logo
UN High Commissioner For Human Rights Volker Türk Concludes Official Visit To Serbia

UN High Commissioner For Human Rights Volker Türk Concludes Official Visit To Serbia

Scoop22-05-2025

Belgrade, 21 May 2025
Dobar dan,
And thank you all for coming.
My visit to Serbia is part of a long and solid cooperation between the UN Human Rights Office and the country. I am grateful to the Government for having facilitated this visit, and for the important meetings yesterday and today with the authorities, with parliamentarians, with independent institutions, civil society, university students and other partners.
I appreciate the Government's engagement with my Office and with UN human rights mechanisms. Serbia has ratified almost all international human rights treaties and recently acceded to the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. I also welcome the adoption by the Government of the Leave No One Behind guidance tool that is meant to influence legislative and policy processes. But it is also very important to move forward and to guarantee a meaningful participation of all relevant stakeholders in the legislative processes. The national human rights mechanisms and the independence of the judiciary also need to be strengthened.
For more than six months, Serbia has been witnessing a wave of protests mainly led by students, calling for transparency and accountability for the tragic incident at Novi Sad's railway station on 1 November of last year. The students' demands also include fighting corruption, the release of those who were detained for taking part in peaceful protests, accountability for attacks against demonstrators, and an increase in the budget for higher education.
Today at the University of Belgrade, I had a chance to meet with students and their professors. I was impressed by the energy and by the enthusiasm of these young people. They have expressed a strong desire to me for a free and democratic society, and a thirst for human rights. Their voices need to be heard and respected.
Societies thrive when there is an open, free and inclusive space for dialogue, where challenges can be discussed safely, when divergent opinions can be expressed freely, when criticism can be expressed without fear of reprisals, and when the vilification of critical voices is consigned to the past.
Freedom of expression and the right to peaceful assembly are fundamental to society – particularly when there is sharp disagreement on major issues. A solution needs to be found so that the exercise of these freedoms is not pitted against the right to education.
During my visit, I was struck by the level of profound polarisation and division within society, and by the lack of trust in State institutions and political actors. This highlights the need for the renewal of the social contract. Trust can only be gained through confidence-building measures, an open mind, and a self-critical reflection by everyone.
I have urged the Government to ensure transparency and carry out prompt and thorough investigations into the Novi Sad tragedy, as well as into all allegations of violence against peaceful protesters. I have also expressed the readiness of my Office to carry out a fact-finding mission into the incidents surrounding the demonstration on 15 March. Nonetheless, it is encouraging to see that the recent protests have been mostly peaceful.
My Office has received reports of raids, verbal attacks, harassment, intimidation, arbitrary arrests, threats and smear campaigns directed against human rights defenders and media workers. We have also received reports about unlawful digital surveillance and lawsuits being used to intimidate, with a chilling effect. These are obviously concerns that need to be taken seriously and addressed.
I am concerned about a rise in hate speech, both online and in traditional media outlets. Women, Roma and other communities, as well as LGBTIQ+ people and journalists, are particularly targeted. And sometimes, even politicians and high-level officials engage in hateful rhetoric. Vilifying and stigmatising those who exercise their human rights and defend them can only lead to deeper polarisation and fear.
It is crucial to address the root causes of discrimination and marginalisation against all ethnic and national minorities. The Roma community still suffers from high poverty rates, exclusion, and limited access to healthcare, education, employment and basic services. This is unfortunately a phenomenon we see in many countries in Europe. Existing anti-discrimination policies need to be reinforced, with systematic collection of disaggregated data to help monitor and combat discrimination.
Gender backlash is a global phenomenon, which also manifests itself in Serbia. It is expressed through the recent suspension of the gender equality law, misogynistic narratives and attacks, notably against women in the public sphere, as well as gender-based violence, including femicide. People with disabilities also suffer from discrimination. Their rights need to be guaranteed, both in laws and in their application.
Serbia is part of a region that has suffered greatly as a result of war and conflict. Serbians have shown willingness to advance and rebuild a nation based on equality and human rights. Transitional justice is an important pillar in this process.
More is needed in this regard. Accountability for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed during the 1990s remains a major challenge. A number of criminal cases are still under investigation, with limited and often slow judicial proceedings. Most convictions involve low-ranking officials, while cross-border judicial cooperation and information sharing are still weak.
Serbia also lacks a legal framework to recognise the status of missing people and the rights of their families. And victims' access to justice and reparations remains inadequate.
Memorialisation is an essential part of the healing process. The denial of war crimes and glorification of war criminals are the opposite. Without genuine transitional justice, including truth and reconciliation, wounds of the past will remain open.
I also had discussions with the authorities regarding the human rights situation in Kosovo, particularly with respect to non-majority communities. I am aware of the situation, and my Office will continue to work on it. I am committed to follow up personally.
During the visit, I was touched by the resilience of people I met, as well as their desire and willingness to advance human rights in the country. They have my full solidarity and support.
Thank you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Choose Clean Water - Latest News [Page 1]
Choose Clean Water - Latest News [Page 1]

