logo
Trump says US and Iranian officials will talk next week as ceasefire holds

Trump says US and Iranian officials will talk next week as ceasefire holds

Mr Trump, who helped negotiate the ceasefire that took hold on Tuesday on the 12th day of the war, told reporters at a Nato summit that he was not particularly interested in restarting negotiations with Iran, insisting that US strikes had destroyed its nuclear programme.
Earlier in the day, an Iranian official questioned whether the United States could be trusted after its weekend attack.
President Donald Trump speaks during a media conference at the end of the Nato summit in The Hague, Netherlands (Alex Brandon/AP)
'We may sign an agreement, I don't know,' Mr Trump said.
'The way I look at it, they fought, the war is done.'
Iran has not acknowledged any talks taking place next week, though US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff has said there has been direct and indirect communication between the countries.
A sixth round of negotiations between the US and Iran had been scheduled for earlier this month in Oman but was cancelled when Israel attacked Iran.
Earlier, Mr Trump said the ceasefire was going 'very well', and added that Iran was 'not going to have a bomb and they're not going to enrich'.
Iran has insisted, however, that it will not give up its nuclear programme.
In a vote underscoring the tough path ahead, its parliament agreed to fast-track a proposal that would effectively stop the country's co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN watchdog that has monitored the programme for years.
Ahead of the vote, parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf criticised the IAEA for having 'refused to even pretend to condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities' that the United States carried out on Sunday.
'For this reason, the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran will suspend co-operation with the IAEA until security of nuclear facilities is ensured, and Iran's peaceful nuclear programme will move forward at a faster pace,' Mr Qalibaf told legislators.
Damage at Fordo enrichment facility after strikes in Iran (Maxar Technologies via AP)
IAEA director general Rafael Mariano Grossi said he had already written to Iran to discuss resuming inspections of their nuclear facilities.
Among other things, Iran claims to have moved its highly enriched uranium ahead of the US strikes, and Mr Grossi said his inspectors need to reassess the country's stockpiles.
'We need to return,' he said.
'We need to engage.'
French President Emmanuel Macron, whose country was part of the 2015 deal with Iran that restricted its nuclear programme but began unravelling after Mr Trump pulled the US out in his first term, said he hoped Tehran would come back to the table.
UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres 'very much hopes' the promised talks will lead to an end to the Israel-Iran conflict, UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric said.
Mr Guterres also hopes the momentum from the Israel-Iran ceasefire will also lead to negotiations to end the conflict in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, Mr Dujarric said.
Iran has long maintained that its nuclear programme was peaceful, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb.
However, Israeli leaders have argued that Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon.
Israel is widely believed to be the only Middle Eastern country with nuclear weapons, which it has never acknowledged.
Workers clear rubble of a damaged building in Tehran, Iran (Vahid Salemi/AP)
The Israel Atomic Energy Commission said its assessment was that the US and Israeli strikes have 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years'.
It did not give evidence to back up its claim.
The US strikes hit three Iranian nuclear sites, which Mr Trump said 'completely and fully obliterated' the country's nuclear programme.
At the Nato summit, when asked about a US intelligence report that found Iran's nuclear programme has been set back only a few months, Mr Trump scoffed and said it would at least take 'years' to rebuild.
Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei confirmed that the strikes by US B-2 bombers using bunker-buster bombs had caused significant damage.
'Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure,' he told Al Jazeera on Wednesday, while refusing to go into detail.
Mr Baghaei seemed to suggest Iran might not shut out IAEA inspectors for good, noting that the bill before parliament only talks of suspending work with the agency, not ending it.
He also insisted Iran has the right to pursue a nuclear energy programme.
A heavily damaged building in a residential area in Beersheba, Israel (Ariel Schalit/AP)
'Iran is determined to preserve that right under any circumstances,' he said.
Mr Witkoff said on Fox News late on Tuesday that Israel and the US had achieved their objective of 'the total destruction of the enrichment capacity' in Iran, and Iran's prerequisite for talks – that Israel end its campaign – had been fulfilled.
'The proof is in the pudding,' he said.
'No-one's shooting at each other. It's over.'
Mr Grossi said he could not speculate on how bad the damage was but that Iran's nuclear capabilities were well known.
'The technical knowledge is there, and the industrial capacity is there,' he said.
'That no-one can deny, so we need to work together with them.'
An Israeli official said the ceasefire agreement with Iran amounted to 'quiet for quiet', with no further understandings about Iran's nuclear programme going ahead.
In the Fox News interview, Mr Witkoff said Mr Trump is now looking to land 'a comprehensive peace agreement that goes beyond even the ceasefire'.
'We're already talking to each other, not just directly, but also through interlocutors,' Mr Witkoff said, adding that the conversations were promising and 'we're hopeful that we can have a long-term peace agreement'.
However, Mr Baghaei said Washington had 'torpedoed diplomacy' with its attacks on nuclear sites, and that while Iran in principle was always open to talks, national security was the priority.
'We have to make sure whether the other parties are really serious when they're talking about diplomacy, or is it again part of their tactics to make more problems for the region and for my country,' he said.
China, a close Iranian partner and major buyer of Iranian oil, said it hoped a 'lasting and effective ceasefire can be achieved so as to promote' peace and stability in the region.
China has blamed Israel for starting the war and destabilising the region.
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun told reporters that China is willing to 'inject positive factors to safeguard peace and stability in the Middle East'.
Mr Grossi said Iran and the international community should seize the opportunity of the ceasefire for a long-term diplomatic solution.
'Out of the … bad things that military conflict brings, there's also now a possibility, an opening,' he said.
'We shouldn't miss that opportunity.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump meets Zelensky and says higher Nato spending may deter future aggression
Trump meets Zelensky and says higher Nato spending may deter future aggression

