What can foreigners in Sweden expect from the economy in 2025?
This week's episode of Sweden in Focus Extra features an interview with the economist Américo Fernández from SEB bank.
Advertisement
With the Swedish economy still in a difficult place, The Local's Becky Waterton asks SEB economist Américo Fernández what the outlook is like for the country as a whole, and for households in Sweden, in the coming months and beyond.
What do recent Swedish currency gains mean for foreigners in Sweden? What's useful for immigrants to think about when saving for pensions? How should couples with unequal incomes think about their savings in Sweden? And is now a good time to invest in a summer house in Sweden?
Membership+ subscribers can listen to the full conversation in the latest episode of Sweden in Focus Extra, out April 9th.
READ ALSO:
Get Membership+ to listen to all The Local's podcasts
Sweden in Focus Extra is a podcast for The Local's Membership+ subscribers.
Sign up to Membership+ now and get early, ad-free access to a full-length episode of the Sweden in Focus podcast every weekend, as well as Sweden in Focus Extra every Wednesday.
Please visit the link that applies to you and get a 40% discount on Membership+
Read more about Membership+ in our help centre.
Already have Membership+ but not receiving all the episodes? Go to the podcast tab on your account page to activate your subscription on a podcast platform. If you prefer to listen on the site, you can find all episodes at the bottom of our podcast page.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local Sweden
2 hours ago
- Local Sweden
Europe's largest CO2 capture facility is being built in Stockholm
Work has begun on one of the world's largest carbon capture and storage (CCS) sites in Stockholm. When finished, it is expected to be able to capture more than the Swedish capital's annual road emissions. Advertisement The new plant will have the capacity to capture and store more than 800,000 tonnes of CO2 per year, which is more than the annual emissions from the Swedish capital's road traffic, said Anders Egelrud, CEO of utility Stockholm Exergi, which is leading the project. It "is going to be the largest project of this kind in Europe and one of the largest in the world," Wopke Hoekstra, the European climate commissioner, told reporters as construction began. The investment amounts to 13 billion kronor ($1.4 billion) and the technology will be used to separate, liquefy, and permanently store CO2, generating so-called negative emissions. Stockholm Exergi, which produces heat and electricity for the Swedish capital, already uses residual products from the forestry industry, such as wood chips. The new facility will enable the capture and storage of carbon dioxide released from their own production. Funding comes from subsidies and loans, including from an EU fund and the Swedish state, as well as purchases of emission certificates by private companies. Advertisement The captured CO2 will be temporarily stored on-site before being shipped to Norway for permanent storage in the "underwater" CO2 cemetery Northern Lights, off the coast of Norway. In practical terms, after capture, the CO2 is liquefied and transported by ship to the facility near Norway's Bergen. It is then transferred to large tanks, before going through a 110-kilometre (68-mile) pipeline to be injected into the seabed, at a depth of around 2.6 kilometres. "In the Nordics, you simply have the geography to relatively easily ship it and store it," Hoekstra told AFP. CCS technology is complex and costly but has been advocated by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the International Energy Agency (IEA), especially for reducing the CO2 footprint of industries like cement and steel, which are difficult to decarbonise. The world's overall capture capacity is currently just 50.5 million tonnes, according to the IEA, or barely 0.1 percent of the world's annual total emissions.