Scoop

time2 hours ago

  • Scoop

Choose Clean Water - Latest News [Page 1]

Changes To Fish & Game Continue Coalition's Handover Of Power To Polluters Choose Clean Water spokesperson Tom Kay says the changes announced today are clearly designed to remove Fish & Game's ability to advocate for the health of rivers. More >> 'Don't Be Fooled': Govt's Freshwater Reforms Means More Pollution In Your Water & Commercial Control Of Public Resources Friday, 30 May 2025, 7:30 pm | Choose Clean Water Choose Clean Water says it's important for the public to make submissions on the changes (these can be made until 27 July 2025) but it's just as important for the public to contact MPs and Ministers directly to voice their opposition. More >> National Direction Changes Expected To Advance Dangerous ACT Ideology At Expense Of The Health Of NZers And Environment Monday, 26 May 2025, 3:04 pm | Choose Clean Water Choose Clean Water says the cabinet paper's prioritising of 'the enjoyment of private property rights' in public policy is straight out of an extreme libertarian ideology and becomes incoherent and dangerous when applied to communities' needs ... More >> Farm Model Weakness Proves Strength Of Input Controls To Save Rivers Wednesday, 11 August 2021, 4:57 pm | Choose Clean Water Freshwater campaigners say the independent review of farm modelling tool, 'Overseer', released today has found profound weaknesses with the tool and in doing so has proved the strength of Government and regional councils turning to greater control of inputs ... More >> Government Must Stand Strong On Freshwater Reform For All New Zealanders Wednesday, 14 July 2021, 1:52 pm | Choose Clean Water Campaigners say the Government must stand strong against pressure from some in the agricultural sector to weaken freshwater reforms, following the release today of the Government's consultation document on freshwater farm plans and fencing rules. ... More >> Wairarapa Water Ltd.'s Bad Science And Poor Process A Warning Bell For All Monday, 21 December 2020, 1:31 pm | Choose Clean Water Freshwater campaigners say Wairarapa iwi Rangitāne o Wairarapa statement released today highlighting their concerns around Wairarapa Water Ltd's 'rushed time frames and incorrect information' is an important warning bell for the public and politicians. ... More >> Fish & Game Endangers Its Vital Public Role By Moving Closer To Federated Farmers Friday, 27 November 2020, 3:49 pm | Choose Clean Water Freshwater Campaigners Say The NZ Fish And Game Council Is Endangering Its Vital Public Role In The Protection Of Rivers And Lakes If It Moves Closer To Federated Farmers, Following Today's Announcement On The Two Organisations' Intention To ... More >> Water Campaigners Welcome Greens' Focus On Nitrogen Pollution Saturday, 12 September 2020, 12:16 pm | Choose Clean Water Water campaigners are welcoming the Greens' focus on nitrogen pollution in the party's 'Farming for the future' policy released today. 'Excessive nitrogen in our waterways is impacting the health of people, rivers and lakes, and wildlife ... More >> Water Storage Should Not Be Prioritised Over Waste & Drinking Water Infrastructure Thursday, 11 June 2020, 5:03 pm | Choose Clean Water The Government should be putting public health first in its post-Covid spending, freshwater campaigners say, prioritising waste and drinking water infrastructure over water storage Campaigners from Choose Clean Water were disappointed to learn ... More >> Crucial Policy Missing From Government's Water Announcement, Say Campaigners Thursday, 28 May 2020, 12:16 pm | Choose Clean Water Freshwater campaigners are frustrated the Government has delayed a crucial decision on nitrogen pollution for a further 12 months until after the election. 