Leader Live

time16 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Trump meets Zelensky and says higher Nato spending may deter future aggression

Nato members agreed to raise their spending targets by 2035 to 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) annually on core defence requirements as well as defence- and security-related spending. That target had been 2% of GDP. 'Europe stepping up to take more responsibility for security will help prevent future disasters like the horrible situation with Russia and Ukraine,' Mr Trump said at the summit-ending news conference shortly after meeting with Mr Zelensky. 'And hopefully we're going to get that solved.' The US president also reiterated his belief that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine that began with Moscow's invasion in February 2022. 'He'd like to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him,' Mr Trump said. 'He called the other day, and he said, 'Can I help you with Iran?' I said, 'No, you can help me with Russia'.' Mr Trump's meeting with Mr Zelensky was their first face-to-face session since April when they met at St Peter's Basilica during Pope Francis's funeral. Mr Trump also had a major confrontation with Mr Zelensky earlier this year at the White House. Mr Zelensky, in a social media post, said The Hague talks were substantive and he thanked Mr Trump for the US assistance. 'We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people. We appreciate the attention and the readiness to help bring peace closer,' Mr Zelensky added. Mr Trump left open the possibility of sending Kyiv more US-made Patriot air defence missile systems. Asked by a Ukrainian reporter, who said that her husband was a Ukrainian soldier, Mr Trump acknowledged that sending more Patriots would help the Ukrainian cause. 'They do want to have the antimissile missiles, OK, as they call them, the Patriots,' Mr Trump said. 'And we're going to see if we can make some available. We need them, too. We're supplying them to Israel, and, they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective. They do want that more than any other thing.' Over the course of the war, the US has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defence systems to Ukraine. But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by Russia. Mr Trump laid into the US media throughout his news conference but showed unusual warmth towards the Ukrainian reporter. 'That's a very good question,' Mr Trump said about the query about Patriots. 'And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband.' Ukraine has been front and centre at recent Nato summits. But as the alliance's latest annual meeting of leaders opened in the Netherlands, Mr Zelensky was not in the room. The Trump administration has blocked Ukraine's bid to join Nato. The conflict with Russia has laid waste to Ukrainian towns and killed thousands of civilians. Just last week, Russia launched one of the biggest drone attacks of the war. During Mr Trump's 2024 campaign for the White House, the Republican pledged a quick end to the war. He saw it as a costly conflict that, he claimed, would not have happened had he won re-election in 2020. Since taking office in January, he has struggled to find a resolution to the conflict and has shown frustration with both Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky. Mr Zelensky spent Tuesday in The Hague shuttling from meeting to meeting. He got a pledge from summit host the Netherlands for military aid, including new drones and radars to help knock out Russian drones. British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced that the United Kingdom will provide 350 air defence missiles to Ukraine, funded by £70 million raised from the interest on seized Russian assets.

