally opposed the GOP's budget and the $45 million military parade for the Army's 250th anniversary on Saturday, which is also Trump's 79th birthday. 'We have so many of our congressmen, and we have some senators in here, I have to tell you,' Trump said from the balcony. 'They snuck in, but that's OK. They wanted to be here.' On Wednesday, Paul said Trump had revoked his family's invitation, and accused the president of being 'incredibly petty.' 'The level of immaturity is beyond words,' Paul said at the time, adding that the move had caused him to 'lose a lot of respect I once had for Donald Trump.' Yet the following morning, Trump took to Truth Social to say that 'of course' Paul and his family could come. 'He's the toughest vote in the history of the U.S. Senate, but why wouldn't he be?' Trump wrote. 'Besides, it gives me more time to get his Vote on the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill, one of the greatest and most important pieces of legislation ever put before our Senators & Congressmen/women. It will help to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! I look forward to seeing Rand. The Party will be Great!' Trump's aside Thursday may also have had to do with Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, who has long been a thorn in Trump's side from the right, most recently with his vote against the GOP's budget which passed the House by a single vote. On Thursday morning, Massie claimed the White House had withheld his invitation. 'Incredibly petty & shortsighted of Trump's staff to exclude Republicans from the annual White House picnic while inviting Pelosi and every Democrat,' Massie posted on X, a few hours before Trump cleared the air regarding Paul. 'I always give my few tickets to my staff and their kids, but apparently this year my tickets have been withheld as well. Low class.' It wasn't immediately clear whether Massie ultimately attended the picnic. The White House did not respond to a request for comment from the Daily Beast, nor did Massie's office.

Judge blocks Trump's election executive order, siding with Democrats who called it overreach
Judge blocks Trump's election executive order, siding with Democrats who called it overreach

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Judge blocks Trump's election executive order, siding with Democrats who called it overreach

ATLANTA (AP) — A federal judge on Friday blocked President Donald Trump's attempt to overhaul elections in the U.S., siding with a group of Democratic state attorneys general who challenged the effort as unconstitutional. Trump's March 25 executive order sought to compel officials to require documentary proof of citizenship for everyone registering to vote for federal elections, accept only mailed ballots received by Election Day and condition federal election grant funding on states adhering to the new ballot deadline. The group of attorneys general said the directive 'usurps the States' constitutional power and seeks to amend election law by fiat.' The White House has defended the order as 'standing up for free, fair and honest elections' and called proof of citizenship a 'commonsense' requirement. Judge Denise J. Casper of the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts said in Friday's order that the states had a likelihood of success as to their legal challenges. 'The Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections,' Casper wrote. Casper also noted that, when it comes to citizenship, 'there is no dispute (nor could there be) that U.S. citizenship is required to vote in federal elections and the federal voter registration forms require attestation of citizenship.' Casper cited arguments made by the states that the requirements would 'burden the States with significant efforts and substantial costs' to update procedures.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store