'We have urged the Government many times to put in place clear and unequivocal limits for ... More >> Strong Water Rules Essential As New Report Shows Most NZ Rivers Polluted Thursday, 16 April 2020, 12:39 pm | Choose Clean Water A government report released today shows most New Zealand rivers are polluted, highlighting why strong water rules are urgently needed, say freshwater campaigners. The report shows most of our waterways are under stress and many are severely impacted. In our ... More >> Industry Lobbyists And Politicians – Don't Exploit Covid-19 Crisis To Push Long-held Agendas Monday, 23 March 2020, 11:18 am | Choose Clean Water It is irresponsible and dishonest for agricultural industry lobbyists and opportunistic politicians to exploit the Covid-19 crisis for their unrelated political agendas, say freshwater campaign group Choose Clean Water. Federated Farmers have called for ... More >> 'Don't Fail Us On Water, PM': Togs, Towels And A Serious Message At Parliament Today Monday, 2 March 2020, 7:38 am | Choose Clean Water A group of young freshwater campaigners are getting their togs on, grabbing a towel and heading to parliament at rush hour this morning with a message to Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern; 'Don't fail us on water.' The group, from the student-established ... More >> 'Strong Water Rules Now': Campaigners Remind PM Of Clean River Promises Outside Parliament Today Tuesday, 11 February 2020, 6:59 am | Choose Clean Water Freshwater campaigners will be outside parliament today with large banners reminding the Prime Minister of her party's 2017 pre-election promises to clean up the country's rivers. The group from Choose Clean Water, a student-established campaign to strengthen ... More >> Stats NZ shows urban & rural NZers agree on water pollution Wednesday, 2 October 2019, 3:00 pm | Choose Clean Water Results of the General Social Survey highlighted today by Stats NZ today show that urban and rural New Zealanders agree on freshwater pollution, say freshwater campaigners. 'Information on the General Social Survey 2018 released today by Stats NZ today ... More >> Freshwater policy holds potential if Gov resists pressure Thursday, 5 September 2019, 11:03 am | Choose Clean Water Freshwater campaigners welcome the release of Action for healthy waterways policy discussion documents today saying they hold great potential to deliver on the Government's election promise. However, it is clear there is intense pressure from dairy lobbyists ... More >> Dairy-led water accords do nothing to stop intensification Monday, 2 September 2019, 4:22 pm | Choose Clean Water Dairy industry-led water accords have done nothing to stop intensification over the last decades, which has led to the decline of the health of the country's rivers and lakes, say freshwater campaigners. And there is no commitment from dairy leaders ... More >> An 'action plan' with no action and a fatal flaw Tuesday, 5 June 2018, 4:20 pm | Choose Clean Water An 'action plan' with no action and a fatal flaw: Why agricultural leaders continue to fail New Zealand's rivers and their industry For immediate use 4pm Tuesday, 5 June 2018 Choose Clean Water NZ The Good Farming Practice: Action Plan for Water ... More >>