US Treasury's Bessent extends measures to avoid debt ceiling breach
US Treasury's Bessent extends measures to avoid debt ceiling breach

Reuters

time17 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US Treasury's Bessent extends measures to avoid debt ceiling breach

WASHINGTON, June 25 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday extended the department's authority to continue extraordinary cash management measures to keep from breaching the federal debt ceiling by nearly a month, until July 24. Bessent said in a letter to congressional leaders that he had determined that the "debt issuance suspension period" previously scheduled to expire on Friday needed to continue. The declaration allows the Treasury to suspend funding from government pension and retiree healthcare funds that are not needed to pay immediate benefits. Bessent has estimated that the Treasury would no longer be able to pay all of its obligations without an increase or suspension of the debt limit some time during the mid-to-late summer. His letter did not provide any specific updates to this timing, although he told reporters on Tuesday that the so-called debt ceiling "X-date" could change if courts interfered with President Donald Trump's tariffs, which pulled in a record $23 billion in customs revenue during May. But his extension to July 24 appeared partly aimed at keeping pressure on Congress to raise the debt ceiling as part of a massive tax-and-spending package before its traditional August recess. "Based on our current estimates, we continue to believe that Congress must act to increase or suspend the debt ceiling as soon as possible before its scheduled August recess to protect the full faith and credit of the United States," Bessent said in the letter.

The latest US foray into military action has a name: The Trump Doctrine
The latest US foray into military action has a name: The Trump Doctrine

Reuters

time18 minutes ago

  • Reuters

The latest US foray into military action has a name: The Trump Doctrine

WASHINGTON, June 25 (Reuters) - With his order for B-2 bombers to strike Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday, President Donald Trump swerved away from his usual reluctance to use military force, directly involving the U.S. in a foreign war and alarming many of his "America First" supporters. Now, the thinking behind his decision has a name, according to Vice President JD Vance: the Trump Doctrine. Vance laid out the elements in remarks on Tuesday: articulate a clear American interest, try to solve a problem with diplomacy and, if that fails, "use overwhelming military power to solve it and then you get the hell out of there before it ever becomes a protracted conflict." To some observers, however, the new doctrine sounds like an effort to offer a tidy framework to describe a foreign policy that often looks unpredictable and inconsistent. "It's hard for me to relate seriously to something called the 'Trump Doctrine,'" said Middle East analyst Aaron David Miller, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "I don't think Trump has a doctrine. I think Trump has only held instincts." Trump's decision to get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran came after Supreme Leader Ali Khamanei said Iran would not give up its ability to enrich uranium. Soon after the U.S. strikes, Trump announced a ceasefire, which has mostly held. On Wednesday, Trump vowed again that Iran would not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon and said talks with Tehran would resume next week. Iran has said its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only. 'President Trump and Vice President Vance are the perfect team because they share the same 'peace through strength' vision for U.S. foreign policy," said White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly in response to a request for comment. Trump faces pressure to explain his decision to intervene in the Israel-Iran conflict. Vance, who previously embraced isolationism, has been one of the administration's main messengers on the issue. Trump helped win over voters by arguing that the "stupid" U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had left the United States in a quagmire and that he would work to avoid foreign entanglements. He has mostly stuck to the pledge, with some exceptions: the use of American force against Houthi rebels launching attacks from Yemen this year, and his orders to kill ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in 2019 and Iranian Revolutionary Guard commander Qasem Soleimani in January 2020. But the prospect of the United States getting dragged into an extended conflict with Iran angered many in the isolationist wing of the Republican Party, including prominent Trump supporters like strategist Steve Bannon and conservative media personality Tucker Carlson. Opinion polling also reflects deep concern among Americans about what might come next. Some 79% of Americans surveyed in a Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed on Monday said they worried "that Iran may target U.S. civilians in response to the U.S. airstrikes." Melanie Sisson, a senior foreign policy fellow at the Brookings Institution, said Vance appears to be trying to satisfy Trump's right flank by "trying to figure out how to explain how and why the administration can undertake a military action without it being a prelude to war." To some, Vance's Trump Doctrine rings true. "Vance has provided an accurate summary of President Trump's approach over recent days to the conflict in the Middle East," said Clifford May, founder and president of Washington's Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank. "Most outside analysts, and certainly most historians, may think the term 'doctrine' is premature. But if President Trump builds on this successful use of U.S. force, it would be a tremendous doctrine for President Trump to boast," May added. Still, whether the new framework sticks will likely depend on how the current conflict ends. It is too soon to 'pronounce either that this was a brilliant success or that it was a massive strategic failure," said Rebecca Lissner, an expert at the Council on Foreign Relations. "We need to see how the diplomacy plays out and where we actually land in terms of constraint, visibility and survival of the Iranian nuclear program."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store