Local Sweden
2 hours ago
- Local Sweden
Immigrants contribute more to the Swedish economy than people born in Sweden
New figures from Sweden's National Institute of Economic Research (NIER, or Konjunkturinstitutet in Swedish) have revealed that people born outside of Sweden represent a greater net gain to the Swedish economy than those born in the country, with Indians topping the list. Advertisement What was the report about? The report, which the institute was tasked with putting together on behalf of the government back in 2023, investigated among other things the net contribution of people born outside of Sweden compared to those born in Sweden. The government tasked NIER with calculating 'the costs of immigration', telling them specifically to look at the net cost or benefits of immigration for labour migration and asylum seekers, even listing the average cost or benefit per person and per country of origin. The most recent data used in the report is from 2022, as that was the last full year of data available at the time it was written. This was calculated by subtracting each group's public expenses – for example the cost benefits and public services they have received – from the income the state receives from them in taxes. Essentially, a positive net contribution for a particular group means that that group's resources are effectively redistributed to a different group through public finances. Some groups, for example children and the elderly, generally have a negative net contribution, as they pay less tax and use expensive public services like schools, preschool, pensions, care and healthcare. Others, for example people of working age, generally have a positive net contribution, effectively earning money and paying tax to fund other groups in society. For immigrants, NIER said, and refugees in particular, the time spent in Sweden is important when it comes to net contributions, as it can take time to get established on the Swedish labour market and start paying tax. Advertisement How did the figures differ between groups? In 2022, the most recent figures in the report, around 2.2 million people living in Sweden were registered as utrikesfödd, literally born outside the country. This group had a slightly positive contribution to public finances of six billion kronor, or around 0.1 percent of GDP. In individual terms, that's an individual contribution of around 2,700 kronor per person. People born in Sweden had almost exactly the opposite figures, with a net negative contribution of -6 billion kronor, or -0.1 percent of GDP. Their individual contribution per person was negative at around -700 kronor (this is lower than the figure above as there are more of them). Sweden's immigrant population is roughly one third refugees (around 789,000) and two thirds 'other immigrants' (1.4 million). When the group of people born outside Sweden was split into these two groups, the picture was slightly different. Refugees had a negative net contribution of -22 billion kronor, or -0,4 percent of GDP. For other immigrants, this figure was much higher, with a positive net contribution of 28 billion kronor or 0.5 percent of GDP. This was by far the highest positive contribution of any group in the study. On an individual basis, 'other immigrants' contribute an average of 19,800 kronor per person to the Swedish economy. NIER writes that even though the 'refugee' group as a whole had a negative net contribution, there were substantial variations within the group (as there were with other groups). When this group was limited to people of working age, the ten percent contributing the most had an average net contribution of almost 500,000 kronor per person, while the ten percent contributing the least had an average individual negative net contribution of -300,000 kronor. Advertisement In general, the most expensive cost to the state for people born within Sweden was pensions, followed by childcare, schooling and health and social care. This is mainly due to the fact that most foreign-born people move to Sweden as adults so Sweden does not need to fund their schooling. The most expensive posts for immigrants were financial benefits, child benefits and unemployment insurance, especially when it comes to refugees, as well as fees related to the justice system and integration. How did the figures differ by country of origin? NIER listed contributions by country of origin for immigrants from countries with at least 15,000 foreign-born residents in 2022. The country with by far the highest net contribution to Sweden was India, with Sweden's 56,000 Indians contributing 6.6 billion kronor to the Swedish economy in 2022 or 119,000 kronor per person. That's more than the entire negative contribution of those born in Sweden (-6 billion). Diagram from NIER's report showing the net contribution of different groups to the Swedish economy in 2022. (Figure is per person in thousands of kronor). Image: NIER The next highest group, according to NIER, was 'non-European Anglo-Saxon countries', more specifically the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, followed by former Yugoslavian countries, Iran, new EU member states who joined in 2004 or 2007 and 'Other Western Europe', defined as Belgium, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Portugal, Switzerland, the UK, Germany and Austria. Chile was next, followed by China, Lebanon and Thailand. As far as groups with a negative contribution to state finances were concerned, Swedish-born people had the smallest negative contribution, costing the state around 6 billion kronor, or 700 kronor per person. Next up were people from Iraq, followed by Ethiopia, 'other Nordic' (Denmark, Iceland and Norway), and Afghanistan. Rounding out the groups at the end of the graph were Eritrea, Somalia and Syria, with Finns costing the state the most per person in 2022 (-13.7 billion kronor, or 99,000 kronor per person). This is primarily due to the fact that many Finns who arrived as labour migrants between 1950 and 1970 are now middle aged or older, meaning that they have high costs for pensions, healthcare and elderly care. Advertisement NIER does also warn that the figures in its report should be taken with a pinch of salt – certain expenses and incomes can either not be calculated directly or the available data is not broken down on an individual level, such as figures for schools, healthcare, infrastructure or indirect taxes like employer fees, so many of them are based on assumptions. The figures also do not take into account other affects of immigration on the Swedish economy, such as higher productivity or effects on the labour market. Has there been any criticism of the report? The report has received criticism for essentially being a 'talking point order', essentially an attempt by the government to get NIER to publish figures supporting its hard line on immigration. In an article in Expressen, Daniel Suhonen and Tony Johanson from union think-tank Katalys, argued that the figures in the report were a 'cold shower' for the government, which the day before it was released chose to highlight only one figure in a press conference – the cost of refugees to the Swedish economy. Advertisement Suhonen and Johanson also criticised the way the figures were reported, arguing that many immigrants have lower than average incomes and pay lower than average tax, but that this is not the same as them 'costing' the state money. 'The problem isn't that they show profits or costs, rather differences in tax payments and use of welfare, but lower tax payments is not a 'cost',' they argued, among other things highlighting the fact that immigration can benefit the country in other ways than purely through higher tax income. 'If you claim that NIER's figures show that refugees are a 'cost', then you also have to admit that those born in Sweden also represent a 'cost' – and that right now, those born outside Sweden are the ones keeping Swedish public finances afloat,' they said. 'We suspect that's not what the government and Sweden Democrats were asking for when they ordered these calculations from NIER.'