Changes To Fish & Game Continue Coalition's Handover Of Power To Polluters
Changes To Fish & Game Continue Coalition's Handover Of Power To Polluters

Scoop

time2 hours ago

  • Scoop

Changes To Fish & Game Continue Coalition's Handover Of Power To Polluters

Changes announced to Fish & Game this morning are another move in the Coalition Government's handover of power to intensive farming and other polluting commercial interests, and will result in the further degradation of our rivers and freshwater, say freshwater campaigners. Choose Clean Water spokesperson Tom Kay says the changes announced today are clearly designed to remove Fish & Game's ability to advocate for the health of rivers. 'Fish & Game has used its statutory purpose as a strong advocate for the health of rivers across New Zealand, and as such has helped protect numerous rivers from pollution and degradation.' 'There are some things about the system that do need fixing, but this is not only about that—this is the Coalition Govt taking advantage of an opportunity to reduce Fish & Game's influence over polluters." 'When environmental groups, local community groups, or iwi can't afford to legally challenge a damaging activity or poorly made decision, Fish & Game is often there to ensure waterways are protected—working on behalf of their members to protect habitat for fish. But this Government is trying to stop that.' The Coalition has stated that Fish & Game's advocacy functions will be 'revised' so regional Fish & Game Councils will only be able to take court action in relation to advocacy if explicitly approved by the New Zealand Fish & Game Council or the Minister and within a new restricted advocacy policy. This morning's press release from Minister for Hunting and Fishing James Meager on the changes states they will restrict the organisation's ability to undertake court proceedings and require 'Fish & Game councils to better consider the interests of other stakeholders such as farmers and the aviation sector in decision-making'. 'It's telling that the Government has said specifically that it wants Fish & Game to better consider farming interests. Why not public health interests? Why not the interests of future generations? Why not the myriad of other commercial interests that operate in our communities? This demonstrates that this decision is another example of the Government enabling more pollution in rivers, lakes, and drinking water sources, and the handing of more power over our water to polluting commercial interests like intensive farming.' 'We know how detrimental the influence of Ministers can be over the statutory purposes of agencies like the Department of Conservation to protect our environment, for example. This is another case of Ministers being given the power to step in and stop actions that would protect our environment.' Fish & Game led the processes to secure many Water Conservation Orders—similar to National Parks—for our rivers, protecting them for anglers and the public alike to enjoy. In 2002 they launched a large campaign against 'Dirty Dairying' and the conversion of land into intensive agriculture, particularly in the South Island. More recently, Fish & Game took up a legal challenge against ongoing extreme pollution of Southland's waterways where dairy interests were wrongly claiming 'there is no evidence of diffuse discharges from farming activities, either individually or cumulatively, causing adverse effects, including significant adverse effects on aquatic life'. 'Proponents of damaging, intensive agriculture and other major polluters are all over this Government's decisions. This decision stinks of undue influence.'

Government Continues To Respond To Royal Commission Into Abuse In Care
Government Continues To Respond To Royal Commission Into Abuse In Care

Scoop

time7 hours ago

  • Scoop

Government Continues To Respond To Royal Commission Into Abuse In Care

Press Release – New Zealand Government The Royal Commission made 95 recommendations in its 2021 redress report, and 138 in its final report in 2024. Of these 233 recommendations overall, 207 are addressed to the Crown, of these, 85 have been either accepted, partially accepted or we have … Lead Coordination Minister for the Government's Response to the Royal Commission's Report into Historical Abuse in State Care and in the Care of Faith-based Institutions The Government has outlined its ongoing response to the Royal Commission into Historical Abuse in State Care and in the Care of Faith-based Institutions. 'We are committed to continuing to respond to the Royal Commission of Inquiry with respect and dignity. To maintain transparency with our response, the Government's released its Response Plan which lays out what work has already been completed and what work is still underway,' Lead Coordination Minister Erica Stanford says. The Royal Commission made 95 recommendations in its 2021 redress report, and 138 in its final report in 2024. Of these 233 recommendations overall, 207 are addressed to the Crown, of these, 85 have been either accepted, partially accepted or we have accepted the intent. Since the release of the Royal Commission's Final report in July 2024: The Government acknowledged that torture occurred at Lake Alice Psychiatric Hospital Child and Adolescent Unit (Lake Alice) and introduced two pathways for redress which are now underway; An end-of-life payment of $20,000 was made available for Lake Alice survivors along with work to address inequities in the reimbursement of legal fees; Public Apologies were made by the Prime Minister and Government agency Chief Executives on 12 November 2024; A $32 million investment as part of the apology to increase capacity in current redress and claims systems from approximately 1350 to 1550 claims per year Progression of the Responding to Abuse in Care Legislation Amendment Bill which supports the Crown response to a range of recommendations a $2 million dual purpose survivor-focused fund for local authorities, non-governmental organisations and community groups; Commitment to a national day of reflection on the one-year anniversary of the public apology, 12 November 2025; Budget 2025 investment of $533 million over four years, for redress improvements including increasing average payments and increasing the number of claims paid each year; Budget 2025 investment of $188 million over four years to improve the safety of children, young people and vulnerable people. 'We know the Crown's response will be ongoing given the number and complexity of recommendations. The Royal Commission estimated it could take up to 15 years. 'While we can never fully make redress for or right the harm survivors experienced, the Government remains committed to engaging with the Royal Commission's report and recommendations in good faith and with careful consideration,' Ms Stanford says.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store