Local Sweden
4 hours ago
- Local Sweden
Can Sweden's green industry dream be kept alive after Northvolt failure?
The rise and fall of battery maker Northvolt led to fears over several Swedish green industry projects, but can startup steelmaker Stegra confound the doubters? Advertisement Just outside the town of Boden in Sweden's far north a massive worksite is teeming with activity. The metal skeletons rising out of the ground hint at the brand new mill which will produce steel using technology that the company says gives off 95 percent less CO2 emissions than traditional methods. "Right now, we got the pole position," Denis Hennessy, Stegra's vice president for steel, said during a site tour. "We're in a very unique position to do some things first in the industry," Hennessy said as he described the benefits of building a completely new plant. Among heavy industries, iron and steel production is the number one CO2 emitter, according to the International Energy Agency. The traditional process gives off nearly two tonnes of CO2 for every tonne of steel made. Hydrogen The iron ore that comes out of a mine is usually rich in oxides, chemical compounds made up of iron and oxygen, and this oxygen has to be removed – usually by heating it with coke in a blast furnace – which is when most of the CO2 is released. Stegra will remove the oxygen by circulating heated hydrogen gas which binds the oxygen – creating water as a byproduct The hydrogen is also to be produced on site at an electrolyser plant powered by renewable energy. Advertisement Access to cheap renewable energy, such as hydro power in Sweden's north, is key to Stegra's business model, according to CEO Henrik Henriksson. He told a group of investors and reporters that most established European steel firms are paying three times as much for their electricity. "That gives us a relatively huge cost advantage," he added. While traditional steelmaking is still cheaper, Stegra thinks it will benefit by being able to charge a premium for "green" steel. When the company first announced plans for a new plant in 2021, it was called H2 Green Steel and had an ambitious target of starting production in 2024. It also aimed for annual output of five million tonnes of steel – more than all of Sweden's current annual output – by 2030. Northvolt's shadow It is now targeting to turn on the mills in the second half of 2026, with an initial capacity of 2.5 million tonnes of steel per year, which they hope to eventually double. This is a still a drop in the ocean compared to the near 1.9 billion tonnes of steel shipped worldwide in 2024, according to the World Steel Association. Behind Stegra is investment firm Vargas Holding, which was also a co-founder of battery maker Northvolt. Advertisement Northvolt was seen as a cornerstone in European efforts to catch up with Chinese battery producers before production delays and a debt mountain led it to declare bankruptcy in March. As Northvolt was seen as a leader in a green industrial boom in Sweden, its demise has dampened optimism. A review by Dagens Arbete, a magazine published by three labour unions, found that 20 out 30 "green industrial projects" in Sweden were either delayed or had been cancelled. Stegra also has detractors. Magnus Henrekson, a professor at the Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), told AFP that the first problem with the startup was the inland location without the infrastructure to transport large amounts of steel to nearby ports. "And this is to be done by a startup, without previous experience of steel production," Henrekson said, adding that he thought that given Stegra's massive power needs, it was over optimistic to think electricity prices would remain competitive. No Chinese competitor Henrekson also noted that there are signs that the wider steel industry has lost faith in hydrogen reduced iron, highlighting ArcelorMittal's announcement in November that it was holding off decisions on several direct reduction plants – citing both market and technology concerns. Despite the challenges, Stegra's Henriksson stressed that the company was "different" from Northvolt. "We are a different team. We are a different setup," he said, adding that there was "no green steel business" in China to provide competition. Henriksson also said that a key difference was also steel as a product was much different from battery packs for vehicles – which require customers to adapt software, technology and design. Producers who want to reduce their carbon footprint can simply use Stegra's steel, he said. "On Monday ... you can run brown steel. And on Tuesday, you can run green."
